成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

最新文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

熱讀文章

加載中,請(qǐng)稍候。。。

當(dāng)期雜志
訂閱
雜志紙刊
網(wǎng)站
移動(dòng)訂閱
--
--
--
闊人們,請(qǐng)看看豪車外的世界吧!
 作者: John Cassidy    時(shí)間: 2011年11月09日    來(lái)源: 財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:         
字體 [   ]        
打印        
發(fā)表評(píng)論        

美國(guó)的金融精英們所傳遞出的信息很明白:他們就是搞不明白。
轉(zhuǎn)貼到: 微信 新浪微博 關(guān)注騰訊微博 人人網(wǎng) 豆瓣

????兩個(gè)月前,“占領(lǐng)華爾街”運(yùn)動(dòng)(Occupy Wall Street)剛剛進(jìn)駐位于曼哈頓下城的祖科蒂公園(Zuccotti Park)。兩個(gè)月后,它已迅速演變成一場(chǎng)全美性運(yùn)動(dòng),席卷了從邁阿密到西雅圖的眾多城市。隨著冬季即將到來(lái),一些地方警局開(kāi)始驅(qū)趕示威者,這場(chǎng)抗議運(yùn)動(dòng)的前景并不明朗。但從某種意義上,這并不重要。不管這些聲稱代表99%人群的示威者和他們的露營(yíng)地未來(lái)怎樣,美國(guó)的商界領(lǐng)袖們都需要認(rèn)真思考這場(chǎng)運(yùn)動(dòng)暴露出來(lái)的問(wèn)題。

????推動(dòng)“占領(lǐng)華爾街”運(yùn)動(dòng)迅速蔓延的怒火依然沒(méi)有消退。民意調(diào)查顯示,多達(dá)半數(shù)的美國(guó)人支持這些示威者,或者至少認(rèn)為他們代表了公眾的意見(jiàn)。從很多方面看,聲稱代表99%人群的示威者們利用的正是當(dāng)初推動(dòng)茶黨(Tea Party)崛起的因素,也就是說(shuō)同樣是民眾的不滿情緒——民眾普遍認(rèn)為,商界和政界都被一小撮圈內(nèi)人所操縱,特別是與華爾街有關(guān)聯(lián)的人。左翼和右翼的極端人士夸大了這一情形,但聽(tīng)起來(lái)確實(shí)是這么一回事,這可能導(dǎo)致美國(guó)兩黨政治立場(chǎng)的轉(zhuǎn)向,調(diào)轉(zhuǎn)矛頭,指向大企業(yè)。別再批評(píng)奧巴馬政府在推動(dòng)華爾街改革和抑制貧富差距方面的溫和動(dòng)作,身處1%陣營(yíng)的杰米?戴蒙們和丹尼爾?勒布們應(yīng)該從豪車?yán)锵蛲饪纯矗巯旅绹?guó)正在發(fā)生的事情。(杰米?戴蒙和丹尼爾?勒布分別是摩根大通和Third Point LLC對(duì)沖基金公司的首席執(zhí)行官。——譯注)

????多年來(lái)普通民眾只是眼睜睜的看著收入增長(zhǎng)停滯,工作被轉(zhuǎn)移到了中國(guó),少數(shù)幸運(yùn)兒也要像中世紀(jì)的十字軍一樣出征海外。每一年,記者們(包括筆者)都能從美國(guó)人口局(Census Bureau)的最新數(shù)據(jù)中看到,最富有的1%人群所持有的全美財(cái)富比例越來(lái)越高。(美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)預(yù)算辦公室(Congressional Budget Office)的一項(xiàng)新研究顯示,1979年至2007年期間,這一比例從不到 8%上升到了17%。)盡管如此,天下依然太平。當(dāng)時(shí)的美國(guó)似乎完全背離了“社會(huì)不公擴(kuò)大最終會(huì)導(dǎo)致社會(huì)動(dòng)蕩、政局不穩(wěn)”的歷史真理?,F(xiàn)在情況變了。經(jīng)過(guò)了金融危機(jī)、救助方案和大蕭條后,社會(huì)不公最終成為了一個(gè)突出的問(wèn)題。越來(lái)越多的1%成員遭到質(zhì)問(wèn),他們到底是從哪里賺到的這么多錢。

