成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

首頁(yè) 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

美國(guó)迎來(lái)第五波疫情,疫苗保護(hù)力卻在減弱

Erin Prater
2022-05-19

人們的確不斷意識(shí)到,無(wú)論是因?yàn)榻臃N疫苗還是曾經(jīng)感染,獲得的免疫力都會(huì)隨著時(shí)間的推移而減弱。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

打或不打第二劑加強(qiáng)針,至少對(duì)一部分人來(lái)說(shuō),這是個(gè)問(wèn)題。

大多數(shù)的美國(guó)人還無(wú)法選擇接種第二劑新冠肺炎疫苗加強(qiáng)針。5月13日,《財(cái)富》雜志詢問(wèn)美國(guó)疾病控制與預(yù)防中心(U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),為什么還沒(méi)有針對(duì)多數(shù)人群打第二針加強(qiáng)針出臺(tái)指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn),預(yù)計(jì)什么時(shí)候出臺(tái),該中心并未給出明確回答。

然而,對(duì)于那些符合接種條件的人(主要是老年人和免疫功能低下者),它確實(shí)提出了最新的指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn),敦促他們考慮自身可能因?yàn)榛A(chǔ)病和社交接觸而導(dǎo)致感染新冠病毒后出現(xiàn)“重癥”。該聯(lián)邦機(jī)構(gòu)修訂后的意見(jiàn)是:在打第四針前要三思。此時(shí)此刻,由于新冠肺炎基金的撥付在美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)陷入僵局,人們擔(dān)心美國(guó)政府可能會(huì)定量減少疫苗供應(yīng)配給。

對(duì)于符合接種條件的人來(lái)說(shuō),第二針加強(qiáng)針值得打嗎?沒(méi)有資格接種的人是不是錯(cuò)失了良機(jī)?特別是,當(dāng)前正值第五波新冠肺炎疫情來(lái)襲,而白宮預(yù)計(jì)今年秋冬會(huì)再次出現(xiàn)疫情。

“第二針加強(qiáng)針的作用還不確定。”Fractal Therapeutics的首席執(zhí)行官、新冠肺炎研究人員阿里吉特·查克拉瓦蒂說(shuō),“作用似乎不大,而且持續(xù)時(shí)間很短。但如果你想通過(guò)‘瑞士奶酪’策略來(lái)加強(qiáng)個(gè)人防護(hù),它相當(dāng)于又多了一層保護(hù)。從這個(gè)角度看,這是值得的。”

“多多少少有點(diǎn)效果”

約翰斯·霍普金斯大學(xué)布隆伯格公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院(Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)的流行病學(xué)家凱里·阿爾托夫稱,是否推薦大多數(shù)美國(guó)人打第二針加強(qiáng)針是一個(gè)很復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題。

“如果不能確定一樣?xùn)|西的利大于弊,我們就不想推薦?!彼?月13日向《財(cái)富》雜志表示,“盡管mRNA疫苗的安全性十分高,但我們?nèi)匀幌M_保這些疫苗可以有效地讓人們遠(yuǎn)離醫(yī)院、免于死亡。”

“更進(jìn)一步,我們還要確保這些疫苗在病毒發(fā)生變化時(shí)仍然有效。”

據(jù)《華盛頓郵報(bào)》(Washington Post)最近報(bào)道,在今年1月和2月的首波奧密克戎疫情中,因?yàn)樾鹿诓《径劳龅娜酥校臃N了疫苗的人占一半,高于去年秋天德?tīng)査兎N爆發(fā)時(shí)期23%的數(shù)字。

阿爾托夫稱在沒(méi)有看到背后的數(shù)據(jù)之前,不會(huì)對(duì)《華盛頓郵報(bào)》的上述報(bào)道發(fā)表評(píng)論。但人們的確不斷意識(shí)到,無(wú)論是因?yàn)榻臃N疫苗還是曾經(jīng)感染,獲得的免疫力都會(huì)隨著時(shí)間的推移而減弱。

“我們知道免疫力在大約四個(gè)月后開(kāi)始減弱,而當(dāng)前的主流病毒變種具有更強(qiáng)的突破能力?!眰魅静<摇⒏鐐惐葋喆髮W(xué)瓦格洛斯醫(yī)師和外科醫(yī)生學(xué)院(Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons)的醫(yī)學(xué)助理教授馬庫(kù)斯·佩雷拉博士在今年4月的一篇博客中寫(xiě)道。

