data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/97c3d/97c3d867dc62838bbeda924c2f4d8fb2519faa30" alt=""
一家初創(chuàng)公司成為“獨角獸”,即作為私有公司市值達(dá)到10億美元,曾經(jīng)是一個令人羨慕的身份。十年前獨角獸公司只有80家。后來零利率時代帶來的繁榮,使獨角獸公司的數(shù)量到2024年初超過1,200家。但投資這些公司的風(fēng)險投資家們卻有一個迫切的問題:他們能否順利退出?
所謂的“獨角獸時代”已經(jīng)結(jié)束,取而代之的是公開市場的冰凍期,《財富》雜志在1月發(fā)表的封面文章中將其稱為“獨角獸消亡時代”。隨著加息和政府監(jiān)管部門對并購活動的打擊,那些以前可以獲得數(shù)十億美元融資的公司發(fā)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)在很難取得成功,有許多公司在不太寬容的金融環(huán)境下折戟沉沙。
在周二舉辦的《財富》科技頭腦風(fēng)暴大會上,來自谷歌(Google)獨立成長基金CapitalG和諾威斯特(Norwest)等風(fēng)險投資公司的多位知名投資人匯聚一堂,討論了他們?nèi)绾螒?yīng)對新現(xiàn)實,以及未來幾年IPO市場是否會復(fù)蘇。討論的結(jié)果喜憂參半,大多數(shù)投資者都認(rèn)為,2021年IPO市場的繁榮,導(dǎo)致投資者對初創(chuàng)公司產(chǎn)生了不切實際和不負(fù)責(zé)任的預(yù)期。Renegade Partners聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼總經(jīng)理雷娜塔·昆蒂尼表示:“我們來這里不是為了預(yù)測市場時機?!?/p>
是否進(jìn)行IPO
雖然2021年經(jīng)歷了火爆的公開募股市場,但隨著加息,投資者紛紛轉(zhuǎn)投國債等更安全的資產(chǎn),IPO數(shù)量銳減。因此,對于科技公司而言,IPO作為曾經(jīng)可靠的退出策略,已經(jīng)不再是一個選項。
CapitalG合伙人吉爾·格林伯格·蔡斯表示,最近Reddit和Rubric等科技公司的IPO大獲成功,使市場狀況似乎有所好轉(zhuǎn)。這兩家公司的股價依舊高于發(fā)行價。她表示:“我們需要更多這樣的公司。在看到更多數(shù)據(jù)之前,我們認(rèn)為IPO市場直到2025年年初都難有起色?!?/p>
這可能依舊過于樂觀。藍(lán)寶石創(chuàng)投(Sapphire Ventures)聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼總裁賈伊·達(dá)斯表示,他認(rèn)為最糟糕的階段尚未結(jié)束,2021年和2022年的風(fēng)險投資熱潮,使公司坐擁過多現(xiàn)金,卻沒有創(chuàng)造出在公開市場上足以吸引更謹(jǐn)慎的投資者的數(shù)據(jù)。相反,他預(yù)測科技公司將繼續(xù)求助于私募股權(quán)公司,因為后者支付的估值倍數(shù),通常遠(yuǎn)低于風(fēng)險投資公司所追求的倍數(shù)。
由于監(jiān)管機構(gòu)更嚴(yán)格的態(tài)度,另外一種退出途徑也已經(jīng)關(guān)閉。美國司法部和聯(lián)邦貿(mào)易委員會(Federal Trade Commission)對大規(guī)模交易的審查變得更加嚴(yán)格,例如Adobe在2023年晚些時候放棄了以200億美元收購設(shè)計軟件公司Figma的計劃。昆蒂尼表示:“這肯定會抑制創(chuàng)新。”
周日,《華爾街日報》的一篇報道稱,谷歌以230億美元收購網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全公司W(wǎng)iz的計劃,已經(jīng)進(jìn)入后期談判階段。這筆交易如果順利完成,則意味著并購市場復(fù)蘇,但在周二的專家討論中,嘉賓們均表現(xiàn)出謹(jǐn)慎樂觀的態(tài)度。
盡管市場形勢日趨緊張,但風(fēng)險投資家們一致認(rèn)為,尤其是在市場崩潰前,風(fēng)險投資公司在沒有清晰的可持續(xù)營收途徑的初創(chuàng)公司投入大量資金之后,對所投資的公司抱有更現(xiàn)實的預(yù)期,可以使科技生態(tài)系統(tǒng)變得更健康。諾威斯特合伙人麗莎·吳表示:“自然會有一些后遺癥?!?/p>
唯一的例外是人工智能,在該領(lǐng)域領(lǐng)先的公司依舊能獲得2021年的估值。在沒有明確了解人工智能的整體潛在市場(TAM)的情況下,蔡斯表示她會選擇“你需要相信的估值方法”,即嘗試?yán)斫夤镜幕局笜?biāo),以及這些公司如何實現(xiàn)增長,以證明其融資的合理性。她說道:“這種技術(shù)潛力巨大。我們在評估市場規(guī)模時,需要采取截然不同的方式。”
當(dāng)然,麥德羅納風(fēng)險投資集團(tuán)(Madrona Venture Group)的總經(jīng)理馬特·麥基爾韋恩表示,無論是技術(shù)的能力還是客戶的需求,人工智能市場正在快速進(jìn)化。他認(rèn)為,以這些人工智能的能力為基礎(chǔ)創(chuàng)建并且可以為客戶創(chuàng)造真正價值的初創(chuàng)公司,將在人工智能時代的下一個階段占據(jù)優(yōu)勢。
麥基爾韋恩表示,目前OpenAI的GPT和谷歌的Gemini等大語言模型吸引了大量關(guān)注,但最重要的人工智能模式“是商業(yè)模式”。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
風(fēng)險投資公司諾威斯特創(chuàng)投的合伙人麗莎·吳STEVE VARGO/FORTUNE
一家初創(chuàng)公司成為“獨角獸”,即作為私有公司市值達(dá)到10億美元,曾經(jīng)是一個令人羨慕的身份。十年前獨角獸公司只有80家。后來零利率時代帶來的繁榮,使獨角獸公司的數(shù)量到2024年初超過1,200家。但投資這些公司的風(fēng)險投資家們卻有一個迫切的問題:他們能否順利退出?
