成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專(zhuān)題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

WTO處于生死關(guān)頭

David Meyer
2021-06-24

中國(guó)是該組織需要考慮到的重要因素之一?

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

世界貿(mào)易組織(World Trade Organization,簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)WTO)完全了解其自身正在面臨的危機(jī)。

美國(guó)前總統(tǒng)唐納德?特朗普破壞了WTO解決貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端的核心功能,而現(xiàn)任美國(guó)總統(tǒng)喬?拜登并沒(méi)有清除特朗普設(shè)置的障礙。此外,全球貿(mào)易規(guī)則的公平性也引發(fā)了普遍的不滿(mǎn)情緒。

在尼日利亞人恩戈齊?奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,這個(gè)擁有164個(gè)成員的國(guó)際組織正在面臨許多亟待解決的問(wèn)題。

然而,最緊迫的危機(jī)是:各國(guó)之間的新冠疫苗爭(zhēng)奪戰(zhàn),以及為了盡快結(jié)束新冠肺炎疫情,是否應(yīng)該暫時(shí)取消對(duì)疫苗專(zhuān)利以及其他知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)。

印度和南非在去年最先主張新冠疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免。有些支持這種立場(chǎng)的人認(rèn)為,WTO的未來(lái)取決于它接下來(lái)對(duì)此所做出的決定。

南非駐WTO大使索勒瓦?姆倫比-彼得說(shuō):“WTO的信譽(yù)取決于它能否在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上取得有意義的結(jié)果,是否能夠真正在不同地區(qū)增加疫苗產(chǎn)量?!?/p>

“最后的致命一擊”

位于日內(nèi)瓦的WTO并沒(méi)有任何實(shí)際權(quán)力,它只是各國(guó)就貿(mào)易問(wèn)題做出重大決策的一個(gè)框架,并且通常是以協(xié)商的方式。WTO應(yīng)該作為解決爭(zhēng)端的平臺(tái),因?yàn)樗谐蓡T國(guó)都同意相同的規(guī)則。其中最重要的規(guī)則之一是《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》(簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)TRIPS),該協(xié)定在1995年WTO成立時(shí)正式生效。

這個(gè)協(xié)定是創(chuàng)立WTO的基礎(chǔ),其中規(guī)定了在特殊情況下豁免專(zhuān)利和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的規(guī)則,而且以前確實(shí)曾經(jīng)發(fā)生過(guò)這種情況:2003年,WTO成員國(guó)同意豁免TRIPS中的義務(wù)。這些義務(wù)曾經(jīng)導(dǎo)致缺乏生產(chǎn)能力的發(fā)展中國(guó)家無(wú)法進(jìn)口廉價(jià)仿制藥品。(該豁免在2017年成為永久性豁免。)

不過(guò)對(duì)WTO而言,共識(shí)是關(guān)鍵。

如果各成員國(guó)未能就某項(xiàng)豁免達(dá)成共識(shí),WTO成員國(guó)就可以以75%的絕對(duì)多數(shù)通過(guò)豁免提案,但這將引發(fā)前所未有的動(dòng)蕩。

如果WTO支持新冠疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免,則意味著其要面對(duì)歐盟(尤其是德國(guó))、加拿大和英國(guó)等國(guó)的反對(duì)。

美國(guó)的立場(chǎng)最近從反對(duì)變成了支持。法國(guó)也持同樣立場(chǎng)。

支持者認(rèn)為,雖然這是各國(guó)之間的爭(zhēng)議,但最終結(jié)果將對(duì)整個(gè)WTO產(chǎn)生影響。

公民全球貿(mào)易觀察(一個(gè)關(guān)注WTO和貿(mào)易協(xié)定的美國(guó)倡議組織)的創(chuàng)始人洛里?沃勒克稱(chēng):“面對(duì)一個(gè)世紀(jì)以來(lái)全人類(lèi)面臨的最嚴(yán)峻的挑戰(zhàn)之一,WTO的功能反而變成了障礙,而不是提供解決方案。我認(rèn)為這將是對(duì)它最后的致命一擊?!?

“如果TRIPS豁免成功通過(guò),人們把WTO視為一種拯救生命和生計(jì)的解決方案,它就能夠樹(shù)立良好的信譽(yù),形成強(qiáng)大的勢(shì)頭,可以著手解決嚴(yán)重的結(jié)構(gòu)性問(wèn)題?!?/p>

目前,WTO存在的問(wèn)題數(shù)不勝數(shù)。

改革迫在眉睫

首當(dāng)其沖的是負(fù)責(zé)處理各成員國(guó)之間貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端的WTO上訴機(jī)構(gòu)。該機(jī)構(gòu)是國(guó)際貿(mào)易體系的一個(gè)關(guān)鍵部分,通常配有七名法官,但由于其不利于美國(guó)的決定激怒了特朗普,在有法官退休之后,美國(guó)方面一直阻止上訴機(jī)構(gòu)任命新法官。由于法官人數(shù)不足,該機(jī)構(gòu)在2019年底徹底停擺。

