幾乎從新冠病毒肆虐全球開(kāi)始,研究人員和流行病學(xué)家們就警告,新冠病毒與已知病毒尤其是季節(jié)性流感病毒的行為方式截然不同。新冠病毒不僅比流感病毒有更強(qiáng)的傳染力,它還可能引發(fā)靜脈和動(dòng)脈血栓,造成嗅覺(jué)和/或味覺(jué)喪失,甚至導(dǎo)致罕見(jiàn)的兒童多系統(tǒng)炎癥綜合征。
人們對(duì)待這條信息的嚴(yán)肅程度,取決于地理位置,而且通常會(huì)受到政治因素的影響。但一項(xiàng)最新研究表明,這些警告被證明是可怕的預(yù)言。
這項(xiàng)研究對(duì)因新冠和因季節(jié)性流感住院的患者進(jìn)行了為期18個(gè)月的隨訪和對(duì)比分析。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),新冠患者的死亡率、醫(yī)療保健利用率和大多數(shù)器官系統(tǒng)出現(xiàn)負(fù)面健康后果的比例,遠(yuǎn)高于流感患者。研究結(jié)果發(fā)表于12月14日的醫(yī)學(xué)期刊《柳葉刀》(The Lancet)傳染病部分。
“一種多系統(tǒng)疾病”
臨床流行病學(xué)中心(Clinical Epidemiology Center)主任、圣路易斯退伍軍人事務(wù)中心醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)(Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System)研究與發(fā)展服務(wù)主管以及本篇論文的高級(jí)作者齊亞德·阿爾阿里表示:“無(wú)論是德?tīng)査暗牟《具€是德?tīng)査《净蛘邐W密克戎病毒流行期間,無(wú)論患者是否接種了疫苗,這種情況都非常明顯。新冠病毒依舊是對(duì)人類健康比流感更嚴(yán)重的威脅?!?/p>
在這篇論文發(fā)表時(shí),美國(guó)與新冠有關(guān)的住院人數(shù)激增,有15個(gè)州表示呼吸道疾病發(fā)病率水平較高或極高,其中包括新冠、流感、呼吸道合胞病毒和其他呼吸道疾病。雖然住院人數(shù)遠(yuǎn)低于奧密克戎最高峰時(shí)期的水平,但隨著氣溫下降,人們更多地留在室內(nèi)和人群密集的環(huán)境,預(yù)計(jì)住院人數(shù)會(huì)持續(xù)增多。
阿爾阿里的研究對(duì)比分析了94種預(yù)先指定的健康結(jié)果。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在18個(gè)月跟進(jìn)期內(nèi),新冠病毒與其中64種或近70%的健康結(jié)果的“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)顯著增加”有關(guān)。新冠增加的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)包括心臟驟停、中風(fēng)、慢性腎病和認(rèn)知障礙,以及精神健康與疲勞等。后兩種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)通常與長(zhǎng)新冠有關(guān)。
相比之下,季節(jié)性流感只會(huì)導(dǎo)致其中六種狀況的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加。此外,新冠會(huì)導(dǎo)致研究中的幾乎所有器官系統(tǒng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,而流感主要會(huì)導(dǎo)致肺部的健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加。阿里阿爾表示,這些研究結(jié)果表明,“新冠是一種多系統(tǒng)疾病,而流感更多的是一種呼吸道疾病”。
“一個(gè)可怕的敵人”
研究人員表示,雖然新冠帶來(lái)了更大風(fēng)險(xiǎn),但對(duì)流感依舊不能掉以輕心。事實(shí)上,該項(xiàng)研究的一個(gè)明確結(jié)果是,長(zhǎng)新冠是比急性新冠更嚴(yán)重的健康問(wèn)題,同樣,長(zhǎng)流感帶來(lái)的威脅遠(yuǎn)高于急性流感階段。
阿爾阿里表示:“五年前,我不會(huì)想到研究‘長(zhǎng)流感’的可能性。但我們從新冠疫情中得到的一個(gè)重要教訓(xùn)是,最初被認(rèn)為只會(huì)導(dǎo)致短期疾病的感染,也可能引發(fā)慢性疾病。將疾病概念化成一種急性疾病,掩蓋了后期發(fā)生的健康損失帶來(lái)的更沉重的負(fù)擔(dān)。這啟發(fā)我們研究新冠和流感的長(zhǎng)期后果?!?/p>
他們的研究結(jié)果是:新冠在短期和長(zhǎng)期內(nèi)帶來(lái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),遠(yuǎn)高于流感。但阿爾阿里表示,流感依舊是“一個(gè)可怕的敵人。進(jìn)入今年冬季,新冠和流感病例持續(xù)增多,人們務(wù)必要接種兩種疫苗,符合條件的還應(yīng)該接種呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗,而且要采取預(yù)防措施以降低風(fēng)險(xiǎn)?!?/p>
