成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開
扎克伯格為慈善基金留了三大“后門”

扎克伯格為慈善基金留了三大“后門”

Mathew Ingram 2015-12-04
在新的模式下,他對(duì)資金的去向和用途會(huì)有更多決定權(quán),而不是單純地把錢交給慈善組織或非營(yíng)利服務(wù)團(tuán)體,失去對(duì)資金的控制。公司也可以做營(yíng)利性投資或捐贈(zèng)政治獻(xiàn)金,而且政治捐款情況無需公開披露

馬克?扎克伯格對(duì)新生女兒的承諾令人矚目——他在給女兒的公開信中說,和妻子普里西拉?陳將捐出99%的財(cái)產(chǎn)。按Facebook目前的股票價(jià)值計(jì)算,捐贈(zèng)金額約為450億美元。不過,這位Facebook聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人捐款的方式不太常見。他將對(duì)承諾捐出的資金有更多控制權(quán),某些情況下也可以享受稅收優(yōu)惠政策。

新聞聚合網(wǎng)站BuzzFeed等媒體指出,扎克伯格夫婦建立的慈善基金會(huì)是一家有限責(zé)任公司,而非基金信托架構(gòu)??萍己蛡髅浇绲囊恍┤顺峙u(píng)態(tài)度,認(rèn)為這樣做沖淡了扎克伯格捐贈(zèng)財(cái)產(chǎn)的慈善色彩。但也有人指出,這種方式能讓扎克伯格做一些慈善信托辦不到的事兒。

這種靈活性有可能讓基金會(huì)更有效率,對(duì)扎克伯格家人來說也會(huì)比傳統(tǒng)慈善信托更有利。

蘋果創(chuàng)始人史蒂夫?喬布斯的遺孀勞倫娜?鮑威爾?喬布斯也曾以有限責(zé)任公司的形式創(chuàng)立基金會(huì),名為Emerson Collective。公司可以做營(yíng)利性投資或捐贈(zèng)政治獻(xiàn)金,而且,與慈善信托不同的是,政治捐款情況無需公開披露。正是這一點(diǎn),讓這種模式更具吸引力。

扎克伯格已經(jīng)表示,該基金會(huì)的所有盈利都將用于慈善。以有限責(zé)任公司形式組建的私人基金會(huì)可能讓所有者享受稅收減免優(yōu)惠,但僅限于向依據(jù)美國(guó)稅法第501(c)條注冊(cè)的非營(yíng)利性組織捐贈(zèng)的資金。

慈善專家勞拉?阿里拉加-安德里森和丈夫、硅谷風(fēng)投人士馬克?安德里森共同經(jīng)營(yíng)著一家私人基金會(huì)。她在接受《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》采訪時(shí)說:“在當(dāng)前環(huán)境下采用有限責(zé)任公司模式的好處在于,第一,為了達(dá)到理想效果,可以敏捷精準(zhǔn)地作出反應(yīng)。投資領(lǐng)域的選擇也更自由,營(yíng)利性和非營(yíng)利性領(lǐng)域的投資可以同步進(jìn)行?!?/p>

此前,扎克伯格以往所做的部分善舉,曾因管理不當(dāng)或模式不理想而備受批評(píng)。2010年,他們夫婦兩人曾向紐瓦克的公立教育系統(tǒng)捐款1億美元,希望改善當(dāng)?shù)亟逃?。但批評(píng)者指出,其中很大一部分捐款都進(jìn)了咨詢機(jī)構(gòu)的腰包,而且最終未能改善當(dāng)?shù)氐慕逃w系,學(xué)生的成績(jī)也未見起色,某些情況下甚至讓問題惡化了。

由此,一些科技界人士猜測(cè),正是因?yàn)槌霈F(xiàn)了類似問題,扎克伯格此次才會(huì)決定建立有限責(zé)任公司模式的基金會(huì),而不是常見的符合稅法第501(c)條規(guī)定的慈善信托。在新的模式下,他對(duì)資金的去向和用途會(huì)有更多決定權(quán),而不是單純地把錢交給慈善組織或非營(yíng)利服務(wù)團(tuán)體,失去對(duì)資金的控制。

而之所以用這種模式建立基金會(huì),另一部分原因可能是,即便扎克伯格捐出擁有控制權(quán)的股份后,仍然能繼續(xù)控制Facebook。扎克伯格在Facebook持有約4.19億股B類股份,每一股有10票的投票權(quán)。他不僅掌握著多數(shù)有投票權(quán)的股份,還通過代理投票權(quán)等方式控制著董事會(huì)。

