上周四,薩姆·班克曼-弗里德來(lái)到曼哈頓下城的莫伊尼漢法院,后面緊跟著他的兩名律師,他想要捍衛(wèi)自己在被軟禁期間使用即時(shí)通訊應(yīng)用程序的權(quán)利。
在整個(gè)刑事審判過(guò)程中,這位名譽(yù)掃地的FTX創(chuàng)始人使用電子產(chǎn)品的行為一直備受爭(zhēng)議。12月,美國(guó)司法部指控他犯有八項(xiàng)與加密貨幣交易所倒閉有關(guān)的罪名,包括電信詐騙和違反競(jìng)選財(cái)務(wù)法規(guī)。
作為保釋條件的一部分,薩姆·班克曼-弗里德被允許繼續(xù)使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng),他似乎很享受這種特權(quán),他甚至在一月中旬創(chuàng)建了一個(gè)Substack(美版微信“公眾號(hào)”)。但檢方發(fā)現(xiàn),他一直在通過(guò)加密消息應(yīng)用Signal給前雇員發(fā)電子郵件和短信,其中包括FTX US的總法律顧問(wèn)和FTX的現(xiàn)任首席執(zhí)行官約翰·雷三世(John Ray III),后者在交易所11月宣告破產(chǎn)后接管了FTX。
通過(guò)Signal(閱后即焚應(yīng)用程序)和電子郵件,班克曼-弗里德給FTX US的總法律顧問(wèn)萊恩·米勒(Ryne Miller)發(fā)消息稱(chēng),他想和對(duì)方重新取得聯(lián)系,看看他們是否能建立“建設(shè)性的關(guān)系”。根據(jù)法庭文件,檢察官計(jì)劃在10月班克曼-弗里德的聽(tīng)證會(huì)上傳喚米勒作證,并將米勒視為“一號(hào)證人”,他們認(rèn)為班克曼-弗里德聯(lián)系米勒的行為是在干擾證人。
1月下旬,檢察官尋求更改班克曼-弗里德的保釋條件,以阻止他在律師不在場(chǎng)的情況下與FTX和Alameda的現(xiàn)任或前任員工聯(lián)系,以及使用加密或即時(shí)通訊應(yīng)用程序,如Signal,聯(lián)系現(xiàn)任或前任員工。劉易斯·卡普蘭(Lewis Kaplan)法官于2月1日同意了限制班克曼-弗里德通信特權(quán)的新規(guī)定,隨后拒絕了檢察官和班克曼-弗里德的辯護(hù)團(tuán)隊(duì)達(dá)成的放寬條件的妥協(xié)方案,而是要求在周四的聽(tīng)證會(huì)上討論此事。
檢察官同意,如果班克曼-弗里德在手機(jī)上安裝監(jiān)控應(yīng)用程序,他就可以使用WhatsApp等特定應(yīng)用程序,但不允許他使用Signal等加密應(yīng)用程序。但卡普蘭對(duì)“加密”的定義提出異議,質(zhì)疑檢察官是否了解班克曼-弗里德有能力規(guī)避任何擬議的條件。正如卡普蘭對(duì)聚集在一起的律師們所說(shuō),“我讀過(guò)各式間諜小說(shuō)”。
他還引用了研究人員最近的一項(xiàng)突破作為班克曼-弗里德如何用其他通信手段躲避檢察官檢查的例子。研究人員最終解密了16世紀(jì)蘇格蘭女王瑪麗在監(jiān)禁期間所寫(xiě)的加密信件——這些隱秘信息幾個(gè)世紀(jì)以來(lái)一直不為世人關(guān)注。
美國(guó)助理檢察官丹妮爾·沙遜(Danielle Sassoon)說(shuō),如果有必要,她相信檢察官能夠破譯班克曼-弗里德發(fā)出的任何信件。
關(guān)于iMessage上刪除文本功能的各種更新(這些更新讓人想起了去蘋(píng)果天才吧的經(jīng)歷),雙方律師團(tuán)隊(duì)進(jìn)行了反復(fù)討論,最后同意商定一份可接受的通訊方式清單,以及要求班克曼-弗里德安裝監(jiān)控應(yīng)用程序,這款監(jiān)控應(yīng)用程序可以確保班克曼-弗里德無(wú)法刪除WhatsApp上的任何信息。
由于班克曼-弗里德有過(guò)可疑的聯(lián)系記錄,盡管卡普蘭似乎對(duì)是否應(yīng)該允許他進(jìn)行任何電子通信持懷疑態(tài)度,但他同意等待雙方團(tuán)隊(duì)的提案,并將有關(guān)此事的裁定延長(zhǎng)至2月21日。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
上周四,薩姆·班克曼-弗里德來(lái)到曼哈頓下城的莫伊尼漢法院,后面緊跟著他的兩名律師,他想要捍衛(wèi)自己在被軟禁期間使用即時(shí)通訊應(yīng)用程序的權(quán)利。
在整個(gè)刑事審判過(guò)程中,這位名譽(yù)掃地的FTX創(chuàng)始人使用電子產(chǎn)品的行為一直備受爭(zhēng)議。12月,美國(guó)司法部指控他犯有八項(xiàng)與加密貨幣交易所倒閉有關(guān)的罪名,包括電信詐騙和違反競(jìng)選財(cái)務(wù)法規(guī)。
作為保釋條件的一部分,薩姆·班克曼-弗里德被允許繼續(xù)使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng),他似乎很享受這種特權(quán),他甚至在一月中旬創(chuàng)建了一個(gè)Substack(美版微信“公眾號(hào)”)。但檢方發(fā)現(xiàn),他一直在通過(guò)加密消息應(yīng)用Signal給前雇員發(fā)電子郵件和短信,其中包括FTX US的總法律顧問(wèn)和FTX的現(xiàn)任首席執(zhí)行官約翰·雷三世(John Ray III),后者在交易所11月宣告破產(chǎn)后接管了FTX。