有人曾經(jīng)希望拜登上任之后能夠扭轉(zhuǎn)這種局面,但在今年早些時(shí)候,美國(guó)拒絕了歐洲提出的填補(bǔ)法官職位空缺的提案,令人大失所望。

拜登政府表示:“美國(guó)對(duì)WTO上訴機(jī)構(gòu)依舊有系統(tǒng)性擔(dān)憂(yōu)。WTO成員國(guó)都知道,在過(guò)去的16年多時(shí)間里,歷任美國(guó)政府都曾經(jīng)提出并解釋過(guò)這種擔(dān)憂(yōu)?!?/p>

現(xiàn)任美國(guó)貿(mào)易代表戴琪在2月的確認(rèn)聽(tīng)證會(huì)上重申了美國(guó)政府的擔(dān)憂(yōu)。她表示,WTO的上訴機(jī)構(gòu)“在多起案件中存在越權(quán)裁決、對(duì)WTO協(xié)定解釋不當(dāng)?shù)惹闆r,損害了美國(guó)和其他WTO成員國(guó)的利益”,并指控WTO超期裁決貿(mào)易終端。

戴琪指出:“WTO亟需改革,以確保導(dǎo)致這些問(wèn)題出現(xiàn)的根本原因得以消除。”

香港中文大學(xué)的經(jīng)濟(jì)法教授布萊恩?默丘里奧反對(duì)疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免。他說(shuō):“雖然美國(guó)一直在與WTO接觸,但沒(méi)有跡象表明美國(guó)會(huì)在短期內(nèi)同意對(duì)上訴機(jī)構(gòu)法官的任命。這不是好消息。在WTO的治理方面,這比支持知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)豁免的談判更加重要?!?/p>

不止美國(guó)希望看到WTO改革。在2月發(fā)布的一份重要政策文件中,歐盟表示,推動(dòng)WTO規(guī)則現(xiàn)代化改革的談判以失敗告終,爭(zhēng)端解決制度停擺,對(duì)各國(guó)貿(mào)易政策的監(jiān)督無(wú)效。

于2001年加入WTO的中國(guó)也是WTO需要考慮到的重要因素之一。

默丘里奧稱(chēng):“中國(guó)當(dāng)前的表現(xiàn)較為強(qiáng)勢(shì),所以對(duì)于其認(rèn)為不符合國(guó)家利益的改革措施,它不會(huì)被迫接受?!?/p>

沃勒克承認(rèn),即使WTO成功通過(guò)了對(duì)新冠疫苗和醫(yī)療用品的TRIPS專(zhuān)利豁免,這些問(wèn)題也不會(huì)消失。她補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“但是,WTO一旦擁有了成為解決方案而不是障礙的經(jīng)驗(yàn),就可以大幅提高各國(guó)解決這些挑戰(zhàn)的意愿和誠(chéng)意?!?/p>

沃勒克提到了亞太經(jīng)合組織貿(mào)易部長(zhǎng)在本月初發(fā)布的一份聯(lián)合聲明。聲明呼吁緊急討論疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免問(wèn)題。

其中有關(guān)WTO改革的部分寫(xiě)道:“WTO必須證明全球貿(mào)易規(guī)則有助于解決新冠肺炎疫情這場(chǎng)人類(lèi)大災(zāi)難,并推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的復(fù)蘇。”

奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的角色

2021年年初,隨著美國(guó)特朗普政府的下臺(tái),奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉成功接任WTO總干事,她的上任沒(méi)有受到任何阻撓。她目前正在致力于解決諸多問(wèn)題,正是這些問(wèn)題導(dǎo)致了她的前任(巴西人羅伯托?阿澤維多)的離職。

世界貿(mào)易組織總干事恩戈齊?奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉曾經(jīng)表示,針對(duì)新冠疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免問(wèn)題,“我們必須立即行動(dòng)起來(lái),邀請(qǐng)各成員國(guó)的大使坐上談判桌進(jìn)行協(xié)商?!眻D片來(lái)源:Dursun Aydemir—Anadolu/Bloomberg/Getty Images

上周早些時(shí)候,美國(guó)和歐盟就波音和空中客車(chē)飛機(jī)補(bǔ)貼的長(zhǎng)期貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端達(dá)成五年休戰(zhàn)協(xié)議,當(dāng)時(shí)奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉曾經(jīng)發(fā)布推文稱(chēng):“只要有政治意愿,即使最棘手的問(wèn)題也能夠解決?!?/p>

然而,默丘里奧卻懷疑她的管理能力能否對(duì)WTO的改革進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生太大影響。

他說(shuō):“她在上任時(shí)曾經(jīng)表示,各國(guó)代表團(tuán)應(yīng)該相互交流。但在最近的一次總干事會(huì)議上,各國(guó)代表只是在閱讀事先準(zhǔn)備的報(bào)告,這被稱(chēng)為是史上最糟糕的一次會(huì)議。

另一方面,恩戈齊與前任不同,她會(huì)積極尋找問(wèn)題的解決方案。如果調(diào)解人的角色受到歡迎,她或許不僅可以促成談判,還將對(duì)能否最終達(dá)成協(xié)議產(chǎn)生影響?!?/p>

姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克都認(rèn)為WTO的信譽(yù)取決于疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免問(wèn)題。對(duì)于這種觀點(diǎn),WTO秘書(shū)處發(fā)言人拒絕發(fā)表意見(jiàn),而是提到了奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉在5月的一次講話。

她在講話中稱(chēng),WTO能夠幫助解決疫苗供應(yīng)鏈的監(jiān)督和透明,幫助制造商擴(kuò)大生產(chǎn),建立一個(gè)地理上更多元化的生產(chǎn)基地。

她在講話中還指出,各成員國(guó)“必須解決與技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓、專(zhuān)有知識(shí)和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的問(wèn)題”,包括專(zhuān)利豁免提案。她說(shuō):“我們必須現(xiàn)在行動(dòng)起來(lái),邀請(qǐng)各國(guó)駐WTO大使坐上談判桌進(jìn)行協(xié)商?!?/p>

“議程驅(qū)動(dòng)”

大型制藥公司在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上的立場(chǎng)是,WTO成員國(guó)不需要支持專(zhuān)利豁免,只要可以推動(dòng)取消對(duì)醫(yī)療用品的出口限制即可。

位于日內(nèi)瓦的國(guó)際藥品制造商協(xié)會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)的總干事托馬斯?庫(kù)尼稱(chēng):“在消除影響全球疫苗、治療藥物和診斷工具的生產(chǎn)分配的貿(mào)易壁壘方面,WTO依舊大有可為?!?/p>

“呼吁疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免背后都是出于政治考慮,是為了嘩眾取寵,在短期內(nèi)不會(huì)增加疫苗產(chǎn)量,反而有可能毀掉幫助我們快速應(yīng)對(duì)新冠肺炎疫情的框架。”

默丘里奧也認(rèn)為姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克的建議都是議程驅(qū)動(dòng)。

他說(shuō):“我認(rèn)為,主張WTO的信譽(yù)取決于TRIPS專(zhuān)利豁免的結(jié)果這種觀點(diǎn)過(guò)于夸張。對(duì)某個(gè)話題感興趣的人都會(huì)用這樣的話術(shù),比如環(huán)保主義者會(huì)說(shuō)WTO的信譽(yù)取決于漁業(yè)補(bǔ)貼的結(jié)果,科技界人士會(huì)說(shuō)信譽(yù)取決于電子商務(wù)和服務(wù)談判,而實(shí)業(yè)家們也會(huì)提到同樣的補(bǔ)貼問(wèn)題?!?/p>

然而,沃勒克堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為專(zhuān)利豁免的結(jié)果不會(huì)改變WTO的制度,因?yàn)槠渲贫纫呀?jīng)臨時(shí)暫停了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)。她說(shuō):“這不會(huì)對(duì)TRIPS協(xié)定有任何改變?!?/p>

姆倫比-彼得表示:“WTO是一個(gè)論壇,它有應(yīng)對(duì)當(dāng)前疫情的相關(guān)政策工具,可以通過(guò)解決知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘,在不同地區(qū)增加疫苗產(chǎn)量?!?/p>

國(guó)際藥品制造商協(xié)會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)的總干事庫(kù)尼指出,“專(zhuān)利豁免在短期內(nèi)對(duì)緩解新冠肺炎疫情毫無(wú)幫助”,因?yàn)橘Q(mào)易壁壘和原材料短缺才是根本問(wèn)題。

新建新冠疫苗生產(chǎn)設(shè)施確實(shí)需要技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓?zhuān)欢档米⒁獾氖?,在世界衛(wèi)生組織于去年建立的“新冠肺炎技術(shù)獲取資源庫(kù)”中,疫苗公司沒(méi)有做出任何貢獻(xiàn)。該計(jì)劃的目的是希望為疫苗公司提供一種途徑,去自愿幫助愿意參與疫苗生產(chǎn)的其他制造商。

沃勒克表示,大量現(xiàn)有的產(chǎn)能沒(méi)有得到充分的利用。

最近,位于以色列的梯瓦制藥發(fā)布聲明,抱怨疫苗公司拒絕使用其主動(dòng)提供的產(chǎn)能。許多公司也有類(lèi)似的不滿(mǎn)。對(duì)此,沃勒克聲稱(chēng)通過(guò)疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免,以及為進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大產(chǎn)能進(jìn)行注資,可以使疫苗產(chǎn)量快速增加數(shù)十億劑。

沃勒克表示:“你的首要任務(wù)是先踏上那條路,但隨后你就會(huì)看見(jiàn)一道緊鎖的大門(mén)?!?/p>

南非駐WTO大使姆倫比-彼得說(shuō):“當(dāng)前的新冠肺炎疫情并未減緩,病毒變異和變種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)可能使醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品和醫(yī)療技術(shù)的療效受到影響,許多人的生命危在旦夕,我們希望這一切能夠讓W(xué)TO各成員國(guó)認(rèn)識(shí)到情況的緊迫性?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍

