成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

首頁 500強 活動 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領導力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

這家美國公司靠“歐式”奶粉東山再起

Emma Hinchliffe
2021-01-06

這家公司的使命是,為無法母乳喂養(yǎng)(或用吸奶器吸奶),又不想讓孩子使用美國配方奶粉的媽媽們,提供一種安全、健康的替代選擇。

文本設置
小號
默認
大號
Plus(0條)

圖片來源:COURTESY OF BOBBIE

2019年6月的某一天下午,美國食品與藥品管理局(Food and Drug Administration,以下簡稱FDA)的兩名檢查員來到了位于舊金山的一座倉庫。

這兩位身穿制服的女士從公文包里拿出一篇打印好的《財富》雜志文章,文章的標題是《初創(chuàng)公司顛覆吸奶器行業(yè)。嬰兒配方奶粉會是下一個嗎?》。她們在這篇文章中重點圈出了所有出現(xiàn)“嬰兒配方奶粉”字樣的內(nèi)容。

這兩位FDA的官員正在約談Bobbie公司的創(chuàng)始人。Bobbie是一家規(guī)模很小的銷售配方奶粉的新公司。這家初創(chuàng)公司向約100位灣區(qū)客戶推出訂購計劃試點。在之后的10天里,公司創(chuàng)始人一直小心謹慎地在其網(wǎng)站和產(chǎn)品包裝上宣傳其產(chǎn)品是“幼兒奶粉”或“配方奶粉”。然而,《財富》雜志的文章和其他文章都將這家初創(chuàng)公司描述為“嬰兒配方奶粉”行業(yè)中的一員。

這足以引起FDA的關注。該政府部門對嬰幼兒配方奶粉的監(jiān)管,比對其他大部分食品都要嚴格,甚至高于可以攝入其他食物的兒童使用的其他類型的配方奶粉。在美國,作為嬰兒配方奶粉銷售的所有產(chǎn)品必須符合《嬰兒配方食品法》(Infant Formula Act)的要求,包括對使用配方奶粉的嬰兒進行成長監(jiān)控研究、營養(yǎng)測試和食品安全等規(guī)則。在美國境外生產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)品通常無法滿足這些規(guī)定。Bobbie使用歐洲原材料在德國生產(chǎn)奶粉,其目的就是生產(chǎn)與在歐盟國家銷售的配方奶粉接近的產(chǎn)品。Bobbie銷售的對象是注重配料的美國父母,他們有時候會通過Bobbie的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人勞拉?莫迪所說的美國經(jīng)銷商“黑市”購買歐洲生產(chǎn)的配方奶粉。

FDA的檢查人員在倉庫結(jié)束與Bobbie團隊的談話之后,這家公司收到了FDA的警告和召回令。公司創(chuàng)始人猜測,Bobbie是史上規(guī)模最小的收到警告和召回令的美國公司之一。當時公司剛剛成立18個月,員工不到15人,他們給100位訂閱用戶打電話,向用戶解釋說他們收到了FDA的警告,并被要求停止奶粉生產(chǎn)。公司創(chuàng)始人和員工家里都有剛出生的孩子,他們自己甚至都停止使用公司的配方奶粉。公司的首席執(zhí)行官莫迪表示:“我從來沒有感到如此脆弱。我有時候會覺得這不公平。我們在一個城市進行了試點,但我們還是進行了全國召回?!?/p>

莫迪稱,F(xiàn)DA的行動讓她倍感意外,因為市場上有許多幼兒奶粉、配方奶粉甚至“夜間”配方奶粉都未受到該部門同等程度的審查。她說,公司最大的錯誤是側(cè)重于網(wǎng)上傳達信息,并沒有在產(chǎn)品包裝上說明奶粉適用人群是“12個月及以上的”幼兒,而不是新生兒。莫迪說:“現(xiàn)在回想起來,很難讓人不感到懊悔,我們本應該注意到這個問題。這只是一個失誤而已?!?/p>

對于一家試圖顛覆配方奶粉行業(yè)的硅谷初創(chuàng)公司,F(xiàn)DA反應如此謹慎,并不令人意外。該政府機構堅持嚴格履行其職責,以確保將配方奶粉作為唯一營養(yǎng)來源的兒童,所使用的產(chǎn)品是健康、安全的。莫迪表示:“嬰兒配方奶粉行業(yè)不存在任何被誤解的空間?!贝送猓嗄暌詠?,美國的嬰兒配方奶粉一直被幾家大公司主導,如美贊臣(Mead Johnson)的Enfamil和雅培(Abbott Nutrition)的心美力(Similac)等。在過去五年中,美國市場一直沒有新的嬰兒配方奶粉品牌出現(xiàn)。

