在新冠病毒疫情爆發(fā)后不久,人們開始為住宅和辦公室購買便攜式空氣凈化器。理由?該設備可以將病毒(可在室內漂浮多達3小時)從空氣中過濾掉,從而降低患病風險。
但空氣凈化器真的好用嗎?答案是肯定的,按照美國環(huán)保局的說法,在一定程度上是有用的。
空氣凈化器的效力取決于它們捕捉空氣中顆粒物以及它們相對于過濾空間的過濾能力。它與其他技術同時使用時會發(fā)揮更大的效力,例如增強室內通風,在中央暖氣和空調系統(tǒng)中使用高端過濾器,以及遵守社交疏離政策等。
在購買空氣凈化器之前不妨了解以下信息。
誰需要便攜式空氣凈化器?
空氣凈化器相對于其他一些解決方案(例如改善通風,只需打開幾扇窗戶)來說較為昂貴。人們應該將其看作是一種額外的預防措施,或將其作為其他解決方案無法實施時的最后手段。
例如,高樓的窗戶通常是不能打開的;也有可能你在家中陪伴著一名感染了新冠病毒的家庭成員,或者那些經(jīng)常前往家庭之外高風險地帶的人。例如,擔心暴露于學生中的教師們可能會希望給其家人增添額外的保護措施。專家們甚至建議將空氣凈化器納入學校更廣泛的重啟計劃。
現(xiàn)有的空氣凈化技術有哪些?
空氣凈化器并非生來就是一模一樣的,我們首先要看其過濾原理。
最廣泛使用的空氣凈化技術是人們眾所周知的機械過濾。簡而言之,就是指空氣凈化器將空氣送入能夠捕捉懸浮顆粒物的實體過濾器,基本上與通過篩網(wǎng)過濾水中雜質的方式一樣。
第二種方法是越來越流行的電離技術。該技術將電解質釋放至懸浮物中,從而讓其附著在物體表面而不是懸浮在空氣中。然而,一些研究發(fā)現(xiàn),電離式凈化器的效率沒有其他凈化器高。環(huán)保局曾警告說,一些電離式凈化器會產生臭氧,而且其濃度可能會威脅人類肺部健康。得益于技術的改善以及來自于監(jiān)管方的壓力,零臭氧排放電離式凈化器也已面世,而且加州空氣資源委員會已針對臭氧排放濃度低于安全標準的空氣凈化器列出了一個清單。
最后,還有多種非傳統(tǒng)空氣凈化技術。其中一些遭到了廣泛的審查,例如Molekule使用的PECO專屬過濾技術。但由于空氣凈化器僅受制于有限的監(jiān)管方監(jiān)管,因此請務必謹慎對待實驗性技術。
哪種過濾器能夠捕捉冠狀病毒?
要想確??諝鈨艋髂軌蜻^濾冠狀病毒,最簡單的辦法是購買帶有高效空氣過濾器(HEPA)的機械式空氣凈化器,它對0.3微米以上懸浮物的捕捉率達到了99.97%。醫(yī)院通常使用這種過濾級別的凈化器,而且業(yè)界普遍認為它能夠有效地過濾掉空氣中的冠狀病毒。
冠狀病毒的大小僅有0.1微米,比HEPA標稱的可捕捉顆粒物的尺寸要小。然而,要懸浮在空氣中,病毒需要一個載體,通常是水滴,而水滴的尺寸則要大得多,因此可以被過濾器俘獲。
令人感到疑惑的是,一些空氣凈化器可能宣傳自己有“HEPA類型”的過濾器,這一點具有誤導性,因為這些過濾器的效果可能與真正的HEPA過濾器有差距。
包括電離式和靜電式空氣凈化器在內的其他設備在清潔空氣時無需使用過濾器。事情倒是簡單了,但這種無過濾器凈化器的效果可謂是千差萬別,而且有關其捕捉冠狀病毒效力的研究著實非常有限。因此總的來說,機械式HEPA過濾器是最安全的選擇。
但有一個值得注意的例外:實驗室測試顯示,Molekule的專屬PECO技術在捕捉懸浮顆粒物時的效力比HEPA更高,而且是直接摧毀并非是捕捉。然而,Molekule的設備在市場上的價格亦位于頂端(見下圖)。
你的空氣凈化器是否足夠大?
