在全球人民為減少新冠病毒的傳播所做出的努力中,一項(xiàng)正在落地的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新格外引入注目:健康通行證。
健康通行證(或是很多人所簡單理解的疫苗護(hù)照)背后的原理相當(dāng)簡單。每個(gè)人都能在他們的移動(dòng)設(shè)備上攜帶個(gè)人健康數(shù)據(jù)。當(dāng)需要出示時(shí),他們只要在醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)、體育賽事場館或者機(jī)場掃描二維碼(或類似的東西),即能顯示“是否已接種過疫苗”的證明。
理論上看,這項(xiàng)技術(shù)并不復(fù)雜,但要真正實(shí)施起來,卻困難重重。
人們對(duì)此充滿隱憂:數(shù)據(jù)隱私、方法論以及(就新冠疫情而言)能夠打上疫苗的機(jī)會(huì)有限,甚至對(duì)疫苗本身的態(tài)度也呈現(xiàn)出兩極分化。周二,在由《財(cái)富》雜志主辦的健康主題線上頭腦風(fēng)暴討論中,人們對(duì)這些問題疑慮重重。
ID2020 聯(lián)盟的執(zhí)行董事達(dá)科塔·格魯納 (Dakota Gruener) 表示,拋開這些困難,疫苗護(hù)照計(jì)劃在美國和其他國家都引起了人們的“巨大興趣”,ID2020 聯(lián)盟是一個(gè)旨在建立全球通用的數(shù)字身份證的組織。
格魯納說,人們急于恢復(fù)疫情前的常態(tài),而全球通用、能被普遍接受的疫苗接種狀態(tài)證明正可以助推這一進(jìn)程。
她說,要想妥善落實(shí)這一計(jì)劃,有兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵細(xì)節(jié)需要解決。首先,必須建立起完備的隱私保護(hù)措施,讓個(gè)人可以自主選擇他們?cè)敢夤蚕淼慕】禂?shù)據(jù)類型。再者,這些通行證還需要在各行各業(yè)、各個(gè)國家中得到廣泛接受。
包括 IBM Watson Health 在內(nèi)的一些公司一直在努力研發(fā)解決方案。 IBM Watson Health 支付方與新興業(yè)務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)全球副總裁埃里克·皮西尼 (Eric Piscini) 表示,這是一個(gè)“在大流行之前多年”就已經(jīng)開始實(shí)施的項(xiàng)目。格魯納說,這一技術(shù)可能還有其他潛在用途,包括嬰兒疫苗接種證明、便攜式醫(yī)療記錄或大學(xué)學(xué)位或培訓(xùn)課程證明。
但現(xiàn)在,疫苗護(hù)照則是其中更為直接和緊急的應(yīng)用案例。
IBM Watson Health 的健康通行證旨在幫助雇主解決工作場所安全、出入記錄和設(shè)施管理等問題,讓個(gè)人能夠通過數(shù)字錢包共享核酸測(cè)試結(jié)果,或現(xiàn)場進(jìn)行溫度掃描。
數(shù)字錢包建立在區(qū)塊鏈技術(shù)之上,以解決這一行業(yè)內(nèi)普遍關(guān)注的數(shù)據(jù)隱私和數(shù)據(jù)泄露的潛在漏洞。
“區(qū)塊鏈技術(shù)讓我們可以選擇提供 [疫苗接種] 狀態(tài)的證明, 而無需在我們平臺(tái)上的更改或保留任何信息,”皮西尼說。
倫斯勒理工學(xué)院化學(xué)和生物工程研究所教授喬納森·多迪克 (Jonathan Dordick) 表示,除了隱私問題之外,美國聯(lián)邦政府、州公共衛(wèi)生部門和各個(gè)縣衛(wèi)生部門的要求也各不相同,而且在不斷變化。
“當(dāng)你又要弄清有什么樣的通行證,又要弄清什么樣的個(gè)人信息可以放在通行證上,以及當(dāng)你做了核酸測(cè)試時(shí),這個(gè)測(cè)試意味著什么,這給人們的生活帶來了很多不便,”多迪克說。
此外,相關(guān)要求和接種疫苗的途徑也因國而異。
“我覺得,我們看到有些動(dòng)作快的人已經(jīng)開始籌備健康通行證落實(shí)事宜,但在一些主要市場,例如美國和英國,確實(shí)需要一些更開放的配套措施,”北美航空聯(lián)盟立法和監(jiān)管部門高級(jí)副總裁莎倫.平克頓說,該聯(lián)盟是北美的一個(gè)貿(mào)易協(xié)會(huì)和游說團(tuán)體。
皮西尼表示,雖然后續(xù)的物流問題可能還不清楚,但這項(xiàng)技術(shù)已經(jīng)存在。他說,仍需關(guān)注的是該計(jì)劃的落實(shí)問題和怎么教育公眾接受這種觀念。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
編譯:陳聰聰
在全球人民為減少新冠病毒的傳播所做出的努力中,一項(xiàng)正在落地的技術(shù)創(chuàng)新格外引入注目:健康通行證。
健康通行證(或是很多人所簡單理解的疫苗護(hù)照)背后的原理相當(dāng)簡單。每個(gè)人都能在他們的移動(dòng)設(shè)備上攜帶個(gè)人健康數(shù)據(jù)。當(dāng)需要出示時(shí),他們只要在醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)、體育賽事場館或者機(jī)場掃描二維碼(或類似的東西),即能顯示“是否已接種過疫苗”的證明。
理論上看,這項(xiàng)技術(shù)并不復(fù)雜,但要真正實(shí)施起來,卻困難重重。
人們對(duì)此充滿隱憂:數(shù)據(jù)隱私、方法論以及(就新冠疫情而言)能夠打上疫苗的機(jī)會(huì)有限,甚至對(duì)疫苗本身的態(tài)度也呈現(xiàn)出兩極分化。周二,在由《財(cái)富》雜志主辦的健康主題線上頭腦風(fēng)暴討論中,人們對(duì)這些問題疑慮重重。