審校:汪皓

世界貿(mào)易組織(World Trade Organization,簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)WTO)完全了解其自身正在面臨的危機(jī)。

美國(guó)前總統(tǒng)唐納德?特朗普破壞了WTO解決貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端的核心功能,而現(xiàn)任美國(guó)總統(tǒng)喬?拜登并沒(méi)有清除特朗普設(shè)置的障礙。此外,全球貿(mào)易規(guī)則的公平性也引發(fā)了普遍的不滿(mǎn)情緒。

在尼日利亞人恩戈齊?奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下,這個(gè)擁有164個(gè)會(huì)員國(guó)的國(guó)際組織正在面臨許多亟待解決的問(wèn)題。

然而,最緊迫的危機(jī)是:各國(guó)之間的新冠疫苗爭(zhēng)奪戰(zhàn),以及為了盡快結(jié)束新冠肺炎疫情,是否應(yīng)該暫時(shí)取消對(duì)疫苗專(zhuān)利以及其他知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)。

印度和南非在去年最先主張新冠疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免。有些支持這種立場(chǎng)的人認(rèn)為,WTO的未來(lái)取決于它接下來(lái)對(duì)此所做出的決定。

南非駐WTO大使索勒瓦?姆倫比-彼得說(shuō):“WTO的信譽(yù)取決于它能否在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上取得有意義的結(jié)果,是否能夠真正在不同地區(qū)增加疫苗產(chǎn)量?!?/p>

“最后的致命一擊”

位于日內(nèi)瓦的WTO并沒(méi)有任何實(shí)際權(quán)力,它只是各國(guó)就貿(mào)易問(wèn)題做出重大決策的一個(gè)框架,并且通常是以協(xié)商的方式。WTO應(yīng)該作為解決爭(zhēng)端的平臺(tái),因?yàn)樗谐蓡T國(guó)都同意相同的規(guī)則。其中最重要的規(guī)則之一是《與貿(mào)易有關(guān)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)協(xié)定》(簡(jiǎn)稱(chēng)TRIPS),該協(xié)定在1995年WTO成立時(shí)正式生效。

這個(gè)協(xié)定是創(chuàng)立WTO的基礎(chǔ),其中規(guī)定了在特殊情況下豁免專(zhuān)利和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的規(guī)則,而且以前確實(shí)曾經(jīng)發(fā)生過(guò)這種情況:2003年,WTO成員國(guó)同意豁免TRIPS中的義務(wù)。這些義務(wù)曾經(jīng)導(dǎo)致缺乏生產(chǎn)能力的發(fā)展中國(guó)家無(wú)法進(jìn)口廉價(jià)仿制藥品。(該豁免在2017年成為永久性豁免。)

不過(guò)對(duì)WTO而言,共識(shí)是關(guān)鍵。

如果各成員國(guó)未能就某項(xiàng)豁免達(dá)成共識(shí),WTO成員國(guó)就可以以75%的絕對(duì)多數(shù)通過(guò)豁免提案,但這將引發(fā)前所未有的動(dòng)蕩。

如果WTO支持新冠疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免,則意味著其要面對(duì)歐盟(尤其是德國(guó))、加拿大和英國(guó)等國(guó)的反對(duì)。

美國(guó)的立場(chǎng)最近從反對(duì)變成了支持。法國(guó)也持同樣立場(chǎng)。

支持者認(rèn)為,雖然這是各國(guó)之間的爭(zhēng)議,但最終結(jié)果將對(duì)整個(gè)WTO產(chǎn)生影響。

公民全球貿(mào)易觀察(一個(gè)關(guān)注WTO和貿(mào)易協(xié)定的美國(guó)倡議組織)的創(chuàng)始人洛里?沃勒克稱(chēng):“面對(duì)一個(gè)世紀(jì)以來(lái)全人類(lèi)面臨的最嚴(yán)峻的挑戰(zhàn)之一,WTO的功能反而變成了障礙,而不是提供解決方案。我認(rèn)為這將是對(duì)它最后的致命一擊?!?

“如果TRIPS豁免成功通過(guò),人們把WTO視為一種拯救生命和生計(jì)的解決方案,它就能夠樹(shù)立良好的信譽(yù),形成強(qiáng)大的勢(shì)頭,可以著手解決嚴(yán)重的結(jié)構(gòu)性問(wèn)題?!?/p>

目前,WTO存在的問(wèn)題數(shù)不勝數(shù)。

改革迫在眉睫

首當(dāng)其沖的是WTO的上訴機(jī)構(gòu),負(fù)責(zé)處理各成員國(guó)之間的貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端。

WTO的上訴機(jī)構(gòu)是國(guó)際貿(mào)易體系的核心,通常配有七名法官,但在有法官退休之后,對(duì)美國(guó)不利的決定激怒了特朗普,于是他一直阻止上訴機(jī)構(gòu)任命新法官。按照規(guī)定,上訴機(jī)構(gòu)處理成員國(guó)的上訴需要至少有三名法官,但在2019年年底,有兩位法官任期屆滿(mǎn),導(dǎo)致其法官人數(shù)不足,因此該機(jī)構(gòu)徹底停擺。

