成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

最新文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

熱讀文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

當(dāng)期雜志
訂閱
雜志紙刊
網(wǎng)站
移動(dòng)訂閱
--
--
--
退避三舍不能化解辦公室沖突
 作者: Linda A. Hill, Kent Lineback    時(shí)間: 2011年07月21日    來源: 財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:         
字體 [   ]        
打印        
發(fā)表評(píng)論        

面對(duì)辦公室政治,總怕惹火上身的管理者注定要失敗。想成為高效的上司,必須對(duì)他人保持足夠的影響力。
轉(zhuǎn)貼到: 微信 新浪微博 關(guān)注騰訊微博 人人網(wǎng) 豆瓣

????組織內(nèi)部的沖突、辦公室政治、或者鬧劇,它們盡管名目各異,其實(shí)相近。然而,在工作還是其他場(chǎng)合,很少有人喜歡與別人發(fā)生爭(zhēng)執(zhí)或?qū)?。?shí)際上,為避免這種情況,許多人花費(fèi)大量了的時(shí)間和精力。

????在近期召開的一次管理會(huì)議上,一位中層管理人員對(duì)我們抱怨說:“我不懂怎么處理辦公室政治。大家一直在明爭(zhēng)暗斗。在我上一份工作中,我只需要埋頭專心做好自己的事情。但是這次不同了。我怎樣才能置身事外?”

????很可惜,我們的答案或許并不是她想要的。她本人并不需要玩弄辦公室政治,但是組織沖突是無法回避的,也不應(yīng)該回避。

????根據(jù)我們的經(jīng)驗(yàn),她對(duì)待辦公室政治的這種態(tài)度在經(jīng)理人中非常普遍。但這卻會(huì)成為他們工作中的巨大障礙,影響他們的工作效率。

????這并非空穴來風(fēng)。另一位出版行業(yè)經(jīng)理人曾對(duì)我們講述過他的經(jīng)歷。在一次重要的工作小組會(huì)議上,對(duì)于跨部門使用編輯內(nèi)容的問題,他認(rèn)為應(yīng)該堅(jiān)持公司的政策,他甚至給出了非常有說服力的實(shí)例來支持自己的主張。

????公司的政策是鼓勵(lì)免費(fèi)共享非競(jìng)爭(zhēng)性內(nèi)容,這對(duì)他的業(yè)務(wù)模式至關(guān)重要。但在會(huì)上,他發(fā)現(xiàn),很顯然,那些反對(duì)他的人在會(huì)前就已經(jīng)通過氣了;并且,針對(duì)希望調(diào)整的部分,他們已經(jīng)事先達(dá)成了一致。實(shí)際上,在他還沒給出自己的理由之前,他們就已經(jīng)確定了工作小組的正式立場(chǎng)。

????你是否覺得這不公平?對(duì)他來說,這是又一個(gè)骯臟的辦公室政治的例子。他告訴我們:“我從來不玩這種把戲?!?/p>

????我們認(rèn)為,他混淆了兩種不同的辦公室政治。一種是狹隘的,只是為了滿足個(gè)人的抱負(fù)和需求,而另外一種則是純粹是在某些重要問題上的分歧。我們想知道,當(dāng)某一業(yè)務(wù)真的面臨危機(jī)時(shí),尋求同盟,建立統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線有什么錯(cuò)呢?我們問他:“你為什么不在會(huì)議之前與工作小組的成員進(jìn)行溝通,與他們?nèi)〉靡恢履???/p>

????其實(shí),我們從來不建議,經(jīng)理人要“有政治意識(shí)”,或者要“玩政治”。但是,對(duì)于無處不在的政治環(huán)境,經(jīng)理人必須愿意,并且能夠在其中發(fā)揮有效作用。他們的成功不僅取決于他們對(duì)團(tuán)隊(duì)的管理能力,還包括對(duì)組織內(nèi)其他部門施加有效影響的能力。