美國(guó)疾病預(yù)防控制中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,CDC)表示,美國(guó)近80%的成年人已經(jīng)接種了基礎(chǔ)新冠疫苗,但只有17%接種了加強(qiáng)針。此外,據(jù)疾控中心估計(jì),截至11月25日,約40%的成年人接種了季節(jié)性流感疫苗。
約15%的美國(guó)成年人出現(xiàn)了長(zhǎng)新冠癥狀,但在俄克拉荷馬州,這個(gè)比例高達(dá)34%。阿爾阿里團(tuán)隊(duì)今年早些時(shí)候在《自然醫(yī)學(xué)》(Nature Medicine)發(fā)表的一篇論文稱,長(zhǎng)新冠對(duì)身體的影響可能持續(xù)兩年甚至更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間,而且即使初始癥狀不需要住院治療的患者,其生活質(zhì)量也會(huì)因?yàn)殚L(zhǎng)新冠受到影響。
“輕視新冠感染是在冒險(xiǎn)”
顯然,長(zhǎng)新冠依舊是一個(gè)迫在眉睫的威脅。此外,研究表明每一次連續(xù)感染新冠,都是在賭博。一個(gè)健康的、接種了疫苗的年輕人,在首次感染新冠時(shí)可能只有輕度癥狀,但在下一次感染的時(shí)候卻可能莫名其妙地出現(xiàn)長(zhǎng)新冠癥狀。長(zhǎng)新冠可能包括記憶力喪失、新患糖尿病、中風(fēng)等癥狀,而且我們沒(méi)有任何經(jīng)過(guò)驗(yàn)證的治療方法,因此最佳策略是避免感染。
阿爾阿里的研究使用美國(guó)退伍軍人事務(wù)部的數(shù)據(jù),分析了2020年3月至2022年6月期間入院治療的80,000名新冠患者,以及2015年10月至2019年2月期間入院治療的近11,000名流感患者。研究稱,除了預(yù)先指定的健康結(jié)果、器官系統(tǒng)、重新住院和入住重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室等因素以外,他們還選擇了對(duì)受試者長(zhǎng)達(dá)18個(gè)月的跟進(jìn)隨訪,“以比較評(píng)估死亡風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和負(fù)擔(dān)”。
在分析中,研究人員將健康結(jié)果分成了10個(gè)器官系統(tǒng),分別是:心血管、凝血和血液學(xué)、疲勞、腸胃、腎臟、精神健康、新陳代謝、肌肉骨骼、神經(jīng)和肺。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),新冠病毒導(dǎo)致其中9個(gè)系統(tǒng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,而流感僅導(dǎo)致肺部系統(tǒng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加。
在所有研究周期(30天、180天、360天和540天)內(nèi),新冠患者入住重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)更高,重新住院的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)同樣更高。研究人員表示,兩種病毒的絕對(duì)死亡率、負(fù)面健康結(jié)果和醫(yī)療保健使用率都較高,但盡管新冠病毒從德?tīng)査暗牟《镜降聽(tīng)査俚綂W密克戎,經(jīng)歷了多次進(jìn)化,“新冠的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)依舊遠(yuǎn)高于季節(jié)性流感”。
研究作者指出了研究存在的兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵局限性。首先,弗吉尼亞州參與研究的人員以老年白人男性為主,這可能限制了研究結(jié)果的普遍適用性。而且由于研究人員僅評(píng)估了因新冠或流感住院的患者,因此研究結(jié)果并不能外推,將未住院的患者包含在內(nèi)。
另外一種病毒株JN.1已被發(fā)現(xiàn)。這種病毒株相比其他病毒株的成長(zhǎng)優(yōu)勢(shì)表明,它可能更容易傳播,或者更有可能逃避人體的免疫系統(tǒng)。每一次感染或多或少都存在長(zhǎng)新冠風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 “輕視新冠感染是在冒險(xiǎn)??陀^證據(jù)是顯而易見(jiàn)的,無(wú)論是首次感染還是再次感染,新冠都是人類健康面臨的嚴(yán)重威脅?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
本文作者醫(yī)學(xué)博士卡羅琳·巴伯在國(guó)際上發(fā)表過(guò)科學(xué)和醫(yī)學(xué)論文,她是一位25歲的急診醫(yī)生。她著有《失控的藥物:你不知道的事情可能會(huì)害死你》(Runaway Medicine: What You Don’t Know May Kill You)一書,并參與創(chuàng)建了加州的無(wú)家可歸者就業(yè)計(jì)劃“改變之輪”(Wheels of Change)。
翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
幾乎從新冠病毒肆虐全球開(kāi)始,研究人員和流行病學(xué)家們就警告,新冠病毒與已知病毒尤其是季節(jié)性流感病毒的行為方式截然不同。新冠病毒不僅比流感病毒有更強(qiáng)的傳染力,它還可能引發(fā)靜脈和動(dòng)脈血栓,造成嗅覺(jué)和/或味覺(jué)喪失,甚至導(dǎo)致罕見(jiàn)的兒童多系統(tǒng)炎癥綜合征。
人們對(duì)待這條信息的嚴(yán)肅程度,取決于地理位置,而且通常會(huì)受到政治因素的影響。但一項(xiàng)最新研究表明,這些警告被證明是可怕的預(yù)言。
這項(xiàng)研究對(duì)因新冠和因季節(jié)性流感住院的患者進(jìn)行了為期18個(gè)月的隨訪和對(duì)比分析。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),新冠患者的死亡率、醫(yī)療保健利用率和大多數(shù)器官系統(tǒng)出現(xiàn)負(fù)面健康后果的比例,遠(yuǎn)高于流感患者。研究結(jié)果發(fā)表于12月14日的醫(yī)學(xué)期刊《柳葉刀》(The Lancet)傳染病部分。
“一種多系統(tǒng)疾病”
臨床流行病學(xué)中心(Clinical Epidemiology Center)主任、圣路易斯退伍軍人事務(wù)中心醫(yī)療保健系統(tǒng)(Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System)研究與發(fā)展服務(wù)主管以及本篇論文的高級(jí)作者齊亞德·阿爾阿里表示:“無(wú)論是德?tīng)査暗牟《具€是德?tīng)査《净蛘邐W密克戎病毒流行期間,無(wú)論患者是否接種了疫苗,這種情況都非常明顯。新冠病毒依舊是對(duì)人類健康比流感更嚴(yán)重的威脅?!?/p>
在這篇論文發(fā)表時(shí),美國(guó)與新冠有關(guān)的住院人數(shù)激增,有15個(gè)州表示呼吸道疾病發(fā)病率水平較高或極高,其中包括新冠、流感、呼吸道合胞病毒和其他呼吸道疾病。雖然住院人數(shù)遠(yuǎn)低于奧密克戎最高峰時(shí)期的水平,但隨著氣溫下降,人們更多地留在室內(nèi)和人群密集的環(huán)境,預(yù)計(jì)住院人數(shù)會(huì)持續(xù)增多。
阿爾阿里的研究對(duì)比分析了94種預(yù)先指定的健康結(jié)果。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),在18個(gè)月跟進(jìn)期內(nèi),新冠病毒與其中64種或近70%的健康結(jié)果的“風(fēng)險(xiǎn)顯著增加”有關(guān)。新冠增加的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)包括心臟驟停、中風(fēng)、慢性腎病和認(rèn)知障礙,以及精神健康與疲勞等。后兩種風(fēng)險(xiǎn)通常與長(zhǎng)新冠有關(guān)。
相比之下,季節(jié)性流感只會(huì)導(dǎo)致其中六種狀況的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加。此外,新冠會(huì)導(dǎo)致研究中的幾乎所有器官系統(tǒng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,而流感主要會(huì)導(dǎo)致肺部的健康風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加。阿里阿爾表示,這些研究結(jié)果表明,“新冠是一種多系統(tǒng)疾病,而流感更多的是一種呼吸道疾病”。
“一個(gè)可怕的敵人”
研究人員表示,雖然新冠帶來(lái)了更大風(fēng)險(xiǎn),但對(duì)流感依舊不能掉以輕心。事實(shí)上,該項(xiàng)研究的一個(gè)明確結(jié)果是,長(zhǎng)新冠是比急性新冠更嚴(yán)重的健康問(wèn)題,同樣,長(zhǎng)流感帶來(lái)的威脅遠(yuǎn)高于急性流感階段。
阿爾阿里表示:“五年前,我不會(huì)想到研究‘長(zhǎng)流感’的可能性。但我們從新冠疫情中得到的一個(gè)重要教訓(xùn)是,最初被認(rèn)為只會(huì)導(dǎo)致短期疾病的感染,也可能引發(fā)慢性疾病。將疾病概念化成一種急性疾病,掩蓋了后期發(fā)生的健康損失帶來(lái)的更沉重的負(fù)擔(dān)。這啟發(fā)我們研究新冠和流感的長(zhǎng)期后果?!?/p>
他們的研究結(jié)果是:新冠在短期和長(zhǎng)期內(nèi)帶來(lái)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),遠(yuǎn)高于流感。但阿爾阿里表示,流感依舊是“一個(gè)可怕的敵人。進(jìn)入今年冬季,新冠和流感病例持續(xù)增多,人們務(wù)必要接種兩種疫苗,符合條件的還應(yīng)該接種呼吸道合胞病毒疫苗,而且要采取預(yù)防措施以降低風(fēng)險(xiǎn)?!?/p>
