成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

<meter id="71rmo"></meter>
    <abbr id="71rmo"></abbr>

    立即打開
    溝通要多動腦少動嘴

    溝通要多動腦少動嘴

    Megan Hustad 2013年01月11日
    因為害怕遺漏,很多人在溝通中都喜歡羅列要點。甲乙丙丁、一二三四、ABCD.…洋洋灑灑,長篇大論。但事實上,這并不是最有效地溝通方式。專家建議,溝通之前先想清楚,然后做到簡明扼要。

    ????杰夫·貝佐斯堅持使用完整的句子。去年11月,作家本·卡斯諾查寫道,亞馬遜(Amazon)CEO杰夫·貝佐斯不允許管理團(tuán)隊在交給他的會議紀(jì)要中使用要點羅列的方式。貝佐斯的要求是在段落中正確斷句,不能一目十行地看。他的理念是,如果必須以書面形式完整地闡述你的想法,將有助于想法的完善。

    ????卡斯諾查指出:“貝佐斯要求團(tuán)隊將句子寫全,是希望團(tuán)隊成員能全面思考每個想法,從而讓這些想法更能經(jīng)受住時間的考驗?!薄敦敻弧冯s志(Fortune)近日刊登了一篇貝佐斯的專訪,文中貝佐斯談到:“如果沒有想清楚,根本寫不出長達(dá)6頁、架構(gòu)清晰的敘事備忘錄?!笨ㄋ怪Z查前述文章的靈感正是來源于此。

    ????乍一看,這一規(guī)矩有道理。但完整的句子真能解決要點羅列法的弊端,杜絕空洞堂皇的詞藻堆砌嗎?如今在商業(yè)溝通中,議論文很多時候被誤以為就是用七年級英文老師口中的“助動詞”將一堆抽象概念連起來,很多語法正確的句子都不知所云。舉例來說:

    ????為了提供市場最佳客戶體驗,打造與眾不同的技能組合,賦予相關(guān)機構(gòu)知識、技能和內(nèi)部強化,我們設(shè)立了五項至關(guān)重要的目標(biāo)。

    ????或者是下面這封剛剛發(fā)到我郵箱的郵件。

    ????設(shè)計師們致力于想象和創(chuàng)造空間、體系、語言、工具及基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施,為每個人和我們這個世界提供特定的關(guān)系與傾向。

    ????這樣的句子主要給我們一點感覺,知道大概講的是什么事情。主旨可能顯而易見,但細(xì)細(xì)讀來你可能會想,如果用更少的字來說,少一些故作姿態(tài)呢?我用了好一會兒才意識到這些完整的句子基本上都只是改頭換面的要點列表。將所有這些詞塞入同一個句子或許有道理,或許沒有。往往很難分辨這樣一個句子的各個部分是如何聯(lián)系起來的。

    ????會不會問題不在于句子不完整,而在于我們用羅列法表述繁復(fù)龐大的想法時,羅列不能勝任溝通之目的?過去我們常常會羅列一些東西,這樣就不必老惦記著。(做完一件事或買好一件東西,就把它從列表中刪除,然后把這個列表也扔掉。)列表本來就是用完就扔的東西。

    ????現(xiàn)在,我們使用列表是因為我們覺得我們的想法過于復(fù)雜,用簡單的幾句話難以說清楚?!豆鹕虡I(yè)評論》(Harvard Business Review)撰稿人克雷格·莫科恩在最近的一篇博客中指出,現(xiàn)在不滿足于一個頭銜的人越來越多。這可以理解,但并不聰明,他指出:

    ????現(xiàn)實稍微有點殘酷:在任何一個特定時間,我們在其他人的腦海中只能“占據(jù)”一個位置。人們不能同時將我們認(rèn)為是項目經(jīng)理、教授、律師、保險經(jīng)紀(jì)人、編輯和創(chuàng)業(yè)家等等全部。這些頭銜可能全都是真實的,但人們首先只能想到一種職業(yè)。

    ????給你自己6個頭銜,商務(wù)社交網(wǎng)站LinkedIn和SEO培訓(xùn)師當(dāng)然會鼓勵你通過這種方式跨界發(fā)展。但要知道,當(dāng)人類((而不是機器人)查看你的簡歷時,他們可能會很困惑。

    ????Jeff Bezos insists on complete sentences. In November, the writer Ben Casnocha?wrote?about how the Amazon (AMZN) CEO doesn't allow his executive team to hand him memos dotted with bullet points. Instead, Bezos demands correctly punctuated sentences that live in paragraphs and defy easy scanning. The idea is that having to spell your idea out in full will improve it.