????我們發(fā)現(xiàn),許多經(jīng)理人會(huì)選擇遠(yuǎn)離是非,只有在迫不得已的時(shí)候,他們才會(huì)硬著頭皮去處理是非。他們誤解了組織沖突的本質(zhì)。他們只是簡(jiǎn)單地認(rèn)為,組織沖突就是不和諧,或者是組織設(shè)計(jì)缺陷的體現(xiàn)。甚至有人認(rèn)為,組織沖突只是因?yàn)椴煌F(tuán)體在爭(zhēng)權(quán)奪利。

????實(shí)際上,沖突是不可避免的,也很自然。主要原因在于,所有現(xiàn)代化組織內(nèi)部都具有三個(gè)特點(diǎn)。

????1. 勞動(dòng)分工。組織通過為不同個(gè)人和團(tuán)隊(duì)分配任務(wù)實(shí)現(xiàn)有效運(yùn)行。沒有人是無所不能的。雖然他們?cè)谕粋€(gè)機(jī)構(gòu)框架下工作,但這些團(tuán)隊(duì)會(huì)形成各自的觀點(diǎn)、目標(biāo)和需要優(yōu)先完成的任務(wù),這是不可避免的。

????2. 相互依賴。要完成各自的工作,每個(gè)團(tuán)隊(duì)都需要依賴組織內(nèi)的其他團(tuán)隊(duì)。沒有一個(gè)團(tuán)隊(duì)靠單打獨(dú)斗就能正常運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn),或取得成功。

????3. 資源稀少。沒有一個(gè)組織能夠滿足內(nèi)部團(tuán)隊(duì)的所有要求,因此必須要做出取舍。在分配資金、人力、空間、時(shí)間和精力等資源時(shí),總會(huì)有輸家和贏家。很明顯,所有團(tuán)隊(duì)都希望自己是贏家。

????大部分組織沖突的產(chǎn)生并不是為了自身利益,而是因?yàn)椴煌瑘F(tuán)隊(duì)對(duì)于公司應(yīng)采取的行動(dòng)在觀念上存在合理的差別。比如,公司應(yīng)該投資哪個(gè)市場(chǎng)?應(yīng)該在哪里建廠?應(yīng)該生產(chǎn)哪種產(chǎn)品?

????當(dāng)然,肯定會(huì)有人玩辦公室政治。確實(shí)有一些“職場(chǎng)惡棍”希望高人一頭。由團(tuán)隊(duì)成員個(gè)性引發(fā)的組織沖突確實(shí)會(huì)帶來組織功能的紊亂。對(duì)確實(shí)存在的業(yè)務(wù)問題所持的不同觀點(diǎn),我們認(rèn)為是合理沖突。但更多情況下,合理沖突看起來更像是個(gè)人沖突,因?yàn)楦鞣綖榱藞?jiān)持己見,不免變得情緒化。這種反應(yīng)雖然很可悲,但也符合人性的特點(diǎn)。但這并不會(huì)使問題本身變成私人事務(wù),這只是意味著,所有當(dāng)事人必須將自我與根本基本問題剝離開來。

????既然組織沖突不可避免,而且因?yàn)橥ǔ?huì)涉及重大問題而無法回避,因此經(jīng)理人需要了解組織沖突典型的解決辦法。我們總是認(rèn)為,只有依靠數(shù)據(jù)、通過理性分析才能做出選擇,才能告訴所有當(dāng)事人,什么是“正確的”或者“最佳的”答案。但可惜的是,盡管分析非常有用,并且常常能帶給人啟發(fā),但一些重要的問題太過復(fù)雜,根本就找不到毫無爭(zhēng)議的答案。

????大多數(shù)組織沖突都是通過影響力得以解決的。老板具有影響力,他的團(tuán)隊(duì)便能實(shí)現(xiàn)目標(biāo)。若老板缺乏影響力,那么他的團(tuán)隊(duì)便只能承受失敗。

