成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

訂閱

多平臺閱讀

微信訂閱

雜志

申請紙刊贈閱

訂閱每日電郵

移動應(yīng)用

專欄 - 蘋果2_0

專利之爭戰(zhàn)火又起,谷歌聲討蘋果微軟

Philip Elmer-DeWitt 2011年08月08日

蘋果(Apple)公司內(nèi)部流傳著一個老笑話,那就是史蒂夫·喬布斯周圍是一片“現(xiàn)實扭曲力場”:你離他太近的話,就會相信他所說的話。蘋果的數(shù)百萬用戶中已經(jīng)有不少成了該公司的“信徒”,而很多蘋果投資者也賺得盆滿缽滿。不過,Elmer-DeWitt認為,在報道蘋果公司時有點懷疑精神不是壞事。聽他的應(yīng)該沒錯。要知道,他自從1982年就開始報道蘋果、觀察史蒂夫·喬布斯經(jīng)營該公司。
安卓深受專利之困,谷歌的頭牌律師深知這一點。

谷歌首席法務(wù)官抨擊蘋果和微軟的博客原文
來源:谷歌

????谷歌(Google)的首席法務(wù)官在谷歌的官方博客上發(fā)表了一篇長文,對蘋果(Apple)和微軟(Microsoft)進行憤怒聲討,稱這兩家公司通過可疑專利和虛假專利,對谷歌的安卓系統(tǒng)發(fā)動了一次敵對的、有組織的、反競爭的攻擊行動(這些形容詞都是他的原話)。這篇博客可能是有史以來,任何一位高科技律師寫過的最有誤導(dǎo)性的文章了。

????我并不是說這位名叫大衛(wèi)?德拉蒙德的律師控訴錯了,谷歌的競爭對手也的確在用專利體系對抗安卓系統(tǒng)。問題是谷歌自己也沒有占領(lǐng)道德優(yōu)勢。原因何在?

????? 德拉蒙德控訴稱,谷歌的競爭對手在所謂的“虛假專利”上多付了很多錢。但如果北電網(wǎng)絡(luò)(Nortel)的6,000個專利是虛假的,那么為什么谷歌一開始愿意出價近10億美元購買這些專利?北電網(wǎng)絡(luò)的專利最終被蘋果、微軟和黑莓手機生產(chǎn)商RIM等企業(yè)聯(lián)手以45億美元購走,但谷歌居然也表示愿意幾乎全價支付這45億美元,這又是為什么?(延伸閱讀:《專利競購:蘋果嚴陣以待,谷歌不以為意》)

????? 他控訴微軟和蘋果“搞在一塊兒”,共享核心專利,而將谷歌排除在外。不過微軟公司表示曾致信谷歌,邀請谷歌和自己聯(lián)手競購Novell公司的專利,但谷歌拒絕了這一邀請。微軟手頭有一封電子郵件可資證明。

????? 德拉蒙德的博客文章標題是“專利體系攻擊安卓”。不過正如Daring Fireball科技博客的約翰?格魯伯所言:“攻擊安卓系統(tǒng)的并非是‘專利體系’,而是谷歌的競爭對手。谷歌不僅侵犯了這些企業(yè)的專利權(quán),而且谷歌的安卓系統(tǒng)還危害了這些企業(yè)的業(yè)務(wù)。攻擊安卓的正是這些企業(yè)。”

????科技博客TechCrunch的MG?西格勒上周三撰文發(fā)問:“為什么谷歌今天會在博客上針對專利問題發(fā)難?這是因為谷歌在北電專利競購上的失利僅僅是個開始?!彼赋?,谷歌已經(jīng)參與了對無線通信技術(shù)專利公司InterDigital 8,800個專利的競標。不過他寫道:“谷歌有將近400億美元的現(xiàn)金和現(xiàn)金等價物可供支配,但蘋果手中的現(xiàn)金幾乎是谷歌的一倍。如果蘋果和微軟結(jié)盟,那么這二者差不多有1,000億美元的購買力。說到底,谷歌通過競標戰(zhàn)勝蘋果是沒什么指望了,而且他們也別無選擇?!?/p>

????德拉蒙德稱,美國司法部(the Department of Justice)現(xiàn)在正在調(diào)查北電專利問題,他對此深受鼓舞。(不過他沒有提的是,美國監(jiān)管機構(gòu)現(xiàn)在正在花更大的力氣,調(diào)查谷歌自身的反競爭行為。)不過這不意味著谷歌自己在專利問題上就是清白的。上個月在谷歌與甲骨文(Oracle)的專利侵權(quán)糾紛案中,有幾封郵件被曝光,這些郵件顯示,安卓系統(tǒng)的開發(fā)者安迪?魯賓曾建議谷歌獲得Java的授權(quán)(Java由Sun公司開發(fā),該公司后被甲骨文收購——譯注),但卻被谷歌創(chuàng)始人謝爾蓋?布林和拉里?佩奇駁回了。

????據(jù)軟件專利資訊博客FOSS Patents的弗洛里安?穆勒報道,審理谷歌與甲骨文專利糾紛的法官在看到這些郵件后,建議谷歌的法務(wù)團隊與甲骨文進行庭外和解。這位法官說道:“有安迪?魯賓作證,你們一定會敗訴的。如果發(fā)現(xiàn)你們故意侵權(quán),很可能會裁定你們永遠不得使用該專利。所以你們最好仔細想想?!?/p>

????譯者:樸成奎

????Google's (GOOG) chief legal counsel's angry screed on the company's official blog in which he accuses Apple (AAPL) and Microsoft (MSFT) of waging a hostile, organized, anti-competitive campaign against Android through dubious and bogus patents (adjectives all his) may be remembered as one of the most misguided briefs any high-tech lawyer has ever written.