ID2020 聯(lián)盟的執(zhí)行董事達(dá)科塔·格魯納 (Dakota Gruener) 表示,拋開這些困難,疫苗護(hù)照計(jì)劃在美國和其他國家都引起了人們的“巨大興趣”,ID2020 聯(lián)盟是一個(gè)旨在建立全球通用的數(shù)字身份證的組織。
格魯納說,人們急于恢復(fù)疫情前的常態(tài),而全球通用、能被普遍接受的疫苗接種狀態(tài)證明正可以助推這一進(jìn)程。
她說,要想妥善落實(shí)這一計(jì)劃,有兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵細(xì)節(jié)需要解決。首先,必須建立起完備的隱私保護(hù)措施,讓個(gè)人可以自主選擇他們?cè)敢夤蚕淼慕】禂?shù)據(jù)類型。再者,這些通行證還需要在各行各業(yè)、各個(gè)國家中得到廣泛接受。
包括 IBM Watson Health 在內(nèi)的一些公司一直在努力研發(fā)解決方案。 IBM Watson Health 支付方與新興業(yè)務(wù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)全球副總裁埃里克·皮西尼 (Eric Piscini) 表示,這是一個(gè)“在大流行之前多年”就已經(jīng)開始實(shí)施的項(xiàng)目。格魯納說,這一技術(shù)可能還有其他潛在用途,包括嬰兒疫苗接種證明、便攜式醫(yī)療記錄或大學(xué)學(xué)位或培訓(xùn)課程證明。
但現(xiàn)在,疫苗護(hù)照則是其中更為直接和緊急的應(yīng)用案例。
IBM Watson Health 的健康通行證旨在幫助雇主解決工作場所安全、出入記錄和設(shè)施管理等問題,讓個(gè)人能夠通過數(shù)字錢包共享核酸測(cè)試結(jié)果,或現(xiàn)場進(jìn)行溫度掃描。
數(shù)字錢包建立在區(qū)塊鏈技術(shù)之上,以解決這一行業(yè)內(nèi)普遍關(guān)注的數(shù)據(jù)隱私和數(shù)據(jù)泄露的潛在漏洞。
“區(qū)塊鏈技術(shù)讓我們可以選擇提供 [疫苗接種] 狀態(tài)的證明, 而無需在我們平臺(tái)上的更改或保留任何信息,”皮西尼說。
倫斯勒理工學(xué)院化學(xué)和生物工程研究所教授喬納森·多迪克 (Jonathan Dordick) 表示,除了隱私問題之外,美國聯(lián)邦政府、州公共衛(wèi)生部門和各個(gè)縣衛(wèi)生部門的要求也各不相同,而且在不斷變化。
“當(dāng)你又要弄清有什么樣的通行證,又要弄清什么樣的個(gè)人信息可以放在通行證上,以及當(dāng)你做了核酸測(cè)試時(shí),這個(gè)測(cè)試意味著什么,這給人們的生活帶來了很多不便,”多迪克說。
此外,相關(guān)要求和接種疫苗的途徑也因國而異。
“我覺得,我們看到有些動(dòng)作快的人已經(jīng)開始籌備健康通行證落實(shí)事宜,但在一些主要市場,例如美國和英國,確實(shí)需要一些更開放的配套措施,”北美航空聯(lián)盟立法和監(jiān)管部門高級(jí)副總裁莎倫.平克頓說,該聯(lián)盟是北美的一個(gè)貿(mào)易協(xié)會(huì)和游說團(tuán)體。
皮西尼表示,雖然后續(xù)的物流問題可能還不清楚,但這項(xiàng)技術(shù)已經(jīng)存在。他說,仍需關(guān)注的是該計(jì)劃的落實(shí)問題和怎么教育公眾接受這種觀念。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
編譯:陳聰聰
The global push to reduce the spread of the coronavirus has invigorated focus on a tech innovation already underway: health passes.
The theory behind a health pass—or what many think of specifically as a vaccine passport—is fairly straightforward. Individuals would be able to carry their personal health data on mobile devices. When prompted, they could scan a QR code (or something similar) at the doctor’s office, a sporting event, or the airport to show proof of vaccination status.
It’s not theoretically complicated, but implementation of the technology is.
There are a plethora of concerns about data privacy, methodology, and—in the case of COVID-19—limited access to vaccines or even polarization over the vaccines themselves. These were a handful of issues raised Tuesday at a virtual Brainstorm Health panel discussion, hosted by Fortune.
Barriers aside, the vaccine passport project has drawn “a huge amount of interest” both in the U.S. and abroad, according to Dakota Gruener, executive director of the ID2020 Alliance, a global partnership to build a universal digital ID.
