成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開
Why is there no safety.gov - especially for oil?

Why is there no safety.gov - especially for oil?

Shelley DuBois 2010年05月18日

????Even as BP races to somehow cap the spill from the wreck of the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, it and the other major oil companies already have another mess to clean up: the status of their safety statistics.

????It may seem premature to address the issue when thousands of gallons per day of crude are still spilling out of the sea floor, but the Minerals Management Service, the regulator responsible for monitoring drilling activity, is facing a major overhaul. And if the state of oil company safety information doesn't get fixed soon, it could quickly fall further into the void.

????The MMS regulates offshore drilling, so Transocean's destroyed Deepwater Horizon rig falls under its jurisdiction. Yet the regulator also issues drilling permits and collects $13 billion a year worth of royalties from the exploration companies it monitors. Though such financial relationships sound unseemly, they're not unheard of in the intersection between regulator and corporation. What is less common (but not without precedent) are the 2008 allegations against MMS employees in Denver who were sharing sex, drugs and money with oil industry officials.

MMS will split into two bodies. Solution or punishment?

????In a tactic recognizable to unruly high school students everywhere, President Obama's Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, announced on May 9 that he wants to split the MMS into two parts. One section would be the Office of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, which would have no ties with the licensing, fee-collecting side of the MMS. This would be mainly an administrative move, and wouldn't require congressional approval for the bulk of it. And it presents a good time for the MMS to become more transparent about safety.

????Easier said than done, though: the oil industry has a poor track record for transparency. Today, the New York Times reported that the MMS has been shushing scientists who've warned against the environmental risks of offshore drilling. The paper also said BP (BP) has been inexplicably vague about the true spill rate in the leak. They lowballed the initial figure to 1,000 barrels a day, which was quickly upped to 5,000 by independent research groups, and have consistently barred scientists from they access they need to use more accurate methods of measure.

????This week Fortune reported that statistics about oil company safety records are too scattered to be useful to anyone, including people who want to buy stocks. "It's not clear to me that there's any way of working out who the safest companies in the U.S. are," said Deutsche bank analyst Paul Sankey in a letter to investors. He also wrote that safety records are key information for investors, since spills kill stock value. BP's stock has dropped by 15% since the Horizon sank.

The information flow comes from too many pipes

????Part of the information flow problem is that safety statistics come from all over the industry. A division of the federal Department of Transportation called the Office of Pipeline Safety oversees pipelines, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversees refineries and the MMS oversees big offshore rigs like Transocean. Now, the MMS will splinter further, which means it might be even more difficult to access safety information about offshore drilling.

????Government information can be extremely difficult to access when two organizations share responsibility for it, says John Wonderlich, the Policy Director for the Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit that pushes for government transparency and accountability. There's a good chance that dividing the MMS will complicate the process of getting any data, he says, and oil companies are already particularly elusive.

????On top of that, there's no strong legal mandate to make government data more accessible. There are a weak couple of sentences tacked on to a government appropriations act in 2001, says Wonderlich.

????"At the heart of government-wide data quality was a very brief rider on a government appropriations bill that has led to complex and often inappropriate regulations about how data should be treated by the federal government. It's kind of unfortunate."

掃碼打開財富Plus App
蜜臀AV免费一区二区三区| 国产男女爽爽爽免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕精品久久久久久直播| 国内精品国产成人国产三级| 亚洲一区二区三区成人网站| 老司机免费的精品视频| 久人人爽人人爽人人片av| 欧美午夜福利一级高清一区二区| 日韩一区二区三区免费观看女同| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区| 国产欧美精品一区二区三区| 中国无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪软件| 国产97色在线 日韩| 无码国产午夜福利片在线观看| 丰满亚洲大尺度无码无码专线| 亚洲AV女人18毛片水真多| 日本在线爱做网站| 激情久久AV一区AV二区AV三区| 中文字幕日韩人妻在线乱码| 亚洲欧洲日韩国产精品妖精| 亚洲精品色午夜无码专区| 国产啪精品视频网站免费尤物| 吸咬奶头狂揉60分钟视频| 西西人体午夜大胆无码视频| 亚洲天堂精品日本| 国产日韩在线观看国产精品一区二区av片| 純愛無遮擋H肉動漫在線播放| 精产国品一二三产区草莓| 粗大的内捧猛烈进出小视频| 亚洲一区不卡免费在线观看| 国产成人色视频一区二区三区| 亚洲中文久久精品无码97| 大屁股xxx波多无码久久| 奶头好大揉着好爽视频| 免费人成年激情视频在线| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠888米奇视频| 丰满人妻一区二区三区视频53| 91精品国产高清久久久久久| 偷偷做久久久久网站| 久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码网站| 亚洲综合成人AV一区在线观看|