成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開
電子書不是天上掉下來

電子書不是天上掉下來

Philip Elmer-DeWitt 2012-06-20
電子書的生產(chǎn)成本比紙質(zhì)書低20%左右,因?yàn)殡娮訒恍枰垙垺⒂∷?、運(yùn)輸、倉儲(chǔ)等成本,而且也消除了未售出書冊的退還成本。但電子書同時(shí)也會(huì)產(chǎn)生一些額外的費(fèi)用:維護(hù)電腦服務(wù)器、監(jiān)控盜版、對舊書進(jìn)行數(shù)字化處理等。一句話,電子書的寫作和出版也需要投入人力物力。

????每當(dāng)我撰文論述電子書業(yè)務(wù)時(shí)——尤其是在美國司法部(the Justice Department)對蘋果公司(Apple)及五家圖書出版商提出反壟斷訴訟的背景情況下,總會(huì)有人留言稱,電子書定價(jià)過高,因?yàn)殇N售電子書的出版商其實(shí)并不用承擔(dān)紙質(zhì)圖書印刷和發(fā)行通常所需要支付的任何費(fèi)用。

????當(dāng)然,電子書不會(huì)憑空從石頭縫里蹦出來,但我從來沒有看到過哪篇文章合理地闡述過出版一本電子書的實(shí)際成本。因此,我很高興地在最新一期的《紐約客》雜志(the New Yorker)上發(fā)現(xiàn),肯?奧萊塔寫了一篇精辟的文章——《紙質(zhì)追蹤》(Paper Trail),對電子書業(yè)務(wù)進(jìn)行了闡述。其中有一段是這樣寫的:

????“電子書的生產(chǎn)成本比紙質(zhì)書便宜,每本電子書在生產(chǎn)成本上大約可以便宜20%,因?yàn)殡娮訒恍枰垙?、印刷、運(yùn)輸、倉儲(chǔ)等成本,而且也消除了未售出書冊的退還成本——這是一項(xiàng)重要的開支,因?yàn)橛?0%至50%的書最終會(huì)退給出版商。但電子書同時(shí)也會(huì)產(chǎn)生一些額外的費(fèi)用:維護(hù)電腦服務(wù)器、監(jiān)控盜版、對舊書進(jìn)行數(shù)字化處理等。此外,出版商還得付錢給作家和編輯,以及支付租金及管理費(fèi)用,更不用說精裝版圖書的印刷、分銷和倉儲(chǔ)費(fèi)用,而精裝書仍然在出版商的銷售中占據(jù)絕大部分的份額。”

????電子書相比紙質(zhì)書在成本上節(jié)省的20%似乎并不是很大一筆錢,尤其是考慮到亞馬遜(Amazon)一直在以14.99美元到4.99美元的價(jià)格銷售電子版圖書,有時(shí)甚至免費(fèi)提供,而這些圖書的精裝版售價(jià)卻高達(dá)30美元。

????考慮到大多數(shù)圖書的成本超過了出版商的銷售收入,這種計(jì)算就變得更加復(fù)雜了。亞馬遜的杰夫?貝索斯認(rèn)為,目前傳統(tǒng)出版模式的浪費(fèi)令人窩火,而他的圖書出版模式對于讀者(降低了圖書價(jià)格)及希望成為作家的人(消除了作者和讀者之間的“把關(guān)人”)都更加高效、更加出色。

????正如奧萊塔指出……

????然而,傳統(tǒng)出版模式對作家而言具有一些優(yōu)勢,尤其是在出版商發(fā)揮類似風(fēng)險(xiǎn)投資公司的作用時(shí)更是如此。作家向某出版商成功推銷出版一本書的建議時(shí),他會(huì)收到一筆預(yù)付版稅,它有助于作家負(fù)擔(dān)相應(yīng)的調(diào)查研究及寫作的費(fèi)用。這些預(yù)付版稅大多從來沒有收回過。相當(dāng)于暢銷書養(yǎng)著非暢銷書。光景好的年份里,出版商仍能夠獲得微薄的利潤,從而可以讓更多的作家通過獲得出版商提供的預(yù)付版稅來冒險(xiǎn)啟動(dòng)新的寫作項(xiàng)目,也就是說,這種模式養(yǎng)活了一大批職業(yè)作家。如果是在一個(gè)更高效的環(huán)境里,出版商只會(huì)付錢給那些能寫出暢銷書的作家,而很少會(huì)付錢給那些寫不出暢銷書的作家,這對于嚴(yán)肅的讀者和作家而言都是一個(gè)令人憂慮的情形。據(jù)Taleist網(wǎng)站最近進(jìn)行的一項(xiàng)調(diào)查顯示,在所有自費(fèi)出版的作家當(dāng)中,有半數(shù)作家每年從寫作中賺取的收入還不到500美元。楊表示,如果出版商沒有錢向作家支付預(yù)付版稅的話,“我們擁有的優(yōu)質(zhì)圖書數(shù)量會(huì)更少。它對作家的影響堪稱巨大?!?/p>

