凌晨3點(diǎn),娜塔莎·斯科特依舊無眠,因?yàn)橛甑吻么蛟诜寇嚨能図?,窗外還有動物的叫聲。她的臥室與外面世界之間的屏障只有一層薄薄的車皮。
她對《財(cái)富》雜志表示,這種時(shí)候讓她感覺“舉世只剩下自己一個(gè)人類”。33歲的斯科特來自亞特蘭大。她說那個(gè)晚上讓她意識到,社交媒體上宣傳的那種迷人的房車生活,只是“在美化無家可歸的狀態(tài)”。
你很容易就能刷到一家人把全家財(cái)物塞到房車?yán)锟鞓烦霭l(fā)的生活方式視頻。這類生活方式在社交媒體上被冠以房車生活(#vanlife)的標(biāo)簽,在Instagram上的引用次數(shù)達(dá)到1,390萬,在TikTok上的視頻觀看次數(shù)達(dá)到107億。2010年代,這種另類生活方式在追求游牧探險(xiǎn)的千禧一代中開始流行。疫情期間,它成為遠(yuǎn)程辦公者的生活方式之一,也為在通脹高企的情況下不想買房或租房的人們提供了一種更經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)惠的替代選擇,因此快速走紅。
房車生活被美化成一種神奇的、簡樸的生活方式,自然吸引了斯科特。她曾經(jīng)是一位飛行員招募員,還有一份副業(yè)。在看過YouTube和TikTok“推薦”頁面推送的房車生活視頻之后,她經(jīng)常夢想著要嘗試一下這種游牧式的生活方式。
去年,收到一居室公寓漲房租的通知之后,她終于下定了決心。她用自己的儲蓄,以5,000美元的價(jià)格買了一輛沒有改裝的房車(沒有鋪地毯和管道)。
但斯科特很快就發(fā)現(xiàn),房車生活實(shí)際上并不像聽起來那么美好,于是她開始通過TikTok賬號@nomadgonewrong記錄這種田園詩一般的生活方式如何變得令人失望。她在這個(gè)月將賬號更名為@nomadgoneright。她說,汽油價(jià)格昂貴,在馬路上很孤獨(dú),而且房車經(jīng)常需要維修。這種生活方式讓她非常緊張。
斯科特表示:“房車生活比視頻中看起來更艱難。實(shí)話實(shí)說,它比我想象的更難?!?/p>
將生活方式內(nèi)容搬到現(xiàn)實(shí)當(dāng)中,并不像看上去那么美好
開始房車生活后不久,斯科特在一輪裁員中失去了飛行員招募員的工作,只能依靠自由職業(yè)維持生計(jì)。收入不穩(wěn)定增加了在馬路上生活的難度。
斯科特說,沒有房子,通貨膨脹還導(dǎo)致日常用品價(jià)格上漲,因此她發(fā)現(xiàn)為了讓房車更適合居住,她在汽油和食物以及其他方面的支出越來越多。她還有一些意外的應(yīng)急支出,包括經(jīng)歷了一次爆胎。
斯科特表示:“如果你想削減財(cái)務(wù)支出,只能吃垃圾食品?!彼硎荆缃幻襟w上描繪的房車生活,并沒有展示你依靠從加油站購買的食物為生的部分。她感覺,人們往往會描繪快樂的房車生活,躺在草坪躺椅上,放松地享用烤漢堡,但從來沒有人說過車?yán)镉卸酂幔蛘咭坏┫掠?,你就只能被困在車?yán)?。他們也沒有展示在沒有改裝的房車?yán)锷顣r(shí),如何洗澡或找衛(wèi)生間。
如果遇到極端天氣,或者晚上感覺不安全,她會選擇住Airbnb民宿。她意識到,要把房車改造得適宜居住難度太大,于是她最終賣掉了這輛車,換了一輛更容易改造的房車。
在整個(gè)過程中,斯科特完全依靠自己,沒有家人的支持。
數(shù)字游牧還是無家可歸?
