盡管近四分之一的美國(guó)成年人在使用ChatGPT,也有成千上萬(wàn)家公司將人工智能融入其運(yùn)營(yíng)中,但許多消費(fèi)者仍未消除對(duì)類似《終結(jié)者》中人工智能掌控一切的恐懼。這對(duì)于試圖說(shuō)服顧客購(gòu)買其帶有“人工智能”標(biāo)簽產(chǎn)品的品牌來(lái)說(shuō)可能是個(gè)壞消息。
今年6月發(fā)表在《酒店?duì)I銷與管理雜志》(Journal of Hospitality Market and Management)上的一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),如果產(chǎn)品被貼上“人工智能”的標(biāo)簽,消費(fèi)者對(duì)購(gòu)買該產(chǎn)品的興趣就會(huì)降低。在一系列研究中,參與者被問(wèn)及其購(gòu)買意向,所涉及產(chǎn)品從電視到吸塵器,再到消費(fèi)與健康服務(wù)等,且這些產(chǎn)品都被標(biāo)注了“人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)”或“高科技”兩種描述詞之一。這項(xiàng)研究的作者之一、華盛頓州立大學(xué)(Washington State University)卡森商學(xué)院酒店管理教授多甘·古爾索伊(Dogan Gursoy)說(shuō),在大約200名不同年齡和性別的參與者中,人工智能標(biāo)簽對(duì)消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買意愿的影響是一致的。
古爾索伊告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“在每一個(gè)案例中,每當(dāng)我們提到'人工智能'與'高科技'時(shí),消費(fèi)者的購(gòu)買意愿都會(huì)下降?!?/p>
事實(shí)上,根據(jù)高知特(Cognizant)對(duì)1000名美國(guó)消費(fèi)者的調(diào)查,購(gòu)物者在很大程度上受到了人工智能的威脅,僅有30%的受訪者表示信任生成式人工智能。近四分之三的受訪者認(rèn)為生成式人工智能將提高企業(yè)利潤(rùn),而28%的受訪者認(rèn)為,與企業(yè)、小企業(yè)、員工和政府相比,生成式人工智能給消費(fèi)者帶來(lái)的益處最少。
古爾索伊表示,品牌在很大程度上高估了消費(fèi)者對(duì)人工智能的信任程度,他的研究為此論斷提供了支撐。當(dāng)消費(fèi)者在情感上對(duì)人工智能的信任度較低時(shí)(情感信任是決定購(gòu)物者是否購(gòu)買產(chǎn)品的關(guān)鍵因素),他們對(duì)標(biāo)注“人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)”的產(chǎn)品的購(gòu)買意愿也較低。對(duì)于參與者認(rèn)為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較高的商品,如汽車,其購(gòu)買意愿和情感信任都較低。
身份威脅和生存恐懼
古爾索伊說(shuō),對(duì)許多消費(fèi)者來(lái)說(shuō),圍繞人工智能的焦慮源于該技術(shù)帶來(lái)的身份威脅。人工智能取代人類的恐懼(Z世代擔(dān)心他們的工作會(huì)被這項(xiàng)技術(shù)取代)仍然十分突出。
古爾索伊說(shuō):“它威脅到了我的身份,還威脅到了人類的身份。任何事物都不應(yīng)比我們更聰慧?!?/p>
消費(fèi)者對(duì)隱私的擔(dān)憂加劇了這些恐懼,根據(jù)思科公司(Cisco)的《2023年消費(fèi)者隱私調(diào)查》,大多數(shù)消費(fèi)者表示,由于各大組織使用該技術(shù),他們對(duì)人工智能的信任已被侵蝕。立法者也做出了相應(yīng)的反應(yīng):深度偽造視頻和音頻內(nèi)容的泛濫導(dǎo)致馬薩諸塞州總檢察長(zhǎng)安德里亞·坎貝爾(Andrea Campbell)對(duì)人工智能敲響了警鐘,警告使用該技術(shù)的公司必須遵守該州的消費(fèi)者保護(hù)和數(shù)據(jù)隱私法規(guī)。亞馬遜(Amazon)在全食超市(Whole Foods)使用的掌紋掃描支付系統(tǒng)引發(fā)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全專家的擔(dān)憂。
