成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開(kāi)
美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)會(huì)議紀(jì)要:伯南克故意放任雷曼倒閉

美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)會(huì)議紀(jì)要:伯南克故意放任雷曼倒閉

Christopher Matthews 2014-02-24
5年前,雷曼兄弟的倒閉啟動(dòng)了全球金融危機(jī)的多米諾骨牌。美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)曾聲稱,當(dāng)時(shí)已經(jīng)無(wú)力救助這家投行。但最近公布的會(huì)議紀(jì)要顯示,美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)當(dāng)時(shí)的不作為是伯南克主動(dòng)選擇的結(jié)果。 正如一些學(xué)者所說(shuō),這個(gè)決定是美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)歷史上最嚴(yán)重的錯(cuò)誤之一。

????美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)聲稱沒(méi)有救助雷曼兄弟的權(quán)利,這一點(diǎn)更可疑,而上周五上午公布的美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)2008年會(huì)議紀(jì)要進(jìn)一步削弱了這種說(shuō)法。對(duì)雷曼袖手旁觀的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)借口是,對(duì)面臨流動(dòng)性緊縮但仍具有償還能力的銀行,央行是最后的救助手段。也就是說(shuō),對(duì)于任何擁有抵押品的銀行,美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)都應(yīng)該出資救助。為什么不出手救助雷曼?伯南克曾經(jīng)這樣為自己的決定辯護(hù),他說(shuō),他無(wú)法提供任何救助,因?yàn)槔茁值芤呀?jīng)喪失了償還能力:

????雷曼兄弟本身可能是太大而不能倒,在某種意義上說(shuō),雷曼的倒閉會(huì)對(duì)全球金融體系產(chǎn)生巨大的負(fù)面影響,但我們卻束手無(wú)策,因?yàn)槔茁值鼙举|(zhì)上已資不抵債。

????但一家公司是資不抵債還是流動(dòng)性不足,這兩種情況之間并沒(méi)有涇渭分明的區(qū)別,而是取決于對(duì)一群神秘資產(chǎn)的評(píng)估方式。近期公布的會(huì)議紀(jì)要中美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)公開(kāi)市場(chǎng)委員會(huì)成員的意見(jiàn)顯示,讓雷曼倒閉的決定似乎緣于反對(duì)政府干預(yù)的意識(shí)形態(tài),而不是其他原因。下面是圣路易斯聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行行長(zhǎng)詹姆斯?布拉德于9月16日(雷曼破產(chǎn)后的第二天)發(fā)布的意見(jiàn):

????我的政策立場(chǎng)是,維持聯(lián)邦基金利率目標(biāo)在當(dāng)前的水平,等過(guò)段時(shí)間再來(lái)評(píng)估雷曼兄弟申請(qǐng)破產(chǎn)保護(hù)對(duì)國(guó)民經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響(如果確實(shí)有響的話)。美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)拒絕為雷曼兄弟的競(jìng)購(gòu)者提供資金擔(dān)保,由此已經(jīng)開(kāi)始重新確立一種意識(shí),即市場(chǎng)不能每次一碰到苦難的關(guān)鍵時(shí)刻就指望政府的救助。眼下變更利率會(huì)混淆這個(gè)重要信號(hào),抵消之前決策的大部分積極成果。

????當(dāng)然,事后諸葛亮是好當(dāng),但美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)成員認(rèn)為雷曼兄弟破產(chǎn)對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)幾乎沒(méi)有影響,這個(gè)觀點(diǎn)令人震驚。而且布拉德認(rèn)為,不救助雷曼兄弟的決定并非迫不得已,而是主動(dòng)選擇的結(jié)果。

????波士頓聯(lián)邦儲(chǔ)備銀行總裁羅森格倫也許是2008年美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)理事會(huì)中最有見(jiàn)地的一位成員,因?yàn)樗菫閿?shù)不多的贊成從9月份就開(kāi)始降息的人之一,而且,他還質(zhì)疑過(guò)任由雷曼兄弟倒閉的決定:

????我認(rèn)為,現(xiàn)在就判斷關(guān)于雷曼兄弟的決策是否正確還言之過(guò)早。鑒于財(cái)政部不愿意提供資金,我們別無(wú)選擇。但我們采取了經(jīng)過(guò)精心計(jì)算的策略。如果貨幣市場(chǎng)基金出現(xiàn)擠兌,或者說(shuō),如果非政府第三方回購(gòu)市場(chǎng)關(guān)閉,這個(gè)辦法的效果就會(huì)打折扣。

????羅森格倫的說(shuō)法是有點(diǎn)模糊不清。他認(rèn)為讓雷曼倒閉是“經(jīng)過(guò)精心計(jì)算的策略”,但又說(shuō)美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)“別無(wú)選擇”。但是這種似是而非的說(shuō)法也有點(diǎn)正當(dāng)?shù)睦碛?。從金融危機(jī)調(diào)查委員會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)的電子郵件來(lái)看,我們認(rèn)為美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)當(dāng)時(shí)顯然在考慮用2000億美元貸款來(lái)保住雷曼兄弟。這些電子郵件稱這種方式為“一場(chǎng)賭博”,也許值得一試。

????但美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)從來(lái)沒(méi)有真正嘗試過(guò)這種方式,而且似乎其中包含意識(shí)形態(tài)的原因。這就更加令人困惑,因?yàn)樵谶^(guò)去30年中,聯(lián)邦政府都會(huì)在危機(jī)時(shí)刻進(jìn)行干預(yù),以防止金融體系崩潰產(chǎn)生破壞性影響。有鑒于此,經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)家艾倫?梅爾策稱這項(xiàng)決定是“美聯(lián)儲(chǔ)歷史上最嚴(yán)重的錯(cuò)誤之一”。5年之后的今天,從最近發(fā)布的會(huì)議紀(jì)要來(lái)看,我們沒(méi)有理由不同意梅爾策的評(píng)價(jià)。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

????譯者:Lina

????