空氣凈化器的衡量指標稱之為潔凈空氣量(CADR)。這個標準反映了凈化器捕捉污染物的效能,但要理解這個數(shù)字并不容易。
大多數(shù)空氣凈化器有三個CADR標準,分別針對花粉、灰塵和煙霧,其過濾效率略有不同。按照家用電器制造商協(xié)會的推薦,所購買空氣凈化器的煙霧過濾CADR至少應該是房間空間的三分之二。
例如,如果房間大小為12英尺X 10英尺,或120立方英尺,那么所購買空氣凈化器的煙霧 CADR至少應該是80。
如果對此特別在意的話,你可以購買適用于更大房間的空氣凈化器,這也就意味著房間中的空氣過濾頻率將高于其必要頻率。此外,對于那些層高高于8英尺的房間來說,協(xié)會稱應該購買適用于更大房間的空氣凈化器(不過該組織并未說明如何調整相關指標。)
然而,這種做法并不適用于所有空氣凈化器:戴森和Molekule都已提交了按照CADR標準制定的自家設備指標。但它們也都就每個型號所適用的房間大小進行了建議。
獨立式空氣凈化器基本上都是針對單個房間使用,因此,如果你需要對多個房間的空氣進行過濾,那么你可能得購買多臺凈化器。
哪款空氣凈化器最好?
有幾個型號的空氣凈化器在知名評論人士心目中一直名列前茅,不過人們還是得根據(jù)價格、房間大小和設計等因素來自行判斷。
Coway AP-1512HH Mighty空氣凈化器是Tom’s Guide與《紐約時報》Wirecutter專欄的首選,亦得到了Cnet的高度評價。此外,Blueair Blue Pure 411和Honeywell HPA 300在上述三個榜單中也一直都處于靠前的位置。
好的空氣凈化器價格幾何?
空氣凈化器的價格千差萬別,這取決于其過濾能力和所使用的技術。
最貴的空氣凈化器包括799美元的Molekule;在低端,備受推崇的Blueair 411的價格僅為119美元。
我們還應注意:空氣凈化器的總價格不僅包括購入價格,同時還包括更換濾網(wǎng)的成本和頻率,以及設備的耗電量。這一點對于電離式凈化器來說是一個明顯的優(yōu)勢,它沒有需要更換的濾網(wǎng)。然而,其初始成本要高于機械式凈化器,而且你還得清潔收集顆粒物的金屬板,但有用戶說這一體驗并不愉快。
可以從哪里了解有關空氣凈化器的詳情?
空氣凈化器評測領域一個非常有用的工具便是AHAM編錄的室內空氣凈化器名錄。該名錄包含各類空氣凈化器的CADR和表現(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù),業(yè)已經(jīng)過獨立實驗室測試驗證。
您也可以在空氣凈化器包裝或營銷材料上尋找AHAM的“Verifide”標識。該標識表明凈化器制造商有關過濾能力以及其他細節(jié)的標稱值都已得到了獨立驗證。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Feb
在新冠病毒疫情爆發(fā)后不久,人們開始為住宅和辦公室購買便攜式空氣凈化器。理由?該設備可以將病毒(可在室內漂浮多達3小時)從空氣中過濾掉,從而降低患病風險。
但空氣凈化器真的好用嗎?答案是肯定的,按照美國環(huán)保局的說法,在一定程度上是有用的。
空氣凈化器的效力取決于它們捕捉空氣中顆粒物以及它們相對于過濾空間的過濾能力。它與其他技術同時使用時會發(fā)揮更大的效力,例如增強室內通風,在中央暖氣和空調系統(tǒng)中使用高端過濾器,以及遵守社交疏離政策等。
在購買空氣凈化器之前不妨了解以下信息。
誰需要便攜式空氣凈化器?