有人曾經(jīng)希望拜登上任之后能夠扭轉(zhuǎn)這種局面,但在今年早些時(shí)候,美國(guó)拒絕了歐洲提出的填補(bǔ)法官職位空缺的提案,令人大失所望。

拜登政府表示:“美國(guó)對(duì)WTO上訴機(jī)構(gòu)依舊有系統(tǒng)性擔(dān)憂(yōu)。WTO成員國(guó)都知道,在過(guò)去的16年多時(shí)間里,歷任美國(guó)政府都曾經(jīng)提出并解釋過(guò)這種擔(dān)憂(yōu)?!?/p>

現(xiàn)任美國(guó)貿(mào)易代表戴琪在2月的確認(rèn)聽(tīng)證會(huì)上重申了美國(guó)政府的擔(dān)憂(yōu)。她表示,WTO的上訴機(jī)構(gòu)“在多起案件中存在越權(quán)裁決、對(duì)WTO協(xié)定解釋不當(dāng)?shù)惹闆r,損害了美國(guó)和其他WTO成員國(guó)的利益”,并指控WTO超期裁決貿(mào)易終端。

戴琪指出:“WTO亟需改革,以確保導(dǎo)致這些問(wèn)題出現(xiàn)的根本原因得以消除?!?/p>

香港中文大學(xué)的經(jīng)濟(jì)法教授布萊恩?默丘里奧反對(duì)疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免。他說(shuō):“雖然美國(guó)一直在與WTO接觸,但沒(méi)有跡象表明美國(guó)會(huì)在短期內(nèi)同意對(duì)上訴機(jī)構(gòu)法官的任命。這不是好消息。在WTO的治理方面,這比支持知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)豁免的談判更加重要?!?/p>

不止美國(guó)希望看到WTO改革。在2月發(fā)布的一份重要政策文件中,歐盟表示,推動(dòng)WTO規(guī)則現(xiàn)代化改革的談判以失敗告終,爭(zhēng)端解決制度停擺,對(duì)各國(guó)貿(mào)易政策的監(jiān)督無(wú)效。

于2001年加入WTO的中國(guó)也是WTO需要考慮到的重要因素之一。

默丘里奧稱(chēng):“中國(guó)當(dāng)前的表現(xiàn)較為強(qiáng)勢(shì),所以對(duì)于其認(rèn)為不符合國(guó)家利益的改革措施,它不會(huì)被迫接受?!?/p>

沃勒克承認(rèn),即使WTO成功通過(guò)了對(duì)新冠疫苗和醫(yī)療用品的TRIPS專(zhuān)利豁免,這些問(wèn)題也不會(huì)消失。她補(bǔ)充說(shuō):“但是,WTO一旦擁有了成為解決方案而不是障礙的經(jīng)驗(yàn),就可以大幅提高各國(guó)解決這些挑戰(zhàn)的意愿和誠(chéng)意?!?/p>

沃勒克提到了亞太經(jīng)合組織貿(mào)易部長(zhǎng)在本月初發(fā)布的一份聯(lián)合聲明。聲明呼吁緊急討論疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免問(wèn)題。

其中有關(guān)WTO改革的部分寫(xiě)道:“WTO必須證明全球貿(mào)易規(guī)則有助于解決新冠肺炎疫情這場(chǎng)人類(lèi)大災(zāi)難,并推動(dòng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的復(fù)蘇?!?/p>

奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉的角色

2021年年初,隨著美國(guó)特朗普政府的下臺(tái),奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉成功接任WTO總干事,她的上任沒(méi)有受到任何阻撓。她目前正在致力于解決諸多問(wèn)題,正是這些問(wèn)題導(dǎo)致了她的前任(巴西人羅伯托?阿澤維多)的離職。

上周早些時(shí)候,美國(guó)和歐盟就波音和空中客車(chē)飛機(jī)補(bǔ)貼的長(zhǎng)期貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端達(dá)成五年休戰(zhàn)協(xié)議,當(dāng)時(shí)奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉曾經(jīng)發(fā)布推文稱(chēng):“只要有政治意愿,即使最棘手的問(wèn)題也能夠解決?!?/p>

然而,默丘里奧卻懷疑她的管理能力能否對(duì)WTO的改革進(jìn)程產(chǎn)生太大影響。

他說(shuō):“她在上任時(shí)曾經(jīng)表示,各國(guó)代表團(tuán)應(yīng)該相互交流。但在最近的一次總干事會(huì)議上,各國(guó)代表只是在閱讀事先準(zhǔn)備的報(bào)告,這被稱(chēng)為是史上最糟糕的一次會(huì)議。

另一方面,恩戈齊與前任不同,她會(huì)積極尋找問(wèn)題的解決方案。如果調(diào)解人的角色受到歡迎,她或許不僅可以促成談判,還將對(duì)能否最終達(dá)成協(xié)議產(chǎn)生影響。”

姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克都認(rèn)為WTO的信譽(yù)取決于疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免問(wèn)題。對(duì)于這種觀點(diǎn),WTO秘書(shū)處發(fā)言人拒絕發(fā)表意見(jiàn),而是提到了奧孔喬-伊韋阿拉在5月的一次講話。