斯科特的現(xiàn)實(shí)遭遇,在試圖模仿房車生活內(nèi)容的許多人身上都在上演。內(nèi)容創(chuàng)作者吉恩和謝伊擁有社交賬號@geneandshay。他們生活在一輛經(jīng)過改造的房車?yán)?,在視頻中分享了這種生活方式的缺點(diǎn),例如無休無止的維修,而且當(dāng)車?yán)锾珶犭y以入睡的時(shí)候還需要花錢住酒店。@bylandnjeep說的很直白:“房車生活網(wǎng)紅文化都是垃圾。”
斯科特表示,有創(chuàng)作者跟她說他們也有類似的經(jīng)歷。與此同時(shí),她的視頻也招致了一些人的批評,有人認(rèn)為斯科特最初開始這種生活方式就是錯誤的選擇。但她認(rèn)為這是因?yàn)槿藗儾幌敕寇嚿畹幕孟氡淮蚱?。斯科特表示,這些人在社交媒體上走紅,他們都有相同的富有魅力的敘事。而她所展示的是日常生活。斯科特解釋說:“但你應(yīng)該對這些內(nèi)容保密,而不是將它們公布于眾。”
掩蓋問題會在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上引發(fā)誤解。社交媒體是一個(gè)高度個(gè)性化的廣告工具,可能被用于讓年輕觀眾誤以為他們需要購買某件物品或一種生活方式。據(jù)銀率網(wǎng)(Bankrate)調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn),64%的社交媒體用戶表示后悔看過廣告之后沖動購物。而像斯科特這樣將儲蓄全部投入到一種與宣傳不符的生活方式,自然更加失望,這并不令人意外。
當(dāng)亞特蘭大的無家可歸者問斯科特是否需要幫助時(shí),她開始質(zhì)疑人們?nèi)绾慰创?。她說道:“除了在社交媒體上,沒有人認(rèn)為這是一種房車生活,而是覺得這就是無家可歸?!?
斯科特建議人們在開始房車生活之前做好調(diào)研,而不是以身試險(xiǎn),可以先嘗試三周,因?yàn)槿苤蟆懊墼缕凇笨赡芤呀?jīng)結(jié)束了。
她目前依舊在記錄自己的體驗(yàn),反駁那些她認(rèn)為在TikTok上無處不在的單方面敘事。她已經(jīng)放棄了房車生活,說這段時(shí)間讓她損失慘重。她目前住在一家青年旅社,可以節(jié)省公寓的租金,同時(shí)她希望能重回校園,學(xué)習(xí)一個(gè)更穩(wěn)定的專業(yè),例如用戶體驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)或技術(shù),并嘗試重建自己的生活。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
娜塔莎·斯科特嘗試過房車生活。毫不夸張的說,這種生活并不像她所預(yù)期的那樣。攝影:MARIO GUTIéRREZ —— 蓋蒂圖片社
凌晨3點(diǎn),娜塔莎·斯科特依舊無眠,因?yàn)橛甑吻么蛟诜寇嚨能図?,窗外還有動物的叫聲。她的臥室與外面世界之間的屏障只有一層薄薄的車皮。
她對《財(cái)富》雜志表示,這種時(shí)候讓她感覺“舉世只剩下自己一個(gè)人類”。33歲的斯科特來自亞特蘭大。她說那個(gè)晚上讓她意識到,社交媒體上宣傳的那種迷人的房車生活,只是“在美化無家可歸的狀態(tài)”。
你很容易就能刷到一家人把全家財(cái)物塞到房車?yán)锟鞓烦霭l(fā)的生活方式視頻。這類生活方式在社交媒體上被冠以房車生活(#vanlife)的標(biāo)簽,在Instagram上的引用次數(shù)達(dá)到1,390萬,在TikTok上的視頻觀看次數(shù)達(dá)到107億。2010年代,這種另類生活方式在追求游牧探險(xiǎn)的千禧一代中開始流行。疫情期間,它成為遠(yuǎn)程辦公者的生活方式之一,也為在通脹高企的情況下不想買房或租房的人們提供了一種更經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)惠的替代選擇,因此快速走紅。
房車生活被美化成一種神奇的、簡樸的生活方式,自然吸引了斯科特。她曾經(jīng)是一位飛行員招募員,還有一份副業(yè)。在看過YouTube和TikTok“推薦”頁面推送的房車生活視頻之后,她經(jīng)常夢想著要嘗試一下這種游牧式的生活方式。
去年,收到一居室公寓漲房租的通知之后,她終于下定了決心。她用自己的儲蓄,以5,000美元的價(jià)格買了一輛沒有改裝的房車(沒有鋪地毯和管道)。
但斯科特很快就發(fā)現(xiàn),房車生活實(shí)際上并不像聽起來那么美好,于是她開始通過TikTok賬號@nomadgonewrong記錄這種田園詩一般的生活方式如何變得令人失望。她在這個(gè)月將賬號更名為@nomadgoneright。她說,汽油價(jià)格昂貴,在馬路上很孤獨(dú),而且房車經(jīng)常需要維修。這種生活方式讓她非常緊張。
