成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開
Report card: Obama's plan to fix financial rules

Report card: Obama's plan to fix financial rules

2009年06月22日

????The President's new plan has some good ideas, but also a few troubling developments. Now it's Congress's turn.

????By Adam Lashinsky

????Now that President Obama has presented his plan to fix the way the U.S. regulates finance, it's time to assess if the plan will work. The 85-page "white paper" his Treasury Department released lays out the specifics. Now Congress will begin its ugly process of turning the proposals into law. There are some good ideas here. There's also a whole lot that may make Wall Street howl in protest.

????Here, then, are some preliminary grades on a preliminary plan. The final exam is a long way off.

????Give government power to wind down systemically important players. This is a good idea, if the manner in which this purportedly rare power is to be exercised is clearly spelled out to the affected companies. Last year there was considerable debate about whether the federal government had the authority to seize Lehman, an investment bank not regulated by the FDIC, instead of allowing it to collapse. These powers should be written down to avoid the embarrassing position the Bush and Obama administrations have found themselves in in the last year, exercising power that may or may not exist. (Grade: B+)

????Empower the Fed to oversee the biggest financial players, including imposing leverage restrictions (and liquidity and capital requirements) on the largest financial companies. This arguably is the only proposal that means anything at all. Limiting the use of leverage at institutions like Citigroup (C, Fortune 500) or AIG (AIG, Fortune 500) would have made all the difference in 2008. Then again, the same action would have eroded years of profits at Goldman Sachs (GS, Fortune 500). A leverage restriction for banks and nonbanks alike would go a long way to preventing another crisis. Exactly how the requirements are written, including if they are transparent to investors, will mean everything. (Grade: Incomplete. Too soon to know.)

????Create a super-regulator for consumer-oriented financial products, including mortgages and credit cards. It sounds good, but adding another regulator rather than eliminating them is a troubling development. (Grade: C)

????Eliminate the Office of Thrift Supervision. Oh, actually, Obama does plan to do away with one ineffectual agency. What's not to like about eliminating the regulator that oversaw AIG, Countrywide and WaMu? The total number of regulators will stay the same. There should be more, not less, of this, but Beltway types say the White House doesn't want to risk political fights with Congressional committee chairmen whose turf includes agencies that should go away. This isn't change we can believe in, suffice it to say. (Grade: A on the specific action; D on the larger message.)

????Urge harmonization between the SEC and CFTC. It's an open secret that the securities regulator and futures regulator step on each other's toes. A March 2008 blueprint by former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson suggested the agencies should be merged. That plan went nowhere. "Harmonization" is Washingtonspeak for "nothing will happen." It's sort of like forming a blue-ribbon commission. (Grade: F)

????Require hedge funds to register; regulate derivatives. Registration of hedge funds is harmless, and bringing the unregulated products they trade into the tent is a good idea. But this regulation should be constructive, not punitive. Plenty of laws against manipulation and abuse already exist. What we shouldn't be doing is going after "speculators," also known as investors. It's a slippery slope. (Grade: C-)

????Reduce reliance on ratings agencies and require the originator, sponsor or broker of securitized mortgages to retain a financial interest in loans. Whoa. This is a bombshell. Diminishing the roll of the agencies will be a fun one to watch. Requiring mortgaging originators to hold a portion of their loans will annoy the banks. This will be a bloody debate. (Grade: B-)

????Create a council of regulators to monitor systemic risk. This sounds like a Washington problem waiting to happen. A council could be helpful because its members will be powerful and motivated to spot problems. But it will be a political body in a political town. You'd have to see it in action to know if it works. (Grade: Incomplete.)

????Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Larry Summers, the president's chief economist, concluded an opinion piece in The Washington Post earlier in the week by writing: "Now is the time to act." Actually, March 2008, when Paulson suggested his blueprint, would have been a really good time to act. Now would be good too.

掃碼打開財富Plus App
波多野结衣亚洲AV无码无在线观看| 亚洲高清无码电影| 88国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 夫目前侵犯一区二区三区| 亚洲av无码日韩av无码导航| 欧美午夜福利视频| 强奷乱码中文字幕熟女一| 精品人妻无码区二区三区| 77777亚洲午夜久久多喷 | 2021国内精品久久久久精品K8| 91精品国产乱码在线观看| 国产成人无码视频一区二区三区| 污污内射久久一区二区欧美| 亚洲一区二区三区蜜桃| 純愛無遮擋H肉動漫在線播放| 国产一级 片射在线观看| 18禁无遮挡羞羞污污污污免费| 欧美精品V欧洲高清视频在线观看| 国产精品永久免费,亚洲国产精品尤物YW在线观看| 成年免费a级毛片免费看无码| 妺妺窝人体色www在线观看| 欧美一性一乱一交一视频| 无码人妻一区二区三区蜜桃手机版| 欧美FREESEX黑人又粗又大| 亚洲日韩国产AV无码无码精品| 99久久人妻无码精品系列蜜桃| 成人va在线一区二区三区四区| 99久久国产综合精品五月天| 中文字幕久无码免费久久| 国产精品久久久久久久hd| 久久久精品国产亚洲综合久久久国产中文字幕免费| 国产乱人伦中文无无码视频试看| 在线人成视频播放午夜福利| 岳的又肥又大水多啊喷了视频| 青椒午夜影院在线日本视频| 午夜后入在线观看| 一级特黄AAA大片在线观看| 精品熟女碰碰人人A久久| 最近中文字幕MV在线资源| 无码精品动漫一区二区| 国产精品一久久香蕉国产线看|