????對(duì)于努力工作、勇于承擔(dān)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)并創(chuàng)造價(jià)值的人們,大多數(shù)美國(guó)人并不嫉妒他們創(chuàng)造的巨額財(cái)富。人們對(duì)史蒂芬?喬布斯鋪天蓋地的溢美之詞就是一個(gè)明證,說(shuō)明偉大的企業(yè)家仍然備受推崇。但這里有一個(gè)不成文的社會(huì)契約,即回報(bào)應(yīng)基于個(gè)人的努力和成就。如果現(xiàn)在很多美國(guó)人認(rèn)為,美國(guó)企業(yè)界已違背了這一契約,有什么可奇怪的嗎?在很多大公司,高管們更感興趣的似乎是如何塞滿個(gè)人腰包,而不是公司的長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)發(fā)展。巨額薪酬還只是個(gè)引子。想想輕信的董事會(huì)、粉飾盈利的帳本、舉報(bào)人被封口、為高管提供豐厚離職補(bǔ)償金的黃金降落傘制度等等,最終付出昂貴代價(jià)的卻是納稅人。真正奇怪的是為什么經(jīng)過(guò)了這么長(zhǎng)的時(shí)間公眾的怒氣才開(kāi)始爆發(fā)。

????近來(lái)一些商界領(lǐng)袖的行為顯示他們已意識(shí)到了推動(dòng)這次運(yùn)動(dòng)的因素是什么。沃倫?巴菲特已表示,他應(yīng)該繳納更多的稅。花旗集團(tuán)(Citigroup)首席執(zhí)行官潘偉迪在接受《財(cái)富》雜志(Fortune)采訪時(shí)提出愿意與抗議者會(huì)面,承認(rèn)華爾街已失去公眾的信任?;ㄆ旌推渌笮豌y行也已經(jīng)明智地決定,不效法美國(guó)銀行(Bank of America)收取借記卡服務(wù)費(fèi)的做法。但金融業(yè)內(nèi)太多人依然我行我素,仿佛時(shí)間依然停留在2007年。無(wú)論是抱怨奧巴馬是一個(gè)隱蔽的社會(huì)主義者的投資銀行家們,抑或是向著“占領(lǐng)華爾街”示威者們高呼“去找份工作吧”的沃頓(Wharton)學(xué)生們,還是曾經(jīng)溫和但正在利用資金和影響力試圖保留喬治?布什時(shí)代富人減稅政策的美國(guó)商會(huì)(Chamber of Commerce),他們傳遞出來(lái)的信息都是一樣的:我們不明白!

????對(duì)于金融界精英們而言,說(shuō)到底他們的特權(quán)有賴于所有其他人的默許,針?shù)h相對(duì)是愚蠢而危險(xiǎn)的行為。哪怕是為了自己著想,1%陣營(yíng)也應(yīng)該有點(diǎn)頭腦。

????--John Cassidy是《財(cái)富》雜志供稿人,《紐約客》(New Yorker)雜志的在編撰稿人。

????Just two months after taking over Zuccotti Park in lower Manhattan, Occupy Wall Street has mushroomed into a national movement, with offshoots in cities from Miami to Seattle. With winter coming on and some local police departments moving to clear out the demonstrators, it isn't clear where the protest goes from here. In one sense it doesn't matter. Regardless of what happens to the 99ers and their encampments, American business leaders need to take seriously what the lessons are for them.

