成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

Uber收購(gòu)?fù)赓u公司Postmates,為何被批評(píng)為“邪惡交易”

Robert Hackett
2020-07-11

有人認(rèn)為,這種策略的設(shè)計(jì)目的就是最大程度壓低人們的報(bào)酬。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

7月6日,Uber同意以26.5億美元收購(gòu)送餐服務(wù)公司Postmates,令投資者歡呼雀躍,但另外一群人的反應(yīng)卻截然相反,他們是網(wǎng)約車行業(yè)和送餐行業(yè)的主力零工人員。

伊丹·阿爾瓦是一名司機(jī),他在Uber曝出丑聞后的幾年轉(zhuǎn)投Lyft。他形容Uber收購(gòu)Postmates的交易是“不道德的”和“邪惡的”,因?yàn)檫@會(huì)助長(zhǎng)Uber壓榨工人工資的能力。在這些基于應(yīng)用程序的公司收取的車費(fèi)和訂餐費(fèi)中,網(wǎng)約車司機(jī)和送餐員可以獲得一定的抽成,但比例已經(jīng)大幅下降。

阿爾瓦同時(shí)還是勞工權(quán)益組織Gig Workers Rising的發(fā)起人。他說(shuō):“這筆交易如同允許一個(gè)貪污分子收購(gòu)一家銀行?!?/p>

阿爾瓦說(shuō)他在灣區(qū)運(yùn)送乘客平均每小時(shí)的收入約為20美元至22美元。但扣除油費(fèi)和意外車輛維修費(fèi)(僅去年就有5次爆胎)以后,他估計(jì)自己的收入“絕對(duì)遠(yuǎn)低于每小時(shí)15美元”,而且“極有可能接近10美元。”

阿爾瓦譴責(zé)網(wǎng)約車公司的“掠奪策略”,他說(shuō)這種策略的設(shè)計(jì)目的就是最大程度壓低人們的報(bào)酬,包括把公司最基本的工作者、司機(jī)和送餐員認(rèn)定為承包商,而不是有權(quán)享有福利的全職員工等。Uber和其他零工經(jīng)濟(jì)公司目前正在抗?fàn)幖又莸囊豁?xiàng)法律,這項(xiàng)法律可能迫使這些公司將其旗下的工作者重新劃分為全職員工。

這些公司豪擲數(shù)千萬(wàn)美元,試圖發(fā)起一項(xiàng)替代性的州公民表決提案,讓它們能夠在規(guī)則改革中得到豁免。

食物金字塔頂端的爭(zhēng)奪

為了抗擊全球新冠疫情,各地政府紛紛采取封城措施,導(dǎo)致網(wǎng)約車公司和送餐公司的業(yè)務(wù)陷入困境。即使在這種情況下,這些公司為了爭(zhēng)奪市場(chǎng)份額依舊沒(méi)有停止廝殺。

DoorDash的送餐員路易斯·瓦斯克斯曾經(jīng)是Uber和Lyft的司機(jī),他在新冠疫情爆發(fā)時(shí)改為送餐。他對(duì)行業(yè)整合表示擔(dān)憂。對(duì)于Uber收購(gòu)Postmates的交易,他說(shuō):“我覺(jué)得這對(duì)司機(jī)來(lái)說(shuō)不公平,也不是什么好事。Uber之所以這樣做是因?yàn)樗鼈兿胍髟走@個(gè)行業(yè)?!?/p>

消費(fèi)趨勢(shì)跟蹤機(jī)構(gòu)Edison Trends表示,Uber與Postmates合并后將占到美國(guó)送餐行業(yè)37%的市場(chǎng)份額。這將使其僅次于當(dāng)前的市場(chǎng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者DoorDash。DoorDash占有44%的市場(chǎng)份額。

盡管在疫情期間,競(jìng)爭(zhēng)依舊愈演愈烈。DoorDash上個(gè)月剛剛?cè)谫Y4億美元,估值接近160億美元。Grubhub擁有17%的市場(chǎng)份額。在傳聞中與Uber的交易失敗之后不久,該公司上個(gè)月同意出售荷蘭Just Eat Takeaway公司。