空氣凈化器相對于其他一些解決方案(例如改善通風,只需打開幾扇窗戶)來說較為昂貴。人們應該將其看作是一種額外的預防措施,或將其作為其他解決方案無法實施時的最后手段。
例如,高樓的窗戶通常是不能打開的;也有可能你在家中陪伴著一名感染了新冠病毒的家庭成員,或者那些經(jīng)常前往家庭之外高風險地帶的人。例如,擔心暴露于學生中的教師們可能會希望給其家人增添額外的保護措施。專家們甚至建議將空氣凈化器納入學校更廣泛的重啟計劃。
現(xiàn)有的空氣凈化技術有哪些?
空氣凈化器并非生來就是一模一樣的,我們首先要看其過濾原理。
最廣泛使用的空氣凈化技術是人們眾所周知的機械過濾。簡而言之,就是指空氣凈化器將空氣送入能夠捕捉懸浮顆粒物的實體過濾器,基本上與通過篩網(wǎng)過濾水中雜質的方式一樣。
第二種方法是越來越流行的電離技術。該技術將電解質釋放至懸浮物中,從而讓其附著在物體表面而不是懸浮在空氣中。然而,一些研究發(fā)現(xiàn),電離式凈化器的效率沒有其他凈化器高。環(huán)保局曾警告說,一些電離式凈化器會產生臭氧,而且其濃度可能會威脅人類肺部健康。得益于技術的改善以及來自于監(jiān)管方的壓力,零臭氧排放電離式凈化器也已面世,而且加州空氣資源委員會已針對臭氧排放濃度低于安全標準的空氣凈化器列出了一個清單。
最后,還有多種非傳統(tǒng)空氣凈化技術。其中一些遭到了廣泛的審查,例如Molekule使用的PECO專屬過濾技術。但由于空氣凈化器僅受制于有限的監(jiān)管方監(jiān)管,因此請務必謹慎對待實驗性技術。
哪種過濾器能夠捕捉冠狀病毒?
要想確保空氣凈化器能夠過濾冠狀病毒,最簡單的辦法是購買帶有高效空氣過濾器(HEPA)的機械式空氣凈化器,它對0.3微米以上懸浮物的捕捉率達到了99.97%。醫(yī)院通常使用這種過濾級別的凈化器,而且業(yè)界普遍認為它能夠有效地過濾掉空氣中的冠狀病毒。
冠狀病毒的大小僅有0.1微米,比HEPA標稱的可捕捉顆粒物的尺寸要小。然而,要懸浮在空氣中,病毒需要一個載體,通常是水滴,而水滴的尺寸則要大得多,因此可以被過濾器俘獲。
令人感到疑惑的是,一些空氣凈化器可能宣傳自己有“HEPA類型”的過濾器,這一點具有誤導性,因為這些過濾器的效果可能與真正的HEPA過濾器有差距。
包括電離式和靜電式空氣凈化器在內的其他設備在清潔空氣時無需使用過濾器。事情倒是簡單了,但這種無過濾器凈化器的效果可謂是千差萬別,而且有關其捕捉冠狀病毒效力的研究著實非常有限。因此總的來說,機械式HEPA過濾器是最安全的選擇。
但有一個值得注意的例外:實驗室測試顯示,Molekule的專屬PECO技術在捕捉懸浮顆粒物時的效力比HEPA更高,而且是直接摧毀并非是捕捉。然而,Molekule的設備在市場上的價格亦位于頂端(見下圖)。
你的空氣凈化器是否足夠大?