他引用了以色列于4月發(fā)表在《新英格蘭醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》(The New England Journal of Medicine)上的一項(xiàng)研究說(shuō):“如果是想保護(hù)年輕人免患重癥,第四針?biāo)坪鯚o(wú)法帶來(lái)太多好處?!毖芯堪l(fā)現(xiàn),醫(yī)護(hù)人員在接種第二針加強(qiáng)針后,抗體平均會(huì)恢復(fù)到打完第一針加強(qiáng)針后的水平。沒(méi)有打第二針的醫(yī)護(hù)人員的抗體水平則繼續(xù)下降。

然而,第二針加強(qiáng)針并沒(méi)有大幅減少最終感染奧密克戎的幾率:接種了第二針加強(qiáng)針的受試者中,約20%的人感染了病毒,而只打了一針的人中,感染比例為25%。所有感染了病毒的受試者,無(wú)論打了幾針加強(qiáng)針,都出現(xiàn)了輕微癥狀,而且呈現(xiàn)出高病毒載量,也就是說(shuō)他們很可能具有傳染性。

該研究稱第二針加強(qiáng)針是“可以產(chǎn)生免疫反應(yīng)的”、“安全的”,但只是“稍微有點(diǎn)效,主要是針對(duì)有癥狀的疾病”。該研究未能為在年輕人和健康人群中接種第四針疫苗提供有力依據(jù)。

查克拉瓦蒂指出,將人們按照免疫功能是否受損進(jìn)行劃分存在一個(gè)問(wèn)題,即“人與人之間的免疫應(yīng)答強(qiáng)度存在很大異質(zhì)性”,他補(bǔ)充道,他的研究團(tuán)隊(duì)很快將就此發(fā)表一篇論文。

“它的鐘形曲線非常寬。有些人中和抗體的半衰期非常非常短;有些人則很長(zhǎng)。無(wú)法把人整齊地分成兩類?!?/p>

“轉(zhuǎn)瞬即逝”的效果

查克拉瓦蒂引用5月13日發(fā)表在《美國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)雜志網(wǎng)絡(luò)開(kāi)放》(JAMA Network Open)上的一項(xiàng)研究說(shuō),雖然加強(qiáng)針恢復(fù)了對(duì)重癥的預(yù)防能力,但“持續(xù)時(shí)間相當(dāng)短”。該研究發(fā)現(xiàn),接種完第三針疫苗后,對(duì)奧密克戎的免疫力僅在幾周后就開(kāi)始下降,而打完前兩針后幾個(gè)月才開(kāi)始減弱,稱加強(qiáng)針的抗體反應(yīng)是“轉(zhuǎn)瞬即逝的”。

但這不僅僅與一個(gè)人對(duì)重復(fù)接種疫苗的免疫應(yīng)答有關(guān)。

“你的身體對(duì)每一次接種的反應(yīng)都不同,但病毒同樣也在做出反應(yīng)?!彼f(shuō)。

奧密克戎變種越來(lái)越善于躲避曾經(jīng)感染和接種疫苗產(chǎn)生的免疫保護(hù)。最近的一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),那些之前感染過(guò)奧密克戎BA.1毒株但沒(méi)有接種疫苗的人,在接觸到最近席卷南非的新變種BA.4和B.5毒株時(shí),中和抗體的水平下降了近八倍。該研究顯示,那些既接種了疫苗又感染過(guò)的人,中和抗體水平下降了三倍。

查克拉瓦蒂說(shuō),一開(kāi)始,人們希望,針對(duì)原始毒株的抗體能夠抵抗未來(lái)的變種和亞變種,“但病毒在夜以繼日地努力解決這個(gè)問(wèn)題?!?/p>

查克拉瓦蒂建議,還沒(méi)有打過(guò)第一針加強(qiáng)針的人要去打,如果有一天可以再次打加強(qiáng)針了,也要繼續(xù)接種。

“我自己?jiǎn)??我?huì)再打一針加強(qiáng)針?!彼f(shuō),“會(huì)有什么驚艷的效果嗎?不。我認(rèn)為大多數(shù)人都沒(méi)有注意到,事實(shí)上,疫苗正在逐漸失去——幾乎已經(jīng)完全失去——預(yù)防感染的能力。它們也可能正在失去抵御重癥的能力。”

“不管打不打第二針加強(qiáng)針,六個(gè)月后,我們或多或少又會(huì)陷入同樣的境地。”