隨著競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手逐漸減少,剩下的公司紛紛提供最便宜、最便利的服務(wù),這壓縮了公司的利潤(rùn)空間。

瓦斯克斯是一位單身父親。他哀嘆說(shuō)自己的收入越來(lái)越少。談及早在五年前的收入,瓦斯克斯說(shuō):“開(kāi)始的時(shí)候收入真得不錯(cuò)?!?/p>

他說(shuō):“現(xiàn)在卻變成了雞肋?!?/p>

拆東墻補(bǔ)西墻

有些司機(jī)譴責(zé)Uber花數(shù)十億美元收購(gòu)Postmates,給工作者支付的報(bào)酬卻少得可憐。

妮可·穆?tīng)柺且晃籐yft兼職司機(jī)。她形容Uber的行為非常虛偽。她說(shuō):“他們沒(méi)有錢給人們支付基本工資,卻有錢收購(gòu)一家全新的公司?”

穆?tīng)栒f(shuō):“我認(rèn)為這筆交易就是一記響亮的耳光。”她是另外一家勞動(dòng)者權(quán)益組織Rideshare Drivers United的發(fā)起人。該組織正在鼓動(dòng)網(wǎng)約車司機(jī)建立工會(huì)。

Postmates的送餐員彼得·楊說(shuō),他看不出Uber收購(gòu)Postmates有任何好處。他在一封電子郵件中寫道:“我不覺(jué)得交易之后,勞動(dòng)者的待遇會(huì)有任何好轉(zhuǎn)。收入不會(huì)增加,就業(yè)保障也不會(huì)有任何改善?!?/p>

此外,楊說(shuō)他擔(dān)心這筆交易會(huì)影響人們的就業(yè)狀況,包括他自己在內(nèi)。他說(shuō),他做過(guò)兩年Uber司機(jī),但一年前他發(fā)生過(guò)一次小事故之后,Uber取消了他的資格,直接把他踢出了平臺(tái)。

楊說(shuō),在Postmates被Uber收購(gòu)之后,他擔(dān)心自己也會(huì)被Postmates封殺。雖然Postmates已經(jīng)向送餐員承諾該筆收購(gòu)不會(huì)對(duì)送餐員的工作產(chǎn)生直接影響,但他認(rèn)為,這個(gè)承諾“像他們的話一樣蒼白無(wú)力?!?/p>

楊補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“現(xiàn)在他們說(shuō)的都是廢話?!?/p>

Uber強(qiáng)調(diào)其關(guān)心工作者的利益

但也有人對(duì)該筆交易持更樂(lè)觀的態(tài)度。

前Uber和Lyft司機(jī)邁克爾·古墨拉表達(dá)了截然相反的觀點(diǎn)。古墨拉目前經(jīng)營(yíng)一個(gè)有關(guān)網(wǎng)約車行業(yè)的博客Rideshare Report。他說(shuō),從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來(lái)看,他認(rèn)為行業(yè)整合“實(shí)際上對(duì)司機(jī)是有利的”,因?yàn)檫@將迫使更多工作者團(tuán)結(jié)起來(lái),從而更容易“實(shí)現(xiàn)勞資談判的目的”。

但古墨拉指出,Uber“進(jìn)行[該筆交易]根本不是為了司機(jī)的利益?!?/p>

Uber聲稱收購(gòu)Postmates將對(duì)零工人員有利。一位發(fā)言人在寫給《財(cái)富》雜志的電子郵件中表示,憑借合并后的餐廳網(wǎng)絡(luò)、訂單和送餐機(jī)會(huì),“我們能夠?yàn)椴蛷d和食品雜貨店等領(lǐng)域的派送人員提供更可預(yù)測(cè)的、更豐厚的收入機(jī)會(huì)?!?/p>

