成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

立即打開(kāi)
選CEO如何避免雅虎式悲劇

選CEO如何避免雅虎式悲劇

Dennis Carey 2012年05月14日
雅虎剛剛上任不到半年的CEO因?yàn)楹?jiǎn)歷注水丑聞閃電離職,雅虎備受詬病的CEO招聘問(wèn)題再次引起廣泛關(guān)注。如何在這個(gè)事關(guān)公司前途和命運(yùn)的重大問(wèn)題上避免雅虎式的滑鐵盧,這個(gè)問(wèn)題值得深思。

??? 美國(guó)一部分頂級(jí)公司未能進(jìn)行嚴(yán)格的背景調(diào)查,確保CEO候選人是帶領(lǐng)公司迎接未來(lái)挑戰(zhàn)的最佳人選,結(jié)果在眾目睽睽之下遭遇滑鐵盧。上周,雅虎(Yahoo)就嘗到了這樣的苦果,這家公司的CEO斯科特?湯普森被曝簡(jiǎn)歷造假。

????當(dāng)初主導(dǎo)此次CEO篩選并最終選定湯普森的雅虎董事帕蒂?哈特已計(jì)劃退出董事會(huì)。對(duì)于目前服務(wù)于財(cái)富500強(qiáng)公司董事會(huì)的4,000多名高管或考慮加入這些董事會(huì)的人,雅虎事件無(wú)疑敲響了警鐘。

????如果這些問(wèn)題在CEO任命前沒(méi)有浮出水面,結(jié)果可能導(dǎo)致這家公司以及來(lái)自其他公司、但是服務(wù)與這家公司董事會(huì)的高管在眾目睽睽之下陷入窘境,同時(shí)會(huì)動(dòng)搖股東和員工對(duì)管理層的信心。學(xué)歷核查并不難。難的是要從市場(chǎng)領(lǐng)域獲得實(shí)實(shí)在在的數(shù)據(jù),確保入選的CEO能勝任這份工作?;萜眨℉ewlett-Packard)就是一個(gè)例子,去年在李艾科的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下這家公司的市值縮水了40%。最近,惠普一位董事告訴我們,李艾科是被“推銷給董事會(huì)的”,“這種情況不會(huì)再發(fā)生了”。

????類似的失誤不光出現(xiàn)在雅虎,也出現(xiàn)在摩托羅拉(Motorola)、可口可樂(lè)(Coke)和寶潔(Procter & Gamble)等公司中。一旦發(fā)現(xiàn)選錯(cuò)人,指責(zé)之聲便會(huì)四起,人們首先就會(huì)質(zhì)問(wèn):“為什么我們以前不知道這些情況?”優(yōu)秀的公司會(huì)建立體系,確保能夠做到這一點(diǎn)。比如,寶潔第二次就取得了極大的成功,它在組織內(nèi)部深入挖掘,根據(jù)更充分的信息進(jìn)行篩選,最終選定了雷富禮(A.G. Lafley)。

????很多公司CEO招聘看走眼,最后只能一拍兩散,皆因信息不足和過(guò)于放權(quán),過(guò)于依賴第三方的工作。幸運(yùn)的是,要改善這個(gè)流程有很多工作可以做。

????要弄清候選人能為公司帶來(lái)什么以及他/她與未來(lái)的職責(zé)和公司文化是否相符,企業(yè)不能停留于粗淺的背景調(diào)查。不同于其他高管職位,CEO候選人的背景調(diào)查比較特殊,因?yàn)楹芏鄷r(shí)候候選人都沒(méi)有做過(guò)CEO。

????下面三種措施可以幫助企業(yè)避免雅虎式的困境:

確保董事會(huì)的參與

????帕蒂?哈特退出雅虎董事會(huì),凸顯了很重要的一點(diǎn):招聘CEO是董事會(huì)的重要職責(zé),因此背景調(diào)查應(yīng)該始于董事、終于董事。即使是與第三方、如獵頭公司合作時(shí),董事會(huì)也不能完全放手不管。董事們應(yīng)該核查背景調(diào)查,如果他們與證明人有私人關(guān)系的話就更是如此。如果董事會(huì)打算像很多公司那樣,完全依賴第三方進(jìn)行背景調(diào)查,董事們需要確保第三方能獲得候選人管理經(jīng)歷的“內(nèi)部一手資料”。我們看到過(guò)太多董事會(huì)完全放手的結(jié)果。結(jié)果并不美妙。

????Some of the best companies in the U.S. have failed, very publicly, to rigorously check references on CEO candidates to ensure that they are the right fit for the company's challenges ahead. Yahoo learned this lesson the hard way last week when it was revealed that their CEO, Scott Thompson, padded his resume.

