成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

涉嫌盜竊谷歌機(jī)密,Uber前高管獲刑18個(gè)月

很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間以來(lái),這起案件都是硅谷最受關(guān)注、最知名的商業(yè)機(jī)密案。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

“Uber前高管盜竊谷歌商業(yè)機(jī)密”已成了硅谷最引人注目的案件之一——當(dāng)事人安東尼·萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基是一名無(wú)人駕駛技術(shù)工程師,曾就職于谷歌母公司Alphabet公司。而這位工程師在跳槽后,卻轉(zhuǎn)手將自己從谷歌竊取的商業(yè)機(jī)密賣給現(xiàn)任東家、谷歌在無(wú)人駕駛領(lǐng)域的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手Uber。萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基也因此被判處18個(gè)月的監(jiān)禁。

周二,美國(guó)地方法院法官威廉·阿爾蘇普在舊金山宣讀了這一判決。此前,盡管萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基請(qǐng)求“寬大處理”,檢察官卻毫不為之所動(dòng)——他們強(qiáng)烈要求把萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基關(guān)進(jìn)監(jiān)獄,以震懾這種“厚顏無(wú)恥到令人震驚”的行為。

這位工程師的落馬可謂一出將貪婪和背叛發(fā)揮到極致的大戲,讓所有涉案人員都顏面掃地。

硅谷商業(yè)機(jī)密法務(wù)部門的主任吉姆·普利說(shuō):“很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間以來(lái),這起案件都是硅谷最受關(guān)注、最知名的商業(yè)機(jī)密案?!?/p>

他說(shuō),這起案件之所以如此備受矚目,是因?yàn)槿R萬(wàn)多夫斯基作為一名掌握高精尖技術(shù)的行業(yè)領(lǐng)先者,“以一種既引人關(guān)注、又實(shí)為隱秘的方式”,明修棧道,暗度陳倉(cāng)——明面上高調(diào)地在谷歌和Uber這兩家強(qiáng)大的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手間橫跳,暗地里“牽連著一樁數(shù)億美元的交易。 ”

普雷說(shuō):“除了他,沒(méi)人能把這件事做得如此令人嘆為觀止?!?/p>

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基的罪狀使他面臨著牢獄之災(zāi),也讓他傾家蕩產(chǎn)。他在給阿爾蘇普法官的信中說(shuō),這幾年他還一直在法庭上狡辯,而最終的判決給他好好上了一課,教訓(xùn)他“人要謙卑”。他還曾因監(jiān)獄爆發(fā)疫情,請(qǐng)求法官判他在家中監(jiān)禁,否則可能相當(dāng)于判了他“死刑”。

阿爾蘇普法官審理了谷歌母公司Alphabet旗下的無(wú)人駕駛汽車部門Waymo在2017年對(duì)Uber提起的民事訴訟。Waymo指控稱,一年前,Uber從谷歌挖走了萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基,并從他盜取的商業(yè)秘密中獲利,萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基也因此被起訴。而在雙方就這起民事訴訟達(dá)到和解差不多一年之際,阿爾蘇普法官建議檢察官再次對(duì)萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基進(jìn)行刑事調(diào)查。

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基在谷歌任職期間,該公司還向他提供了一筆空前的巨款用于項(xiàng)目研發(fā),包括1.2億美元的獎(jiǎng)金——而在這起由自己的反水引起的民事仲裁中,僅向谷歌退回這筆款項(xiàng)就足以使他破產(chǎn)了。

Waymo在其民事訴訟中提供的證據(jù)表明,Uber一位不愿露面的前高管特拉維斯·卡蘭尼克欺騙了公司董事會(huì),給萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基開出空頭支票,承諾將以6.8億美元的高價(jià)收購(gòu)其公司Ottomotto,以引誘他從谷歌跳槽,而這樁以股票為基礎(chǔ)的交易從未付清——該密謀的相關(guān)細(xì)節(jié)在電郵和證詞中都得到了詳述。最終,Uber解雇了萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基。他們還預(yù)料到谷歌遲早會(huì)對(duì)此進(jìn)行報(bào)復(fù),因此承諾對(duì)萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基進(jìn)行法律保護(hù)。如今,該承諾也作廢了。