然而,對(duì)于該筆交易對(duì)零工人員的好處,接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪的多數(shù)人都持懷疑態(tài)度。Postmates的送餐員保羅·奧哈是一個(gè)非官方的Facebook同行群組的管理員,他說(shuō)他認(rèn)為該筆交易“給送餐員帶來(lái)好處的可能性微乎其微?!?/p>

奧哈說(shuō):“希望Uber能像可口可樂(lè)公司(Coca-Cola)那樣做?!彼囊馑际牵琔ber最終為消費(fèi)者提供許多選擇(用按需服務(wù)應(yīng)用與軟飲料對(duì)比),基本上形成內(nèi)部競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的格局。

他說(shuō),成為送餐員就像是加入了一場(chǎng)充滿不確定性的經(jīng)濟(jì)“游戲”。潛在雇主越少,代表“設(shè)計(jì)城市”的方法越少,也就意味著潛在回報(bào)減少。

失去胃口,贏得戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)

如果Uber授予Postmates一定程度的獨(dú)立自主權(quán),允許司機(jī)、商戶和客戶根據(jù)自己的偏好在不同應(yīng)用程序之間切換,這將帶來(lái)更多選擇和更高的靈活性。但該筆交易背后的邏輯顯然是為了利用整合和規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)節(jié)約成本。

Uber在公布該交易的聲明中表示,在明年第一季度交易按計(jì)劃完成之后,公司“打算允許面向消費(fèi)者的Postmates應(yīng)用繼續(xù)獨(dú)立運(yùn)營(yíng)?!惫具€表示,計(jì)劃合并兩家公司的后端業(yè)務(wù),并削減日常開(kāi)支2億美元。

威爾弗雷德·陳是一位自由撰稿人。他平時(shí)通過(guò)在Postmates等按需服務(wù)應(yīng)用程序上送餐來(lái)賺取外快。他總結(jié)了零工人員的焦慮。行業(yè)整合將使零工人員越來(lái)越受制于少數(shù)幾家超級(jí)強(qiáng)大的公司。

他說(shuō):“問(wèn)題是,這意味著工作者的選擇越來(lái)越少,也意味著平臺(tái)變得更加龐大,越來(lái)越難以對(duì)付。隨著Uber的霸權(quán)不斷擴(kuò)大,它們會(huì)有更多手段對(duì)付工作者,剝削我們的手段也會(huì)變得更加殘忍?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Biz

7月6日,Uber同意以26.5億美元收購(gòu)送餐服務(wù)公司Postmates,令投資者歡呼雀躍,但另外一群人的反應(yīng)卻截然相反,他們是網(wǎng)約車行業(yè)和送餐行業(yè)的主力零工人員。

伊丹·阿爾瓦是一名司機(jī),他在Uber曝出丑聞后的幾年轉(zhuǎn)投Lyft。他形容Uber收購(gòu)Postmates的交易是“不道德的”和“邪惡的”,因?yàn)檫@會(huì)助長(zhǎng)Uber壓榨工人工資的能力。在這些基于應(yīng)用程序的公司收取的車費(fèi)和訂餐費(fèi)中,網(wǎng)約車司機(jī)和送餐員可以獲得一定的抽成,但比例已經(jīng)大幅下降。

阿爾瓦同時(shí)還是勞工權(quán)益組織Gig Workers Rising的發(fā)起人。他說(shuō):“這筆交易如同允許一個(gè)貪污分子收購(gòu)一家銀行?!?/p>

阿爾瓦說(shuō)他在灣區(qū)運(yùn)送乘客平均每小時(shí)的收入約為20美元至22美元。但扣除油費(fèi)和意外車輛維修費(fèi)(僅去年就有5次爆胎)以后,他估計(jì)自己的收入“絕對(duì)遠(yuǎn)低于每小時(shí)15美元”,而且“極有可能接近10美元?!?/p>

阿爾瓦譴責(zé)網(wǎng)約車公司的“掠奪策略”,他說(shuō)這種策略的設(shè)計(jì)目的就是最大程度壓低人們的報(bào)酬,包括把公司最基本的工作者、司機(jī)和送餐員認(rèn)定為承包商,而不是有權(quán)享有福利的全職員工等。Uber和其他零工經(jīng)濟(jì)公司目前正在抗?fàn)幖又莸囊豁?xiàng)法律,這項(xiàng)法律可能迫使這些公司將其旗下的工作者重新劃分為全職員工。