美國(guó)疾病預(yù)防控制中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,CDC)表示,美國(guó)近80%的成年人已經(jīng)接種了基礎(chǔ)新冠疫苗,但只有17%接種了加強(qiáng)針。此外,據(jù)疾控中心估計(jì),截至11月25日,約40%的成年人接種了季節(jié)性流感疫苗。
約15%的美國(guó)成年人出現(xiàn)了長(zhǎng)新冠癥狀,但在俄克拉荷馬州,這個(gè)比例高達(dá)34%。阿爾阿里團(tuán)隊(duì)今年早些時(shí)候在《自然醫(yī)學(xué)》(Nature Medicine)發(fā)表的一篇論文稱,長(zhǎng)新冠對(duì)身體的影響可能持續(xù)兩年甚至更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間,而且即使初始癥狀不需要住院治療的患者,其生活質(zhì)量也會(huì)因?yàn)殚L(zhǎng)新冠受到影響。
“輕視新冠感染是在冒險(xiǎn)”
顯然,長(zhǎng)新冠依舊是一個(gè)迫在眉睫的威脅。此外,研究表明每一次連續(xù)感染新冠,都是在賭博。一個(gè)健康的、接種了疫苗的年輕人,在首次感染新冠時(shí)可能只有輕度癥狀,但在下一次感染的時(shí)候卻可能莫名其妙地出現(xiàn)長(zhǎng)新冠癥狀。長(zhǎng)新冠可能包括記憶力喪失、新患糖尿病、中風(fēng)等癥狀,而且我們沒(méi)有任何經(jīng)過(guò)驗(yàn)證的治療方法,因此最佳策略是避免感染。
阿爾阿里的研究使用美國(guó)退伍軍人事務(wù)部的數(shù)據(jù),分析了2020年3月至2022年6月期間入院治療的80,000名新冠患者,以及2015年10月至2019年2月期間入院治療的近11,000名流感患者。研究稱,除了預(yù)先指定的健康結(jié)果、器官系統(tǒng)、重新住院和入住重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室等因素以外,他們還選擇了對(duì)受試者長(zhǎng)達(dá)18個(gè)月的跟進(jìn)隨訪,“以比較評(píng)估死亡風(fēng)險(xiǎn)和負(fù)擔(dān)”。
在分析中,研究人員將健康結(jié)果分成了10個(gè)器官系統(tǒng),分別是:心血管、凝血和血液學(xué)、疲勞、腸胃、腎臟、精神健康、新陳代謝、肌肉骨骼、神經(jīng)和肺。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),新冠病毒導(dǎo)致其中9個(gè)系統(tǒng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加,而流感僅導(dǎo)致肺部系統(tǒng)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)增加。
在所有研究周期(30天、180天、360天和540天)內(nèi),新冠患者入住重癥監(jiān)護(hù)室的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)更高,重新住院的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)同樣更高。研究人員表示,兩種病毒的絕對(duì)死亡率、負(fù)面健康結(jié)果和醫(yī)療保健使用率都較高,但盡管新冠病毒從德?tīng)査暗牟《镜降聽(tīng)査俚綂W密克戎,經(jīng)歷了多次進(jìn)化,“新冠的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)依舊遠(yuǎn)高于季節(jié)性流感”。
研究作者指出了研究存在的兩個(gè)關(guān)鍵局限性。首先,弗吉尼亞州參與研究的人員以老年白人男性為主,這可能限制了研究結(jié)果的普遍適用性。而且由于研究人員僅評(píng)估了因新冠或流感住院的患者,因此研究結(jié)果并不能外推,將未住院的患者包含在內(nèi)。
另外一種病毒株JN.1已被發(fā)現(xiàn)。這種病毒株相比其他病毒株的成長(zhǎng)優(yōu)勢(shì)表明,它可能更容易傳播,或者更有可能逃避人體的免疫系統(tǒng)。每一次感染或多或少都存在長(zhǎng)新冠風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。 “輕視新冠感染是在冒險(xiǎn)??陀^證據(jù)是顯而易見(jiàn)的,無(wú)論是首次感染還是再次感染,新冠都是人類健康面臨的嚴(yán)重威脅?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
本文作者醫(yī)學(xué)博士卡羅琳·巴伯在國(guó)際上發(fā)表過(guò)科學(xué)和醫(yī)學(xué)論文,她是一位25歲的急診醫(yī)生。她著有《失控的藥物:你不知道的事情可能會(huì)害死你》(Runaway Medicine: What You Don’t Know May Kill You)一書,并參與創(chuàng)建了加州的無(wú)家可歸者就業(yè)計(jì)劃“改變之輪”(Wheels of Change)。