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基則在法庭文件中為自己辯稱,外界說(shuō)他“偷走了谷歌價(jià)值數(shù)十億美元的秘密為自己和Uber謀取私利”完全是一種“陰險(xiǎn)的表述”,讓他在媒體上飽受群嘲。他呼吁法官也抵制這套不實(shí)說(shuō)辭。

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基為自己辯護(hù)稱,在他被指控的33項(xiàng)罪名中,納入量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的應(yīng)該僅集中于他認(rèn)罪的那一項(xiàng)“商業(yè)秘密盜竊罪”:下載包含谷歌無(wú)人駕駛項(xiàng)目詳細(xì)信息的文件,包括該項(xiàng)目的目的,指標(biāo)及面臨著哪些挑戰(zhàn)、攻克了哪些難關(guān)等。

美國(guó)方面認(rèn)為,萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基與Uber的談判以及他對(duì)谷歌的背叛提供了重要的背景信息。圣塔克拉拉大學(xué)法學(xué)院的一名教授埃里克·高德曼說(shuō),負(fù)責(zé)該案的檢察官表示,“該案中的其他方面也疑點(diǎn)重重,即使不完全是犯罪行為……政府則認(rèn)為,這足以證明他惡劣的天性?!?/p>

高德曼說(shuō):“總的來(lái)說(shuō),如果萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基沒(méi)有為自己的所作所為受到應(yīng)有的制裁,實(shí)在是太不合理了——他為了一己私利,侵犯了這么多人的利益?!钡珜?duì)于萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基擔(dān)憂的“在監(jiān)獄中爆發(fā)新冠疫情”的狀況,這位教授則表示同情和理解:“他不應(yīng)該面臨病毒帶來(lái)的健康威脅,甚至因此死在獄中——這與他的罪行不相稱,不是他應(yīng)受的懲罰。”

三年前,當(dāng)Waymo起訴Uber時(shí),雙方在庭前就萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基如何影響他們?cè)谛屡d的無(wú)人駕駛汽車市場(chǎng)中的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)爆發(fā)了激烈的爭(zhēng)論。如今,鳳凰城的Waymo是美國(guó)市面上唯一的付費(fèi)無(wú)人駕駛汽車。而Uber的無(wú)人駕駛研發(fā)部門Advanced Technologies Group尚未在其商業(yè)布局中敲定發(fā)布無(wú)人駕駛汽車的確切日期。

與此同時(shí),萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基成立了一家名為Pronto的新公司,生產(chǎn)一種無(wú)需依賴激光雷達(dá)的卡車安全系統(tǒng),可幫助無(wú)人駕駛汽車熟悉周圍環(huán)境。該技術(shù)也是Waymo對(duì)Uber的訴訟中涉及的爭(zhēng)議部分。在寫給阿爾蘇普法官的信中,萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基請(qǐng)求法官對(duì)他從輕發(fā)落,以使其能繼續(xù)“通過(guò)技術(shù)推動(dòng)世界進(jìn)步”。

高德曼說(shuō):“有些人的行徑在我們看來(lái)足以終結(jié)其職業(yè)生涯,然而他們卻能恢復(fù)聲譽(yù)……這可能要花點(diǎn)時(shí)間,但對(duì)那些能創(chuàng)造高價(jià)值的人來(lái)說(shuō),硅谷對(duì)他們先前的罪行是很健忘的?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

編譯:陳聰聰

“Uber前高管盜竊谷歌商業(yè)機(jī)密”已成了硅谷最引人注目的案件之一——當(dāng)事人安東尼·萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基是一名無(wú)人駕駛技術(shù)工程師,曾就職于谷歌母公司Alphabet公司。而這位工程師在跳槽后,卻轉(zhuǎn)手將自己從谷歌竊取的商業(yè)機(jī)密賣給現(xiàn)任東家、谷歌在無(wú)人駕駛領(lǐng)域的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手Uber。萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基也因此被判處18個(gè)月的監(jiān)禁。

