成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開
Why is there no safety.gov - especially for oil?

Why is there no safety.gov - especially for oil?

Shelley DuBois 2010年05月18日

????Even as BP races to somehow cap the spill from the wreck of the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, it and the other major oil companies already have another mess to clean up: the status of their safety statistics.

????It may seem premature to address the issue when thousands of gallons per day of crude are still spilling out of the sea floor, but the Minerals Management Service, the regulator responsible for monitoring drilling activity, is facing a major overhaul. And if the state of oil company safety information doesn't get fixed soon, it could quickly fall further into the void.

????The MMS regulates offshore drilling, so Transocean's destroyed Deepwater Horizon rig falls under its jurisdiction. Yet the regulator also issues drilling permits and collects $13 billion a year worth of royalties from the exploration companies it monitors. Though such financial relationships sound unseemly, they're not unheard of in the intersection between regulator and corporation. What is less common (but not without precedent) are the 2008 allegations against MMS employees in Denver who were sharing sex, drugs and money with oil industry officials.

MMS will split into two bodies. Solution or punishment?

????In a tactic recognizable to unruly high school students everywhere, President Obama's Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, announced on May 9 that he wants to split the MMS into two parts. One section would be the Office of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, which would have no ties with the licensing, fee-collecting side of the MMS. This would be mainly an administrative move, and wouldn't require congressional approval for the bulk of it. And it presents a good time for the MMS to become more transparent about safety.

????Easier said than done, though: the oil industry has a poor track record for transparency. Today, the New York Times reported that the MMS has been shushing scientists who've warned against the environmental risks of offshore drilling. The paper also said BP (BP) has been inexplicably vague about the true spill rate in the leak. They lowballed the initial figure to 1,000 barrels a day, which was quickly upped to 5,000 by independent research groups, and have consistently barred scientists from they access they need to use more accurate methods of measure.

????This week Fortune reported that statistics about oil company safety records are too scattered to be useful to anyone, including people who want to buy stocks. "It's not clear to me that there's any way of working out who the safest companies in the U.S. are," said Deutsche bank analyst Paul Sankey in a letter to investors. He also wrote that safety records are key information for investors, since spills kill stock value. BP's stock has dropped by 15% since the Horizon sank.

The information flow comes from too many pipes

????Part of the information flow problem is that safety statistics come from all over the industry. A division of the federal Department of Transportation called the Office of Pipeline Safety oversees pipelines, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversees refineries and the MMS oversees big offshore rigs like Transocean. Now, the MMS will splinter further, which means it might be even more difficult to access safety information about offshore drilling.

????Government information can be extremely difficult to access when two organizations share responsibility for it, says John Wonderlich, the Policy Director for the Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit that pushes for government transparency and accountability. There's a good chance that dividing the MMS will complicate the process of getting any data, he says, and oil companies are already particularly elusive.

????On top of that, there's no strong legal mandate to make government data more accessible. There are a weak couple of sentences tacked on to a government appropriations act in 2001, says Wonderlich.

????"At the heart of government-wide data quality was a very brief rider on a government appropriations bill that has led to complex and often inappropriate regulations about how data should be treated by the federal government. It's kind of unfortunate."

掃碼打開財富Plus App
欧美日韩一级片在线| 国产aⅴ无码久久丝袜美腿| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩链接| 台湾黄三级高清在线观看播放| AV无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 99久久99久久精品免费看蜜桃| 日韩AV无码久久一区二区| 公天天吃我奶躁我的比视频| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久久| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜免费观看| 久久婷婷久久一区二区三区| 国产午夜无码精品免费看| 日韩精品区一区二免费| 久久在精品线影院精品国产| 亚洲成人免费播放| 精品自拍视频在线观看| 午夜电影理论片费看禁忌| 国产日韩欧美大片| 一本加勒比HEZYO无码资源网| 久久精品无码中文字幕老司机| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久| 国产精品美女久久久久| 人妻少妇精品视中文字幕国语| 精品久久人人爽人人玩人人妻| 国产午夜电影在线观看| 久久久久亚洲AV成人网人人软件| 人人草人人做人人爱 | 国产性色欧美亚洲黄片| 麻豆亚洲福利电影欧美在线| 免费中文熟妇在线影片| 人人人澡人人肉人人精品| 日日狠狠久久偷偷色综合96蜜桃| 伊人色综合久久天天| 欧美成人一区二区三区在线视频| 丰满亚洲大尺度无码无码专线| 日韩中文无线码免费av| 久久99热狠狠色精品一区| 亚洲成色WWW成人网站| 人妻中文字幕乱人伦在线| 高清不卡一区二区三区| 午夜精品久久久久久中宇|