成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

最新文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

熱讀文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

當(dāng)期雜志
訂閱
雜志紙刊
網(wǎng)站
移動(dòng)訂閱
--
--
--
“我說(shuō)了算!”—— 一種有缺陷的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式
 作者: Linda A. Hill, Kent Lineback    時(shí)間: 2011年04月29日    來(lái)源: 財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:         
字體 [   ]        
打印        
發(fā)表評(píng)論        

許多老板認(rèn)為,他們最有力的管理工具是頭銜帶來(lái)的權(quán)力。但是,還有更有效的方式,可以幫助你帶好你的兵。
轉(zhuǎn)貼到: 微信 新浪微博 關(guān)注騰訊微博 人人網(wǎng) 豆瓣

????大多數(shù)人認(rèn)為,老板充分行使職權(quán)的根本在于權(quán)力和威望。老板的權(quán)力越多越好。

????電影、電視和大眾文學(xué)都在宣揚(yáng)一種老套的管理模式,通過(guò)它們,一個(gè)好的企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)總是被刻畫(huà)成一個(gè)頤指氣使的形象,并且在言行舉止方面,總要擺出一副“我說(shuō)了算”的架勢(shì)。

????但事實(shí)并非如此。利?普朗科特?托斯特、弗朗切斯卡?基諾和理查德?P?拉里克三位研究人員提出了最新證據(jù),對(duì)這種觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了批判。在哈佛商學(xué)院(Harvard Business School)近期在線(xiàn)發(fā)表的一份工作論文中,他們提出了自己的觀點(diǎn):“……當(dāng)一位領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者的權(quán)力欲望加重時(shí),他或她將傾向于控制團(tuán)隊(duì)中的言論和交流,進(jìn)而抑制團(tuán)隊(duì)成員的作用,最終降低團(tuán)隊(duì)的績(jī)效?!?/p>

????換句話(huà)說(shuō),以“我是老板”的心態(tài)看待自己的工作,老板在與下屬的討論中往往表現(xiàn)得自以為是。這既限制了其他人表達(dá)自己觀點(diǎn)的時(shí)間,實(shí)際上也是在告訴他們:“你們的觀點(diǎn)無(wú)足輕重。我的觀點(diǎn)才是最重要的?!倍罱K結(jié)果必然是,觀點(diǎn)越來(lái)越少,創(chuàng)新能力也被削弱。

????當(dāng)然,權(quán)力或者威望本身并沒(méi)有什么問(wèn)題。真正重要的是,擁有這種權(quán)力的人如何對(duì)待它們。以我們的研究和經(jīng)歷來(lái)看,許多老板認(rèn)為,權(quán)力是促使其他人完成必要工作的重要途徑。當(dāng)然,他們很少會(huì)坦率地說(shuō)出來(lái),但他們要傳達(dá)的意思已經(jīng)非常明顯:“照我說(shuō)的做,因?yàn)槲沂抢习澹艺f(shuō)了算?!?/p>

????把這一觀點(diǎn)放在老板,或者是經(jīng)理人和企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者的實(shí)際職責(zé)中來(lái)考慮,結(jié)果會(huì)怎樣呢?老板是要對(duì)其他人的績(jī)效負(fù)責(zé)的。他通過(guò)影響其他人來(lái)履行該職責(zé)——通過(guò)塑造和影響其他人的行為、思想和情感——使每個(gè)人以及整個(gè)團(tuán)隊(duì)的工作更加高效。

????既然經(jīng)理人的核心任務(wù)是要影響其他人,那么,如何才能最有效地完成這個(gè)任務(wù)呢?

