成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线

首頁 500強(qiáng) 活動(dòng) 榜單 商業(yè) 科技 領(lǐng)導(dǎo)力 專題 品牌中心
雜志訂閱

疫情后人們不愿回到辦公室工作的原因

CHLOE BERGER
2023-06-07

如今的通勤更加費(fèi)錢費(fèi)時(shí),對(duì)于美國(guó)民眾來說,通勤這個(gè)概念可能比新冠疫情前更令人苦惱。

文本設(shè)置
小號(hào)
默認(rèn)
大號(hào)
Plus(0條)

對(duì)于雇員來說,新冠疫情后上辦公室工作的成本要高于疫情前。圖片來源:KEVIN DIETSCH—GETTY IMAGES

在引發(fā)人們的恐慌和煩惱方面,可能除了“根管治療”或“有意分開”之外,鮮有詞語或短語能與“通勤”一詞媲美。如今的通勤更加費(fèi)錢費(fèi)時(shí),對(duì)于美國(guó)民眾來說,通勤這個(gè)概念可能比新冠疫情前更令人苦惱。

房地產(chǎn)中介服務(wù)公司Clever Real Estate對(duì)多項(xiàng)政府?dāng)?shù)據(jù)的計(jì)算結(jié)果顯示,美國(guó)民眾平均每年在通勤上耗費(fèi)的金錢和時(shí)間分別為8466美元和239個(gè)小時(shí)。該機(jī)構(gòu)還評(píng)選了通勤最好和最差的城市。上述費(fèi)用和時(shí)間較新冠疫情前分別增長(zhǎng)了31%和20%;2019年平均每位工人的通勤成本為6499美元和200個(gè)小時(shí)。Clever發(fā)現(xiàn),如今往返于辦公室的成本約占通勤者年收入的19%,其中包括平均867美元的汽車油費(fèi)和410美元的汽車維護(hù)費(fèi)(很明顯,一些通勤者搭乘的是公共交通)。

創(chuàng)40年新高的高通脹,俄烏沖突以及美國(guó)油轉(zhuǎn)氣產(chǎn)能下滑,這些因素在去年都成為了油價(jià)上漲的推手(今年,像紐約這類大城市的地鐵票也將漲價(jià)),如今在車?yán)锎蜷_美國(guó)國(guó)家公共電臺(tái)(NPR),收聽主持人美妙柔和的播音變得越來越貴。一些在新冠疫情期間從高成本城市搬走、遠(yuǎn)程工作的員工如今回到了辦公室,采取混合或完全辦公室辦公,通勤時(shí)間因此變得更長(zhǎng)(而且更加昂貴)。

有鑒于如此沉重的經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān)以及大量時(shí)間的耗費(fèi),難怪很多員工在首席執(zhí)行官呼吁回歸辦公室辦公時(shí)都表現(xiàn)出了抗拒的情緒。在經(jīng)濟(jì)下行和通脹期間,員工正在努力尋求削減成本,這也是2022年冬天遠(yuǎn)程工作再次回彈的原因。領(lǐng)英(LinkedIn)資深自由編輯喬治·安德斯告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“遠(yuǎn)程工作通常更省錢,因?yàn)樗鼘⑼ㄇ诔杀窘档偷搅肆?,同時(shí)還能讓午餐、咖啡等變得更便宜?!?/p>

Owl Labs的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),遠(yuǎn)程工作員工所花的錢只有其在辦公室辦公的同僚的一半(誠(chéng)然,Owl Labs的員工與該趨勢(shì)多少有點(diǎn)關(guān)聯(lián),因?yàn)樗麄冎鞴ヒ曨l會(huì)議設(shè)備);在辦公室辦公每個(gè)月在通勤和食物方面的花費(fèi)為863美元,而居家員工每月為432美元。當(dāng)然,也得看具體情況。賬單服務(wù)Doxo向《財(cái)富》雜志提供的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,對(duì)于美國(guó)人來講,居家工作并不一定能自動(dòng)省錢,因?yàn)槊吭碌碾娰M(fèi)和燃?xì)赓M(fèi)要比新冠疫情之前多出23美元,完全看你怎么取舍。