“任何時(shí)候,當(dāng)你把數(shù)據(jù)托付給一家私人公司時(shí),就是在信任這家公司會(huì)保障數(shù)據(jù)安全。而大多數(shù)時(shí)候,你可能不應(yīng)該這樣做?!笨萍急O(jiān)管倡導(dǎo)組織Fight for the Future負(fù)責(zé)人埃文·格里爾(Evan Greer)在接受美國(guó)全國(guó)廣播公司財(cái)經(jīng)頻道(CNBC)采訪時(shí)表示。
Amazon Web Services首席信息安全官克里斯·貝茨(Chris Betz)在六月份的一篇博文中表示,該公司在繼續(xù)投資生成式人工智能的同時(shí),也在優(yōu)先考慮安全問(wèn)題。
無(wú)人能處理得當(dāng)
由于人們已經(jīng)對(duì)人工智能產(chǎn)生了不信任感,因此生產(chǎn)和宣傳人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)產(chǎn)品的品牌面臨著一場(chǎng)艱苦的戰(zhàn)斗。古爾索伊說(shuō),需要說(shuō)服消費(fèi)者讓其相信人工智能在特定產(chǎn)品中的好處:“很多人都會(huì)問(wèn),為什么我的咖啡機(jī)需要人工智能,或是為什么我的冰箱或吸塵器需要人工智能?”
他認(rèn)為,唯一的問(wèn)題在于,尚無(wú)公司能夠成功運(yùn)用這一策略。
古爾索伊說(shuō):“公司在這類信息傳達(dá)方面做得不夠到位。所有人都對(duì)人工智能的發(fā)展或相關(guān)情況守口如瓶,這是可以理解的。但消費(fèi)者也需要知曉他們的數(shù)據(jù)是安全的。”
為了說(shuō)服消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買那些宣揚(yáng)人工智能效用的產(chǎn)品,品牌首先需要消除消費(fèi)者對(duì)這項(xiàng)技術(shù)的擔(dān)憂。這意味著企業(yè)要闡明產(chǎn)品如何通過(guò)人工智能技術(shù)實(shí)現(xiàn)效用,并提高數(shù)據(jù)使用的透明度。
古爾索伊說(shuō):“總有人不愿接受這一點(diǎn),但對(duì)于大部分消費(fèi)者來(lái)說(shuō),我們需要引導(dǎo)他們的想法。”(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
盡管近四分之一的美國(guó)成年人在使用ChatGPT,也有成千上萬(wàn)家公司將人工智能融入其運(yùn)營(yíng)中,但許多消費(fèi)者仍未消除對(duì)類似《終結(jié)者》中人工智能掌控一切的恐懼。這對(duì)于試圖說(shuō)服顧客購(gòu)買其帶有“人工智能”標(biāo)簽產(chǎn)品的品牌來(lái)說(shuō)可能是個(gè)壞消息。
今年6月發(fā)表在《酒店?duì)I銷與管理雜志》(Journal of Hospitality Market and Management)上的一項(xiàng)研究發(fā)現(xiàn),如果產(chǎn)品被貼上“人工智能”的標(biāo)簽,消費(fèi)者對(duì)購(gòu)買該產(chǎn)品的興趣就會(huì)降低。在一系列研究中,參與者被問(wèn)及其購(gòu)買意向,所涉及產(chǎn)品從電視到吸塵器,再到消費(fèi)與健康服務(wù)等,且這些產(chǎn)品都被標(biāo)注了“人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)”或“高科技”兩種描述詞之一。這項(xiàng)研究的作者之一、華盛頓州立大學(xué)(Washington State University)卡森商學(xué)院酒店管理教授多甘·古爾索伊(Dogan Gursoy)說(shuō),在大約200名不同年齡和性別的參與者中,人工智能標(biāo)簽對(duì)消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買意愿的影響是一致的。