翻譯:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
Almost from the start of SARS-CoV-2’s rampage around the globe, researchers and epidemiologists warned that it appeared to behave differently than known viruses, particularly seasonal flu. That included not only COVID-19’s general contagiousness compared to flu viruses, but also its ability to cause clotting problems in the veins and arteries, result in loss of smell and/or taste, and even lead to a rare multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children.
That message was taken more or less seriously, depending on geography and, often, politics. But as a new study makes clear, the warnings have proved darkly prophetic.
The study, a comparative analysis with 18 months of follow-up of hospital admissions for those with COVID-19 and those with seasonal flu, found that COVID-19 patients experienced significantly higher rates of death, healthcare utilization, and adverse health outcomes in most organ systems than did patients with the flu. Its results were published on Dec. 14 in the infectious diseases section of the medical journal The Lancet.
‘A multi-systemic disease’
“This was evident in pre-Delta, Delta, and Omicron (strains), and evident in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals,” says Ziyad Al-Aly, the director of the Clinical Epidemiology Center, chief of research and development service at the Veterans Affairs Saint Louis Health Care System, and senior author of the study. “COVID remains a much more serious threat to human health than the flu.”
The study arrives as the U.S. is seeing a significant uptick in COVID-related hospitalizations and with 15 states reporting high or very high levels of respiratory illness, which takes in COVID-19, the flu, RSV, and other respiratory diseases. The hospitalization numbers are well below those posted during Omicron’s peak, but with colder weather moving more people indoors and into crowded settings, they may reasonably be expected to continue rising.
Al-Aly’s study undertook a comparative analysis of 94 pre-specified health outcomes and found that over 18 months of follow-up, COVID was associated with a “significantly increased risk” for 64 of them, or nearly 70%. The disease’s enhanced risk list includes everything from cardiac arrest, stroke, chronic kidney disease, and cognitive impairment to mental health and fatigue, two characteristics often associated with long COVID.