????傳統(tǒng)觀點(diǎn)認(rèn)為,施加影響的核心工具,就是你的頭銜帶給你的權(quán)力或者正式職權(quán)。但是如果你在擔(dān)任老板時(shí),以這種錯(cuò)誤觀點(diǎn)作為指導(dǎo),那么,你可能無(wú)法成為你希望扮演的,你需要扮演的,抑或是你本來(lái)可以扮演好的那個(gè)角色。

????在施加影響時(shí),權(quán)力與威望是一種有缺陷的工具,我們?cè)谏衔奶岬降难芯浚闶亲钚伦C據(jù)。而其他證據(jù)顯示,那些只看到自身權(quán)力的人,往往將他人視作沒(méi)有思想的“物件”,他們不喜歡接受別人的觀點(diǎn),對(duì)他人存在刻板印象,并且由于他們過(guò)于注重目標(biāo),因此只是將其他人視為達(dá)到目的的途徑。簡(jiǎn)而言之,如果你傾向于“我是老板!”的管理方式,那你可能會(huì)貶低其他人的價(jià)值。因此,要想獲得下屬的認(rèn)同,并充分挖掘他們的潛力,這并不是一種有效的方式。

????但是,如果依靠正式職權(quán)并不能最有效地影響其他人,那么,什么才是最佳方式呢?

????影響的基礎(chǔ)在于信任,而不是壓制——即人們對(duì)你有信心,相信你會(huì)做正確的事。從根本上來(lái)說(shuō),即便是威望,也是以信任為基礎(chǔ)的。

????人們對(duì)你的信任包括兩個(gè)主要部分:對(duì)你的能力的信心,和對(duì)你的性格的信任。只要人們認(rèn)為你知道該做什么和如何做好,人們便會(huì)相信你能夠勝任。他們不期望你學(xué)識(shí)淵博。你不可能掌握每個(gè)下屬工作的技術(shù)層面。但你應(yīng)該十分清楚如何制定明智的決策,做出正確的判斷,合理把握輕重緩急,帶領(lǐng)企業(yè)向前邁進(jìn)。

????如果人們對(duì)于你的意愿、價(jià)值與標(biāo)準(zhǔn),你的關(guān)注重心,以及你的情感成熟度有足夠的理解和信心,他們就會(huì)信任你的個(gè)性。如果人們不了解你,或者對(duì)你沒(méi)有信心,僅有能力并不能讓你走得更遠(yuǎn)。

????威望與權(quán)力并不能激發(fā)人們的關(guān)注與認(rèn)同,但信任卻能夠做到。團(tuán)隊(duì)的關(guān)注與認(rèn)同則是干好工作的必要條件。如果人們不信任你,無(wú)論你做什么或者說(shuō)什么都無(wú)濟(jì)于事。要成為一名高效的經(jīng)理人和企業(yè)領(lǐng)袖,首先要讓人們信任你的能力和性格。

????毫無(wú)疑問(wèn),在某些情況下,依然需要采取“我是老板!”的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)方式,尤其是身處危機(jī)當(dāng)中,此時(shí)的員工,需要一個(gè)強(qiáng)有力的指揮者。但大多數(shù)時(shí)間里,還是把你的權(quán)利大棒收起來(lái)吧,把它放在別人能看見(jiàn)的地方就足夠了,最好還是少用它。

????哈佛商學(xué)院(Harvard Business School)教授琳達(dá)?A?希爾與擁有30年管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)的作家肯特?林內(nèi)貝克共同撰寫(xiě)了《做個(gè)真正的老板:成為偉大領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者必須具備的三個(gè)特質(zhì)》(Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader)。

????Most people think that power and authority are what make a boss fully effective. The more power, the better the boss.

????Films, popular literature, and television foster the stereotype that a good leader is one who wields power visibly and says, "I'm in charge" in word, deed, and demeanor.

????But this is not necessarily so. The latest piece of evidence to undermine this popular view comes from researchers Leigh Plunkett Tost, Francesca Gino, and Richard P. Larrick, who argue in a working paper recently published online by Harvard Business School, "...when a leader feels a heightened sense of power, he or she tends to dominate group discussions and interactions, thereby suppressing contributions from other team members and consequently decreasing team performance."