她在講話中稱(chēng),WTO能夠幫助解決疫苗供應(yīng)鏈的監(jiān)督和透明,幫助制造商擴(kuò)大生產(chǎn),建立一個(gè)地理上更多元化的生產(chǎn)基地。

她在講話中還指出,各成員國(guó)“必須解決與技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓、專(zhuān)有知識(shí)和知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有關(guān)的問(wèn)題”,包括專(zhuān)利豁免提案。她說(shuō):“我們必須現(xiàn)在行動(dòng)起來(lái),邀請(qǐng)各國(guó)駐WTO大使坐上談判桌進(jìn)行協(xié)商。”

“議程驅(qū)動(dòng)”

大型制藥公司在這個(gè)問(wèn)題上的立場(chǎng)是,WTO成員國(guó)不需要支持專(zhuān)利豁免,只要可以推動(dòng)取消對(duì)醫(yī)療用品的出口限制即可。

位于日內(nèi)瓦的國(guó)際藥品制造商協(xié)會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)的總干事托馬斯?庫(kù)尼稱(chēng):“在消除影響全球疫苗、治療藥物和診斷工具的生產(chǎn)分配的貿(mào)易壁壘方面,WTO依舊大有可為。”

“呼吁疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免背后都是出于政治考慮,是為了嘩眾取寵,在短期內(nèi)不會(huì)增加疫苗產(chǎn)量,反而有可能毀掉幫助我們快速應(yīng)對(duì)新冠肺炎疫情的框架?!?/p>

默丘里奧也認(rèn)為姆倫比-彼得和沃勒克的建議都是議程驅(qū)動(dòng)。

他說(shuō):“我認(rèn)為,主張WTO的信譽(yù)取決于TRIPS專(zhuān)利豁免的結(jié)果這種觀點(diǎn)過(guò)于夸張。對(duì)某個(gè)話題感興趣的人都會(huì)用這樣的話術(shù),比如環(huán)保主義者會(huì)說(shuō)WTO的信譽(yù)取決于漁業(yè)補(bǔ)貼的結(jié)果,科技界人士會(huì)說(shuō)信譽(yù)取決于電子商務(wù)和服務(wù)談判,而實(shí)業(yè)家們也會(huì)提到同樣的補(bǔ)貼問(wèn)題?!?/p>

然而,沃勒克堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為專(zhuān)利豁免的結(jié)果不會(huì)改變WTO的制度,因?yàn)槠渲贫纫呀?jīng)臨時(shí)暫停了知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)。她說(shuō):“這不會(huì)對(duì)TRIPS協(xié)定有任何改變?!?/p>

姆倫比-彼得表示:“WTO是一個(gè)論壇,它有應(yīng)對(duì)當(dāng)前疫情的相關(guān)政策工具,可以通過(guò)解決知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)壁壘,在不同地區(qū)增加疫苗產(chǎn)量?!?/p>

國(guó)際藥品制造商協(xié)會(huì)聯(lián)合會(huì)的總干事庫(kù)尼指出,“專(zhuān)利豁免在短期內(nèi)對(duì)緩解新冠肺炎疫情毫無(wú)幫助”,因?yàn)橘Q(mào)易壁壘和原材料短缺才是根本問(wèn)題。

新建新冠疫苗生產(chǎn)設(shè)施確實(shí)需要技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓?zhuān)欢档米⒁獾氖?,在世界衛(wèi)生組織于去年建立的“新冠肺炎技術(shù)獲取資源庫(kù)”中,疫苗公司沒(méi)有做出任何貢獻(xiàn)。該計(jì)劃的目的是希望為疫苗公司提供一種途徑,去自愿幫助愿意參與疫苗生產(chǎn)的其他制造商。

沃勒克表示,大量現(xiàn)有的產(chǎn)能沒(méi)有得到充分的利用。

最近,位于以色列的梯瓦制藥發(fā)布聲明,抱怨疫苗公司拒絕使用其主動(dòng)提供的產(chǎn)能。許多公司也有類(lèi)似的不滿(mǎn)。對(duì)此,沃勒克聲稱(chēng)通過(guò)疫苗專(zhuān)利豁免,以及為進(jìn)一步擴(kuò)大產(chǎn)能進(jìn)行注資,可以使疫苗產(chǎn)量快速增加數(shù)十億劑。

沃勒克表示:“你的首要任務(wù)是先踏上那條路,但隨后你就會(huì)看見(jiàn)一道緊鎖的大門(mén)。”

南非駐WTO大使姆倫比-彼得說(shuō):“當(dāng)前的新冠肺炎疫情并未減緩,病毒變異和變種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)可能使醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品和醫(yī)療技術(shù)的療效受到影響,許多人的生命危在旦夕,我們希望這一切能夠讓W(xué)TO各成員國(guó)認(rèn)識(shí)到情況的緊迫性?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍

審校:汪皓

The World Trade Organization knows all about crises. Former U.S. President Donald Trump threw a wrench into its core function of resolving trade disputes—a blocker that President Joe Biden has not yet removed—and there is widespread dissatisfaction over the fairness of the global trade rulebook. The 164-country organization, under the fresh leadership of Nigeria's Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, has a lot to fix.