查克拉瓦蒂說(shuō),疫苗遠(yuǎn)非速戰(zhàn)速?zèng)Q之計(jì),而是對(duì)抗新冠肺炎病毒武器庫(kù)中的其中一件工具。如果希望減少感染這種有時(shí)會(huì)致命的病毒的幾率,以及減少患上可能致殘的“長(zhǎng)新冠”的可能性,也可以戴上像N95這樣的高質(zhì)量口罩。

“目前唯一最有效的干預(yù)措施就是戴口罩。”他說(shuō)?!斑@是一個(gè)不幸的事實(shí),因?yàn)橐呀?jīng)過(guò)去兩年了,我們?cè)缇蛻?yīng)該越過(guò)這個(gè)關(guān)口了?!?/p>

他想對(duì)那些有資格打第二針加強(qiáng)針的人說(shuō):“你要想清楚,如果你只能多獲得幾周或者幾個(gè)月的額外保護(hù),什么時(shí)候打?qū)δ阕詈线m?”

“這就是目前為止你能夠得到的。當(dāng)然,實(shí)際結(jié)果也可能不同于預(yù)期,因?yàn)橄乱粋€(gè)變種或許也具有逃逸能力?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Agatha

打或不打第二劑加強(qiáng)針,至少對(duì)一部分人來(lái)說(shuō),這是個(gè)問(wèn)題。

大多數(shù)的美國(guó)人還無(wú)法選擇接種第二劑新冠肺炎疫苗加強(qiáng)針。5月13日,《財(cái)富》雜志詢問(wèn)美國(guó)疾病控制與預(yù)防中心(U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention),為什么還沒(méi)有針對(duì)多數(shù)人群打第二針加強(qiáng)針出臺(tái)指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn),預(yù)計(jì)什么時(shí)候出臺(tái),該中心并未給出明確回答。

然而,對(duì)于那些符合接種條件的人(主要是老年人和免疫功能低下者),它確實(shí)提出了最新的指導(dǎo)意見(jiàn),敦促他們考慮自身可能因?yàn)榛A(chǔ)病和社交接觸而導(dǎo)致感染新冠病毒后出現(xiàn)“重癥”。該聯(lián)邦機(jī)構(gòu)修訂后的意見(jiàn)是:在打第四針前要三思。此時(shí)此刻,由于新冠肺炎基金的撥付在美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)陷入僵局,人們擔(dān)心美國(guó)政府可能會(huì)定量減少疫苗供應(yīng)配給。

對(duì)于符合接種條件的人來(lái)說(shuō),第二針加強(qiáng)針值得打嗎?沒(méi)有資格接種的人是不是錯(cuò)失了良機(jī)?特別是,當(dāng)前正值第五波新冠肺炎疫情來(lái)襲,而白宮預(yù)計(jì)今年秋冬會(huì)再次出現(xiàn)疫情。

“第二針加強(qiáng)針的作用還不確定?!盕ractal Therapeutics的首席執(zhí)行官、新冠肺炎研究人員阿里吉特·查克拉瓦蒂說(shuō),“作用似乎不大,而且持續(xù)時(shí)間很短。但如果你想通過(guò)‘瑞士奶酪’策略來(lái)加強(qiáng)個(gè)人防護(hù),它相當(dāng)于又多了一層保護(hù)。從這個(gè)角度看,這是值得的。”

“多多少少有點(diǎn)效果”

約翰斯·霍普金斯大學(xué)布隆伯格公共衛(wèi)生學(xué)院(Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health)的流行病學(xué)家凱里·阿爾托夫稱,是否推薦大多數(shù)美國(guó)人打第二針加強(qiáng)針是一個(gè)很復(fù)雜的問(wèn)題。

“如果不能確定一樣?xùn)|西的利大于弊,我們就不想推薦?!彼?月13日向《財(cái)富》雜志表示,“盡管mRNA疫苗的安全性十分高,但我們?nèi)匀幌M_保這些疫苗可以有效地讓人們遠(yuǎn)離醫(yī)院、免于死亡。”

“更進(jìn)一步,我們還要確保這些疫苗在病毒發(fā)生變化時(shí)仍然有效。”

據(jù)《華盛頓郵報(bào)》(Washington Post)最近報(bào)道,在今年1月和2月的首波奧密克戎疫情中,因?yàn)樾鹿诓《径劳龅娜酥?,接種了疫苗的人占一半,高于去年秋天德?tīng)査兎N爆發(fā)時(shí)期23%的數(shù)字。