空氣凈化器的衡量指標稱之為潔凈空氣量(CADR)。這個標準反映了凈化器捕捉污染物的效能,但要理解這個數(shù)字并不容易。
大多數(shù)空氣凈化器有三個CADR標準,分別針對花粉、灰塵和煙霧,其過濾效率略有不同。按照家用電器制造商協(xié)會的推薦,所購買空氣凈化器的煙霧過濾CADR至少應該是房間空間的三分之二。
例如,如果房間大小為12英尺X 10英尺,或120立方英尺,那么所購買空氣凈化器的煙霧 CADR至少應該是80。
如果對此特別在意的話,你可以購買適用于更大房間的空氣凈化器,這也就意味著房間中的空氣過濾頻率將高于其必要頻率。此外,對于那些層高高于8英尺的房間來說,協(xié)會稱應該購買適用于更大房間的空氣凈化器(不過該組織并未說明如何調整相關指標。)
然而,這種做法并不適用于所有空氣凈化器:戴森和Molekule都已提交了按照CADR標準制定的自家設備指標。但它們也都就每個型號所適用的房間大小進行了建議。
獨立式空氣凈化器基本上都是針對單個房間使用,因此,如果你需要對多個房間的空氣進行過濾,那么你可能得購買多臺凈化器。
哪款空氣凈化器最好?
有幾個型號的空氣凈化器在知名評論人士心目中一直名列前茅,不過人們還是得根據(jù)價格、房間大小和設計等因素來自行判斷。
Coway AP-1512HH Mighty空氣凈化器是Tom’s Guide與《紐約時報》Wirecutter專欄的首選,亦得到了Cnet的高度評價。此外,Blueair Blue Pure 411和Honeywell HPA 300在上述三個榜單中也一直都處于靠前的位置。
好的空氣凈化器價格幾何?
空氣凈化器的價格千差萬別,這取決于其過濾能力和所使用的技術。
最貴的空氣凈化器包括799美元的Molekule;在低端,備受推崇的Blueair 411的價格僅為119美元。
我們還應注意:空氣凈化器的總價格不僅包括購入價格,同時還包括更換濾網(wǎng)的成本和頻率,以及設備的耗電量。這一點對于電離式凈化器來說是一個明顯的優(yōu)勢,它沒有需要更換的濾網(wǎng)。然而,其初始成本要高于機械式凈化器,而且你還得清潔收集顆粒物的金屬板,但有用戶說這一體驗并不愉快。
可以從哪里了解有關空氣凈化器的詳情?
空氣凈化器評測領域一個非常有用的工具便是AHAM編錄的室內空氣凈化器名錄。該名錄包含各類空氣凈化器的CADR和表現(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù),業(yè)已經(jīng)過獨立實驗室測試驗證。
您也可以在空氣凈化器包裝或營銷材料上尋找AHAM的“Verifide”標識。該標識表明凈化器制造商有關過濾能力以及其他細節(jié)的標稱值都已得到了獨立驗證。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:Feb
Soon after the coronavirus pandemic hit, people started snatching up portable air purifiers for their homes and offices. Their thinking? The devices will scrub the air of the virus (it can float for up to three hours indoors), reducing their risk of falling sick.
But do air purifiers actually work? The answer is yes—to a point, according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
The effectiveness of air purifiers depends on how well they catch air particles and their size in relation to the space they must filter. And it helps to use the devices in concert with other techniques such as increasing ventilation indoors, using high-end filters in central heating and air conditioning systems, and adhering to social distancing.
Here's what you need to know before buying an air purifier.
Who needs a portable air purifier?
Air purifiers are expensive relative to some other solutions—improved ventilation, for instance, can be as simple as opening a few windows. You should think of them as an extra precaution, or as a last resort when other options are unavailable.
For instance, windows in high-rise buildings often can’t be opened. Or maybe you’re at home with a coronavirus-infected family member, or with people who are regularly in risky situations outside of the home. For example, teachers worried about exposure from their students may want the extra protection for their families. Experts have even recommended air purifiers as part of schools’ broader reopening plans.
What types of air-purifying technologies are available?
Air purifiers aren't created equal. The first thing to look at is how a purifier filters the air.
The most widely used air purifier technology is what’s known as mechanical filtration. This simply means a purifier pushes air through a physical filter that catches airborne particles, in essentially the same way a sieve removes particles when you pour water through it.
A second, increasingly widespread method involves ionization. This technology adds an electric charge to particles, which makes them stick to surfaces instead of floating airborne. However, some research has found ionizing purifiers are less effective than other options. And the EPA has warned that some ionizing devices generate ozone at levels that may be damaging to human lungs. Thanks to better technology and pressure from regulators, ionizing filters that don’t generate ozone are now available, and the California Air Resources Board has created a list of those that emit only safe levels of ozone.