????Not that David Drummond is wrong about Google's competitors using the patent system to fight Android. They are. It's that he doesn't have a leg to stand on. Let us count the reasons why.

????Drummond accuses Google's competitors of overpaying for "bogus" patents. But if Nortel's 6,000 patents were bogus, why did Google start the bidding at nearly $1 billion and why was it willing to pay nearly the full $4.5 billion they eventually went for? (See Apple takes the patent wars seriously. Google not so much.)

????? He accuses Microsoft and Apple of "get[ting] into bed" to keep Google from getting access to key patents. But Microsoft says Google turned down its offer to jointly bid for some Novell patents, and it has the e-mail to prove it.

????? Drummond's post is titled "When patents attack Android." But as Daring Fireball's John Gruber suggests, "It's not 'patents' that are attacking Android. It's competing companies whose patents Google has violated — and whose business Android undermines — who are attacking Android."

????"Why did Google blog about patents today?" Techcrunch's MG Siegler asked on Wednesday. "Because the Nortel loss was just the beginning." He points out that Google has joined the bidding for 8,800 patents owned by InterDigital. Google, he writes, "has nearly $40 billion in cash and cash equivalents to spend. But Apple has almost double that. And if Apple teams up with Microsoft again, they'll have over $100 billion in buying power. At the end of the day, Google will not be able to out-bid Apple, and they're running out of options."

????Drummond says he is encouraged that the Department of Justice is looking into the Nortel patent issue (without mentioning that U.S. regulators are looking even more deeply into alleged anti-competitive behavior on Google's part). But Google hasn't been faring well in the patent courts. Some e-mails turned up last month in Google's patent infringement dispute with Oracle that show Android developer Andy Rubin recommending that Google license Java and being overruled by Sergey Brin and Larry Page.

????As FOSS Patents' Florian Mueller reports, when the judge overseeing the case saw the e-mails, he advised Google's legal team to settle out of court: "You are going to be on the losing end of this document with Andy Rubin on the stand. … If willful infringement is found, there are profound implications for a permanent injunction. So you better think about that."

相關(guān)文章:

今日科技:谷歌炮轟蘋果、微軟、黑莓

作者:JP Mangalindan

“專利本意旨在鼓勵創(chuàng)新,但最近有人用它當(dāng)作阻撓創(chuàng)新的武器?!?——大衛(wèi)?德拉蒙德,谷歌高級副總裁兼首席法務(wù)官【谷歌官方博客(Google Blog)】

谷歌患上“微軟綜合癥”?

作者:Ben Elowitz

谷歌早期以對產(chǎn)品進行分散化管理而聞名,Gmail等明星產(chǎn)品都是這一時期的產(chǎn)物。但它現(xiàn)在卻似乎重蹈微軟的覆轍,將越來越多的新產(chǎn)品集成到搜索引擎中。新產(chǎn)品始終處于核心產(chǎn)品的陰影之下,谷歌賴以成功的創(chuàng)新能力勢必受到嚴重壓制。

我來點評

相關(guān)稿件

  最新文章

最新文章:

中國煤業(yè)大遷徙

500強情報中心

財富專欄

99热只有精品在线观看| 国产乱人伦偷精品视频不卡| 九九精品国产亚洲AV日韩| 中文字幕人妻A片免费看| 日韩一区二区三区不卡| 狠狠做深爱婷婷久久综合一区| 欧美亚洲日韩久久精品福利国产精品亚洲综合| 亚洲熟妇αv午夜无码不卡| 柠檬AV导航国产精品久久久| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区狼人影院| 普通话对白国产精品一级毛片| 久久午夜一级a毛片无码鲁丝片午夜精品| 一级作爱视频免费观看 | 尤物无毒不卡在线观看| 亚洲欧洲国产欧美一区精品| 中国女人内射6XXXXX| 亚洲精品中文字幕无码视频| 国产精品99久久不卡| 一区二区三区成人欧美日韩在线观看久| 亚洲AV无码精品无码麻豆| 国产精品视频一区国模私拍| 国产亚洲情侣一区二区无| 97热久久免费频精品99| 欧美日韩免费观看| 久久精品国产福利一区二区| 女人一区二区三区电影| 一级毛片免费高清视频中文字幕精品久久天堂一区| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区| 久久毛片基地全免费的| 久久麻豆精亚洲AV品国产蜜桃| 国产午夜亚洲精品理论片不卡| 国产午夜亚洲精品一级在线| 亚洲国产成人一区二区精品区| 精品国产AV无码一区二区三区| 中文字幕色AV一区二区三区| 国产国拍亚洲精品mv在线观看| 国产精品观看在线亚洲人成网| 亚洲av无码国产一级毛片久久国产精选精华精品| 亚洲日韩成人片在线播放| 久久精品国产亚洲AV果冻传媒| 欧美丝袜秘书在线一区|