By comparison, the seasonal flu was associated with increased risk in only six of the 94 conditions specified. Further, while COVID increased the risks for almost all the organ systems studied, the flu heightened risk primarily for the pulmonary(lung) system. Those findings, Al-Aly says, suggest that “COVID is really a multi-systemic disease, and flu is more a respiratory virus.”
‘A formidable foe’
Though COVID poses a greater risk, the seasonal flu should continue to be taken seriously, the researcher says. In fact, one clear finding of the study is that, much in the same way that long COVID is much more of a health problem than acute COVID, long flu poses more danger than does its acute phase.
“Five years ago, it wouldn’t have occurred to me to examine the possibility of a ‘long flu,’” Al-Aly says. “But a major lesson we learned from SARS-CoV-2 is that an infection which was initially thought to only cause brief illness can also lead to chronic disease. Conceptualizing the illness as an acute event obscures the much larger burden of health loss that occurs later. This revelation motivated us to look at long-term outcomes of COVID-19 versus flu.”
The result: COVID-19 poses a much higher risk, both in the short run and long term, than flu. But the flu remains “a formidable foe,” Al-Aly says. “Going into this winter season where cases of COVID and flu are rising, people should make sure they are vaccinated for both, and for RSV if they qualify, and take precautions to lower their risk.”
According to the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), nearly 80% of adult Americans have completed their primary series of COVID-19 vaccines, but only 17% have received a booster. Meanwhile, nearly four in 10 adults had received a seasonal flu shot as of Nov. 25, the CDC estimated.
Roughly 15% of all U.S. adults have experienced long COVID symptoms, though figures range as high as the reported 34% in Oklahoma. According to a paper published earlier this year by Al-Aly’s team in Nature Medicine, the physical fallout from long COVID may last two years or longer–and it can take a toll on the quality of life even for those whose initial cases didn’t require hospital care.
‘We trivialize COVID infections at our peril’
Clearly, long COVID remains a looming threat. Moreover, research shows that with each successive COVID-19 infection, we roll the dice. One can be young, healthy, and vaccinated, having experienced only mild symptoms during initial infections–then, almost inexplicably, develop long COVID on the next infection. Considering that long COVID can include conditions like memory loss, new diabetes, stroke, etc, and we have no proven treatments, the best strategy is to avoid it altogether.
Al-Aly’s study mined the databases of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to analyze data for more than 80,000 COVID-19 patients admitted to hospitals between March 2020 and June 2022, and for nearly 11,000 flu patients between October 2015 and February 2019. Up to 18 months of follow-up for participants was chosen “to comparatively evaluate risks and burdens of death” in addition to the pre-specified health outcomes, organ systems, hospital readmission, and admission to intensive care, the study says.
As part of their analysis, the researchers composited the health outcomes into 10 organ systems: cardiovascular, coagulation and hematological, fatigue, gastrointestinal, kidney, mental health, metabolic, musculoskeletal, neurological, and pulmonary. COVID-19 showed increased risk in nine of the 10, with the flu showing increased risk only in the pulmonary system.
The COVID group also had a higher risk of admission to intensive care in all of the time periods studied (30, 180, 360, and 540 days) versus the flu group, as well as a higher risk of readmission to the hospital. And absolute rates of death, adverse health outcomes, and healthcare utilization, while high for both viruses, were “significantly higher for COVID-19 compared to seasonal influenza,” despite changes in SARS-CoV-2 over time from pre-Delta to Delta to Omicron, the researchers said.
The study’s authors noted two key limitations. First, the V.A. study population is predominantly older white males, which may limit the generalizability of the study’s findings. And as the researchers assessed only people who were hospitalized with COVID or flu, the results should not be extrapolated to include non-hospitalized individuals.
Another strain of the virus, JN.1, has been detected. The growth advantage it appears to have over other variants suggests that it is either more transmissible or more capable of evading our immune systems. And the specter of long COVID hangs over each infection, to some degree or other. “We trivialize COVID infections at our peril,” says Al-Aly. “The objective evidence is clear, whether it is a first infection or reinfection, COVID is still a serious threat to human health.”
Carolyn Barber, M.D., is an internationally published science and medical writer and a 25-year emergency physician. She is the author of the book Runaway Medicine: What You Don’t Know May Kill You, and the co-founder of the California-based homeless work program Wheels of Change.