所謂的“獨角獸時代”已經(jīng)結(jié)束,取而代之的是公開市場的冰凍期,《財富》雜志在1月發(fā)表的封面文章中將其稱為“獨角獸消亡時代”。隨著加息和政府監(jiān)管部門對并購活動的打擊,那些以前可以獲得數(shù)十億美元融資的公司發(fā)現(xiàn)現(xiàn)在很難取得成功,有許多公司在不太寬容的金融環(huán)境下折戟沉沙。
在周二舉辦的《財富》科技頭腦風(fēng)暴大會上,來自谷歌(Google)獨立成長基金CapitalG和諾威斯特(Norwest)等風(fēng)險投資公司的多位知名投資人匯聚一堂,討論了他們?nèi)绾螒?yīng)對新現(xiàn)實,以及未來幾年IPO市場是否會復(fù)蘇。討論的結(jié)果喜憂參半,大多數(shù)投資者都認(rèn)為,2021年IPO市場的繁榮,導(dǎo)致投資者對初創(chuàng)公司產(chǎn)生了不切實際和不負(fù)責(zé)任的預(yù)期。Renegade Partners聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼總經(jīng)理雷娜塔·昆蒂尼表示:“我們來這里不是為了預(yù)測市場時機?!?/p>
是否進(jìn)行IPO
雖然2021年經(jīng)歷了火爆的公開募股市場,但隨著加息,投資者紛紛轉(zhuǎn)投國債等更安全的資產(chǎn),IPO數(shù)量銳減。因此,對于科技公司而言,IPO作為曾經(jīng)可靠的退出策略,已經(jīng)不再是一個選項。
CapitalG合伙人吉爾·格林伯格·蔡斯表示,最近Reddit和Rubric等科技公司的IPO大獲成功,使市場狀況似乎有所好轉(zhuǎn)。這兩家公司的股價依舊高于發(fā)行價。她表示:“我們需要更多這樣的公司。在看到更多數(shù)據(jù)之前,我們認(rèn)為IPO市場直到2025年年初都難有起色?!?/p>
這可能依舊過于樂觀。藍(lán)寶石創(chuàng)投(Sapphire Ventures)聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人兼總裁賈伊·達(dá)斯表示,他認(rèn)為最糟糕的階段尚未結(jié)束,2021年和2022年的風(fēng)險投資熱潮,使公司坐擁過多現(xiàn)金,卻沒有創(chuàng)造出在公開市場上足以吸引更謹(jǐn)慎的投資者的數(shù)據(jù)。相反,他預(yù)測科技公司將繼續(xù)求助于私募股權(quán)公司,因為后者支付的估值倍數(shù),通常遠(yuǎn)低于風(fēng)險投資公司所追求的倍數(shù)。
由于監(jiān)管機構(gòu)更嚴(yán)格的態(tài)度,另外一種退出途徑也已經(jīng)關(guān)閉。美國司法部和聯(lián)邦貿(mào)易委員會(Federal Trade Commission)對大規(guī)模交易的審查變得更加嚴(yán)格,例如Adobe在2023年晚些時候放棄了以200億美元收購設(shè)計軟件公司Figma的計劃。昆蒂尼表示:“這肯定會抑制創(chuàng)新?!?/p>
周日,《華爾街日報》的一篇報道稱,谷歌以230億美元收購網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全公司W(wǎng)iz的計劃,已經(jīng)進(jìn)入后期談判階段。這筆交易如果順利完成,則意味著并購市場復(fù)蘇,但在周二的專家討論中,嘉賓們均表現(xiàn)出謹(jǐn)慎樂觀的態(tài)度。
盡管市場形勢日趨緊張,但風(fēng)險投資家們一致認(rèn)為,尤其是在市場崩潰前,風(fēng)險投資公司在沒有清晰的可持續(xù)營收途徑的初創(chuàng)公司投入大量資金之后,對所投資的公司抱有更現(xiàn)實的預(yù)期,可以使科技生態(tài)系統(tǒng)變得更健康。諾威斯特合伙人麗莎·吳表示:“自然會有一些后遺癥?!?/p>
唯一的例外是人工智能,在該領(lǐng)域領(lǐng)先的公司依舊能獲得2021年的估值。在沒有明確了解人工智能的整體潛在市場(TAM)的情況下,蔡斯表示她會選擇“你需要相信的估值方法”,即嘗試?yán)斫夤镜幕局笜?biāo),以及這些公司如何實現(xiàn)增長,以證明其融資的合理性。她說道:“這種技術(shù)潛力巨大。我們在評估市場規(guī)模時,需要采取截然不同的方式?!?/p>
當(dāng)然,麥德羅納風(fēng)險投資集團(tuán)(Madrona Venture Group)的總經(jīng)理馬特·麥基爾韋恩表示,無論是技術(shù)的能力還是客戶的需求,人工智能市場正在快速進(jìn)化。他認(rèn)為,以這些人工智能的能力為基礎(chǔ)創(chuàng)建并且可以為客戶創(chuàng)造真正價值的初創(chuàng)公司,將在人工智能時代的下一個階段占據(jù)優(yōu)勢。
麥基爾韋恩表示,目前OpenAI的GPT和谷歌的Gemini等大語言模型吸引了大量關(guān)注,但最重要的人工智能模式“是商業(yè)模式”。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
Lisa Wu, Partner, Norwest Venture Partners
For a startup to earn the moniker “unicorn”— attaining a valuation of $1 billion as a private company—was once a vaunted status. Just a decade ago, only 80 companies had joined the club. Then came the boom of the zero-interest rate era, pushing the number above 1,200 by the beginning of 2024. But the venture capitalists who backed them have a burning question: Will they ever achieve an exit?
The so-called “age of the unicorns” has given way to a freezing of public markets, which Fortune deemed the “age of the unicorpses” in a cover story in January. With interest rates rising and government regulators striking down acquisitions, all of the companies that were able to rake in billions in funding have now found themselves struggling to achieve a successful outcome, with many folding against a less forgiving financial landscape.