周二,美國(guó)地方法院法官威廉·阿爾蘇普在舊金山宣讀了這一判決。此前,盡管萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基請(qǐng)求“寬大處理”,檢察官卻毫不為之所動(dòng)——他們強(qiáng)烈要求把萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基關(guān)進(jìn)監(jiān)獄,以震懾這種“厚顏無(wú)恥到令人震驚”的行為。

這位工程師的落馬可謂一出將貪婪和背叛發(fā)揮到極致的大戲,讓所有涉案人員都顏面掃地。

硅谷商業(yè)機(jī)密法務(wù)部門的主任吉姆·普利說(shuō):“很長(zhǎng)一段時(shí)間以來(lái),這起案件都是硅谷最受關(guān)注、最知名的商業(yè)機(jī)密案?!?/p>

他說(shuō),這起案件之所以如此備受矚目,是因?yàn)槿R萬(wàn)多夫斯基作為一名掌握高精尖技術(shù)的行業(yè)領(lǐng)先者,“以一種既引人關(guān)注、又實(shí)為隱秘的方式”,明修棧道,暗度陳倉(cāng)——明面上高調(diào)地在谷歌和Uber這兩家強(qiáng)大的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手間橫跳,暗地里“牽連著一樁數(shù)億美元的交易。 ”

普雷說(shuō):“除了他,沒(méi)人能把這件事做得如此令人嘆為觀止?!?/p>

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基的罪狀使他面臨著牢獄之災(zāi),也讓他傾家蕩產(chǎn)。他在給阿爾蘇普法官的信中說(shuō),這幾年他還一直在法庭上狡辯,而最終的判決給他好好上了一課,教訓(xùn)他“人要謙卑”。他還曾因監(jiān)獄爆發(fā)疫情,請(qǐng)求法官判他在家中監(jiān)禁,否則可能相當(dāng)于判了他“死刑”。

阿爾蘇普法官審理了谷歌母公司Alphabet旗下的無(wú)人駕駛汽車部門Waymo在2017年對(duì)Uber提起的民事訴訟。Waymo指控稱,一年前,Uber從谷歌挖走了萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基,并從他盜取的商業(yè)秘密中獲利,萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基也因此被起訴。而在雙方就這起民事訴訟達(dá)到和解差不多一年之際,阿爾蘇普法官建議檢察官再次對(duì)萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基進(jìn)行刑事調(diào)查。

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基在谷歌任職期間,該公司還向他提供了一筆空前的巨款用于項(xiàng)目研發(fā),包括1.2億美元的獎(jiǎng)金——而在這起由自己的反水引起的民事仲裁中,僅向谷歌退回這筆款項(xiàng)就足以使他破產(chǎn)了。

Waymo在其民事訴訟中提供的證據(jù)表明,Uber一位不愿露面的前高管特拉維斯·卡蘭尼克欺騙了公司董事會(huì),給萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基開出空頭支票,承諾將以6.8億美元的高價(jià)收購(gòu)其公司Ottomotto,以引誘他從谷歌跳槽,而這樁以股票為基礎(chǔ)的交易從未付清——該密謀的相關(guān)細(xì)節(jié)在電郵和證詞中都得到了詳述。最終,Uber解雇了萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基。他們還預(yù)料到谷歌遲早會(huì)對(duì)此進(jìn)行報(bào)復(fù),因此承諾對(duì)萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基進(jìn)行法律保護(hù)。如今,該承諾也作廢了。

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基則在法庭文件中為自己辯稱,外界說(shuō)他“偷走了谷歌價(jià)值數(shù)十億美元的秘密為自己和Uber謀取私利”完全是一種“陰險(xiǎn)的表述”,讓他在媒體上飽受群嘲。他呼吁法官也抵制這套不實(shí)說(shuō)辭。

萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基為自己辯護(hù)稱,在他被指控的33項(xiàng)罪名中,納入量刑標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的應(yīng)該僅集中于他認(rèn)罪的那一項(xiàng)“商業(yè)秘密盜竊罪”:下載包含谷歌無(wú)人駕駛項(xiàng)目詳細(xì)信息的文件,包括該項(xiàng)目的目的,指標(biāo)及面臨著哪些挑戰(zhàn)、攻克了哪些難關(guān)等。