然而,令那些通勤的人員感到無奈的是,有時(shí)候他們面對(duì)的是一個(gè)基本上沒人的辦公室。 Allstate首席執(zhí)行官湯姆·威爾遜在接受Fortune Connect采訪時(shí)表示:“沒有人希望開車到辦公室進(jìn)行Zoom電話會(huì)議。通勤的作用真的是被大大高估了?!?/p>

他的評(píng)論與很多高管大相徑庭,這些高管認(rèn)為,回歸辦公室會(huì)提升員工的生產(chǎn)力。然而,如果這些首席執(zhí)行官進(jìn)一步了解相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),員工所浪費(fèi)的那點(diǎn)時(shí)間基本上都是花在了上班通勤上。美國(guó)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research)發(fā)布的一份工作論文顯示,2021年和2022年,居家辦公節(jié)省了員工72小時(shí)的日常通勤時(shí)間。該研究發(fā)現(xiàn),很多員工實(shí)際上將這部分額外省下來的時(shí)間用來工作,使得生產(chǎn)力天平反而向遠(yuǎn)程辦公的員工傾斜。

這并不是說通勤一點(diǎn)好處都沒有,它可以作為一種有助于員工脫離工作的“閾限空間”(liminal space)。不過,如果無需通勤會(huì)節(jié)省員工的金錢和時(shí)間,并提升其生產(chǎn)力,那么我們也就能夠理解,完全回歸辦公室上班相當(dāng)于減薪2%-3%,有可能會(huì)讓雇員萌發(fā)辭職的念頭。畢竟,像“超能先生”帕波那樣坐在一輛光鮮亮麗的汽車中也得花個(gè)幾千美元。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:馮豐

審校:夏林

在引發(fā)人們的恐慌和煩惱方面,可能除了“根管治療”或“有意分開”之外,鮮有詞語或短語能與“通勤”一詞媲美。如今的通勤更加費(fèi)錢費(fèi)時(shí),對(duì)于美國(guó)民眾來說,通勤這個(gè)概念可能比新冠疫情前更令人苦惱。

房地產(chǎn)中介服務(wù)公司Clever Real Estate對(duì)多項(xiàng)政府?dāng)?shù)據(jù)的計(jì)算結(jié)果顯示,美國(guó)民眾平均每年在通勤上耗費(fèi)的金錢和時(shí)間分別為8466美元和239個(gè)小時(shí)。該機(jī)構(gòu)還評(píng)選了通勤最好和最差的城市。上述費(fèi)用和時(shí)間較新冠疫情前分別增長(zhǎng)了31%和20%;2019年平均每位工人的通勤成本為6499美元和200個(gè)小時(shí)。Clever發(fā)現(xiàn),如今往返于辦公室的成本約占通勤者年收入的19%,其中包括平均867美元的汽車油費(fèi)和410美元的汽車維護(hù)費(fèi)(很明顯,一些通勤者搭乘的是公共交通)。

創(chuàng)40年新高的高通脹,俄烏沖突以及美國(guó)油轉(zhuǎn)氣產(chǎn)能下滑,這些因素在去年都成為了油價(jià)上漲的推手(今年,像紐約這類大城市的地鐵票也將漲價(jià)),如今在車?yán)锎蜷_美國(guó)國(guó)家公共電臺(tái)(NPR),收聽主持人美妙柔和的播音變得越來越貴。一些在新冠疫情期間從高成本城市搬走、遠(yuǎn)程工作的員工如今回到了辦公室,采取混合或完全辦公室辦公,通勤時(shí)間因此變得更長(zhǎng)(而且更加昂貴)。

有鑒于如此沉重的經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān)以及大量時(shí)間的耗費(fèi),難怪很多員工在首席執(zhí)行官呼吁回歸辦公室辦公時(shí)都表現(xiàn)出了抗拒的情緒。在經(jīng)濟(jì)下行和通脹期間,員工正在努力尋求削減成本,這也是2022年冬天遠(yuǎn)程工作再次回彈的原因。領(lǐng)英(LinkedIn)資深自由編輯喬治·安德斯告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“遠(yuǎn)程工作通常更省錢,因?yàn)樗鼘⑼ㄇ诔杀窘档偷搅肆?,同時(shí)還能讓午餐、咖啡等變得更便宜?!?/p>