12月初,當(dāng)扎克伯格宣布設(shè)立慈善基金會(huì)的同時(shí),F(xiàn)acebook也向美國(guó)證監(jiān)會(huì)提交了相關(guān)文件,其中明確顯示,扎克伯格打算長(zhǎng)期控制公司。文件稱,扎克伯格承諾在今后三年中每年向基金會(huì)提供不超過10億美元的資金,而且他“打算在相當(dāng)長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間里保留多數(shù)投票權(quán)”。

縱觀商界,除了捐贈(zèng)模式,蓋茨及其基金會(huì)和扎克伯格打算做的事最為接近。

微軟前CEO比爾?蓋茨及其夫人梅琳達(dá)建立的慈善基金會(huì),是符合稅法第501(c)條規(guī)定的慈善信托。與之相比,扎克伯格夫婦的基金會(huì)有些不同,主要是因?yàn)樵瞬耖_始做慈善的年齡比蓋茨年輕得多。蓋茨夫婦的基金會(huì)是比爾?蓋茨即將卸任時(shí)設(shè)立的,當(dāng)時(shí)他42歲。扎克伯格今年才31歲,而且看起來他不太可能像蓋茨一樣放下工作專門做慈善。

蓋茨夫婦于1997年建立了比爾和梅琳達(dá)?蓋茨基金會(huì)。比爾?蓋茨的朋友,同為億萬富翁的沃倫?巴菲特隨后以合伙人的身份加入其中,承諾將440億美元股票中的85%投入基金會(huì)。

今年6月份,蓋茨基金會(huì)的總規(guī)模為413億美元,這讓扎克伯格的基金會(huì)顯得略大一些。但由于扎克伯格基金會(huì)的價(jià)值是根據(jù)Facebook股價(jià)計(jì)算的,規(guī)模上下浮動(dòng)也很正常。創(chuàng)立以來,蓋茨基金會(huì)的捐款額已超過300億美元。

慈善捐款之風(fēng)在硅谷頗為盛行。已承諾捐出部分或全部資產(chǎn)的科技界億萬富翁包括因特爾聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人戈登?摩爾(他提出了摩爾定律)。迄今摩爾已捐出了大約30億美元資產(chǎn),另有50億美元資產(chǎn)放在了他和妻子創(chuàng)建的基金會(huì)中。

其他熱衷慈善的科技界人士還有eBay創(chuàng)始人皮埃爾?奧米迪亞和該公司前總裁杰夫?斯科爾,兩人的捐款都超過10億美元,捐贈(zèng)對(duì)象包括各種慈善組織。微軟聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人保羅?艾倫也是慈善達(dá)人,捐出的資金約有15億美元。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Charlie

審校:夏林

Mark Zuckerberg’s pledge to his new daughter is an impressive one: Namely, that he and his wife Priscilla Chan will give away 99% of their net worth in their lifetime, as described in an open letter to their new offspring. That works out to about $45 billion, based on the current value of Facebook stock.

The Facebook co-founder is using a somewhat unusual structure in order to fulfill his charitable pledge, however—one that gives him more control over what happens to the money he is promising to give away, but still provides tax benefits.

As BuzzFeed and others have pointed out, the charitable foundation Zuckerberg and Chan have set up is a limited-liability corporation, not a charitable trust. Some in the tech and media community havecriticized this as making the announcement less obviously charitable, but others note that it will enable the Facebook co-founder to do things that charitable trusts are not allowed to do.

That flexibility could make the foundation more effective, although it could also benefit the Zuckerberg family more than a traditional trust.

Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, also has an LLC foundation, called the Emerson Collective, and the flexibility of that structure was apparently one of the things that made it appealing. Corporations can make for-profit investments and political donations—and unlike charitable trusts, they don’t have to report their political donations.

Zuckerberg has said that any money earned by the foundation will be put back into charitable efforts. Private foundations that are LLCs can generate tax savings for their owners, but only for funds that are given by the foundation to registered 501(c) non-profit entities.

“The beauty of having an LLC in today’s world is No. 1, you have the ability to act and react as nimbly as need be to create change,” Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, a philanthropy expert who also runs a private foundation with husband and Silicon Valley VC Marc Andreessen, told The New York Times. “You have the ability to invest politically, in the for-profit sector and the nonprofit sector simultaneously.”