However, one crisis is more pressing than the others: the battle over COVID-19 vaccines, and whether the protection of their patents and other intellectual property should be temporarily lifted to boost production and end the pandemic sooner rather than later.

According to some of those pushing for the waiver—which was originally proposed last year by India and South Africa—the WTO's future rests on what happens next.

"The credibility of the WTO will depend on its ability to find a meaningful outcome on this issue that truly ramps-up and diversifies production," says Xolelwa Mlumbi-Peter, South Africa's ambassador to the WTO.

"Final nail in the coffin"

The Geneva-based WTO isn't an organization with power, as such—it's a framework within which countries make big decisions about trade, generally by consensus. It's supposed to be the forum where disputes get settled, because all its members have signed up to the same rules. And one of its most important rulebooks is the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, or TRIPS, which sprang to life alongside the WTO in 1995.

The WTO's founding agreement allows for rules to be waived in exceptional circumstances, and indeed this has happened before: its members agreed in 2003 to waive TRIPS obligations that were blocking the importation of cheap, generic drugs into developing countries that lack manufacturing capacity. (That waiver was effectively made permanent in 2017.)

Consensus is the key here.

Although the failure to reach consensus on a waiver could be overcome with a 75% supermajority vote by the WTO's membership, this would be an unprecedented and seismic event. In the case of the COVID-19 vaccine IP waiver, it would mean standing up to the European Union, and Germany in particular, as well as countries such as Canada and the U.K.—the U.S. recently flipped from opposing the idea of a waiver to supporting it, as did France.

It's a dispute between countries, but the result will be on the WTO as a whole, say waiver advocates.

"If, in the face of one of humanity's greatest challenges in a century, the WTO functionally becomes an obstacle as in contrast to part of the solution, I think it could be the final nail in the coffin" for the organization, says Lori Wallach, the founder of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, a U.S. campaigning group that focuses on the WTO and trade agreements.

"If the TRIPS waiver is successful, and people see the WTO as being part of the solution—saving lives and livelihoods—it could create goodwill and momentum to address what are still daunting structural problems."

Those problems are legion.

Reform needs

Top of the list is the WTO's Appellate Body, which hears appeals in members' trade disputes. It's a pivotal part of the international trade system, but Trump—incensed at decisions taken against the U.S. —blocked appointments to its seven-strong panel as judges retired. The body became completely paralyzed at the end of 2019, when two judges' terms ended and the panel no longer had the three-judge quorum it needs to rule on appeals.

Anyone who hoped the advent of the Biden administration would change matters was disappointed earlier this year when the U.S. rejected a European proposal to fill the vacancies. "The United States continues to have systemic concerns with the appellate body," it said. "As members know, the United States has raised and explained its systemic concerns for more than 16 years and across multiple U.S. administrations."

At her confirmation hearing in February, current U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai reiterated those concerns—she said the appellate body had "overstepped its authority and erred in interpreting WTO agreements in a number of cases, to the detriment of the United States and other WTO members," and accused it of dragging its heels in settling disputes.

"Reforms are needed to ensure that the underlying causes of such problems do not resurface," Tai said.

"While the U.S. [has] been engaging [with the WTO] it hasn't indicated it would move quickly on allowing appointments to the Appellate Body," says Bryan Mercurio, an economic-law professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, who opposes the vaccine waiver. "This is not a good sign. In terms of WTO governance, it's a much more important step than supporting negotiations on an [intellectual property] waiver."

It's not just the U.S. that wants to see reform at the WTO. In a major policy document published in February, the EU said negotiations had failed to modernize the organization's rules, the dispute-resolution system was broken, the monitoring of countries' trade policies was ineffective.

China is one of the key problems here. It became a WTO member in 2001.

"China is operating from what it sees as a position of strength, so it will not be bullied into agreeing to changes which it sees as not in its interests," says Mercurio.

All these problems won't go away if the WTO manages to come up with a TRIPS waiver for COVID-19 vaccines and medical supplies, Wallach concedes. "But," she adds, "the will and the good faith to tackle these challenges is increased enormously if the WTO has the experience of being part of the solution, not just an obstacle."

Wallach points to a statement released earlier this month by Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) trade ministers, which called for urgent discussions on the waiver. "The WTO must demonstrate that global trade rules can help address the human catastrophe of the COVID-19 pandemic and facilitate the recovery," the statement read in its section about WTO reform.

Okonjo-Iweala's role

The WTO's new director general, whose route to the top was unblocked in early 2021 with the demise of the Trump administration, is certainly keen to fix the problems that contributed to the early departure of her predecessor, Brazil's Robert Azevedo.

Earlier last week, when the U.S. and EU agreed a five-year ceasefire in a long-running dispute over Boeing and Airbus aircraft subsidies, Okonjo-Iweala tweeted: "With political will, we can solve even the most intractable problems."