阿爾托夫稱在沒(méi)有看到背后的數(shù)據(jù)之前,不會(huì)對(duì)《華盛頓郵報(bào)》的上述報(bào)道發(fā)表評(píng)論。但人們的確不斷意識(shí)到,無(wú)論是因?yàn)榻臃N疫苗還是曾經(jīng)感染,獲得的免疫力都會(huì)隨著時(shí)間的推移而減弱。

“我們知道免疫力在大約四個(gè)月后開(kāi)始減弱,而當(dāng)前的主流病毒變種具有更強(qiáng)的突破能力?!眰魅静<?、哥倫比亞大學(xué)瓦格洛斯醫(yī)師和外科醫(yī)生學(xué)院(Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons)的醫(yī)學(xué)助理教授馬庫(kù)斯·佩雷拉博士在今年4月的一篇博客中寫(xiě)道。

他引用了以色列于4月發(fā)表在《新英格蘭醫(yī)學(xué)雜志》(The New England Journal of Medicine)上的一項(xiàng)研究說(shuō):“如果是想保護(hù)年輕人免患重癥,第四針?biāo)坪鯚o(wú)法帶來(lái)太多好處。”研究發(fā)現(xiàn),醫(yī)護(hù)人員在接種第二針加強(qiáng)針后,抗體平均會(huì)恢復(fù)到打完第一針加強(qiáng)針后的水平。沒(méi)有打第二針的醫(yī)護(hù)人員的抗體水平則繼續(xù)下降。

然而,第二針加強(qiáng)針并沒(méi)有大幅減少最終感染奧密克戎的幾率:接種了第二針加強(qiáng)針的受試者中,約20%的人感染了病毒,而只打了一針的人中,感染比例為25%。所有感染了病毒的受試者,無(wú)論打了幾針加強(qiáng)針,都出現(xiàn)了輕微癥狀,而且呈現(xiàn)出高病毒載量,也就是說(shuō)他們很可能具有傳染性。

該研究稱第二針加強(qiáng)針是“可以產(chǎn)生免疫反應(yīng)的”、“安全的”,但只是“稍微有點(diǎn)效,主要是針對(duì)有癥狀的疾病”。該研究未能為在年輕人和健康人群中接種第四針疫苗提供有力依據(jù)。

查克拉瓦蒂指出,將人們按照免疫功能是否受損進(jìn)行劃分存在一個(gè)問(wèn)題,即“人與人之間的免疫應(yīng)答強(qiáng)度存在很大異質(zhì)性”,他補(bǔ)充道,他的研究團(tuán)隊(duì)很快將就此發(fā)表一篇論文。

“它的鐘形曲線非常寬。有些人中和抗體的半衰期非常非常短;有些人則很長(zhǎng)。無(wú)法把人整齊地分成兩類?!?/p>

“轉(zhuǎn)瞬即逝”的效果

查克拉瓦蒂引用5月13日發(fā)表在《美國(guó)醫(yī)學(xué)會(huì)雜志網(wǎng)絡(luò)開(kāi)放》(JAMA Network Open)上的一項(xiàng)研究說(shuō),雖然加強(qiáng)針恢復(fù)了對(duì)重癥的預(yù)防能力,但“持續(xù)時(shí)間相當(dāng)短”。該研究發(fā)現(xiàn),接種完第三針疫苗后,對(duì)奧密克戎的免疫力僅在幾周后就開(kāi)始下降,而打完前兩針后幾個(gè)月才開(kāi)始減弱,稱加強(qiáng)針的抗體反應(yīng)是“轉(zhuǎn)瞬即逝的”。

但這不僅僅與一個(gè)人對(duì)重復(fù)接種疫苗的免疫應(yīng)答有關(guān)。

“你的身體對(duì)每一次接種的反應(yīng)都不同,但病毒同樣也在做出反應(yīng)?!彼f(shuō)。

奧密克戎變種越來(lái)越善于躲避曾經(jīng)感染和接種疫苗產(chǎn)生的免疫保護(hù)。最近的一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),那些之前感染過(guò)奧密克戎BA.1毒株但沒(méi)有接種疫苗的人,在接觸到最近席卷南非的新變種BA.4和B.5毒株時(shí),中和抗體的水平下降了近八倍。該研究顯示,那些既接種了疫苗又感染過(guò)的人,中和抗體水平下降了三倍。

查克拉瓦蒂說(shuō),一開(kāi)始,人們希望,針對(duì)原始毒株的抗體能夠抵抗未來(lái)的變種和亞變種,“但病毒在夜以繼日地努力解決這個(gè)問(wèn)題?!?/p>