At Fortune‘s Brainstorm Tech conference on Tuesday, a panel of top investors from firms including Google’s independent growth fund CapitalG and the multi-billion-dollar firm Norwest discussed how they are coping with the new reality and whether IPO markets will open back up within the next couple of years. The conclusions were mixed, with most agreeing that the heady days of 2021 created unrealistic—and irresponsible—expectations for startups. “We’re not here to time the market,” said Renata Quintini, the cofounder and managing director of Renegade Partners.
To IPO or not to IPO
While 2021 saw a blazing market for public offerings, the number shrunk as interest rates rose and investors turned to safer bets like treasuries. As a result, the once reliable exit strategy for tech companies of an IPO evaporated as an option.
Jill Greenberg Chase, a partner at CapitalG, said that conditions seemed to be thawing thanks to the success of recent tech IPOs, including Reddit and Rubric, whose stocks have remained above their initial price. “We need more of those,” she said. “Until we see more datapoints, we won’t see an IPO market until the beginning of 2025.”
Even that could be too rosy a timeline. Jai Das, the cofounder and president of Sapphire Ventures, said that he doesn’t think the worst is over, with companies still overloaded with cash from the venture craze of 2021 and 2022 but not generating the numbers needed to attract more cautious investors in public markets. Instead, he predicted that tech companies will continue to turn to private equity firms, who traditionally will pay much lower multiples than venture firms chase.
Another exit strategy—mergers and acquisitions—has also closed up due to a more stringent approach from regulators. Both the Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission have provided more scrutiny to proposed mega-deals, including Adobe’s planned $20 billion takeover of the design software maker Figma, which it abandoned in late 2023. “It definitely stifles innovation,” said Quintini.
On Sunday, the Wall Street Journal reported that Google was in late-stage discussions to acquire the cybersecurity firm Wiz for $23 billion. If successful, the deal could signal a return of the M&A market, although the panelists on Tuesday expressed cautious optimism.
Despite the tighter landscape, the VCs agreed that a more realistic approach to the expectations of portfolio companies could lead to a healthier tech ecosystem, especially after firms threw massive sums of money at startups without clear paths to sustainable revenue before the market collapsed. “Naturally, there’s going to be a hangover,” said Lisa Wu, a partner at Norwest.
The only exception is AI, with top companies still commanding 2021-sized valuations. Without a clear understanding of what the total addressable market, or TAM, of AI products could be, Chase said that she turns to “what you need to believe math,” or trying to understand the underlying metrics of companies and how they might grow to justify funding rounds. “There’s so much potential for so much of this technology,” she said. “It’s a completely different paradigm for how we’re thinking about market size.”
Of course, the AI market is evolving rapidly, both in terms of the capability of the technology as well as the needs of the customers, said Matt McIlwain, Managing Director at Madrona Venture Group. The startups that build on top of these AI capabilities and deliver real value to customers will be positioned for next phase of the AI era, he said.
A lot of attention right now is focused on large language models like OpenAI’s GPT an Google’s Gemini McIlwain said, but the most important AI model “is the business model.”