美國(guó)方面認(rèn)為,萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基與Uber的談判以及他對(duì)谷歌的背叛提供了重要的背景信息。圣塔克拉拉大學(xué)法學(xué)院的一名教授埃里克·高德曼說(shuō),負(fù)責(zé)該案的檢察官表示,“該案中的其他方面也疑點(diǎn)重重,即使不完全是犯罪行為……政府則認(rèn)為,這足以證明他惡劣的天性?!?/p>

高德曼說(shuō):“總的來(lái)說(shuō),如果萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基沒(méi)有為自己的所作所為受到應(yīng)有的制裁,實(shí)在是太不合理了——他為了一己私利,侵犯了這么多人的利益?!钡珜?duì)于萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基擔(dān)憂的“在監(jiān)獄中爆發(fā)新冠疫情”的狀況,這位教授則表示同情和理解:“他不應(yīng)該面臨病毒帶來(lái)的健康威脅,甚至因此死在獄中——這與他的罪行不相稱,不是他應(yīng)受的懲罰。”

三年前,當(dāng)Waymo起訴Uber時(shí),雙方在庭前就萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基如何影響他們?cè)谛屡d的無(wú)人駕駛汽車市場(chǎng)中的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)爆發(fā)了激烈的爭(zhēng)論。如今,鳳凰城的Waymo是美國(guó)市面上唯一的付費(fèi)無(wú)人駕駛汽車。而Uber的無(wú)人駕駛研發(fā)部門Advanced Technologies Group尚未在其商業(yè)布局中敲定發(fā)布無(wú)人駕駛汽車的確切日期。

與此同時(shí),萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基成立了一家名為Pronto的新公司,生產(chǎn)一種無(wú)需依賴激光雷達(dá)的卡車安全系統(tǒng),可幫助無(wú)人駕駛汽車熟悉周圍環(huán)境。該技術(shù)也是Waymo對(duì)Uber的訴訟中涉及的爭(zhēng)議部分。在寫給阿爾蘇普法官的信中,萊萬(wàn)多夫斯基請(qǐng)求法官對(duì)他從輕發(fā)落,以使其能繼續(xù)“通過(guò)技術(shù)推動(dòng)世界進(jìn)步”。

高德曼說(shuō):“有些人的行徑在我們看來(lái)足以終結(jié)其職業(yè)生涯,然而他們卻能恢復(fù)聲譽(yù)……這可能要花點(diǎn)時(shí)間,但對(duì)那些能創(chuàng)造高價(jià)值的人來(lái)說(shuō),硅谷對(duì)他們先前的罪行是很健忘的。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

編譯:陳聰聰

Autonomous driving engineer Anthony Levandowski was ordered to spend 18 months prison for stealing trade secrets from Google as he defected to Uber Technologies Inc., in one of the highest-profile criminal cases to hit Silicon Valley.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup in San Francisco imposed the sentence Tuesday after Levandowski pleaded for mercy and prosecutors urged jail time as a deterrent for “brazen and shocking” conduct.

The engineer’s downfall is a saga of avarice and betrayal that left all involved looking bad.

“This was the most-watched, highest-visibility trade secrets case in a long, long time,” said Jim Pooley, a dean of trade secrets law in the Valley.

It was compelling, he said, because as a leader of cutting-edge technology, Levandowski moved between powerful competitors “in a way that was both spectacular and secretive at the same time,” and “with hundreds of millions of dollars being thrown around.”

“Nobody came out of this looking especially terrific,” Pooley said.

The engineer’s guilty plea leaves him a bankrupted convicted felon. His last few years of courtroom battles, he said in a letter to Alsup, have been a “grueling lesson in humility.” Levandowski had asked for a sentence of home confinement due to Covid-19 infections in prisons that he said could amount to a “death sentence.”

Alsup oversaw the civil suit that Alphabet Inc.’s driverless car unit, Waymo, brought against Uber in 2017 alleging the ride-hailing company profited from Levandowski’s theft of secrets when it recruited him away from Alphabet’s Google a year earlier. Almost a full year before the suit settled at trial, Alsup recommended prosecutors criminally investigate Levandowski. He was indicted a year ago.

