蓋茨夫婦如何改變數(shù)十億人的生活?
性別與全球健康和機(jī)遇之間的復(fù)雜關(guān)系也是梅琳達(dá)的新書(shū)《提升時(shí)刻》的主題,該書(shū)于4月首次出版,其中記述了不少生動(dòng)活潑的故事。
但該書(shū)真正的主題似乎是樂(lè)觀主義,也是蓋茨做所有事的態(tài)度。比爾和梅琳達(dá)認(rèn)為,有無(wú)限機(jī)會(huì)解決拖累人類(lèi)社會(huì)發(fā)展的問(wèn)題,從而“迎來(lái)人類(lèi)的提升時(shí)刻,”梅琳達(dá)在書(shū)中寫(xiě)道。
“最令人印象深刻的是,比爾和梅琳達(dá)都抱有極具感染性的樂(lè)觀情緒,認(rèn)為種種問(wèn)題都可以解決,”渣打銀行前首席執(zhí)行官彼得·桑茲表示,目前他擔(dān)任全球基金執(zhí)行董事?!叭祟?lèi)在創(chuàng)新、思考和尋找做事方法上能力巨大。如果跟蓋茨夫婦相處就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),他們總在說(shuō),‘下一步要做什么?’我認(rèn)為這種轉(zhuǎn)變擁有驚人的催化作用,也很鼓舞人心?!?/p>
蓋茨夫婦都承認(rèn)積極看待事物的態(tài)度對(duì)完成使命的重要性,幾乎所有的公開(kāi)演講時(shí)都會(huì)提到?!皹?lè)觀是我們工作的基礎(chǔ),”3月梅琳達(dá)在西雅圖接受采訪時(shí)告訴我?!拔覀円欢ㄒJ(rèn)清世界上事情的真實(shí)情況,認(rèn)真了解并認(rèn)真傾聽(tīng)。但也要相信世界會(huì)越來(lái)越好。我們就相信世界會(huì)變得更好,因?yàn)橐欢〞?huì)變得更好。”
“比爾和梅琳達(dá)都抱有極具感染性的樂(lè)觀情緒,認(rèn)為種種問(wèn)題都可以解決?!薄蚧鸨说谩どF?/em>
梅琳達(dá)說(shuō),與2000年出生的孩子相比,今天出生的孩子5歲前夭折的可能性已降到一半。世界上最窮的地方也不再像以前一樣貧窮?!拔覀円欢ㄒ獔?jiān)持進(jìn)步的信念,幫助其他人堅(jiān)持信念,這樣就會(huì)有更多人跟我們一起上路。你看,我們的旅程并不孤獨(dú)。舉個(gè)例子,如果想制造新疫苗或發(fā)明新技術(shù)造福人類(lèi),就需要很多很多合作伙伴?!?/p>
比爾插嘴說(shuō):“我想說(shuō),現(xiàn)在樂(lè)觀主義尤為重要,因?yàn)楫?dāng)前有種保守傾向(從政治上來(lái)說(shuō)),各種機(jī)構(gòu)的信任度下降了很多。
“我們做的很多事情都需要很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間,”他說(shuō)?!拔覀冄芯堪滩《疽呙缫呀?jīng)超過(guò)15年,想成功估計(jì)還得10年,所以一共得25年。如果一切順利,消滅瘧疾也還需要20年。消滅脊髓灰質(zhì)炎1988年開(kāi)始,但2000年我們才加入。這是個(gè)漫長(zhǎng)的旅程?!彼f(shuō),想讓人們承諾很有挑戰(zhàn),尤其是某些項(xiàng)目的影響距離很多捐助者的日常生活很遙遠(yuǎn)時(shí),比如清除瘧疾的項(xiàng)目?!皹?lè)觀,”他說(shuō),“是吸引人們參與的關(guān)鍵因素?!?/p>
“是的,我們必須相信未來(lái)的可能性,”梅琳達(dá)補(bǔ)充道。“這并不是一種幼稚的樂(lè)觀主義,而是現(xiàn)實(shí)的樂(lè)觀主義。我們?cè)谂υO(shè)想未來(lái),正如領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者為公司或其使命設(shè)置未來(lái)愿景一樣。對(duì)我們來(lái)說(shuō),使命就是讓所有生命具有同等的價(jià)值?!?!-- cend --> |
The complex interplay between gender and global health and opportunity is also the subject of Melinda’s book, The Moment of Lift, which debuted in April. The stories within are often raw and moving.
But the real theme of the book—as it is with all things Gates, it seems—is optimism: what Bill and Melinda see as the endless opportunities to fix what’s dragging us down and to “summon the moment of lift for human beings,” as Melinda writes in her book.
“The enormously impressive thing is that Bill and Melinda both bring a kind of infectious optimism that these are problems that can be solved,” says Peter Sands, the former CEO of Standard Chartered who is now executive director of The Global Fund. “Humanity has enormous capacity to innovate and think through and find ways of doing things. And when you spend any time with them, they’re constantly in the mode of saying, ‘What do we do next?’ And I think that’s a fantastically catalytic and inspiring turn to have.”
Both Gateses acknowledge how central this bright-side view is to the mission—and seem to wield it in nearly every public speech and presentation. “Optimism is fundamental to our work,” Melinda tells me in our March interview in Seattle. “We have to be able to see the reality of what’s going on in the world, and to know that and to listen to that. But we have to believe in the world getting better. And we do believe in the world getting better because it is getting better.”
“Bill and Melinda both bring a kind of infectious optimism that these are problems that can be solved.” – Peter Sands, The Global Fund
A child born today is half as likely to die before the age of 5, compared to a child born in the year 2000, she says. The poorest parts of the world are less poor than they were. “And we have to hold that belief in progress and help others hold that belief so they’ll come along on the journey with us. Because look, the journey we’re on is not a solo journey. Many, many, many partners need to be at the table to create, for instance, a new vaccine or a new technology that’ll benefit everybody.”
Bill chimes in, “I’d say that kind of optimism is particularly important now where there’s a kind of turning inward [politically speaking], and the trust in various institutions is down a lot.
“A lot of the things we do take a long time,” he says. “I mean, we’ve been working on an HIV vaccine for over 15 years, and it’ll probably be 10 more years before we get there—so 25 years in total. Malaria eradication, if things go well, is 20 years away. The polio effort started in 1988; we didn’t get engaged until 2000. You know, it’s a long journey.” That’s challenging, he says, when it comes to getting people to commit—especially when the initial impact of the effort, as in malaria reduction, is far away from many of the donors’ front yards. “Optimism,” he says, “is a key part of it to engage people.”
“Yes, we have to believe in what’s possible,” adds Melinda. “It’s not at all a naive optimism. It’s a realistic optimism. We’re trying to envision the future—as leaders envision the future of where their company or their mission will go. And for us it’s a mission that all lives have equal value.” |