Finally, there are a number of unconventional air purifying technologies available. Some of these, such as the proprietary PECO filtration technology used by Molekule, are widely vetted. But since air purifier claims are subject to limited regulatory oversight, approach experimental technology with caution.
Which filters catch the coronavirus?
The easiest way to ensure your air purifier can filter coronavirus is to buy a mechanical purifier that uses a HEPA filter, which capture 99.97% of particles that are 0.3 microns or larger. This is the filter grade commonly used by hospitals, and is widely considered effective for removing coronavirus from the air.
The size of the coronavirus is only around 0.1 microns, or smaller than what a HEPA filter is rated to reliably catch. But to get airborne, the virus requires a carrier, usually water droplets, which are much larger and therefore can be captured.
Adding to the confusion, some purifiers may be advertised as having "HEPA type" filters, which could be misleading, since these may not be as effective as a true HEPA filters.
Other devices, including ionizing and electrostatic purifiers, clean the air without using filters. That can save hassle, but the effectiveness of filterless purifiers varies widely, and research on their effect on the coronavirus specifically is still limited. So in general, a mechanical HEPA filter is the safest bet.
There is one notable exception: Laboratory tests show Molekule's proprietary PECO technology catches particulates more effectively than HEPA, and destroys them instead of just trapping them. But Molekule's devices are among the most expensive on the market (see below).
Is your purifier big enough?
Air filters are rated on a metric known as Clean Air Delivery Rate, or CADR. This rating reflects how well a purifier removes contaminants, though understanding the number is difficult.
Most purifiers have three CADR ratings, for pollen, dust, and tobacco smoke, which are filtered at slightly different rates. The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) recommends buying a filter with a tobacco smoke CADR of at least two-thirds of the volume of the room in which you'll use the device.
For example, if you’re buying a purifier for a room that’s 12 feet by 10 feet, or 120 cubic feet, you’d want a purifier with a tobacco smoke CADR of at least 80.
If you want to be especially cautious, you can buy a purifier rated for a larger room, which will simply mean your air is being filtered even more often than necessary. Also, for rooms with ceilings higher than eight feet, AHAM says you’ll want a purifier rated for a larger room (though the group doesn’t specify how to adjust your measurement).
This doesn’t apply to all purifiers, though: Neither Dyson nor Molekule have submitted their devices for measurement under the CADR standard. But they offer their own recommendations for the room size each model can protect.
Freestanding air purifiers are largely intended to work for single rooms, so if you want protection in more than one part of your house, you may need multiple purifiers.
Which air purifiers are best?
A few air purifier models are consistently highly ranked by reputable reviewers, though you’ll have to make your own judgment when balancing factors like price, room size, and design.
The Coway AP-1512HH Mighty purifier was the top pick from both Tom’s Guide and the New York Times’ Wirecutter, and was also highly rated by Cnet. The Blueair Blue Pure 411 and the Honeywell HPA 300 also placed consistently high in all three rankings.
How much does an effective air purifier cost?
Air purifier prices can vary a great deal depending on their filtering capacity and the technology they rely on.
Among the most expensive air purifiers is the $799 Molekule. On the other end of the spectrum, the highly-rated Blueair 411 purifier costs just $119.
Also worth considering: An air purifier's total price includes not only the sticker price, but also the cost and frequency of replacement filters, and the electrical cost of running the device. That’s one clear advantage for ionizing purifiers, which don’t have a filter that needs replacing. But they do generally cost more up front than mechanical filters, and you have to clean the metal plates that collect particulates, which some users say is unpleasant.
Where to find more information about air purifiers?
One very useful tool for evaluating air purifiers is this directory of room air cleaners maintained by AHAM. The directory includes room size (CADR) and performance data for a wide variety of purifiers, verified by independent lab tests.
You can also look for AHAM’s “Verifide” mark on a purifier's packaging or marketing materials. This indicates that the manufacturer’s claims about filtration power and other details have been independently verified.