????如果經(jīng)理人對(duì)于有意識(shí)地積累和利用影響力感到困擾,不妨設(shè)想一下缺乏影響力的后果。他和他的團(tuán)隊(duì)只能任人擺布。權(quán)力確實(shí)會(huì)帶來腐敗,但無權(quán)力也會(huì)帶來同樣的后果。比如歷史上那些作惡多端的人,他們?cè)跒樽约旱膼盒修q護(hù)時(shí)總是會(huì)說:“我別無選擇。我必須遵守指令。”

????要成為高效的管理者,必須具備足夠的影響力。為了實(shí)現(xiàn)自己團(tuán)隊(duì)的目標(biāo),并為自己團(tuán)隊(duì)的理想而努力,管理者必須有能力對(duì)其職權(quán)范圍之外的人員和團(tuán)隊(duì)施加有效影響。團(tuán)隊(duì)成員都指望團(tuán)隊(duì)領(lǐng)袖具有這樣的影響力,否則他們便無法有效地工作。組織也需要有影響力的管理人員發(fā)出自己的聲音,來保證組織的正常運(yùn)轉(zhuǎn)。

????培養(yǎng)影響力的最佳途徑是建立互利的長(zhǎng)期關(guān)系。只要始終以高標(biāo)準(zhǔn)要求自己公開、誠(chéng)實(shí)、公平和尊重,擁有影響力也是水到渠成的事。

????“玩政治”與在政治環(huán)境中發(fā)揮影響力截然不同。但頗具諷刺意味的是,應(yīng)對(duì)不良“政治斗爭(zhēng)”的方法是與身邊的人加強(qiáng)往來,而不是躲著他們。獨(dú)善其身只會(huì)降低管理者的影響力和效率。

????如果你希望完成你認(rèn)為有價(jià)值的任務(wù),那么就調(diào)動(dòng)身邊的人吧!不過,我們不是去玩政治游戲,我們要做的是搭建真正能通往成功的橋梁。

????本文作者:Linda A. Hill,哈佛商學(xué)院(Harvard Business School)教授;Kent Lineback,作家,擁有30年豐富的管理經(jīng)驗(yàn)。《做個(gè)真正的老板:成為偉大領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者必須具備的三個(gè)特質(zhì)》(Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader)一書由二人合著。

????Call it organizational conflict, office politics, or just plain drama, few of us enjoy disagreement or confrontation, at work or elsewhere. In fact, many of us spend a significant portion of our time and energy avoiding it.

????"I don't know how to handle the office politics," said one mid-level manager who approached us at a recent management conference. "Everybody's fighting all the time. In my last job, I could just keep my head down and stick to my knitting. How can I stay out of all that?"

????Unfortunately, we had to tell her what she probably didn't want to hear. She didn't need to play political games, but she couldn't and shouldn't avoid the organizational conflict that leads people to play those games.

????In our experience, her attitude is rampant among managers and it's a huge barrier that often makes them far less effective than they need to be.

????This lesson came through loud and clear in the experience described to us by another manager in publishing. At a crucial task force meeting on the use of editorial content across divisions, he delivered a compelling case for not changing company policy.

????The policy, which was to encourage non-competitive sharing of content without charge, was crucial to his business model. At the meeting, however, he discovered that those who opposed him had obviously met beforehand and agreed on the change they wanted. In effect, they'd decided the official position of the task force before he could even make his case.

????Unfair? For him, it was yet another example of dirty office politics. "I'll never play those games," he told us.

????We think he was mistaken. He confused petty politics, the pursuit of personal aspirations and needs, with genuine disagreement about an important question. What's wrong, we wanted to know, with seeking allies and presenting a united front when real business issues are at stake? "Why weren't you," we asked, "the one talking to task force members and seeking allies before the meeting?

????Let's be clear. We never tell any manager to "be political" or to "play politics." We do tell them, however, that they must be willing and able to operate effectively in the political environment that exists in all organizations. Their success will depend on their ability to manage not just their own groups but the broader organizations within which they operate.