    ????"By demanding his team write everything out," Casnocha remarked, "he makes them consider all aspects of an idea to make it more durable for years to come." In Fortune's?recent?profile?of Bezos, which inspired Casnocha's post, Bezos said, "There is no way to write a six-page, narratively structured memo and not have clear thinking."

    ????At first glance, this rule is appealing. But are complete sentences really a fix for those bulleted lists that essentially clump together vaguely smart-sounding noun phrases? A lot of what passes for persuasive writing in business communication today are pile-ups of abstract concepts strung together with what our seventh-grade English teachers called "helping verbs," and plenty of grammatically correct sentences are still mystifying. For example:

    ????In order to accomplish a best-in-market customer experience, instill a differentiated skill-set, and bring the relevant institutional knowledge, skills, and facilitation expertise in-house, we have identified five mission-critical goals.

    ????Or this one, which also recently landed in my Inbox:

    ????Designers work to envision and create spaces, systems, languages, tools and infrastructure that afford specific kinds of relationships and predispositions towards each other and our world.

    ????Such sentences mainly give us a?feeling?for what they're about. The topic may be obvious, but a close reading prompts an urge to question whether it could have been said with fewer words and less grandstanding. It took me a while to realize that these complete sentences were basically gussied-up laundry lists. There may be a good reason to house all those concepts in the same sentence -- or not. It's often hard to tell how all of the sentence's parts relate to one another.

    ????So, what if the problem isn't incomplete sentences but the fact that we are using lists to convey big, unwieldy ideas that lists aren't capable of communicating? We used to list items so we didn't have to think about them. (Do or buy a thing, cross it off the list, then throw the list away.) Lists were disposable by design.

    ????Now, we use lists because we imagine our thoughts or abilities are too complex for one or two simple descriptors. In a recent?blog?post,?Harvard Business Review?contributor Greg McKeown noted an increase in the ranks of people who wouldn't pick one job title. This was understandable but not so smart, he argued:

    ????The slightly painful truth is, at any one time there is only one piece of real estate we can "own" in another person's mind. People can't think of us as a project manager, professor, attorney, insurance agent, editor and entrepreneur all at exactly the same time. They may all be true about us, but people can only think of us as one thing?first.

    ????Give yourself six job titles -- LinkedIn and SEO trainers certainly encourage you to spread your bets that way -- but know that when humans, not robots, read your profile, they'll likely be overwhelmed.

    掃碼打開財富Plus App
    囯产免费久久久久久国产免费| 久久精品无码专区免费青青| 久久亚洲欧美日本精品| 人妻AV无码系列一| 国产欧美成人精品久久久久| 香蕉久久AⅤ一区二区三区| 昆明夫妇交换聚会群4p疯狂大战图片| 亚洲国产成人精品久久久国产| 日韩精品无码观看视频免费| 国产在线拍揄自揄拍无码| 91久久国产综合精品女同国语| 免费观看国产v片在线| 国产区精品系列在线观看不卡| 午夜精品久久久久久久久| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码偷窥| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合网站| 国产超碰人人做人人爱ⅴA| 日本高清线视频在线| 日韩精品在线视频直播 | 午夜A级理论片在线播放韩国| 产大片91精品免费观看3| 亚洲已满18点击进入在线看片| 精品人妻系列无码人妻免费视频| 亚洲精品欧美精品日韩精品| 人人妻人人澡人人爽欧美一区九九| 欧美av国产av亚洲av综合av| 一区二区性生活观看玖玖资源站国产精品| 一级特黄aaa大片在线观看成人一级片在线观看| 久久人人爽爽人人爽av| 两根大肉大捧一进一出好爽视频| 日韩欧美精品在线观看| 日产无人区一线二线三线观看| 东京热av人妻无码专区| 日韩成全视频观看免费观看高清| 亚洲蜜芽在线精品一区| 久久精品成人无码AV片观看| 国内丰满少妇一级毛片| 草莓香蕉榴莲丝瓜18岁| 亚洲一区二区三区乱码在线中国| 肉欲AV片精品一区二区| 免费观看一级特黄三大片视频|