????The anger that fueled Occupy Wall Street's rapid growth isn't going away. Polls show that up to half of Americans support the demonstrators or at least believe they reflect public opinion. In many ways the 99ers are drawing on the same popular sentiment that gave rise to the Tea Party: a perception that business and politics are rigged in favor of a privileged clique of insiders, particularly those connected to Wall Street. Extremists on the left and the right exaggerate that picture, but it rings true enough to provide the makings of a political swing against big business that could sweep up the two main parties. Instead of criticizing the Obama administration's modest efforts to reform Wall Street and rein in excesses, the Jamie Dimons and Daniel Loebs of this world should be looking out of their limos at what is happening in America.

????For years ordinary citizens looked on impassively as their incomes stagnated, their jobs were shipped to China, and a few lucky folks made out like medieval crusaders. Every year journalists (myself included) would point to the latest Census Bureau data showing that the top 1% of earners were taking a bigger and bigger share of the national pie. (Between 1979 and 2007, says a new Congressional Budget Office study, it went from less than 8% to 17%.) And nothing would happen. The U.S. seemed to be defying the historical truism that rising inequality eventually leads to social and political unrest. Not anymore. With the financial crisis, the bailouts, and the Great Recession, inequality has finally emerged as a potent issue. Increasingly members of the 1% are being asked where they got their sacks of gold.

????Most Americans don't begrudge great riches to anybody who works hard, takes real risks, and creates things of value. As evidenced by the positive outpouring for Steve Jobs, great entrepreneurs are still celebrated. But there is an implicit social contract that links rewards to effort and accomplishment. If many people now believe that corporate America has violated that contract, is it surprising? At many big corporations, the senior managers have seemed more interested in stuffing their pockets than building for the long term. Gargantuan pay packages are only the start of it. Think boards of directors packed with patsies, books cooked to juice earnings, potential whistleblowers silenced, golden parachutes, and finally taxpayers obliged to save expensively tanned hides. The thing that is really surprising is that it has taken this long for public anger to well up.

????Lately some corporate leaders have shown they understand what is driving the outcry. Warren Buffett said he should pay higher taxes. Vikram Pandit, the CEO of Citicorp (C), offered in a Fortune interview to meet with the protesters, acknowledging a lack of trust in Wall Street. Citi and other big banks wisely chose not to follow the lead of Bank of America (BAC) in imposing fees for using debit cards. But too many people in finance are acting as if it were 2007. Whether it is investment bankers griping about Obama being a closet socialist, Wharton MBA students chanting "Get a job" to OWS protestors, or the Chamber of Commerce, once a moderate voice, using its money and clout to try to preserve George W. Bush's tax cuts for the rich, the message conveyed is the same: We don't get it!

????For an economic elite whose perquisites ultimately depend on the acquiescence of everybody else, it is a silly and dangerous pose to strike. If only for its own sake, the 1% needs to show a bit of nous.

????--John Cassidy is a Fortune contributor and a New Yorker staff writer.







更多




最佳評(píng)論

@關(guān)子臨: 自信也許會(huì)壓倒聰明,演技的好壞也許會(huì)壓倒腦力的強(qiáng)弱,好領(lǐng)導(dǎo)就是循循善誘的人,不獨(dú)裁,而有見(jiàn)地,能讓人心悅誠(chéng)服。    參加討論>>
@DuoDuopa:彼得原理,是美國(guó)學(xué)者勞倫斯彼得在對(duì)組織中人員晉升的相關(guān)現(xiàn)象研究后得出的一個(gè)結(jié)論:在各種組織中,由于習(xí)慣于對(duì)在某個(gè)等級(jí)上稱職的人員進(jìn)行晉升提拔,因而雇員總是趨向于晉升到其不稱職的地位。    參加討論>>
@Bruce的森林:正念,應(yīng)該可以解釋為專注當(dāng)下的事情,而不去想過(guò)去這件事是怎么做的,這件事將來(lái)會(huì)怎樣。一方面,這種理念可以幫助員工排除雜念,把注意力集中在工作本身,減少壓力,提高創(chuàng)造力。另一方面,這不失為提高員工工作效率的好方法??赡芎笳呤歉鞔驜OSS們更看重的吧。    參加討論>>