????We see too many managers who hold themselves above the fray and deal with others only when absolutely necessary. They misunderstand the nature of organizational conflict. They think it's dysfunctional or a sign of poor organizational design. Or, they assume it springs from groups vying for dominance.

????In fact, conflict is inevitable and natural because of three features inherent in all modern organizations.

????1. Division of labor. Organizations function by assigning different tasks to different individuals and groups. Not everyone can do everything. Though they operate under the same organizational umbrella, these groups inevitably develop their own points of view, goals, and priorities.

????2. Interdependence. Every group depends on other groups in the organization to do its work. No group can function or succeed on its own.

????3. Scarce resources. No organization can do everything that those in it would like to do. Choices must be made. When resources like money, people, space, time, and attention are divvied up, there will always be winners and losers. Obviously, every group wants to win.

????Most organizational conflict springs not from battling egos but from legitimate differences of opinion among different groups about what the business should do. Should it invest in this or that market? Should it build a plant here or there? Should it make this product or another one?

????Of course, people do play organizational games. There are thugs and bullies who do seek to dominate. There are dysfunctional aspects of organizational conflict that are driven by individual personalities. More often, though, legitimate conflict -- differences of opinion about real business issues -- can seem personal because the people involved have become emotionally invested in the positions they take -- a lamentable but fully human response. That doesn't make the issues themselves personal. It just means those involved must work to separate their egos from the underlying questions.

????If organizational conflict is inevitable, and you cannot avoid it because it often involves important questions, you need to understand how it typically gets resolved. We'd like to think choices are made through rational analysis based on data, which will reveal to all involved the "right" or "best" answer. Unfortunately, while analysis is always useful and often illuminating, most important issues are too complex for it to produce indisputable answers.

????Most organizational conflicts are resolved through influence. The groups with bosses that have influence will get what they need. Those groups whose bosses lack influence will not.

????If the thought of consciously accumulating and exerting influence bothers you, imagine the consequences if you had no influence at all. You and your group would be at the mercy of what others demand of you. Yes, power can corrupt, but powerlessness corrupts too. Just think about all the people throughout history who have explained the evil they did by saying, "I had no choice. I had to do what I was told."

????To be an effective boss, you must influence others -- people and groups over whom you have no formal control -- to get what your group needs and to work for what you believe is best and right. Your own people count on you to do this because they cannot do their work well otherwise. Your organization depends on voices like yours to keep it on the right track.

????The best way to build influence is to create ongoing relationships for mutual advantage. There's no reason you cannot do this while holding yourself to high standards of openness, honesty, fairness, and respect.

????"Playing politics" and wielding influence in a political environment aren't the same. Ironically, the way to cope with dysfunctional "politics" is to engage others, not avoid them. Hunkering down will only make you less influential and so less effective.

????Engage those around you -- not to play political games but to build real bridges -- if you hope to accomplish the work that you believe needs doing.

????Linda A. Hill, a professor at Harvard Business School, and Kent Lineback, a writer with 30 years of management experience, are co-authors of Being the Boss: The 3 Imperatives for Becoming a Great Leader.




相關(guān)稿件



更多




最佳評(píng)論

@關(guān)子臨: 自信也許會(huì)壓倒聰明,演技的好壞也許會(huì)壓倒腦力的強(qiáng)弱,好領(lǐng)導(dǎo)就是循循善誘的人,不獨(dú)裁,而有見地,能讓人心悅誠(chéng)服。    參加討論>>
@DuoDuopa:彼得原理,是美國(guó)學(xué)者勞倫斯彼得在對(duì)組織中人員晉升的相關(guān)現(xiàn)象研究后得出的一個(gè)結(jié)論:在各種組織中,由于習(xí)慣于對(duì)在某個(gè)等級(jí)上稱職的人員進(jìn)行晉升提拔,因而雇員總是趨向于晉升到其不稱職的地位。    參加討論>>
@Bruce的森林:正念,應(yīng)該可以解釋為專注當(dāng)下的事情,而不去想過去這件事是怎么做的,這件事將來會(huì)怎樣。一方面,這種理念可以幫助員工排除雜念,把注意力集中在工作本身,減少壓力,提高創(chuàng)造力。另一方面,這不失為提高員工工作效率的好方法。可能后者是各大BOSS們更看重的吧。    參加討論>>