????In other words, bosses that view their jobs in terms of "I'm the boss!" tend to monopolize discussions with their staff. That both limits the time available for others to express their ideas and tells them, in effect, "your ideas are less important than mine." The outcome, of course, is fewer ideas and less innovation.

????However, power, or authority, itself isn't to blame. What matters is how the people who possess authority think of it. In our own research and experience, we've seen that many bosses think it's the key way they get others to do what needs doing. Though they seldom use the words outright, their message is unmistakable: "Do what I say because I'm the boss. I'm in charge."

????Consider this in the context of what bosses – managers and leaders – actually do. A boss is someone responsible for the performance of others. She fulfills that responsibility by influencing others -- by shaping and making a difference in others' actions, thoughts, and feelings -- in ways that make them more productive individually and as a group.

????A manager's core task is to influence others. But what is the most effective way to do that?

????Conventional wisdom may suggest that your key tool of influence is the power or formal authority that comes with your title. But if you base your efforts as a boss on that false wisdom, you're likely to be less effective than you want to be, need to be, and could be.

????The research we mentioned above is only the latest evidence that power and authority are flawed tools of influence. Other evidence shows that those who focus on their own power tend to treat others as objects, to be less open to others' points of view, to stereotype others, and to be so goal-oriented that they see others only as means to an end. In short, if you tend to focus on "I'm the boss!" you're more likely to devalue others and what they have to offer. Not a great way to build commitment and elicit the best efforts of those who work for you.

????But if relying on your formal authority isn't the best way to influence others, what is?

????All sources of influence, other than coercion, are built on trust -- the confidence people have that you will do the right thing. Even authority ultimately depends on trust.

????People's trust in you consists of two key components: their belief in your competence and their faith in your character. People believe you're competent when they think you know what to do and how to do it. They don't expect you to be the most knowledgeable. It's not possible for you to keep up with the technical side of everyone's work. But you need to know enough to make good decisions, exercise sound judgment, set proper priorities, and move work forward.

????People believe in your character when they understand and have confidence in your intentions, your values and standards, what you truly care about, and your emotional maturity. Competence alone won't get you far if people don't know or have confidence in you.

????Authority and power won't elicit from people the care and commitment that good work demands. Trust will. If people don't trust you, almost nothing else you do or say will matter. Being an effective manager and leader begins with people's belief in your competence and character.

????No doubt, an "I'm the boss!" approach is called for in certain situations, usually in times of crisis when people need a strong, directive voice. Most of the time, though, your club of power and authority is best kept on the shelf, where it's visible but seldom used.

????Linda A. Hill, a professor at Harvard Business School, and Kent Lineback, a writer with 30 years of management experience, are co-authors of Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader.




相關(guān)稿件



更多




最佳評(píng)論

@關(guān)子臨: 自信也許會(huì)壓倒聰明,演技的好壞也許會(huì)壓倒腦力的強(qiáng)弱,好領(lǐng)導(dǎo)就是循循善誘的人,不獨(dú)裁,而有見(jiàn)地,能讓人心悅誠(chéng)服。    參加討論>>
@DuoDuopa:彼得原理,是美國(guó)學(xué)者勞倫斯彼得在對(duì)組織中人員晉升的相關(guān)現(xiàn)象研究后得出的一個(gè)結(jié)論:在各種組織中,由于習(xí)慣于對(duì)在某個(gè)等級(jí)上稱(chēng)職的人員進(jìn)行晉升提拔,因而雇員總是趨向于晉升到其不稱(chēng)職的地位。    參加討論>>
@Bruce的森林:正念,應(yīng)該可以解釋為專(zhuān)注當(dāng)下的事情,而不去想過(guò)去這件事是怎么做的,這件事將來(lái)會(huì)怎樣。一方面,這種理念可以幫助員工排除雜念,把注意力集中在工作本身,減少壓力,提高創(chuàng)造力。另一方面,這不失為提高員工工作效率的好方法??赡芎笳呤歉鞔驜OSS們更看重的吧。    參加討論>>