Copyright ? 2012財(cái)富出版社有限公司。 版權(quán)所有,未經(jīng)書(shū)面許可,任何機(jī)構(gòu)不得全部或部分轉(zhuǎn)載。
《財(cái)富》(中文版)及網(wǎng)站內(nèi)容的版權(quán)屬于時(shí)代公司(Time Inc.),并經(jīng)過(guò)時(shí)代公司許可由香港中詢有限公司出版和發(fā)布。
深入財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)

雜志

·   當(dāng)期雜志
·   申請(qǐng)雜志贈(zèng)閱
·   特約???/font>
·   廣告商

活動(dòng)

·   科技頭腦風(fēng)暴
·   2013財(cái)富全球論壇
·   財(cái)富CEO峰會(huì)

關(guān)于我們

·   公司介紹
·   訂閱查詢
·   版權(quán)聲明
·   隱私政策
·   廣告業(yè)務(wù)
·   合作伙伴
行業(yè)

·   能源
·   醫(yī)藥
·   航空和運(yùn)輸
·   傳媒與文化
·   工業(yè)與采礦
·   房地產(chǎn)
·   汽車
·   消費(fèi)品
·   金融
·   科技
頻道

·   管理
·   技術(shù)
·   商業(yè)
·   理財(cái)
·   職場(chǎng)
·   生活
·   視頻
·   博客

工具

·     微博
·     社區(qū)
·     RSS訂閱
內(nèi)容精華

·   500強(qiáng)
·   專欄
·   封面報(bào)道
·   創(chuàng)業(yè)
·   特寫
·   前沿
·   CEO訪談
博客

·   四不像
·   劉聰
·   東8時(shí)區(qū)
·   章勱聞
·   公司治理觀察
·   東山豹尉
·   山??纯?/font>
·   明心堂主
榜單

·   世界500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   中國(guó)500強(qiáng)排行榜
·   美國(guó)500強(qiáng)
·   最受贊賞的中國(guó)公司
·   中國(guó)5大適宜退休的城市
·   年度中國(guó)商人
·   50位商界女強(qiáng)人
·   100家增長(zhǎng)最快的公司
·   40位40歲以下的商業(yè)精英
·   100家最適宜工作的公司
精品国精品无码自拍自在线| 777米奇色狠狠888俺也去| 日韩精品中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇AV一区二区三区浪潮| 欧美日韩国产在线观看一区二区三区| 欧美人与动牲交a精品| 国产乱子夫妻XX黑人XYX真爽| 超薄丝袜足j一区二区三区| 国产成人无码AV在线播放不卡| 久久精品国产亚洲AV果冻传媒| 亚洲国产成人高清在线观看| 久久精品极品盛宴观看| 国产精品国内自产拍在线播放| 9 9久热RE在线精品视频| 国产成人无码的免费视频在线观看| 日韩精品中文一区二区| 日日摸夜夜添夜夜添高潮喷水| AV无码专区一线二线| 国产精品视频一区丝袜| 国产精品人人做人人爽人人添 | 精品国产乱码一区二区三区麻豆| 国产丝袜在线精品丝袜不卡| 精品亚洲人伦一区二区三区| 77777亚洲午夜久久多喷 | 婷婷五月开心亚洲综合在线| 一级做a爰片性色毛片成人久久久国产一级a毛| 道具抽插骚穴跳蛋玩弄奶头| 必看无人区一码二码三码| 毛片免费视频肛交颜射免费视频| 久久久精品国产亚洲综合久久久国产中文字幕免费| 一区二三国产好的精华液品牌| 国产在线精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲精品无码久久久久y| 日韩一区精品视频在线观看蜜桃| 日日狠狠久久偷偷色综合96蜜桃| 女人18毛片a级毛片女毛片| 无码专区无码专区视频网址| 国产在线精品一区二区不卡麻豆| 国产香线蕉手机视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美在线大香蕉| 亚洲成AV人片一区二区密柚|