Bobbie公司聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人及首席執(zhí)行官勞拉?莫迪。圖片來源:Courtesy of Bobbie

大公司生產(chǎn)的嬰幼兒配方奶粉擠滿了藥店的貨架。這些公司有律師和監(jiān)管專業(yè)人員向FDA報告標簽或配料的任何調(diào)整,而其他大部分食品或膳食補充劑都不需要這種“上市前通告”。Bobbie是一個小團隊,服務半徑只有15英里,僅有幾天的服務經(jīng)驗,所以在FDA知道這家新嬰幼兒配方奶方公司的時候,它還沒有與該部門建立起長期的合作關系。

莫迪認為公司始終堅持的使命是,為無法母乳喂養(yǎng)(或用吸奶器吸奶),又不想讓孩子使用美國配方奶粉的媽媽們,提供一種安全、健康的替代選擇;父母之所以從歐洲購買配方奶粉,是因為相較于許多美國同類產(chǎn)品中所含的棕櫚油、玉米糖漿和傳統(tǒng)牛乳,他們更喜歡歐洲奶粉中的乳糖、椰子油和食草牛乳配方。

莫迪曾經(jīng)擔任愛彼迎(Airbnb)酒店業(yè)務總監(jiān),她因為自己無法用母乳喂養(yǎng)孩子,才有了創(chuàng)業(yè)的想法。莫迪希望自己的公司能夠與在吸奶器行業(yè)橫空出世的Elvie和Willow等初創(chuàng)公司一樣,顛覆配方奶粉行業(yè)。配方奶粉一直在向不需要它的媽媽們大力推銷,而使用它的媽媽們又會產(chǎn)生羞愧感。莫迪在2019年告訴《財富》雜志:“當前喂養(yǎng)孩子的實際情況是我們無法接受的。15%至20%的女性無法產(chǎn)生足夠的母乳以進行純母乳喂養(yǎng)?!?/p>

圖片來源:Courtesy of Bobbie

在FDA發(fā)出警告一年多以后,Bobbie重新振作了起來。公司在致客戶的信中保證,公司不會批評FDA的決定。公司在寫給訂閱用戶的信函中表示:“我們承認我們的標簽和市場營銷可能存在誤導,對此我們向所有客戶致以誠摯的歉意。我們知道這樣做很難,但我們必須這樣做。安全是重中之重,這關系到我們的下一代,并且作為家長,在為孩子選購產(chǎn)品時,理應得到一份安心的承諾?!?/p>

Bobbie發(fā)出的信息引起了多方關注,他們在Bobbie東山再起的過程中發(fā)揮了關鍵作用。Bobbie公司的目標一直是在美國進行生產(chǎn),但能夠生產(chǎn)嬰兒配方奶粉的設施有最低訂單數(shù)量要求,這遠高于這家初創(chuàng)公司可以達到的訂單量。制造商百利高(Perrigo)專門生產(chǎn)零售商自有品牌的配方奶粉和兒童營養(yǎng)飲品。盡管該公司也有意為千禧一代父母們生產(chǎn)產(chǎn)品,但就在幾個月前,當Bobbie曾向百利高發(fā)送“冷郵件”,請求其幫忙生產(chǎn)配方奶粉時,百利高還是拒絕了這一請求。而目前,百利高正在佛蒙特州為Bobbie公司生產(chǎn)配方奶粉。百利高的高管艾德里安?謝里甘說:“我們注意到,人們需要一種接受FDA監(jiān)管的產(chǎn)品,以此滿足消費者[對于歐盟配方奶粉]的偏愛。我之所以再次聯(lián)系勞拉,是因為她們對FDA警告的處理方式打動了我;她們在與消費者溝通的時候非常透明,傳達的信息也很明確?!?/p>