Owl Labs的研究發(fā)現(xiàn),遠(yuǎn)程工作員工所花的錢只有其在辦公室辦公的同僚的一半(誠(chéng)然,Owl Labs的員工與該趨勢(shì)多少有點(diǎn)關(guān)聯(lián),因?yàn)樗麄冎鞴ヒ曨l會(huì)議設(shè)備);在辦公室辦公每個(gè)月在通勤和食物方面的花費(fèi)為863美元,而居家員工每月為432美元。當(dāng)然,也得看具體情況。賬單服務(wù)Doxo向《財(cái)富》雜志提供的數(shù)據(jù)顯示,對(duì)于美國(guó)人來講,居家工作并不一定能自動(dòng)省錢,因?yàn)槊吭碌碾娰M(fèi)和燃?xì)赓M(fèi)要比新冠疫情之前多出23美元,完全看你怎么取舍。

然而,令那些通勤的人員感到無奈的是,有時(shí)候他們面對(duì)的是一個(gè)基本上沒人的辦公室。 Allstate首席執(zhí)行官湯姆·威爾遜在接受Fortune Connect采訪時(shí)表示:“沒有人希望開車到辦公室進(jìn)行Zoom電話會(huì)議。通勤的作用真的是被大大高估了?!?/p>

他的評(píng)論與很多高管大相徑庭,這些高管認(rèn)為,回歸辦公室會(huì)提升員工的生產(chǎn)力。然而,如果這些首席執(zhí)行官進(jìn)一步了解相關(guān)數(shù)據(jù)就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn),員工所浪費(fèi)的那點(diǎn)時(shí)間基本上都是花在了上班通勤上。美國(guó)國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)研究局(National Bureau of Economic Research)發(fā)布的一份工作論文顯示,2021年和2022年,居家辦公節(jié)省了員工72小時(shí)的日常通勤時(shí)間。該研究發(fā)現(xiàn),很多員工實(shí)際上將這部分額外省下來的時(shí)間用來工作,使得生產(chǎn)力天平反而向遠(yuǎn)程辦公的員工傾斜。

這并不是說通勤一點(diǎn)好處都沒有,它可以作為一種有助于員工脫離工作的“閾限空間”(liminal space)。不過,如果無需通勤會(huì)節(jié)省員工的金錢和時(shí)間,并提升其生產(chǎn)力,那么我們也就能夠理解,完全回歸辦公室上班相當(dāng)于減薪2%-3%,有可能會(huì)讓雇員萌發(fā)辭職的念頭。畢竟,像“超能先生”帕波那樣坐在一輛光鮮亮麗的汽車中也得花個(gè)幾千美元。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))

譯者:馮豐

審校:夏林

Commuting—not many words or phrases arguably strike as much dread and annoyance as this one, besides maybe “root canal” or “consciously uncoupling.” And the idea of commuting might be even more annoying than it was before the pandemic considering that it’s now costing Americans more money and time.

The average American shells out $8,466 and spends 239 hours commuting yearly, according to calculations of various government data from real estate agent matching service Clever Real Estate, which also gauged the best and worst cities for commuting. That’s 31% more money and 20% more time than before the pandemic; commuting cost the average worker $6,449 and 200 hours in 2019. Today’s cost of getting to and from the office is about 19% of commuters’ annual income, finds Clever; that includes an average of $867 on gas and $410 on maintenance a year for a car (obviously, some commuters take public transport).

The hike in price of listening to the dulcet tones of a soft-spoken NPR host in the car is the result of several factors: 40-year-high inflation, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and the U.S.’s declining capacity to turn oil into gas all pushed gas prices up last year (and this year, metro fare is also set to rise in big cities like NYC). And some remote workers who moved away from high-cost cities during the pandemic are now returning to the office on a hybrid or fully in-person schedule, making the commute a bit longer (and more expensive).