這些公司豪擲數(shù)千萬(wàn)美元,試圖發(fā)起一項(xiàng)替代性的州公民表決提案,讓它們能夠在規(guī)則改革中得到豁免。

食物金字塔頂端的爭(zhēng)奪

為了抗擊全球新冠疫情,各地政府紛紛采取封城措施,導(dǎo)致網(wǎng)約車公司和送餐公司的業(yè)務(wù)陷入困境。即使在這種情況下,這些公司為了爭(zhēng)奪市場(chǎng)份額依舊沒(méi)有停止廝殺。

DoorDash的送餐員路易斯·瓦斯克斯曾經(jīng)是Uber和Lyft的司機(jī),他在新冠疫情爆發(fā)時(shí)改為送餐。他對(duì)行業(yè)整合表示擔(dān)憂。對(duì)于Uber收購(gòu)Postmates的交易,他說(shuō):“我覺(jué)得這對(duì)司機(jī)來(lái)說(shuō)不公平,也不是什么好事。Uber之所以這樣做是因?yàn)樗鼈兿胍髟走@個(gè)行業(yè)?!?/p>

消費(fèi)趨勢(shì)跟蹤機(jī)構(gòu)Edison Trends表示,Uber與Postmates合并后將占到美國(guó)送餐行業(yè)37%的市場(chǎng)份額。這將使其僅次于當(dāng)前的市場(chǎng)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者DoorDash。DoorDash占有44%的市場(chǎng)份額。

盡管在疫情期間,競(jìng)爭(zhēng)依舊愈演愈烈。DoorDash上個(gè)月剛剛?cè)谫Y4億美元,估值接近160億美元。Grubhub擁有17%的市場(chǎng)份額。在傳聞中與Uber的交易失敗之后不久,該公司上個(gè)月同意出售荷蘭Just Eat Takeaway公司。

隨著競(jìng)爭(zhēng)對(duì)手逐漸減少,剩下的公司紛紛提供最便宜、最便利的服務(wù),這壓縮了公司的利潤(rùn)空間。

瓦斯克斯是一位單身父親。他哀嘆說(shuō)自己的收入越來(lái)越少。談及早在五年前的收入,瓦斯克斯說(shuō):“開(kāi)始的時(shí)候收入真得不錯(cuò)。”

他說(shuō):“現(xiàn)在卻變成了雞肋。”

拆東墻補(bǔ)西墻

有些司機(jī)譴責(zé)Uber花數(shù)十億美元收購(gòu)Postmates,給工作者支付的報(bào)酬卻少得可憐。

妮可·穆?tīng)柺且晃籐yft兼職司機(jī)。她形容Uber的行為非常虛偽。她說(shuō):“他們沒(méi)有錢給人們支付基本工資,卻有錢收購(gòu)一家全新的公司?”

穆?tīng)栒f(shuō):“我認(rèn)為這筆交易就是一記響亮的耳光?!彼橇硗庖患覄趧?dòng)者權(quán)益組織Rideshare Drivers United的發(fā)起人。該組織正在鼓動(dòng)網(wǎng)約車司機(jī)建立工會(huì)。

Postmates的送餐員彼得·楊說(shuō),他看不出Uber收購(gòu)Postmates有任何好處。他在一封電子郵件中寫道:“我不覺(jué)得交易之后,勞動(dòng)者的待遇會(huì)有任何好轉(zhuǎn)。收入不會(huì)增加,就業(yè)保障也不會(huì)有任何改善?!?/p>

此外,楊說(shuō)他擔(dān)心這筆交易會(huì)影響人們的就業(yè)狀況,包括他自己在內(nèi)。他說(shuō),他做過(guò)兩年Uber司機(jī),但一年前他發(fā)生過(guò)一次小事故之后,Uber取消了他的資格,直接把他踢出了平臺(tái)。