之前的產(chǎn)品召回也引起了一位新投資者的注意,她就是Wave Capital的薩拉?阿德勒。當莫迪在愛彼迎任職的時候,阿德勒就已經(jīng)認識莫迪,但她并沒有參與Bobbie最初的240萬美元種子輪融資,因為她對向美國市場推出一種新配方奶粉的可行性和這種產(chǎn)品的需求存在質(zhì)疑。但公司應對召回的做法讓她改變了心意。在說到投資Bobbie的最終決定時,阿德勒表示:“公司應對FDA的做法體現(xiàn)出了管理者的成熟度,很顯然,投資這家公司是一個正確的決定?!?/p>

一家新制造商和一位新投資者給Bobbie樹立了信心,因此公司投入資源開發(fā)一款不會引起FDA不滿的產(chǎn)品,并與該部門建立了良好的關系。在新任監(jiān)管負責人克里斯蒂娜?伯布里克的指導下,公司在2019年11月參觀了FDA位于馬里蘭州銀泉的辦公室,并與官員討論了公司對美國供應鏈所做的調(diào)整。伯布里克此前曾經(jīng)在雅培負責嬰兒配方奶粉監(jiān)管調(diào)查。

?
Bobbie公司經(jīng)過修改的嬰兒配方奶粉獲得了美國食品與藥品管理局的批準,于1月5日開始在全國發(fā)售。圖片來源:Courtesy of Bobbie

如今,Bobbie從1月5日開始,向全美銷售價值24美元的“歐式配方”嬰兒奶粉。這一代配方奶粉被認為與之前招來警告的奶粉截然不同;FDA的發(fā)言人證實,前一代奶粉“沒有重新進入市場”。

一家消費品初創(chuàng)公司很少會遭遇監(jiān)管挑戰(zhàn)。Bobbie的新投資者阿德勒將公司應對監(jiān)管部門的做法與莫迪在愛彼迎見到的模式進行了對比。愛彼迎雖然有時候依舊會規(guī)避政府的限制,但相比于常常被拿來對比的Uber,愛彼迎在成長階段更有可能與監(jiān)管部門達成合作。阿德勒說道:“她們本可以嘗試反抗,并繼續(xù)向市場銷售她們努力推廣的產(chǎn)品。但她們卻這樣反思:從商業(yè)的角度,我們的長期目標到底是什么?”

Bobbie有12名員工,她們共有19個孩子,其中有6個嬰兒,她們很激動能夠再次使用自己公司的產(chǎn)品。莫迪和她的團隊相信,相比于堅持推廣“配方奶粉”,公司現(xiàn)在處在更有利的位置。阿德勒說:“如果當初FDA沒有因為那篇新聞報道找上門來,她們也不會有今天這樣好的局面?!保ㄘ敻恢形木W(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進龍

審校:汪皓

2019年6月的某一天下午,美國食品與藥品管理局(Food and Drug Administration,以下簡稱FDA)的兩名檢查員來到了位于舊金山的一座倉庫。

這兩位身穿制服的女士從公文包里拿出一篇打印好的《財富》雜志文章,文章的標題是《初創(chuàng)公司顛覆吸奶器行業(yè)。嬰兒配方奶粉會是下一個嗎?》。她們在這篇文章中重點圈出了所有出現(xiàn)“嬰兒配方奶粉”字樣的內(nèi)容。

這兩位FDA的官員正在約談Bobbie公司的創(chuàng)始人。Bobbie是一家規(guī)模很小的銷售配方奶粉的新公司。這家初創(chuàng)公司向約100位灣區(qū)客戶推出訂購計劃試點。在之后的10天里,公司創(chuàng)始人一直小心謹慎地在其網(wǎng)站和產(chǎn)品包裝上宣傳其產(chǎn)品是“幼兒奶粉”或“配方奶粉”。然而,《財富》雜志的文章和其他文章都將這家初創(chuàng)公司描述為“嬰兒配方奶粉”行業(yè)中的一員。

這足以引起FDA的關注。該政府部門對嬰幼兒配方奶粉的監(jiān)管,比對其他大部分食品都要嚴格,甚至高于可以攝入其他食物的兒童使用的其他類型的配方奶粉。在美國,作為嬰兒配方奶粉銷售的所有產(chǎn)品必須符合《嬰兒配方食品法》(Infant Formula Act)的要求,包括對使用配方奶粉的嬰兒進行成長監(jiān)控研究、營養(yǎng)測試和食品安全等規(guī)則。在美國境外生產(chǎn)的產(chǎn)品通常無法滿足這些規(guī)定。Bobbie使用歐洲原材料在德國生產(chǎn)奶粉,其目的就是生產(chǎn)與在歐盟國家銷售的配方奶粉接近的產(chǎn)品。Bobbie銷售的對象是注重配料的美國父母,他們有時候會通過Bobbie的聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人勞拉?莫迪所說的美國經(jīng)銷商“黑市”購買歐洲生產(chǎn)的配方奶粉。