斯科特表示:“房車生活比視頻中看起來更艱難。實(shí)話實(shí)說,它比我想象的更難?!?/p>
將生活方式內(nèi)容搬到現(xiàn)實(shí)當(dāng)中,并不像看上去那么美好
開始房車生活后不久,斯科特在一輪裁員中失去了飛行員招募員的工作,只能依靠自由職業(yè)維持生計(jì)。收入不穩(wěn)定增加了在馬路上生活的難度。
斯科特說,沒有房子,通貨膨脹還導(dǎo)致日常用品價(jià)格上漲,因此她發(fā)現(xiàn)為了讓房車更適合居住,她在汽油和食物以及其他方面的支出越來越多。她還有一些意外的應(yīng)急支出,包括經(jīng)歷了一次爆胎。
斯科特表示:“如果你想削減財(cái)務(wù)支出,只能吃垃圾食品?!彼硎荆缃幻襟w上描繪的房車生活,并沒有展示你依靠從加油站購買的食物為生的部分。她感覺,人們往往會描繪快樂的房車生活,躺在草坪躺椅上,放松地享用烤漢堡,但從來沒有人說過車?yán)镉卸酂?,或者一旦下雨,你就只能被困在車?yán)?。他們也沒有展示在沒有改裝的房車?yán)锷顣r(shí),如何洗澡或找衛(wèi)生間。
如果遇到極端天氣,或者晚上感覺不安全,她會選擇住Airbnb民宿。她意識到,要把房車改造得適宜居住難度太大,于是她最終賣掉了這輛車,換了一輛更容易改造的房車。
在整個(gè)過程中,斯科特完全依靠自己,沒有家人的支持。
數(shù)字游牧還是無家可歸?
斯科特的現(xiàn)實(shí)遭遇,在試圖模仿房車生活內(nèi)容的許多人身上都在上演。內(nèi)容創(chuàng)作者吉恩和謝伊擁有社交賬號@geneandshay。他們生活在一輛經(jīng)過改造的房車?yán)铮谝曨l中分享了這種生活方式的缺點(diǎn),例如無休無止的維修,而且當(dāng)車?yán)锾珶犭y以入睡的時(shí)候還需要花錢住酒店。@bylandnjeep說的很直白:“房車生活網(wǎng)紅文化都是垃圾?!?/p>
斯科特表示,有創(chuàng)作者跟她說他們也有類似的經(jīng)歷。與此同時(shí),她的視頻也招致了一些人的批評,有人認(rèn)為斯科特最初開始這種生活方式就是錯誤的選擇。但她認(rèn)為這是因?yàn)槿藗儾幌敕寇嚿畹幕孟氡淮蚱?。斯科特表示,這些人在社交媒體上走紅,他們都有相同的富有魅力的敘事。而她所展示的是日常生活。斯科特解釋說:“但你應(yīng)該對這些內(nèi)容保密,而不是將它們公布于眾。”
掩蓋問題會在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上引發(fā)誤解。社交媒體是一個(gè)高度個(gè)性化的廣告工具,可能被用于讓年輕觀眾誤以為他們需要購買某件物品或一種生活方式。據(jù)銀率網(wǎng)(Bankrate)調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn),64%的社交媒體用戶表示后悔看過廣告之后沖動購物。而像斯科特這樣將儲蓄全部投入到一種與宣傳不符的生活方式,自然更加失望,這并不令人意外。
當(dāng)亞特蘭大的無家可歸者問斯科特是否需要幫助時(shí),她開始質(zhì)疑人們?nèi)绾慰创?。她說道:“除了在社交媒體上,沒有人認(rèn)為這是一種房車生活,而是覺得這就是無家可歸?!?
斯科特建議人們在開始房車生活之前做好調(diào)研,而不是以身試險(xiǎn),可以先嘗試三周,因?yàn)槿苤蟆懊墼缕凇笨赡芤呀?jīng)結(jié)束了。
她目前依舊在記錄自己的體驗(yàn),反駁那些她認(rèn)為在TikTok上無處不在的單方面敘事。她已經(jīng)放棄了房車生活,說這段時(shí)間讓她損失慘重。她目前住在一家青年旅社,可以節(jié)省公寓的租金,同時(shí)她希望能重回校園,學(xué)習(xí)一個(gè)更穩(wěn)定的專業(yè),例如用戶體驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)或技術(shù),并嘗試重建自己的生活。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
It was 3 a.m., and Natasha Scott was lying awake as the rain pounded on the roof of her van, listening to the murmurs of animals outside. The barrier between the world and her bedroom was paper thin.