????Now Yahoo (YHOO) board member Patti Hart, who led the executive search that resulted in Thompson's hiring, plans to step down from the board. For the more than 4,000 executives currently serving on Fortune 500 boards, or considering joining one, these events concerning Yahoo should be a wake-up call.

????When these issues are not surfaced before the CEO is hired, the result can be both public embarrassment – for the company and the executives from other companies that serve on its board – and a jolt to shareholder and employee confidence in leadership. And checking academic pedigrees is the easy part. The more difficult challenge is getting the hard data from the market to ensure that your CEO pick is right for the job. Just look at Hewlett-Packard (HPQ), where shareholders were stripped of 40% of their stock value under Leo Apotheker last year. One HP director recently told us that Apotheker had been "sold to the board" and "that won't happen again."

????Similar misfires have happened not only at Yahoo but also at companies like Motorola (MSI), Coke (KO), and Procter & Gamble (PG). When the wrong person is picked, recriminations and questions immediately begin with, "Why didn't we know this before?" The best companies put in place systems to ensure that they do. P&G, for example, was highly successful the next time around because it dug deeper into the organization and based CEO selection on better information, which led to the selection of CEO A.G. Lafley.

????Many companies make a final hiring decision with too little information and too much delegation, and rely too heavily on third parties to get the job done. Fortunately, there is a great deal that can be done to improve the process.

????Companies must go beyond superficial referencing to determine what a candidate can contribute and how he or she aligns with the future imperatives and culture of the company. But unlike referencing for other senior executive positions, referencing for CEO contenders is tricky because in many cases the person up for the job has never been a CEO before.

????Here are three ways in which companies can avoid a Yahoo-like debacle:

Make sure the board is involved

????Patti Hart's departure from Yahoo's board underscores a crucial point: Hiring the CEO goes to the heart of a board's fiduciary duties, so it makes sense that referencing begins and ends with the directors. Even when working with a third party, such as a search firm, boards should never completely hand off the referencing process. Directors should be a check on referencing, especially if they have a personal relationship with a reference. If a board is going to rely on a third party to take care of the referencing process, as many companies do, the directors need to make sure that that group can get the "inside scoop" on how a candidate leads. We've seen the consequences of boards that relinquish control of the referencing process. It's not pretty.

掃碼打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus App
内射人妻无码色AB麻豆| 亚洲国产精品成人精品无码区在线| 中文亚洲av片在线观看| 久久av免费天堂小草播放| 国产狂喷水潮免费网站www| 亚洲精品一品区二品区三品区| 日韩一区无码高清| 精品动漫国产亚洲AV在线观看| 久久久久无码国产精品一区99国产毛片| 韩国三级中文字幕HD久久精品| 天天做天天躁天天躁| 国产亚洲精品精品国产亚洲综合| 日韩人妻无码专区一本二本| 国产三级精品三级男人的天堂| 99久久久国产精品免费蜜臀| 精品人妻系列无码人妻不卡| 中文字幕在线视频精品| 亚洲日韩中文字幕日韩在线| 刚刚更新成人视频| 人妻少妇精品专区性色AV| 国产精品久久久久久久久免费| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区| 国产免费无码不卡网站| 最近2024中文字幕大全视频一页| 国产亚洲蜜臀AV在线播放| 亚洲一区二区三区AV无码| 亚洲AV永久纯肉无码精品动漫| 欧美V国产V亚洲V日韩九九| 人人色在线视频播放| 国产末成年女av片一区二区| 欧美性爱一级片免费| JAPANESEHD熟女熟妇伦,啊轻点灬大JI巴太粗太长了| 国产亚洲精品福利在线无卡一| 久久久一本精品99久久精品66| 国产精品狼人久久久久影院| 午夜福利一级毛片在线视频| 国产JJIZZ女人多水喷水| 欧洲人体一区二区三区| 国产乱子伦精品无码码专区| 国产一精品一aV一免费| 免费无码专区毛片高潮喷水|