With such a hefty price tag and big chunk of time, it’s no wonder many workers are so resistant to commuting back to the office as CEOs call workers back to their desks. It explains why remote work rebounded again this past winter as workers looked to cut costs during a down economy and inflation. “Working remotely is often a money saver because it reduces commuting costs to zero, while also making lunch, coffee, et cetera, much more affordable,” George Anders, LinkedIn’s senior editor at large, explained to Fortune.

Remote workers spend half the amount of money as their in-person peers, finds research from Owl Labs (granted, they have a bit of stake in the game, since they make video conferencing devices); in-person work runs a worker $863 monthly in commuting and food costs versus $432 a month when working from home. Of course, it’s all dependent on the situation. Americans aren’t always automatically saving money by working from home—consider that monthly electricity and gas bills are $23 higher than they were before the pandemic, per data provided to Fortune by bill pay service Doxo. It’s all about the trade-offs.

But for those who do commute, it doesn’t help that they sometimes end up at a largely empty office. “Nobody wants to drive to an office to do a Zoom call,” Allstate CEO Tom Wilson said in an interview with Fortune Connect. “And commuting is way overrated.”

His comment is a strong departure from the opinions of many other executives, who reason that returning to office would increase worker productivity. But if these CEOs looked closer at the data, they’d find that workers waste a fair bit of time simply on the road to their jobs. A working paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research revealed that working from home saved remote workers 72 hours in daily commute time in 2021 and 2022. Many employees, it found, actually spent that extra time working—tilting the scales of productivity toward the remote-work side.

That’s not to say there aren’t benefits to commuting, which can act as a “l(fā)iminal space” that helps workers detach from work. But if having no commute saves workers money and time, and boosts their productivity, it makes sense that a full return to the office is just as likely to make an employee quit as a 2% or 3% pay cut. Sitting like Bob Parr, a.k.a. Mr. Incredible, in a shrinky-dink car costs thousands of dollars, after all.

財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)所刊載內(nèi)容之知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為財(cái)富媒體知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)有限公司及/或相關(guān)權(quán)利人專屬所有或持有。未經(jīng)許可,禁止進(jìn)行轉(zhuǎn)載、摘編、復(fù)制及建立鏡像等任何使用。
0條Plus
精彩評(píng)論
評(píng)論

撰寫或查看更多評(píng)論

請(qǐng)打開財(cái)富Plus APP

前往打開
熱讀文章
一级a性色生活片久久无| 黑人好猛厉害爽受不了好大撑| 精品国产成人a区在线观看| 久久久久噜噜噜亚洲熟女综合| 欧美日韩一区二区无线码| 99精品無碼人妻一區二區三區| AV中文字幕二三区| 精品国产91久久久久久久久| 亚洲AV香蕉一区区二区三区| 久久精品毛片免费观看| 熟妇高潮一区二区三区| 最新欧美国产亚洲一区| 天堂Aⅴ无码一区二区三区| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天古典| 成人影院一区二区三区国产色综合网| 少妇高潮喷水惨叫久久久| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV麻豆| 又黄又爽又无遮挡的视频1000| 惠民福利亚洲国产日韩在线精品频道| 亚洲高清无码专区视频| 无码中文人妻在线一区二区三区| 寡妇高潮一级毛片免费看| 国产精品国内自产拍在线播放| 亚洲精品高清在线观看| 精品无码国产一区二区三区16| 国产精品裸模私密视频| AV无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 波多野结衣一区二区| 国产性色欧美亚洲黄片| 国产日韩在线视频| 国产av无码专区亚洲av软件| 国产亚洲欧美日韩亚洲中文色| 色久桃花影院在线观看| 3d日本无修肉动漫在线观看| 夜夜操国产天天干精品| 色婷婷五月激情中文字幕| 极品尤物一区二区三区| 97成人无码免费一区二区中文| 在线观看欧美视频| 国产欧美一区二区精品每日更新| 亚洲一级黄色中文字幕在线观看|