通過(guò)Signal(閱后即焚應(yīng)用程序)和電子郵件,班克曼-弗里德給FTX US的總法律顧問(wèn)萊恩·米勒(Ryne Miller)發(fā)消息稱(chēng),他想和對(duì)方重新取得聯(lián)系,看看他們是否能建立“建設(shè)性的關(guān)系”。根據(jù)法庭文件,檢察官計(jì)劃在10月班克曼-弗里德的聽(tīng)證會(huì)上傳喚米勒作證,并將米勒視為“一號(hào)證人”,他們認(rèn)為班克曼-弗里德聯(lián)系米勒的行為是在干擾證人。
1月下旬,檢察官尋求更改班克曼-弗里德的保釋條件,以阻止他在律師不在場(chǎng)的情況下與FTX和Alameda的現(xiàn)任或前任員工聯(lián)系,以及使用加密或即時(shí)通訊應(yīng)用程序,如Signal,聯(lián)系現(xiàn)任或前任員工。劉易斯·卡普蘭(Lewis Kaplan)法官于2月1日同意了限制班克曼-弗里德通信特權(quán)的新規(guī)定,隨后拒絕了檢察官和班克曼-弗里德的辯護(hù)團(tuán)隊(duì)達(dá)成的放寬條件的妥協(xié)方案,而是要求在周四的聽(tīng)證會(huì)上討論此事。
檢察官同意,如果班克曼-弗里德在手機(jī)上安裝監(jiān)控應(yīng)用程序,他就可以使用WhatsApp等特定應(yīng)用程序,但不允許他使用Signal等加密應(yīng)用程序。但卡普蘭對(duì)“加密”的定義提出異議,質(zhì)疑檢察官是否了解班克曼-弗里德有能力規(guī)避任何擬議的條件。正如卡普蘭對(duì)聚集在一起的律師們所說(shuō),“我讀過(guò)各式間諜小說(shuō)”。
他還引用了研究人員最近的一項(xiàng)突破作為班克曼-弗里德如何用其他通信手段躲避檢察官檢查的例子。研究人員最終解密了16世紀(jì)蘇格蘭女王瑪麗在監(jiān)禁期間所寫(xiě)的加密信件——這些隱秘信息幾個(gè)世紀(jì)以來(lái)一直不為世人關(guān)注。
美國(guó)助理檢察官丹妮爾·沙遜(Danielle Sassoon)說(shuō),如果有必要,她相信檢察官能夠破譯班克曼-弗里德發(fā)出的任何信件。
關(guān)于iMessage上刪除文本功能的各種更新(這些更新讓人想起了去蘋(píng)果天才吧的經(jīng)歷),雙方律師團(tuán)隊(duì)進(jìn)行了反復(fù)討論,最后同意商定一份可接受的通訊方式清單,以及要求班克曼-弗里德安裝監(jiān)控應(yīng)用程序,這款監(jiān)控應(yīng)用程序可以確保班克曼-弗里德無(wú)法刪除WhatsApp上的任何信息。
由于班克曼-弗里德有過(guò)可疑的聯(lián)系記錄,盡管卡普蘭似乎對(duì)是否應(yīng)該允許他進(jìn)行任何電子通信持懷疑態(tài)度,但他同意等待雙方團(tuán)隊(duì)的提案,并將有關(guān)此事的裁定延長(zhǎng)至2月21日。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
On Thursday morning, Sam Bankman-Fried arrived at the Moynihan Courthouse in lower Manhattan with his two lawyers in tow, ready to defend his right to communicate through messaging applications while under house arrest.
The disgraced FTX founder’s use of electronics has proved contentious throughout his criminal trial, which began in December after the U.S. Department of Justice charged him with eight counts related to the collapse of the crypto exchange, including wire fraud and campaign finance regulation violations.
As part of his bail conditions, Sam Bankman-Fried was permitted to continue using the internet, a privilege he has seemingly enjoyed—he went so far as to create a Substack in mid-January. Prosecutors were less amused when they found out he had been emailing and messaging former employees through the encrypted messaging app Signal, including FTX US’s general counsel and John Ray III, the current CEO of FTX who took over after the exchange declared bankruptcy in November.