楊說(shuō),在Postmates被Uber收購(gòu)之后,他擔(dān)心自己也會(huì)被Postmates封殺。雖然Postmates已經(jīng)向送餐員承諾該筆收購(gòu)不會(huì)對(duì)送餐員的工作產(chǎn)生直接影響,但他認(rèn)為,這個(gè)承諾“像他們的話一樣蒼白無(wú)力?!?/p>

楊補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“現(xiàn)在他們說(shuō)的都是廢話?!?/p>

Uber強(qiáng)調(diào)其關(guān)心工作者的利益

但也有人對(duì)該筆交易持更樂(lè)觀的態(tài)度。

前Uber和Lyft司機(jī)邁克爾·古墨拉表達(dá)了截然相反的觀點(diǎn)。古墨拉目前經(jīng)營(yíng)一個(gè)有關(guān)網(wǎng)約車行業(yè)的博客Rideshare Report。他說(shuō),從長(zhǎng)遠(yuǎn)來(lái)看,他認(rèn)為行業(yè)整合“實(shí)際上對(duì)司機(jī)是有利的”,因?yàn)檫@將迫使更多工作者團(tuán)結(jié)起來(lái),從而更容易“實(shí)現(xiàn)勞資談判的目的”。

但古墨拉指出,Uber“進(jìn)行[該筆交易]根本不是為了司機(jī)的利益?!?/p>

Uber聲稱收購(gòu)Postmates將對(duì)零工人員有利。一位發(fā)言人在寫給《財(cái)富》雜志的電子郵件中表示,憑借合并后的餐廳網(wǎng)絡(luò)、訂單和送餐機(jī)會(huì),“我們能夠?yàn)椴蛷d和食品雜貨店等領(lǐng)域的派送人員提供更可預(yù)測(cè)的、更豐厚的收入機(jī)會(huì)?!?/p>

然而,對(duì)于該筆交易對(duì)零工人員的好處,接受《財(cái)富》雜志采訪的多數(shù)人都持懷疑態(tài)度。Postmates的送餐員保羅·奧哈是一個(gè)非官方的Facebook同行群組的管理員,他說(shuō)他認(rèn)為該筆交易“給送餐員帶來(lái)好處的可能性微乎其微?!?/p>

奧哈說(shuō):“希望Uber能像可口可樂(lè)公司(Coca-Cola)那樣做?!彼囊馑际牵琔ber最終為消費(fèi)者提供許多選擇(用按需服務(wù)應(yīng)用與軟飲料對(duì)比),基本上形成內(nèi)部競(jìng)爭(zhēng)的格局。

他說(shuō),成為送餐員就像是加入了一場(chǎng)充滿不確定性的經(jīng)濟(jì)“游戲”。潛在雇主越少,代表“設(shè)計(jì)城市”的方法越少,也就意味著潛在回報(bào)減少。

失去胃口,贏得戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)

如果Uber授予Postmates一定程度的獨(dú)立自主權(quán),允許司機(jī)、商戶和客戶根據(jù)自己的偏好在不同應(yīng)用程序之間切換,這將帶來(lái)更多選擇和更高的靈活性。但該筆交易背后的邏輯顯然是為了利用整合和規(guī)模經(jīng)濟(jì)節(jié)約成本。

Uber在公布該交易的聲明中表示,在明年第一季度交易按計(jì)劃完成之后,公司“打算允許面向消費(fèi)者的Postmates應(yīng)用繼續(xù)獨(dú)立運(yùn)營(yíng)。”公司還表示,計(jì)劃合并兩家公司的后端業(yè)務(wù),并削減日常開(kāi)支2億美元。

威爾弗雷德·陳是一位自由撰稿人。他平時(shí)通過(guò)在Postmates等按需服務(wù)應(yīng)用程序上送餐來(lái)賺取外快。他總結(jié)了零工人員的焦慮。行業(yè)整合將使零工人員越來(lái)越受制于少數(shù)幾家超級(jí)強(qiáng)大的公司。

他說(shuō):“問(wèn)題是,這意味著工作者的選擇越來(lái)越少,也意味著平臺(tái)變得更加龐大,越來(lái)越難以對(duì)付。隨著Uber的霸權(quán)不斷擴(kuò)大,它們會(huì)有更多手段對(duì)付工作者,剝削我們的手段也會(huì)變得更加殘忍?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Biz

As investors cheered on Uber's agreement to buy Postmates for $2.65 billion on July 6, another crowd reacted differently: the gig workers who underpin the ride-hailing and food-delivery business.