However, Mercurio is skeptical about her stewardship having much of an effect on the WTO's reform process.

"Upon taking [over she] stated it was time for delegations to speak to each other and not simply past each other, but at the recent General Counsel meeting delegations simply read prepared statements in what some have described as the worst meeting ever," he says.

"On the other hand, Ngozi is very much someone who will actively seek solutions to problems, and in this way different to her predecessor. If the role of mediator is welcomed, she could have an impact not in starting discussions but in getting deals over the finish line."

A spokesperson for the WTO Secretariat declined to offer comment on Mlumbi-Peter and Wallach's suggestions that the organization's credibility rests on the vaccine patent waiver issue, but pointed to a May speech in which Okonjo-Iweala said the WTO could help tackle vaccine supply chain monitoring and transparency, helping manufacturers scale up production, and creating a more geographically diversified manufacturing base.

In her speech, the WTO chief also said members "must address issues related to technology transfer, knowhow and intellectual property," including the waiver proposal. "We must act now to get all our ambassadors to the table to negotiate a text," she said.

"Agenda driven"

Big Pharma's stance on the issue is that WTO members can help the effort without backing a waiver, but instead by pushing for the lifting of export restrictions on medical goods.

"The WTO still has much concrete work to do to remove trade barriers that are hurting manufacture and distribution of vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics globally," says Thomas Cueni, director general of the Geneva-based International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA).

"The call for waiving patents is driven by a political agenda playing to the gallery and not bringing a single more vaccine short term, but could jeopardize the very framework which has helped us to respond so fast to the COVID-19 pandemic."

Mercurio also says Mlumbi-Peter and Wallach's suggestions are agenda-driven.

"I think the comments that the WTO's credibility rests on the outcome of a TRIPS waiver are overstated, in the extreme," he says. "People with an interest in every topic say it—environmentalists say the credibility rests on the outcome of fishery subsidies, tech people say the same on the e-commerce and services negotiations, and industrialists say the same regarding subsidies."

However, Wallach insists that nothing about the waiver would change the system, because the system already provides for such temporary suspensions of intellectual-property protections. "This doesn’t change a comma in the actual TRIPS agreement," she says.

"The WTO is the relevant forum and it has the relevant policy tools to respond to the current pandemic by addressing IP barriers so as to ramp-up and diversify production across the world," says Mlumbi-Peter.

IFPMA's Cueni says "taking away the patent won’t do anything short term for the current pandemic" as the real problems are trade barriers and scarcity of raw materials. There is also a clear need for technology transfers if new COVID-19 vaccine-making facilities are to come online—though it should be noted that the vaccine companies have all failed to contribute to the World Health Organization's COVID-19 Technology Access Pool (C-TAP), which was set up last year as a way for them to voluntarily help other manufacturers join the effort.

Wallach insists a great deal of existing manufacturing capacity is going untapped. Pointing to statements that have been made by the likes of Israel's Teva Pharmaceuticals, which recently complained about vaccine companies refusing to use its offered capacity, she claims the waiver could quickly unlock a billion more doses, along with the funding for further manufacturing capacity to be built out.

"The first thing you have to do is get onto the path, and there's a locked gate," says Wallach.

"We hope given the current pandemic and the risk of mutations and variants that will affect the efficacy of the medical products and technologies, as well as the need to save people's lives, that the WTO Members will recognize the urgency of the matter," says South Africa's Mlumbi-Peter.

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專(zhuān)屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫(xiě)或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開(kāi)
熱讀文章
无码中文字幕一二三区| 麻豆蜜桃国产精品无码视频| 日本中文一区二区三区亚洲| 久久久久久国产一级AV片| 中文成人无码精品久久久不卡| 九九99久久精品国产按摩| 久久综合伊人99麻豆| 亚洲AV无码成人精品区在线播放| 黄色一级网站国产成人毛片| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天5| 久久免免费人妖视频| 欧美日韩影音先锋第一页| 日本人成在线播放免费课体台| 日韩乱码精品一区二区中文字幕| 婷婷伊人在线播放国产麻豆| 迈开腿让我看一下小鸡蛋视频| 久久精品国产亚洲AV果冻传媒| 老熟女高潮一区二区三区| 精品视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国精品无码一区二区三区左线| 成人国产精品久久久免费| 国产日韩欧美在线综合网| 午夜无码免费福利视频网址| 久久久久久久亚洲精品中文| 久久人人做人人妻人人玩精品Au_| 日韩一区二区三区无码视频| 99精品国产99久久久久久97| 91偷拍自产一区二区三区| 男人搡女人搡到高潮视频| 人妻在线无码一区二区三区| 最新国产AV无码专区亚洲AVn| 闺蜜张开腿让我爽了一夜| 午夜性影院在线观看视频播放| 小骚妇下面水多要插视频| 熟妇久久无码人妻av蜜臀| 国产免费午夜福利在线播放| 日韩一区无码高清| 无码精品A在线观看十八禁| 国产一区二区免费播放| 欧美 亚洲 日韩 国产中文字幕在线| 欧美国产日韩在线一区|