Some of Zuckerberg’s previous charitable attempts have come under fire for being mismanaged or poorly structured: In 2010, he and Chan donated $100 million to the Newark public-school system, to try and improve education success rates.

Critics say much of the money was soaked up by consultants, and that the donation didn’t ultimately improve the school system or the outcomes for students—and in some cases may have even exacerbated the problems.

Some tech industry insiders speculate that these kinds of problems could be part of the reason why Zuckerberg decided to make his foundation an LLC rather than a typical 501(c) trust. Instead of just giving money to existing charitable entities or non-profit services, which involves a loss of control, the structure could allow him to have a greater say in where and how the money is used.

Part of the reason for the makeup of the foundation could also be a desire to maintain his grip on Facebook even as he gives away the shares that give him that control. Zuckerberg owns about 419 million Class B shares of the company, each of which has 10 votes. And not only does he have a majority of the voting shares, but he also controls the board of directors in part through the use of proxy votes.

The Securities and Exchange Commission filing that Facebook made as part of the announcement of the Zuckerberg charitable foundation makes it clear that he intends to control the company for a long time. The document says that the Facebook co-founder promises not to give more than $1 billion per year to his foundation over the next three years, and says that he “intends to retain his majority voting position in [Facebook] stock for the foreseeable future.”

Apart from the structure of the entity doing the giving, however, Gates and his charitable foundation are the closest comparison to what Zuckerberg is trying to do.

Some of the differences between the Zuckerberg Chan Initiative and the charitable foundation set up by former Microsoft CEO Bill Gates and his wife Melinda (which is a 501c trust) stem from the fact that the Facebook co-founder is doing his charitable donating at a much younger age. The Gates set up his foundation near the end of his time as CEO, when he was 42. Facebook’s CEO is only 31, and he shows no signs of wanting to step aside to focus on charitable donations the way that Gates did.

The Microsoft co-founder set up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation with his wife in 1997, and his friend and fellow billionaire Warren Buffett later joined as a partner and committed to donating 85% of his $44 billion in stock to the couple’s efforts.

In June, the Gates Foundation had a total of $41.3 billion, which makes the Zuckerberg foundation slightly larger—although obviously that value could change over time, since it is based on the market price of Facebook’s stock. The Gates Foundation has given away more than $30 billion since it was created.

Donating to charity on a large scale is a well established trend in Silicon Valley. Tech billionaires who have committed to giving away some or all of their net worth include Intel co-founder Gordon Moore (the inventor of Moore’s Law). So far he has donated about $3 billion of his assets, and still has $5 billion left in the foundation he created with his wife.

Other significant tech benefactors include eBay founder Pierre Omidyar and former eBay president Jeff Skoll, both of whom have donated more than $1 billion to a variety of charitable interests, and Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen, who has given away about $1.5 bi

掃描二維碼下載財(cái)富APP
在线不卡日本Ⅴ一区二区| 少妇高潮喷水久久久影院| 自拍视频精品一区二区三区| 日韩丰满少妇无码内射| 欧美日韩一区二区在线免费观看| 99久久人妻无码精品系列| 国产高清美女一级毛片久久| 免费无码又爽又刺激网站| 含羞草一卡2卡3卡4卡| 精品福利一区二区三区精品| 老司机精品一区在线视频| 久久精品国产亚洲精品| 免费精品国产一区二区三区| 精品深夜AV无码一区二区| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠85台湾| 99在线精品免费视频九九视| 香蕉久久一区二区不卡无毒影院| 99爱精品成人免费观看| 无码高清人妻碎红楼| 亚洲色婷婷综合开心网| 熟妇久久无码人妻av蜜臀| 欧美XXXX做受欧美Gay| 国产在线精品一区二区在线看| 久久亚洲精品成人无码网站| 亚洲AV综合伊人AV一区加勒比| 国产在线视频国产永久2021| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV手机麻豆| AV无码人妻一区二区三区| 黄色免费在线视频| 国模一区二区三区| 午夜精品久久久久久久久| 午夜日韩欧美电影在线观看| 蜜桃麻豆WWW久久国产精品| 日本一本免费一区二区三区免| 精品国产一区二区三区AV性色| 国产欧美日韩精品不卡在线| 亚洲精品日产精品乱码不卡| 99在线精品免费视频九九视| 欧洲无人区卡一卡二卡三| 国产高清国内精品福利| 久久婷婷香蕉热狠狠综合|