Edan Alva, a driver who opted for Lyft over Uber during the latter’s years of scandal, called the deal "unethical" and "immoral" because, he said, it will amplify Uber's ability to suppress worker pay. Drivers and food couriers receive a share of the ride and meal-order fees charged by the app-based companies, which also take a hefty cut.

"It's like if a large-scale embezzler were allowed to buy a bank," said Alva, who is also an organizer for Gig Workers Rising, a labor advocacy group.

Alva said he makes roughly $20 to $22 hourly on average ferrying passengers around the Bay Area. But after expenses like gas and unexpected car maintenance costs—he had five flat tires in the past year alone—his take is “definitely well below $15 per hour,” and “possibly closer to the $10 point," he estimates.

Alva criticized ride-hailing firms’ “predatory tactics” that he said are designed to minimize people’s compensation, including by recognizing their most essential workers, drivers and couriers, as contractors rather than as full-time employees with benefits. Uber and fellow gig-economy companies are currently fighting a law in California that could force them to reclassify their workers as full-time employees.

The companies are shelling out tens of millions of dollars to promote an alternate state ballot initiative that would exempt them from the rule change.

Fighting atop the food pyramid

Ride-hailing and food-delivery businesses are locked in a fierce battle for market share even as the lockdown measures imposed by authorities to combat the global coronavirus pandemic cause their core operations to flounder.

Luis Vasquez, a DoorDash courier who used to pick up passengers for Uber and Lyft before switching to meal delivery amid the onset of COVID-19, said he is concerned about the industry consolidation. "I don't think it's gonna be fair or good for the drivers," he said of the Uber-Postmates deal. "Uber is doing this because they want to take over."

A combined Uber-Postmates would claim 37% of food delivery market share in the U.S., according to payments-tracker Edison Trends. That would make it the runner-up to the current leader, DoorDash, which has a 44% market share.

Competition continues to heighten, despite the pandemic. DoorDash just last month raised $400 million at a nearly $16 billion valuation. Grubhub, which last month agreed to sell to Netherlands’ Just Eat Takeaway shortly after a rumored deal with Uber fell through, has 17% of the market.

Margins have slimmed as a narrowing band of rivals compete to offer the cheapest, most convenient service.

Vasquez, a single parent, lamented the continual reduction in pay his assignments provide. "When I started it was really good,” he said of his early earnings five years ago.

“Now it's crap,” Vasquez said.

Robbing Peter to feed Paul

Some drivers blasted Uber for spending billions on Postmates while paying workers a pittance.

Nicole Moore, a part-time driver for Lyft, described Uber's actions as hypocritical. "They don't have the money to pay people basic labor standards, but they have the money to buy a whole new company?" she said.

"To me, this is a slap in the face," said Moore, who is also an organizer for Rideshare Drivers United, another worker advocacy group that is agitating to unionize ride-hailing drivers.

Peter Young, a courier for Postmates, said he sees no upside to the Uber-Postmates deal. “I don't really see anything getting better for workers after this. I don't expect pay to rise, or job security to improve, or anything,” he wrote in an email.

Further, Young said, he fears the deal could affect people’s employment status, including his own. After two years transporting riders for Uber, the company “deactivated” him, effectively booting him from its platform, after he got into a “fender-bender” accident last year, he said.

Young said he worries that Postmates could ban him, too, as it gets absorbed by Uber. Though Postmates has assured couriers the acquisition won’t have an immediate effect on their ability to work, that promise, he said, is “only as strong as their word."