FDA的檢查人員在倉庫結(jié)束與Bobbie團隊的談話之后,這家公司收到了FDA的警告和召回令。公司創(chuàng)始人猜測,Bobbie是史上規(guī)模最小的收到警告和召回令的美國公司之一。當時公司剛剛成立18個月,員工不到15人,他們給100位訂閱用戶打電話,向用戶解釋說他們收到了FDA的警告,并被要求停止奶粉生產(chǎn)。公司創(chuàng)始人和員工家里都有剛出生的孩子,他們自己甚至都停止使用公司的配方奶粉。公司的首席執(zhí)行官莫迪表示:“我從來沒有感到如此脆弱。我有時候會覺得這不公平。我們在一個城市進行了試點,但我們還是進行了全國召回?!?/p>

莫迪稱,F(xiàn)DA的行動讓她倍感意外,因為市場上有許多幼兒奶粉、配方奶粉甚至“夜間”配方奶粉都未受到該部門同等程度的審查。她說,公司最大的錯誤是側(cè)重于網(wǎng)上傳達信息,并沒有在產(chǎn)品包裝上說明奶粉適用人群是“12個月及以上的”幼兒,而不是新生兒。莫迪說:“現(xiàn)在回想起來,很難讓人不感到懊悔,我們本應該注意到這個問題。這只是一個失誤而已?!?/p>

對于一家試圖顛覆配方奶粉行業(yè)的硅谷初創(chuàng)公司,F(xiàn)DA反應如此謹慎,并不令人意外。該政府機構堅持嚴格履行其職責,以確保將配方奶粉作為唯一營養(yǎng)來源的兒童,所使用的產(chǎn)品是健康、安全的。莫迪表示:“嬰兒配方奶粉行業(yè)不存在任何被誤解的空間?!贝送?,多年以來,美國的嬰兒配方奶粉一直被幾家大公司主導,如美贊臣(Mead Johnson)的Enfamil和雅培(Abbott Nutrition)的心美力(Similac)等。在過去五年中,美國市場一直沒有新的嬰兒配方奶粉品牌出現(xiàn)。

大公司生產(chǎn)的嬰幼兒配方奶粉擠滿了藥店的貨架。這些公司有律師和監(jiān)管專業(yè)人員向FDA報告標簽或配料的任何調(diào)整,而其他大部分食品或膳食補充劑都不需要這種“上市前通告”。Bobbie是一個小團隊,服務半徑只有15英里,僅有幾天的服務經(jīng)驗,所以在FDA知道這家新嬰幼兒配方奶方公司的時候,它還沒有與該部門建立起長期的合作關系。

莫迪認為公司始終堅持的使命是,為無法母乳喂養(yǎng)(或用吸奶器吸奶),又不想讓孩子使用美國配方奶粉的媽媽們,提供一種安全、健康的替代選擇;父母之所以從歐洲購買配方奶粉,是因為相較于許多美國同類產(chǎn)品中所含的棕櫚油、玉米糖漿和傳統(tǒng)牛乳,他們更喜歡歐洲奶粉中的乳糖、椰子油和食草牛乳配方。

莫迪曾經(jīng)擔任愛彼迎(Airbnb)酒店業(yè)務總監(jiān),她因為自己無法用母乳喂養(yǎng)孩子,才有了創(chuàng)業(yè)的想法。莫迪希望自己的公司能夠與在吸奶器行業(yè)橫空出世的Elvie和Willow等初創(chuàng)公司一樣,顛覆配方奶粉行業(yè)。配方奶粉一直在向不需要它的媽媽們大力推銷,而使用它的媽媽們又會產(chǎn)生羞愧感。莫迪在2019年告訴《財富》雜志:“當前喂養(yǎng)孩子的實際情況是我們無法接受的。15%至20%的女性無法產(chǎn)生足夠的母乳以進行純母乳喂養(yǎng)?!?/p>

