成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開
Why is there no safety.gov - especially for oil?

Why is there no safety.gov - especially for oil?

Shelley DuBois 2010年05月18日

????Even as BP races to somehow cap the spill from the wreck of the Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico, it and the other major oil companies already have another mess to clean up: the status of their safety statistics.

????It may seem premature to address the issue when thousands of gallons per day of crude are still spilling out of the sea floor, but the Minerals Management Service, the regulator responsible for monitoring drilling activity, is facing a major overhaul. And if the state of oil company safety information doesn't get fixed soon, it could quickly fall further into the void.

????The MMS regulates offshore drilling, so Transocean's destroyed Deepwater Horizon rig falls under its jurisdiction. Yet the regulator also issues drilling permits and collects $13 billion a year worth of royalties from the exploration companies it monitors. Though such financial relationships sound unseemly, they're not unheard of in the intersection between regulator and corporation. What is less common (but not without precedent) are the 2008 allegations against MMS employees in Denver who were sharing sex, drugs and money with oil industry officials.

MMS will split into two bodies. Solution or punishment?

????In a tactic recognizable to unruly high school students everywhere, President Obama's Secretary of the Interior, Ken Salazar, announced on May 9 that he wants to split the MMS into two parts. One section would be the Office of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, which would have no ties with the licensing, fee-collecting side of the MMS. This would be mainly an administrative move, and wouldn't require congressional approval for the bulk of it. And it presents a good time for the MMS to become more transparent about safety.

????Easier said than done, though: the oil industry has a poor track record for transparency. Today, the New York Times reported that the MMS has been shushing scientists who've warned against the environmental risks of offshore drilling. The paper also said BP (BP) has been inexplicably vague about the true spill rate in the leak. They lowballed the initial figure to 1,000 barrels a day, which was quickly upped to 5,000 by independent research groups, and have consistently barred scientists from they access they need to use more accurate methods of measure.

????This week Fortune reported that statistics about oil company safety records are too scattered to be useful to anyone, including people who want to buy stocks. "It's not clear to me that there's any way of working out who the safest companies in the U.S. are," said Deutsche bank analyst Paul Sankey in a letter to investors. He also wrote that safety records are key information for investors, since spills kill stock value. BP's stock has dropped by 15% since the Horizon sank.

The information flow comes from too many pipes

????Part of the information flow problem is that safety statistics come from all over the industry. A division of the federal Department of Transportation called the Office of Pipeline Safety oversees pipelines, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration oversees refineries and the MMS oversees big offshore rigs like Transocean. Now, the MMS will splinter further, which means it might be even more difficult to access safety information about offshore drilling.

????Government information can be extremely difficult to access when two organizations share responsibility for it, says John Wonderlich, the Policy Director for the Sunlight Foundation, a non-profit that pushes for government transparency and accountability. There's a good chance that dividing the MMS will complicate the process of getting any data, he says, and oil companies are already particularly elusive.

????On top of that, there's no strong legal mandate to make government data more accessible. There are a weak couple of sentences tacked on to a government appropriations act in 2001, says Wonderlich.

????"At the heart of government-wide data quality was a very brief rider on a government appropriations bill that has led to complex and often inappropriate regulations about how data should be treated by the federal government. It's kind of unfortunate."

掃碼打開財富Plus App
99久久久国产精品免费| 亚洲免费福利精品日韩视频| 人人人澡人人肉人人精品| 热RE99久久6国产精品免费| 欧美激情国产精品视频一区二区| 自拍视频精品一区二区三区| 一级一级女人18毛片| 日韩一区二区三区视频| 国产在线观看你懂的网址视频| 无码精品A∨在线观看无广告| 亚洲人成网站999久久久综合| 无人区乱码二线三线| 国产精品无码A∨在线播放| 波多野结衣一区二区无码中文字幕| 老湿机香蕉久久久久久| 欧美一级一区二区中文字幕| AV无码片一区二区三区| 99久久免费精品国产男女性高| 无码人妻αⅤ免费一区二区三区| 2021国内精品久久久久精品K8| 亚洲不卡av不卡一区二区| 亚洲欧洲日韩一区三区四区| 国产精品成人无码免费| 2021国产精品成人免费视频| 精品视频无码一区二区三区| 体育生GAY爽擼又大又粗的雞巴| 久久综合一区二区三区| 欧美成人精品视频在线播放| 2012最新最全中文字幕| 亚洲丁香色婷婷综合欲色啪| 久久99热精品免费观看| 国产亚洲第一午夜福利合集| 精品无码av一区二区| 国产日韩在线观看国产精品一区二区av片| 亚洲国产视频无码在线观看| 91久久精品日日躁夜夜躁欧美| 亚洲av无码国产精品久久不卡| 人体射精一区二区| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕| 久久久亚洲精品无码| 曰韩内射六十七十老熟女影视|