"And their word generally means nothing these days,” Young added.

Ride sharing is caring

Some people looked more optimistically on the deal.

Michael Gumora, a former Uber and Lyft driver who now runs Rideshare Report, a blog about the ride-sharing business, gave an opposing view. He said he thinks the consolidation will be "good for drivers actually" in the long term, because it will force more workers together, making it easier for them "to get together for the purposes of collective bargaining."

But, Gumora noted, Uber is “not doing [the deal] for the benefit of the drivers at all.”

Uber contends its acquisition of Postmates will offer advantages to their gig workers. A spokesperson wrote to Fortune in an email that with the combined network of restaurants, orders, and opportunities for delivery fulfillment, "we'll be able to offer even stronger and more predictable earning opportunities to delivery people across meals, grocery, and more."

Most people Fortune interviewed were skeptical of any possible benefits for gig workers, however. Paul Oh, a Postmates courier who is the administrator of an unofficial Facebook group for his peers, said he sees only "a very slim chance it is a positive thing for couriers."

"Hopefully, Uber approaches this like Coca-Cola," Oh said, meaning that Uber ends up offering so many options to consumers—on-demand apps versus soft drinks, in this case—that it basically competes against itself.

Being a courier is like participating in an uncertain economic “game,” Oh said. Fewer potential employers means fewer ways “to play your city,” which means less potential reward.

Losing an appetite, winning the war

If Uber grants Postmates some level of separation and autonomy, allowing drivers, merchants, and customers to switch between apps based on their preferences, it could allow for more choice and flexibility. But the logic for the deal no doubt derives from savings presented by consolidation and economies of scale.

In statement announcing the deal, Uber said it “intends to keep the consumer-facing Postmates app running separately” even after the transaction closes, slated for the first quarter of next year. The company said it also plans to combine back-end operations and cut $200 million in overhead costs.

Wilfred Chan, a freelance writer who supplements his income by delivering meals for on-demand apps like Postmates, summed up his gig-worker peers' anxieties. The move puts gig workers increasingly at the mercy of a few ultrapowerful players.

"The problem is that it means less choice for workers. It means that these platforms are growing bigger and harder to fight," Chan said. "As Uber's hegemony grows, they're going to have even more leverage against workers and be able to exploit us even more harshly.”

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開(kāi)
熱讀文章
91久久青青青国产免费| 国产成人无码AV一区二区| 亚洲第一a在线观看网站| 无码国产精品一区二区免费式直播| 99久久人妻精品免费一区| 男女体裸下00动态视频| 国产精品久久久久9999赢消| 国产精品日本一区二区在线播放| 亚洲国产国语自产精品| 亚洲高清在不卡一区二区三区| 无码欧精品亚洲日韩一区app| 中文字幕无码精品三级在线电影| 色欲久久久天天天综合网精品| 亚洲一区二区三区一品精| 色橹橹欧美在线观看视频高清| 成人AV无码一区二区三区| 一区二区天堂资源中文最新版在线一区| 欧美在线日韩在线亚洲第一| 亚洲男人A∨资源网| 久久亚洲精品无码AⅤ大香| 精品国产一区AV天美传媒| 日韩精品一区二区三区视频播放| 亚洲A∨天堂最新地址| 真人作爱90分钟免费看视| 一区香蕉视频亚洲毛片免费一级| 伊人久久大香线蕉av五月天| 久久99精品国产99久久6尤物| 国产动作大片中文字幕亚1州区2| 九热精品视频5月婷婷久久| 精品日本一区二区国产午夜精品久久久久| 久久人搡人人玩人妻精品首页| 真人作爱90分钟免费看视频| 无码人妻精品一区二区蜜桃网站| 国产三级久久久精品麻豆三级| 精品亚洲a∨无码专区毛片| 日本一区二区三区精品国产| 国产在线精品二区| 国产伦精品免编号公布| 精品无码一级毛片免费视频观看| 亚洲精品国产精华液怎么样亚洲 | 青娱乐免费黄色视觉视频|