查克拉瓦蒂建議,還沒(méi)有打過(guò)第一針加強(qiáng)針的人要去打,如果有一天可以再次打加強(qiáng)針了,也要繼續(xù)接種。

“我自己?jiǎn)??我?huì)再打一針加強(qiáng)針?!彼f(shuō),“會(huì)有什么驚艷的效果嗎?不。我認(rèn)為大多數(shù)人都沒(méi)有注意到,事實(shí)上,疫苗正在逐漸失去——幾乎已經(jīng)完全失去——預(yù)防感染的能力。它們也可能正在失去抵御重癥的能力。”

“不管打不打第二針加強(qiáng)針,六個(gè)月后,我們或多或少又會(huì)陷入同樣的境地?!?/p>

查克拉瓦蒂說(shuō),疫苗遠(yuǎn)非速戰(zhàn)速?zèng)Q之計(jì),而是對(duì)抗新冠肺炎病毒武器庫(kù)中的其中一件工具。如果希望減少感染這種有時(shí)會(huì)致命的病毒的幾率,以及減少患上可能致殘的“長(zhǎng)新冠”的可能性,也可以戴上像N95這樣的高質(zhì)量口罩。

“目前唯一最有效的干預(yù)措施就是戴口罩?!彼f(shuō)?!斑@是一個(gè)不幸的事實(shí),因?yàn)橐呀?jīng)過(guò)去兩年了,我們?cè)缇蛻?yīng)該越過(guò)這個(gè)關(guān)口了?!?/p>

他想對(duì)那些有資格打第二針加強(qiáng)針的人說(shuō):“你要想清楚,如果你只能多獲得幾周或者幾個(gè)月的額外保護(hù),什么時(shí)候打?qū)δ阕詈线m?”

“這就是目前為止你能夠得到的。當(dāng)然,實(shí)際結(jié)果也可能不同于預(yù)期,因?yàn)橄乱粋€(gè)變種或許也具有逃逸能力?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:Agatha

To boost again or not to boost again. That is the question—for some, at least.

A second COVID booster currently isn’t an option for most Americans. When asked by Fortune on May 13 why guidance has not yet been released for second boosters for a majority of people, or when it would be, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control failed to answer specifically.

It did, however, point to updated guidance for those who are eligible—the elderly and immunocompromised, mainly—urging them to consider how likely they are to get “very sick” from the virus based on preexisting health issues and community exposure. The federal agency’s revised message: Think twice before scheduling a fourth jab. It comes amid concerns that the U.S. government may be rationing a dwindling supply of vaccines as potential new COVID funding stalls in Congress.

For those who are eligible, is a second booster worth it? And are those who are ineligible missing out—especially during a fifth COVID wave, with yet another predicted by the White House this fall and winter?

“A second booster is sort of on the bubble,” said Arijit Chakravarty, a COVID researcher and CEO of Fractal Therapeutics. “The effects seem small and short lived. But if you’re implementing your own ‘swiss cheese’ strategy, it’s one more layer. In that respect, it’s worthwhile.”

“Somewhat efficacious”

The question of whether to recommend a second booster for most Americans is complicated, said Keri Althoff, an epidemiologist at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.

“We don’t want to recommend anything that isn’t going to confer more benefit than potential harm,” she told Fortune on May 13. “Although mRNA vaccines have an incredible safety profile, we still want to make sure that these vaccines are working effectively to keep people out of the hospital or protect people from death.”

“Even better, we need to make sure these vaccines are still doing it as the virus changes.”

Those who had been vaccinated made up nearly half of COVID fatalities in January and February of this year during the initial Omicron surge—up from 23% during the Delta wave last fall, The Washington Post recently reported.

Althoff wouldn’t comment on The Post’s reporting without seeing the data behind it. But there is growing awareness that immunity—whether from vaccination or previous infection—wanes with time.

“We know immunity starts to wane after four months or so, and we have a variant circulating that is more capable of breaking through our immunity,” Dr. Marcus Pereira, an infectious disease expert and assistant professor of medicine at Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, said in an April blog post.

“A fourth booster does not seem to create much of a benefit when it comes to more severe outcomes for those who are younger,” he said, citing an April study out of Israel published in The New England Journal of Medicine. It found that among health care workers who received a second booster, antibodies were restored to levels around those typically seen after a first booster. Among health care workers who weren’t boosted a second time, antibody levels continue to wane.

A second booster, however, didn’t significantly reduce the percentage of those who eventually developed Omicron—around 20% of those who received a second booster, as compared to 25% of those who had been boosted only once. All participants who developed COVID, regardless of how many boosters they’d received, experienced minimal symptoms but saw high viral loads, meaning they were likely infectious.