Over both Signal and email, Bankman-Fried wrote to Ryne Miller, the general counsel for FTX US, that he wanted to reconnect and see if they could find a way to have a “constructive relationship.” Prosecutors, who plan to call Miller to testify at Bankman-Fried’s hearing in October and have deemed Miller “Witness-1,” have interpreted Bankman-Fried’s outreach as witness tampering, according to court filings.
In late January, prosecutors sought to update Bankman-Fried’s bail conditions to prevent him from communicating with current or former employees at FTX and Alameda, except in the presence of counsel, as well as using encrypted or ephemeral messaging apps, such as Signal. Judge Lewis Kaplan agreed to the new stipulations on Feb. 1 that would limit Bankman-Fried’s communication privileges, and later denied a compromise reached by prosecutors and Bankman-Fried’s defense team to loosen the conditions, instead calling for the Thursday hearing to discuss the matter.
Prosecutors had agreed to allow Bankman-Fried to use certain apps like WhatsApp if he installed monitoring software on his phone, while denying him use of encrypted apps like Signal. But Kaplan took exception with the definition of “encrypted,” questioning whether prosecutors were aware of Bankman-Fried’s potential ability to skirt any proposed conditions. As Kaplan told the assembled lawyers, “I have read all the spy novels.”
He also cited a recent breakthrough by researchers to finally decrypt encoded letters written by Mary, Queen of Scots during her imprisonment in the 16th century—incognito messaging that managed to escape notice for centuries—as an example of how Bankman-Fried could elude prosecutors by using other means of communication.
Danielle Sassoon, an assistant U.S. attorney, said she was confident that prosecutors would be able to decode any letters sent by Bankman-Fried if necessary.
After a back-and-forth about the various updates to deleted text capabilities on iMessage that recalled a visit to the Apple Genius Bar, the two teams of lawyers agreed that they would settle on a list of accepted communication methods, as well as the monitoring software that would ensure that Bankman-Fried could not delete any messages from WhatsApp.
Although Kaplan seemed skeptical that Bankman-Fried should be allowed any electronic communication at all, given his track record of questionable contact, he agreed to extend his order on the matter until Feb. 21, pending the submission of recommendations from both teams.