????作為曾在印刷及電子出版業(yè)工作過的人,我認(rèn)為奧萊塔的這篇文章對電子書戰(zhàn)爭雙方提供了一個(gè)非常公平的描述。訂閱了《紐約客》雜志的讀者可以點(diǎn)擊此處獲得這篇文章的PDF版本。

????翻譯:iDo98

????Whenever I write about the e-book business -- especially in the context of the Justice Department's antitrust suit against Apple (AAPL) and five book publishers -- someone in the comment stream invariably suggests that e-books are vastly overpriced because the publishers who sell them incur none of the usual costs of printing and distribution.

????E-books don't write or edit themselves, of course, but I've never seen a good accounting of what it actually costs to publish one. So I was gratified to find, high up in "Paper Trail," Ken Auletta's smart piece about the e-book business in the current issue of the New Yorker, this paragraph:

????"E-books are cheaper to produce, by about twenty per cent per book, because they do away with the cost of paper, printing, shipping, and warehousing. They also eliminate returns of unsold books—a significant expense, since thirty to fifty per cent of books are returned. But they create additional costs: maintaining computer servers, monitoring piracy, digitizing old books. And publishers have to pay authors and editors, as well as rent and administrative overhead, not to mention the costs of printing, distributing, and warehousing bound books, which continue to account for the large majority of their sales.

????Twenty percent doesn't seem like much of a savings, especially considering that Amazon (AMZN) has been selling electronic versions of books that cost $30 in hardback for anywhere from $14.99 to $4.99 to $0.00

????The accounting gets even more complicated when you consider that most books cost publishers more than they earn. Amazon's Jeff Bezos argues that traditional publishing is infuriatingly wasteful, and that his model is far more efficient and better for both readers (by lowering prices) and would-be authors (by eliminating the "gatekeepers" that prevent them from reaching readers).

????As Auletta points out ...

????The traditional model has advantages for authors, though, particularly in publishers' function as venture-capital firms. When an author sells a book proposal to a publisher, he receives an advance against royalties, which helps underwrite research and writing. Most of these advances are never earned back. But books that sell well support the ones that don't. In a good year, this earns the publishers a modest profit, and it allows more authors to take risks in starting new projects—which is to say, it supports a class of professional writers. In a more efficient world, publishers would pay authors who write best-selling books and rarely pay those who don't, an alarming prospect for most serious readers and writers. According to a recent survey by the Web site Taleist, half of all self-published authors make less than five hundred dollars a year from their writing. If publishers don't have the money to pay advances, Young says, "we're going to have fewer books of quality. The impact on authors could be huge."

????As someone who has worked in print and electronic publishing, I thought Auletta's piece offered a pretty even-handed account of both sides of the e-book wars. If you have a subscription to theNew Yorker, it's available as a pdf here.

掃描二維碼下載財(cái)富APP
波多野成人无码精品电影| 2021国产麻豆剧果冻传媒入口| 免费黄色网站在线观看| 老湿亚洲永久精品ww47| 亚洲日韩精品无码专区站| 久久精品国产亚洲AV麻豆AⅤ| 日本中文字幕在线精品一区| 亚洲综合精品欧美在线一区二区| 丰满人妻少妇久久久久影院| 精品一级毛片A久久久久| 久久久国产乱子伦精品| 第一页中文字幕永久有效| 波多野结衣一区二区三区在线播放| 国产亚洲综合91精品| 亚洲AV无码专区在线电影| 成人精品怡红院在线观看| 香蕉丝瓜榴莲在线观看| 波多野结衣一区二区无码中文字幕| 国产一区二区不卡老阿姨| 国产麻豆剧果冻传媒兄妹蕉谈| 午夜福利无码一区二区| 天天日天天射伊人色综合久久| 国产精品96久久久久久AV网址| 日韩丰满少妇无码内射| 91久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜| 日本人成在线播放免费课体台| 欧美一级二级三级视频| 久久久久无码精品国产| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区应用| 亚洲理论电影在线观看| 亚洲尹人香蕉网在线视颅| 国产AⅤ精品一区二区三区久久| 欧美一级A一级a爱片久久| 婷婷国产天堂久久综合亚洲| 天天看片无码中文字幕| 91伊人久久大香线蕉| aⅴ天堂av电影亚洲av| 9精品视频在线观看免费播放| 台湾黄三级高清在线观看播放| 女自慰喷水免费观看www久久| 99久久无色码人妻蜜柚w|