在FDA發(fā)出警告一年多以后,Bobbie重新振作了起來。公司在致客戶的信中保證,公司不會批評FDA的決定。公司在寫給訂閱用戶的信函中表示:“我們承認我們的標簽和市場營銷可能存在誤導,對此我們向所有客戶致以誠摯的歉意。我們知道這樣做很難,但我們必須這樣做。安全是重中之重,這關系到我們的下一代,并且作為家長,在為孩子選購產(chǎn)品時,理應得到一份安心的承諾?!?/p>

Bobbie發(fā)出的信息引起了多方關注,他們在Bobbie東山再起的過程中發(fā)揮了關鍵作用。Bobbie公司的目標一直是在美國進行生產(chǎn),但能夠生產(chǎn)嬰兒配方奶粉的設施有最低訂單數(shù)量要求,這遠高于這家初創(chuàng)公司可以達到的訂單量。制造商百利高(Perrigo)專門生產(chǎn)零售商自有品牌的配方奶粉和兒童營養(yǎng)飲品。盡管該公司也有意為千禧一代父母們生產(chǎn)產(chǎn)品,但就在幾個月前,當Bobbie曾向百利高發(fā)送“冷郵件”,請求其幫忙生產(chǎn)配方奶粉時,百利高還是拒絕了這一請求。而目前,百利高正在佛蒙特州為Bobbie公司生產(chǎn)配方奶粉。百利高的高管艾德里安?謝里甘說:“我們注意到,人們需要一種接受FDA監(jiān)管的產(chǎn)品,以此滿足消費者[對于歐盟配方奶粉]的偏愛。我之所以再次聯(lián)系勞拉,是因為她們對FDA警告的處理方式打動了我;她們在與消費者溝通的時候非常透明,傳達的信息也很明確?!?/p>

之前的產(chǎn)品召回也引起了一位新投資者的注意,她就是Wave Capital的薩拉?阿德勒。當莫迪在愛彼迎任職的時候,阿德勒就已經(jīng)認識莫迪,但她并沒有參與Bobbie最初的240萬美元種子輪融資,因為她對向美國市場推出一種新配方奶粉的可行性和這種產(chǎn)品的需求存在質(zhì)疑。但公司應對召回的做法讓她改變了心意。在說到投資Bobbie的最終決定時,阿德勒表示:“公司應對FDA的做法體現(xiàn)出了管理者的成熟度,很顯然,投資這家公司是一個正確的決定?!?/p>

一家新制造商和一位新投資者給Bobbie樹立了信心,因此公司投入資源開發(fā)一款不會引起FDA不滿的產(chǎn)品,并與該部門建立了良好的關系。在新任監(jiān)管負責人克里斯蒂娜?伯布里克的指導下,公司在2019年11月參觀了FDA位于馬里蘭州銀泉的辦公室,并與官員討論了公司對美國供應鏈所做的調(diào)整。伯布里克此前曾經(jīng)在雅培負責嬰兒配方奶粉監(jiān)管調(diào)查。

如今,Bobbie從1月5日開始,向全美銷售價值24美元的“歐式配方”嬰兒奶粉。這一代配方奶粉被認為與之前招來警告的奶粉截然不同;FDA的發(fā)言人證實,前一代奶粉“沒有重新進入市場”。

一家消費品初創(chuàng)公司很少會遭遇監(jiān)管挑戰(zhàn)。Bobbie的新投資者阿德勒將公司應對監(jiān)管部門的做法與莫迪在愛彼迎見到的模式進行了對比。愛彼迎雖然有時候依舊會規(guī)避政府的限制,但相比于常常被拿來對比的Uber,愛彼迎在成長階段更有可能與監(jiān)管部門達成合作。阿德勒說道:“她們本可以嘗試反抗,并繼續(xù)向市場銷售她們努力推廣的產(chǎn)品。但她們卻這樣反思:從商業(yè)的角度,我們的長期目標到底是什么?”

Bobbie有12名員工,她們共有19個孩子,其中有6個嬰兒,她們很激動能夠再次使用自己公司的產(chǎn)品。莫迪和她的團隊相信,相比于堅持推廣“配方奶粉”,公司現(xiàn)在處在更有利的位置。阿德勒說:“如果當初FDA沒有因為那篇新聞報道找上門來,她們也不會有今天這樣好的局面。”(財富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進龍

審校:汪皓

On a June afternoon in 2019, two inspectors from the Food and Drug Administration visited a warehouse in San Francisco.