Copyright ? 2012財(cái)富出版社有限公司。 版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)書(shū)面許可,任何機(jī)構(gòu)不得全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)載。
《財(cái)富》(中文版)及網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容的版權(quán)屬于時(shí)代公司(Time Inc.),并經(jīng)過(guò)時(shí)代公司許可由香港中詢(xún)有限公司出版和發(fā)布。
深入財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)

雜志

·   當(dāng)期雜志
·   申請(qǐng)雜志贈(zèng)閱
·   特約專(zhuān)刊
·   廣告商

活動(dòng)

·   科技頭腦風(fēng)暴
·   2013財(cái)富全球論壇
·   財(cái)富CEO峰會(huì)

關(guān)于我們

·   公司介紹
·   訂閱查詢(xún)
·   版權(quán)聲明
·   隱私政策
·   廣告業(yè)務(wù)
·   合作伙伴
行業(yè)

·   能源
·   醫(yī)藥
·   航空和運(yùn)輸
·   傳媒與文化
·   工業(yè)與采礦
·   房地產(chǎn)
·   汽車(chē)
·   消費(fèi)品
·   金融
·   科技
頻道

·   管理
·   技術(shù)
·   商業(yè)
·   理財(cái)
·   職場(chǎng)
·   生活
·   視頻
·   博客

工具

·     微博
·     社區(qū)
·     RSS訂閱
內(nèi)容精華

·   500強(qiáng)
·   專(zhuān)欄
·   封面報(bào)道
·   創(chuàng)業(yè)
·   特寫(xiě)
·   前沿
·   CEO訪談
博客

·   四不像
·   劉聰
·   東8時(shí)區(qū)
·   章勱聞
·   公司治理觀察
·   東山豹尉
·   山??纯?/font>
·   明心堂主
榜單

·   世界500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   中國(guó)500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   美國(guó)500強(qiáng)
·   最受贊賞的中國(guó)公司
·   中國(guó)5大適宜退休的城市
·   年度中國(guó)商人
·   50位商界女強(qiáng)人
·   100家增長(zhǎng)最快的公司
·   40位40歲以下的商業(yè)精英
·   100家最適宜工作的公司
亚洲一区二区在线电影天堂| 国产亚AV手机在线观看| 午夜性爽视频男人的天堂| 久青青视频精品免费观看| 成人无码免费一区二区三区| 无码粉嫩虎白一线天在线观看| 国产国拍亚洲精品永久69| 国内丰满少妇一级毛片| 亚洲成aⅴ人片久青草影院| 国产精品亚洲精品日韩已方| 4399视频在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲精品中文字幕乱码三区91| 国产午夜无码片在线观看网站日本| 精品21国产成人综合网在线| 国产精品久久久久久久午夜片| 深夜A级毛片免费视频| 国产在线不卡国产区美女| 成人A级毛片免费观看AV一区| 国产精品成人扳一级aa毛片 | 亚洲成av人影片在线观看| 一级做a爰片久久毛片a片蜜桃| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片午夜精品| 久久综合九色综合97婷婷| 国产精品视频白浆免费视频| 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲AV永久无码精品水牛影视| 成人午夜亚洲精品无码网站| 夜夜添无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区天堂古代| 婬色男女乱婬视频一级一区| 久久AV无码精品人妻出轨| 亚洲日韩精品国产3区| 国产一级一级理论片A片一区二区| 欧美人妻免费大片一级a一级久久三| 久久久久久久久精品中文字幕一区| 99久久久国产精品免费蜜臀| 成人区人妻精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲欧美高清在线精品二区| 国产AV一区二区三区无码野战| 女人18毛片a级毛片一区**区| 日日麻批免费40分钟无码|