Copyright ? 2012財(cái)富出版社有限公司。 版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)書面許可,任何機(jī)構(gòu)不得全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)載。
《財(cái)富》(中文版)及網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容的版權(quán)屬于時(shí)代公司(Time Inc.),并經(jīng)過時(shí)代公司許可由香港中詢有限公司出版和發(fā)布。
深入財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)

雜志

·   當(dāng)期雜志
·   申請(qǐng)雜志贈(zèng)閱
·   特約???/font>
·   廣告商

活動(dòng)

·   科技頭腦風(fēng)暴
·   2013財(cái)富全球論壇
·   財(cái)富CEO峰會(huì)

關(guān)于我們

·   公司介紹
·   訂閱查詢
·   版權(quán)聲明
·   隱私政策
·   廣告業(yè)務(wù)
·   合作伙伴
行業(yè)

·   能源
·   醫(yī)藥
·   航空和運(yùn)輸
·   傳媒與文化
·   工業(yè)與采礦
·   房地產(chǎn)
·   汽車
·   消費(fèi)品
·   金融
·   科技
頻道

·   管理
·   技術(shù)
·   商業(yè)
·   理財(cái)
·   職場(chǎng)
·   生活
·   視頻
·   博客

工具

·     微博
·     社區(qū)
·     RSS訂閱
內(nèi)容精華

·   500強(qiáng)
·   專欄
·   封面報(bào)道
·   創(chuàng)業(yè)
·   特寫
·   前沿
·   CEO訪談
博客

·   四不像
·   劉聰
·   東8時(shí)區(qū)
·   章勱聞
·   公司治理觀察
·   東山豹尉
·   山海看客
·   明心堂主
榜單

·   世界500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   中國(guó)500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   美國(guó)500強(qiáng)
·   最受贊賞的中國(guó)公司
·   中國(guó)5大適宜退休的城市
·   年度中國(guó)商人
·   50位商界女強(qiáng)人
·   100家增長(zhǎng)最快的公司
·   40位40歲以下的商業(yè)精英
·   100家最適宜工作的公司
午夜福利在线观看视频国产| 91麻豆精品国产一区色欲| 2024最新国产精品一区| 精品国产乱码久久久久久蜜桃网站| 国产精品无码dvd在线观看| 国产中年熟女高潮大集合| 亚洲国产aⅴ成人精品无码| a毛片视频/国产精品第1页| 色综合天天天天做夜夜夜夜做| 久久99精品久久久久久齐齐| 成人男女网18免费视频 | 亚洲欧美日韩在线观看二区| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸| 一个人免费观看A级大片| 久99中文在线视频| jk国产精品福利在线观看| 欧美色成人综合天天影院| 亚洲人成无码网站久久99热国产| 99久久99视频只有精品| 国产精品色婷婷亚洲综合看片| 亚洲国产视频无码在线观看| 最近最新MV在线观看免费高清| 97精品久久久久中文字幕| 欧美Va亚洲Va国产综合| 精品无码国产自产拍在线观看蜜| 叫床很激烈的年轻水嫩大学生| 亚洲精品无码鲁网中文电影| 国产色青青视频在线观看撒| 亚洲中文字幕不卡无码| freesexvideos性少妇欧美| 国产国产人免费人成免费视频| 久久无码精品一区二区三区| 日韩国产欧美综合网| 日韩AⅤ无码AV一区二区三区| 婷婷丁香综合五月久久综合| 惠民福利亚洲国产日韩在线精品频道| 无套内谢孕妇毛片免费看| 成人国产精品一区二区免费| 93精91精品国产综合久久香蕉| 麻豆蜜桃91无码专区在线观看| 玩弄人妻少妇500系列网址|