People are anxious to return to normalcy, Gruener said, and commutable, universally accepted proof of vaccination status could help speed up the process.
As for the best way to go about it, there are two key details that need to be addressed, she said. There must be adequate privacy protections in place, giving individuals the autonomy to choose what sort of health data they share. The passes would also need to be widely accepted across industries and countries.
Some companies, including IBM Watson Health, have been working to develop a solution. It was a project underway “many years before the pandemic,” according to Eric Piscini, global vice president of payer and emerging business networks at IBM Watson Health. Other potential uses for the technology could include proof of infant vaccines, portable medical records, or proof of college degree or training courses, Gruener said.
But vaccine passports in particular have emerged as a more immediate and urgent use case.
IBM Watson Health’s pass was made to help employers address workplace safety, reentry, and facilities management by enabling individuals to share test results or on-site temperature scans via a digital wallet.
The digital wallet is built on blockchain technology to address widespread industry concerns over data privacy and potential vulnerabilities in the case of a data breach.
“Blockchain technology gives us the option to provide verification of [vaccination] status without correcting or keeping any of the information on our platform,” Piscini said.
Beyond privacy concerns are layers of differing and evolving requirements from the federal government, state public health departments, and individual county health departments in the U.S., according to Jonathan Dordick, institute professor of chemical and biological engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.
“That makes life very difficult when you’re trying to figure out what kind of pass exists, what kind of information can be put on the pass, and when you have a test, what does that test mean,” Dordick said.
Additionally, requirements—and access to vaccines—vary internationally.
“I think we are starting to see those first movers, but we still have some major markets like the U.S. and the U.K., for example, that really need to come together around a standard for opening up,” said Sharon Pinkerton, senior vice president of legislative and regulatory policy at Airlines for America, a trade association and lobbying group for the North American airline industry.
While the logistics may be unclear, the technology is there, according to Piscini. It’s the implementation and the education around it that still need some attention, he said.