古爾索伊告訴《財(cái)富》雜志:“在每一個(gè)案例中,每當(dāng)我們提到'人工智能'與'高科技'時(shí),消費(fèi)者的購(gòu)買意愿都會(huì)下降?!?/p>
事實(shí)上,根據(jù)高知特(Cognizant)對(duì)1000名美國(guó)消費(fèi)者的調(diào)查,購(gòu)物者在很大程度上受到了人工智能的威脅,僅有30%的受訪者表示信任生成式人工智能。近四分之三的受訪者認(rèn)為生成式人工智能將提高企業(yè)利潤(rùn),而28%的受訪者認(rèn)為,與企業(yè)、小企業(yè)、員工和政府相比,生成式人工智能給消費(fèi)者帶來(lái)的益處最少。
古爾索伊表示,品牌在很大程度上高估了消費(fèi)者對(duì)人工智能的信任程度,他的研究為此論斷提供了支撐。當(dāng)消費(fèi)者在情感上對(duì)人工智能的信任度較低時(shí)(情感信任是決定購(gòu)物者是否購(gòu)買產(chǎn)品的關(guān)鍵因素),他們對(duì)標(biāo)注“人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)”的產(chǎn)品的購(gòu)買意愿也較低。對(duì)于參與者認(rèn)為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)較高的商品,如汽車,其購(gòu)買意愿和情感信任都較低。
身份威脅和生存恐懼
古爾索伊說(shuō),對(duì)許多消費(fèi)者來(lái)說(shuō),圍繞人工智能的焦慮源于該技術(shù)帶來(lái)的身份威脅。人工智能取代人類的恐懼(Z世代擔(dān)心他們的工作會(huì)被這項(xiàng)技術(shù)取代)仍然十分突出。
古爾索伊說(shuō):“它威脅到了我的身份,還威脅到了人類的身份。任何事物都不應(yīng)比我們更聰慧?!?/p>
消費(fèi)者對(duì)隱私的擔(dān)憂加劇了這些恐懼,根據(jù)思科公司(Cisco)的《2023年消費(fèi)者隱私調(diào)查》,大多數(shù)消費(fèi)者表示,由于各大組織使用該技術(shù),他們對(duì)人工智能的信任已被侵蝕。立法者也做出了相應(yīng)的反應(yīng):深度偽造視頻和音頻內(nèi)容的泛濫導(dǎo)致馬薩諸塞州總檢察長(zhǎng)安德里亞·坎貝爾(Andrea Campbell)對(duì)人工智能敲響了警鐘,警告使用該技術(shù)的公司必須遵守該州的消費(fèi)者保護(hù)和數(shù)據(jù)隱私法規(guī)。亞馬遜(Amazon)在全食超市(Whole Foods)使用的掌紋掃描支付系統(tǒng)引發(fā)了網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全專家的擔(dān)憂。
“任何時(shí)候,當(dāng)你把數(shù)據(jù)托付給一家私人公司時(shí),就是在信任這家公司會(huì)保障數(shù)據(jù)安全。而大多數(shù)時(shí)候,你可能不應(yīng)該這樣做?!笨萍急O(jiān)管倡導(dǎo)組織Fight for the Future負(fù)責(zé)人埃文·格里爾(Evan Greer)在接受美國(guó)全國(guó)廣播公司財(cái)經(jīng)頻道(CNBC)采訪時(shí)表示。
Amazon Web Services首席信息安全官克里斯·貝茨(Chris Betz)在六月份的一篇博文中表示,該公司在繼續(xù)投資生成式人工智能的同時(shí),也在優(yōu)先考慮安全問(wèn)題。
無(wú)人能處理得當(dāng)
由于人們已經(jīng)對(duì)人工智能產(chǎn)生了不信任感,因此生產(chǎn)和宣傳人工智能驅(qū)動(dòng)產(chǎn)品的品牌面臨著一場(chǎng)艱苦的戰(zhàn)斗。古爾索伊說(shuō),需要說(shuō)服消費(fèi)者讓其相信人工智能在特定產(chǎn)品中的好處:“很多人都會(huì)問(wèn),為什么我的咖啡機(jī)需要人工智能,或是為什么我的冰箱或吸塵器需要人工智能?”