During Levandowski’s years at Google, the company heaped unprecedented sums on the engineer, including a $120 million bonus –- only to claw it all back, and more, in a bruising civil arbitration over his defection that drove him into bankruptcy.

Waymo’s civil suit produced evidence that Uber’s shunned former chief Travis Kalanick duped his company’s board in order to lure Levandowski away from Google with a $680 million acquisition of his company, Ottomotto. The stock-based deal never paid out, and the cloak-and-dagger move detailed in emails and testimony ultimately ended with Uber firing Levandowski and later abandoning the legal cover it promised him against Google’s anticipated reprisal.

Levandowski, in a court filing, urged the judge to resist the “sinister narrative” that he stole secrets worth billions of dollars to enrich himself and Uber –- for which he was pilloried in the media.

Of the 33 counts he was charged with, Levandowski argued his sentencing should be narrowly focused on the single trade-secret theft count to which he pleaded guilty: downloading Google files that included details about its driverless program’s goals, metrics, and challenges the company faced and overcame.

The U.S. argued Levandowski’s negotiations with Uber and his defection from Google provide important context. Prosecutors are saying “all these other things were dubious if not outright criminal as well,” said Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University’s law school. “The government’s position is that’s absolutely fair game to show this is his nature.”

“In the abstract, I think it’s unconscionable that Levandowski doesn’t serve prison time for what he did -- he created so many challenges for so many people because of his own self-interest,” Goldman said. But the professor also expressed sympathy for Levandowski’s concerns about the coronavirus threat in prison. “He shouldn’t suffer a major health crisis, or death, from the virus as part of the punishment –- that’s not proportionate to his crime.”

When Waymo sued Uber more than three years ago, both sides pounded the courtroom podium with urgent arguments about how Levandowski might propel or hobble their position in the nascent driverless car market. Today, the only paid-for driverless rides in the U.S. are in Waymo cars in Phoenix. Uber’s driverless unit, Advanced Technologies Group, hasn’t set a date for providing self-driving cars on its network.

Levandowski, meanwhile, has started a new company, Pronto, which makes safety systems for trucks -– without relying on lidar, the technology at issue in Waymo’s suit against Uber that helps autonomous vehicles see their surroundings. In his letter to Alsup, the engineer asked for a sentence that would help him continue “advancing the world through technology.”

“We’ve seen so many people in Silicon Valley resurrect their reputation after what we thought would be career-ending moves,” Goldman said. “It might take him a little time, but the Valley has a short memory of prior sins for people who can deliver high value.”

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章
日韩人妻无码专区一本二本| 亚洲AV无码成人专区片在线观看| 日韩人妻无码专区综合网| 国产美女自为喷水视频| 少妇无码太爽了在线播放| 亚洲中文字幕久久精品无码a| 欧美性xxxxx极品老少| 午夜影视免费观看| 亚洲伊人成色综合国产高清精品毛片| 国产特级毛片AAAAAA高清| 亚洲av无码av在线播放| 精品人妻aⅴ区乱码久久蜜臀| 99在线精品免费视频九九视| 欧美亚洲国产一区二区三区| 嘿咻视频无码免费区在线观看| 精品国产人成在线| 成人免费777777被爆出| 国产成人a一级视频在线观看| 精品卡通动漫在线观看视频一区| 一区二区三区免费av| 亚洲中文字幕久久无码| 色偷偷免费av男人的天堂| 亚洲一区二区三区爽爽爽| 久久精品国产99久久6动漫| 无码AⅤ精品影院| 国产成人Av区一区二区三| 中文字幕专区高清在线观看| 性按摩xxxx在线观看| 亚洲中文字幕无码天然素人| 色综合热无码热国产| 日本xxxx高清色视频在线播放| 精品一区二区三区中文字幕| 国产精品无码不卡一区二区三区| 91免费视频在线观看| 熟年交尾五十路视频在线播放| 色AV永久无码影院AV| 蜜臀AV无码国产精品色午夜麻豆| 亚洲熟妇AV一区二区三区浪潮| 夜夜夜夜曰天天天天| 亚洲AV日韩AV永久无码免下载| 少妇高潮喷水惨叫久久久|