????The Fed's claim that it didn't have the power to save Lehman is much more dubious, and is further weakened by transcripts released Friday morning of the central bank's 2008 meetings. The standard excuse for its inaction on Lehman is that central banks should be the lender of last resort to banks that are in a liquidity crunch, but are still solvent. That is, the Fed should lend money to any bank that has collateral to offer. When defending his decision to not intervene with Lehman, Bernanke has claimed that he could not offer anything because the bank was insolvent:

????Lehman Brothers was in itself probably too big to fail, in the sense that its failure had enormous negative impacts on the global financial system ... But there we were helpless, because it was essentially an insolvent firm.

????But the difference between a firm being insolvent and illiquid isn't cut-and-dried, and it hinges on how you value a bunch of inscrutable assets. Based on the opinions of Federal Reserve Open Market Committee members revealed in the recently released minutes, the decision to let Lehman fail seems to have much more to do with an ideological aversion to government intervention than anything else. Here's St. Louis Fed President James Bullard on Sept. 16, the day after the Lehman bankruptcy:

????My policy preference is to maintain the federal funds rate target at the current level and to wait for some time to assess the impact of the Lehman bankruptcy filing, if any, on the national economy ... By denying funding to Lehman suitors, the Fed has begun to reestablish the idea that markets should not expect help at each difficult juncture. Changing rates today would confuse that important signal and take out much of the positive part out of the previous decision.

????Hindsight is 20/20, of course, but it is stunning that Fed members thought that the Lehman bankruptcy could conceivably have no effect on the economy. Notice as well that Bullard paints the decision to not save Lehman as not one of necessity but of choice.

????Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren was perhaps the most insightful member of the Fed Board in 2008, as he was one of the few in favor of lowering interest rates as early as September, and questions the wisdom of the decision to let Lehman fail:

????I think it's too soon to know whether what we did with Lehman is right. Given that the Treasury didn't want to put money in, what happened was that we had no choice. But we took a calculated bet. If we have a run on the money market funds or if the nongovernment tri-party repo market shuts down, that bet may not look nearly so good.

????Rosengren's statement is a bit murky here. He calls letting Lehman fail a "calculated bet" but then says that the Fed had "no choice." This waffling has the whiff of justification, however. In e-mailsunearthed by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, we can see that the Fed was clearly considering a $200 billion loan to help keep Lehman afloat. These emails called that approach "a gamble" that might be worth taking.

????But the Fed never took it, and it appears they did so at least partly for ideological reasons. This is all the more confusing because the federal government had spent the last 30 years intervening in crises to prevent destructive financial system meltdowns. In light of this, economist Alan Meltzer has called the decision "one of the worst blunders in Federal Reserve history." Five years later, the recently released transcripts give us no reason to disagree with Meltzer's assessment.

掃描二維碼下載財(cái)富APP
国产午夜福利片在线播放| 成人午夜性a一级毛片免费,| 夜夜高潮夜夜爽高清完整版1| 国产精品V欧美精品∨日韩| 中文字幕人妻丝袜美腿乱| 久久国产成人精品国产成人亚洲| 亚洲AV成人无码久久精品| 久久久久久久岛国免费AV| 欧洲变态另类zozo-av色国产色拍| 亚洲熟妇中文字幕日产无码| 丝袜美腿亚洲一区二区| 亚洲午夜无码久久久久小说| 欧美刺激视频中文字幕| 久久不卡免费视频久久高清精品| 亚洲精品国产综合无码| 欧美一级特黄大片色| 日本添下边视频全过程| 日本日本乱码伦视频在线观看| 人人狠狠综合久久88亚洲| 人妻无码中文久久久久专区| 久久人与动人物A级毛片| 忘忧草社区在线www韩国| 无码人妻精品一区二区| 波多野结衣二三区| 亚洲伊人久久精品影院| 久章草在线无码视频观看| 236宅宅理论片免费| av无码精品一区二区三区三级| 精品人妻系列无码天堂| 综合精品五月天喷水| 播放国产精品亚洲av综合成久久久久久三级| 欧美日韩视频一区二区三区。| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 久久久99久久久国产自输拍| 青青人妖无遮挡久久99国产一区二区三区亚洲一区影院午夜福利| 欧美一区二区三区放荡人妇| 国产香蕉一区二区三区在线视频| 久久午夜一级a毛片无码鲁丝片午夜精品| 波多野结衣中文字幕一区二区| 欧美乱人伦中文在线观看不卡| 亚洲AV无码一区二区三区少妇o|