The study called a second booster “immunogenic” and “safe” but only “somewhat efficacious, primarily against symptomatic disease.” It failed to make a strong case for a fourth vaccine in the young and healthy.

The trouble with placing individuals in two categories—immunocompromised and not—is that there is “a lot of person to person heterogeneity in the strength of immune response,” Chakravarty said, adding that his research team would soon be publishing a paper on the topic.

“It lives on a very wide bell curve. Some people have a very, very short half life for neutralizing antibodies; some have very long half lives. They don’t neatly break down into two buckets.”

“Transient” benefit

While boosters restore protection against severe disease, “the duration is quite a bit shorter,” said Chakravarty, citing a study published to JAMA Network Open on May 13. It found a decline in vaccine efficacy against Omicron just weeks after a third dose, versus months after the initial two-dose regime, calling the antibody response after a booster “transient.”

But there’s more at play than one’s ability to mount a response to repeated vaccinations.

“Your body is responding differently to each new dose, but the virus is also reacting,” he said.

Omicron subvariants have become increasingly adept at evading immunity from both prior infection and vaccination. A recent study found that those who had been previously infected with Omicron BA.1 but not vaccinated suffered a nearly eightfold drop in neutralizing antibodies when exposed to BA.4 and B.5, the new Omicron variants sweeping South Africa. Those who had been vaccinated and previously infected saw a milder threefold decrease, according to the study.

The initial hope was that antibodies against the Wuhan strain of COVID would hold up against future variants and subvaraints, “but the virus is working night and day to solve that problem,” Chakravarty said.

Those who’ve yet to receive a first booster shot should do so, Chakravarty advised, and boost again if they’re eventually able.

“Me, personally? I’ll get a second booster,” he said. “Is it going to be amazing? No. I think most people missed the memo that the vaccines are, in fact, fading—have almost completely faded—in the ability to protect against infection. They may also be losing the ability to protect against severe disease as well.”

“Get the second booster or don’t—but either way, six months down the road, we’re all in the same bucket again, more or less.”

Far from a quick fix, vaccines are a tool in an arsenal of weapons against COVID, Chakravarty said. Those who wish to decrease their chances of contracting the sometimes deadly virus—and of developing a potentially disabling case of Long COVID—can also wear a quality mask like an N95.

“Right now the single most effective intervention is to wear a mask,” he said. “That's unfortunate, because two years in, we should have been past this point.”

His message to those eligible for a second booster: “You need to figure out, if you’ve only got a few weeks of added protection, or a few months, when is the right time for you?” he said.

“That’s what you’re going to get as of now. Your mileage may vary, because the next variant may be able to evade that as well.”

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫(xiě)或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開(kāi)財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開(kāi)
熱讀文章
欧美韩国精品另类综合| 91嫩草国产线免费观看91| JK国产精品一区二区夜夜嗨| 小仙女粉嫩高潮白浆在线看视频| 四虎最新转跳入口网址| 好男人免费影院www神马 | 亚洲视频精品在线观看| 国产一二三区在线播放| 国产伦对白刺激精彩露脸| 国产免费爽爽视频在线观| 亚洲AV久无精品一区二区国产| 国产成人无码视频一区二区三区| 国产精品国产三级区别| 久久精品国产亚洲AV热黑人| 在线精品观看一区欧美国产精品不卡在线观看| 日日骚日韩乱码AV一区二区三区| 久久久久无码精品国产AV蜜桃| 久久中文无码日韩A∨| 久久久久久国产精品免费免费男同| 狼人香蕉香蕉精品99| 亚洲国产精品尤物yw在线观看| 无码专区AAAAAA免费视频| 国产精品v欧美精品v日韩苍井空| 亚洲高清无码电影| 国偷自产一区二区三区在线观看| 国产香蕉97碰碰久久人人| 91人摸人人澡人人人超碰| 无码国产精品视频一区二区,| 免费看美女裸体奶头无遮挡| 亚洲蜜芽在线精品一区| 亚洲va成无码人在线观看天堂| 欧美成人精品动漫在线专区| 日本xXXX片免费观看国产| 精品日本一区二区国产午夜精品久久久久| 国产av日韩aⅴ亚洲av| 国产又色又爽又刺激的视频| 亚洲人成无码网WWW| 夜夜精品无码一区二区三区| 国产办公室免费视频观看| 年经丰满岳欲乱中文字幕| 久久精品一区二区三区日韩|