The uniformed women pulled out of a briefcase a printout of a Fortune story headlined: "Startups disrupted breast pumps. Is infant formula next?" On that piece of paper, they had highlighted every place the words "infant formula" appeared.

The FDA officials were there to speak to the people behind Bobbie, a very small, very new company selling formula. In the 10 days since the launch of the startup's pilot subscription program serving about 100 Bay Area customers, the company's founders had been careful to refer to their product on their website and packaging only as "toddler formula" or "companion formula." However, Fortune’s story—and a few others—discussed the startup as part of the "infant formula" industry.

That was enough to grab the FDA's attention. The governmental agency closely watches infant formulas, overseeing the product with a keener eye than it does most foods, or even other types of formula aimed at children old enough to also be consuming other foods. All products sold as infant formulas in the United States must meet the requirements of the Infant Formula Act, which include a growth monitoring study for babies who consume the formula, nutrient testing, and food safety rules. Products made outside the U.S. often don't meet those exact regulations. Bobbie's offering was made in Germany with European ingredients and was meant to approximate the kind of formula sold in European Union countries. The company was marketing to ingredient-conscious American parents who sometimes buy European-made formula on what Bobbie cofounder Laura Modi calls a "black market" of U.S. distributors.

After the FDA inspectors spoke with the Bobbie team at the warehouse, the startup became, its founders suspect, one of the smallest U.S. companies to ever go through an FDA warning and recall. The then-18-month-old business with fewer than 15 employees called its 100 subscribers, alerting them to the FDA's warning, and shut down its production. Bobbie's founders and employees, who had new babies of their own, even stopped using the powder formula themselves. "I'd never felt more vulnerable," says Modi, the company's CEO. "I had a moment of feeling like it wasn't fair…We had a pilot in one city, but we had a national recall."

Modi says she was taken aback by the FDA’s action because several toddler formulas, companion formulas, and even "nighttime" formulas on the market had not attracted similar FDA scrutiny. The company's biggest mistake, she says, was focusing on its messaging online and not specifying on the product's packaging that it was for children "12 months and up," rather than infants. "It's hard not to look back now and say, We should have seen it," says Modi. "It was just a miss."

It's not surprising that the FDA reacted cautiously to a Silicon Valley startup attempting to disrupt the formula space. The governmental agency takes seriously its responsibility to ensure children who rely on formula as their sole source of nutrition are fed a healthy, safe product. "When it comes to infant formula, there's zero room for misinterpretation," Modi says. Furthermore, the infant formula space in the United States has been dominated for years by just a few large players—Mead Johnson's Enfamil and Abbott Nutrition's Similac—with no new infant formula on the market in the past five years.

At the massive companies that produce the kind of baby formulas that dominate drugstore shelves, lawyers and regulatory professionals are responsible for updating the agency on any labeling or ingredient changes—a "pre-market notification" not required for most other food products or supplements. Bobbie, with its skeleton team and mere days of experience serving customers in a 15-mile radius, had no such longstanding relationships by the time the FDA became aware of its new entrant into the space.

For Modi, the startup's mission was always to provide a safe, healthy alternative for mothers who can't breastfeed or pump breast milk and don't want to feed their children the formulas on American shelves; the parents who buy from Europe prefer the region's lactose, coconut oil, and grass-fed dairy formula to the palm oil, corn syrup, and conventional dairy found in many U.S. products.

Modi, a former Airbnb director of hospitality, came up with the idea when she couldn't breastfeed her own child. Just as startups like Elvie and Willow have burst onto the scene in the breast pump space, Modi wanted to disrupt formula—a product that has been both pushed on mothers who don't need it and accompanied by shame for many of those who do. "We are not accepting the realities of feeding your child in today’s world,” Modi told Fortune in 2019. "Fifteen to 20% of women physically cannot produce enough breast milk to exclusively breastfeed."

Over the year following its FDA wake-up call, Bobbie regrouped. In its messaging to its customers, the company made sure not to cast aspersions on the FDA's decision. "We accept that our labeling and our marketing may have been misleading, and for that we truly apologize to all of our customers. We anticipated this would be hard, and it should be," the company wrote in a letter to its subscribers. "When it comes to our kids, safety comes first and every parent deserves peace of mind."