Times like these made her feel like “the only person in the world,” she tells Fortune. Scott, 33 and based in Atlanta, pinpointed that night as the moment when she realized the glamorous van life advertised on social media was just “glorified homelessness.”
You don’t have to search far to see videos showing lifestyle content of families packing all their belongings into a van and hitting the road. Known as #vanlife across social media, the phrase has 13.9 million tags on Instagram and 10.7 billion views on TikTok. The alternative lifestyle became popular in the 2010s among millennials craving a nomadic adventure, and it accelerated during the pandemic as an option for remote workers and those seeking a more affordable alternative to buying or renting amid sky-high inflation.
Romanticized as a magical, simplistic way of life, it was enough to pull Scott in. A former pilot recruiter with a small business on the side, she often daydreamed about trying out the nomadic lifestyle after watching the #vanlife videos that littered her “for you” pages on YouTube and TikTok.
She finally took the plunge after receiving a notice last year that the rent on her one-bedroom apartment was increasing. She used her savings to buy a non-converted van (it wasn’t outfitted with carpeting and plumbing) for $5,000.
But Scott soon found that the reality of van life wasn’t all that sunny, and she began documenting how her idyllic lifestyle turned sour on the TikTok account @nomadgonewrong, renaming her account this month to @nomadgoneright. Gas was high, it was lonely on the road, and the van often needed repairs, she said. It all put her on edge.
“Van life is harder than what it seems like in videos,” Scott says. “It’s harder than I would have ever thought, honestly.”
Lifestyle content isn’t everything it seems to be when you’re actually living it
Shortly after embarking on van life, Scott lost her pilot recruiter job during a round of layoffs, forcing her to rely on freelance work. An unstable income made living on the road that much harder.
Without a home base and with the prices of everyday goods rising as a result of inflation, Scott says she found herself spending more on gas and food as well as other expenses as she attempted to renovate the van to make it more habitable. She also had to pay for unexpected emergencies along the way, including a popped tire.
“If you do try to cut back on finances, you’re just eating junk,” Scott says, adding that #vanlife depictions don’t show the part where you’re living off food purchased from gas stations. She feels they tend to depict happy van lifers relaxing on their lawn chairs enjoying a grilled burger, but says no one talks about how hot it is or how you’re stuck inside the van if it’s raining. Nor do they show how van lifers shower or find bathrooms if they’re not in a converted van, she adds.
When the weather became too extreme or she didn’t feel safe at night, Scott began staying in Airbnbs. She realized that it would ultimately be too difficult to redo her van so it was livable, so she ended up selling it to buy another van that was easier to convert.
All the while, Scott was figuring it out alone, without a family support system to fall back on.
Digital nomad or houseless?
Scott’s reality isn’t all that different from others who have tried to emulate the #vanlife content. Content creators Gene and Shay of @geneandshay, who live in a converted van, shared the downsides of the lifestyle in a video: endless repairs, and the need to shell out for a hotel when it’s too hot to sleep in a van. As @bylandnjeep puts it bluntly, “Van life influencer culture is full of sh––.”
Scott says creators reached out to her saying they’ve endured similar experiences. At the same time, her videos have critics who argue Scott made the wrong choice in embarking on the lifestyle in the first place. But she thinks people are resistant to the idea of this #vanlife fantasy being broken. The same type of person goes viral on social media and they show same type of glamorous narratives, adds Scott. She was showing everyday life. “But that’s something you don’t post because you’re just supposed to keep that a secret,” Scott explains.
Papering over the cracks can lead to misconceptions online. Social media is a highly personalized advertising tool that can be used to make younger audiences feel like they need to buy objects or a lifestyle. About 64% of social media users reported regretting an impulse purchase they made when seeing an advertisement, according to Bankrate. It’s not surprising people like Scott would be even more disappointed when they’ve sunk their savings into a lifestyle that doesn’t live up to the hype.
When homeless people in Atlanta started asking Scott if she needed help, she began to question how she was being seen. “Outside of social media, no one saw it as van life—they saw it as homelessness,” she says.
Scott suggests that people do their research to prepare for van life instead of learning on their feet, and to trial it for three weeks because the “honeymoon stage” might be over by then.
Right now, she continues to post content that documents her experience, pushing back against the one-sided narrative she believes permeates TikTok. She’s given up van life, saying that she lost money from the whole venture in the end. She is currently living in a hostel, saving up for an apartment, looking to go back to school to major in a more stable field like UX design or tech, and trying to rebuild her life.