他認(rèn)為,唯一的問(wèn)題在于,尚無(wú)公司能夠成功運(yùn)用這一策略。
古爾索伊說(shuō):“公司在這類信息傳達(dá)方面做得不夠到位。所有人都對(duì)人工智能的發(fā)展或相關(guān)情況守口如瓶,這是可以理解的。但消費(fèi)者也需要知曉他們的數(shù)據(jù)是安全的?!?/p>
為了說(shuō)服消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買那些宣揚(yáng)人工智能效用的產(chǎn)品,品牌首先需要消除消費(fèi)者對(duì)這項(xiàng)技術(shù)的擔(dān)憂。這意味著企業(yè)要闡明產(chǎn)品如何通過(guò)人工智能技術(shù)實(shí)現(xiàn)效用,并提高數(shù)據(jù)使用的透明度。
古爾索伊說(shuō):“總有人不愿接受這一點(diǎn),但對(duì)于大部分消費(fèi)者來(lái)說(shuō),我們需要引導(dǎo)他們的想法?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
Despite almost a quarter of U.S. adults using ChatGPT and thousands of companies integrating artificial intelligence into their operations, many consumers haven’t ditched the fear of a Terminator-style AI takeover. That could be bad news for brands trying to convince customers to buy their AI-stamped products.
A study published in the Journal of Hospitality Market and Management in June found consumers were less interested in purchasing an item if it was labeled with the term “AI.” Across a series of studies, participants were asked about their intention to buy a product—from televisions to vacuums to consumer and health services—labeled with one of two descriptors, “AI-powered” or “high tech.” Among about 200 participants across age and gender demographics, the impact of AI labels on a consumer’s willingness to buy a product was unanimous, according to Dogan Gursoy, hospitality management professor at Washington State University’s Carson College of Business and one of the study’s authors.
“In every single case,” Gursoy told Fortune, “whenever we mentioned ‘AI’ versus ‘high tech,’ consumers’ purchase intention went down.”
Indeed, shoppers are largely threatened by AI, with only 30% of respondents saying they trust generative AI, according to a Cognizant survey of 1,000 U.S. consumers. Almost three-fourths of respondents believed genAI would increase corporate profits, and 28% believed genAI would benefit consumers the least compared to corporations, small businesses, employees, and the government.
Brands have largely overestimated consumer trust in AI, Gursoy said, and he has the research to support his claim. When consumers had lower emotional trust, a critical factor in determining if a shopper will buy a product, they also had low purchase intentions for products labeled “AI-powered.” Purchase intentions and emotional trust were lower for items participants considered higher risk, such as cars.
Identity threats and existential fears
For many consumers, the anxiety around AI stems from an identity threat the technology poses, Gursoy said. The fear of AI taking over humanity—exemplified in Gen Z’s fear of losing their jobs to the technology—is still salient.
“It threatens my identity, threatens the human identity,” Gursoy said. “Nothing’s supposed to be more intelligent than us.”
These fears have been exacerbated by consumer concerns over privacy, with most consumers saying their trust in AI has already been eroded by organizations using the technology, per Cisco’s 2023 Consumer Privacy Survey. Lawmakers are reacting accordingly: The proliferation of deepfake video and audio content caused Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell to sound the alarm over AI, warning companies that use the technology that they must abide by the commonwealth’s consumer-protection and data-privacy laws. Amazon’s use of a palm-scanning payment system at Whole Foods stores sparked concern from cybersecurity experts.
“Any time you entrust your data with a private corporation, you’re trusting that company to keep that data safe. And most of the time, you probably shouldn’t,” Evan Greer, director of tech regulation advocacy group Fight for the Future, told CNBC.
Amazon Web Services’ chief information security officer Chris Betz said in a June blog post the company is prioritizing security as it continues to invest in genAI.
No one’s getting it right
Since there’s already distrust toward AI, brands producing and advertising AI-powered products have an uphill battle ahead. Consumers need to be convinced of AI’s benefits in a particular product, Gursoy said: “Many people question, Why do I need AI in my coffee maker, or why do I need AI in my refrigerator or my vacuum cleaner?”
The only problem is that no company has been able to successfully tap into this strategy, he argued.
“Companies are not doing a great job of that kind of messaging,” Gursoy said. “Everyone is keeping the AI development or what’s going on with AI a secret, and that’s understandable. But consumers also need to know that their data is safe.”
In order for consumers to purchase items espousing the utility of AI, brands need to first assuage anxieties around the technology. That means companies spelling out the benefits of a product thanks to AI and increasing transparency practices around data usage.
“There are always people who will never want that,” Gursoy said. “But for a large portion of consumers, we need to nudge their mind.”