That messaging caught the eye of a few players who have proved crucial in Bobbie's second act. The company's goal had always been to manufacture in the U.S., but the facilities capable of producing infant formula imposed minimum orders that were higher than the early-stage company felt it could commit to. The manufacturer Perrigo, which makes store-brand formulas and pediatric nutrition drinks, had declined a cold email request to make Bobbie's formula months earlier—even though it was interested in producing a product for millennial parents. "We noticed there was a need for an FDA-regulated product that served consumers' preference [for an EU-style formula]," says Adriane Sherogan, an executive at Perrigo, which is now producing Bobbie's formula in Vermont. "What made me reach out to Laura again was the way they handled the FDA advisory; they were very transparent and clear in communications to consumers."

The recall, too, caught the eye of a new investor, Sara Adler at Wave Capital. Adler knew Modi from Airbnb but decided not to invest in her company's original $2.4 million seed round—questioning the feasibility of bringing a new formula to market and the demand for such a product. But the company's handling of the recall won her over. "The level of maturity they brought to their approach to the FDA made it a no-brainer," Adler says of her eventual decision to invest.

With the confidence of a new manufacturer and a new investor, Bobbie put its resources behind creating a product that wouldn't draw the ire of the FDA and building goodwill with the agency. Under the guidance of a new head of regulatory, Christina Berberich—who previously handled infant formula regulatory findings at Abbott—the company visited the FDA's offices in Silver Spring, Md., in November 2019 and spoke to officials about the company's revamped U.S. supply chain.

Now Bobbie is set to ship its $24 "European-style recipe" infant formula nationwide starting Jan. 5. This iteration of its formula is considered a different product than the one that led to a consumer warning; that formula "did not return to market," confirms an FDA spokesperson.

The regulatory challenges are unusual for such a young consumer goods startup. Adler, Bobbie's new investor, compares the company's approach to regulators to the model Modi saw at Airbnb, which, while still sometimes working around government restrictions, was more likely in its growth stage to cooperate with regulators than was its frequent point of comparison, Uber. "They could have tried to fight it and continued to sell the product they'd worked to bring to market," Adler says. "Instead they said, from a business perspective, what's our long-term goal?"

The 12 employees at Bobbie, who altogether have 19 kids, including six infants, are excited to once again be able to use their own product. Modi and her team believe they're in a stronger position now than they would have been if they had moved forward with their "companion formula." "Had they not had the FDA coming to them because of press," Adler says, "they wouldn't be where they are now."

財富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識產(chǎn)權為財富媒體知識產(chǎn)權有限公司及/或相關權利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評論
評論

撰寫或查看更多評論

請打開財富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章
亚洲欧美中文日韩在线| 中文字幕精品亚洲无线码一区应用| 久热中文字幕在线精品首页| 亚洲综合无码久久精品综合| 亚洲综合欧美色五月俺也去| 国产一线在线视频一区二区三区四区| 国产精品无码A∨一区二区三区| 久久午夜夜伦鲁鲁片无码免费播放区| 236宅宅理论片免费| 无码制服丝袜人妻在线视频| 在线看片无码免费人成视频| 2016年毛片无码免费| 国产精品嫩草影院午夜 | 亚洲中文字幕在线精品2021| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久秋霞1| 国产香蕉一区二区三区在线视频| 久久99中文字幕无码| 国内精品久久久久久久影视麻豆| 亚洲精品6久久久久中文字幕| 国产人成视频在线免费观看| 最近中文在线字幕在线观看| 韩国精品韩国专区久久| 久久精品国 1080P 国产一区二区三区不卡av| 国产在线精品一区二区中文| 国产精品 精品国内自产拍| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃不卡| 精品少妇人妻av一区二区三区| 成人国内免费精品视频在线观看| 久久国产AVJUST麻豆av天堂电影网| 国产精品国语自产拍在线观看| 国产成人无码免费看片软件| 国产综合精品久久久久一区| 天天摸日日添狠狠添婷婷| 国产超碰人人模人人爽人人添| 天天综合网91免费看午夜无码鲁丝片真人一级毛片| 乱人伦xxxx国语对白| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品| 欧美另类图区清纯亚洲| 久久人人爽爽爽人久久久| 久久国产乱子伦免费无码| 人人做人人爽人人爱|