在美聯(lián)儲官員本月齊聚華盛頓的一周前,他們對降息的速度意見不一。
經(jīng)濟并沒有出現(xiàn)那種通常會促使美聯(lián)儲采取積極應對措施的明顯警示信號。但是,包括上周五公布的8月份就業(yè)報告在內(nèi)的一系列就業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)明顯疲軟,這讓美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾(Jerome Powell)相信,有必要采取比往常更大的降息幅度,以防范勞動力市場風險上升。當周公布的兩份通脹報告顯示,物價壓力繼續(xù)緩解,這最終促使美聯(lián)儲采取降息舉措。
當美聯(lián)儲在9月18日發(fā)布其決定時,預測顯示微弱多數(shù)的官員贊成今年將基準利率下調(diào)整整一個百分點或更多——這意味著至少會有一次大幅降息。但有相當多的少數(shù)官員認為僅將基準利率下調(diào)75個基點,這表明他們支持三次較小幅度的降息。
不過,最終,聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會12位有投票權的委員中,除一人外,其余成員都支持鮑威爾從降息50個基點開始大舉降息。這對鮑威爾來說是關鍵的勝利,因為他正試圖延長許多人預言早已結(jié)束的經(jīng)濟擴張。唯一持反對意見的美聯(lián)儲理事米歇爾·鮑曼(Michelle Bowman)則呼吁采取更有節(jié)制的降息步伐,以避免破壞通脹方面的進展。
Potomac River Capital創(chuàng)始人馬克·斯賓德爾(Mark Spindel)說:"主席總是擁有巨大的權力。鮑威爾有能力說服除了鮑曼以外的所有人,這顯然是個成功的故事,他如今是更有權力的主席。”他曾與人合著過一本關于美聯(lián)儲和國會的書。
在會后的新聞發(fā)布會上,鮑威爾稱降息50個基點是“良好的強勁開端”,從“經(jīng)濟和風險管理的角度來看”都是合理的。
經(jīng)濟學家說,如果經(jīng)濟開始下滑,不排除再次降息50個基點的可能性,因為只要通脹降溫,鮑威爾就把保持經(jīng)濟接近充分就業(yè)放在首位。
如果勞動力市場數(shù)據(jù)再次令人失望,鮑威爾可能有機會在未來幾個月再次促使他的同事們傾向于降息50個基點。最近幾天,多位官員表示,他們可能支持進一步降息25個基點,但不排除再次大幅降息的可能性。
德意志銀行(Deutsche Bank)首席美國經(jīng)濟學家馬修·盧澤蒂(Matthew Luzzetti)說:"鑒于他在杰克遜霍爾發(fā)表的言論,以及我們在新聞發(fā)布會上聽到的他的發(fā)言,是的,我認為如果勞動力市場進一步疲軟,鮑威爾主席會傾向于再次降息50個基點?!?/p>
三大關鍵時刻
在過去的一年里,鮑威爾在三大關鍵時刻展現(xiàn)了他的領導力。
他暗示利率可能在2023年12月見頂,屆時一些官員認為他們可能不得不進一步加息。在2024年第一季度通貨膨脹率意外上升,令許多美聯(lián)儲官員感到震驚之后,他耐心地維持利率不變,直到確信價格壓力再次開始緩解。一些議員抱怨他將經(jīng)濟置于風險之中。最后,他選擇了大幅降息作為第一步行動。
所有這些行動都是在強烈的意識指導下進行的,即高利率正在使經(jīng)濟降溫,而不是使經(jīng)濟崩潰,通脹可以得到控制,而對就業(yè)造成的影響比許多經(jīng)濟學家想象的要小。
他在9月18日的新聞發(fā)布會上說:"我們能否成功實現(xiàn)這些目標關系到所有美國人?!?/p>
鮑威爾表示,降息是為了防止經(jīng)濟進一步走弱,這是一種風險管理行為。
鮑威爾上周說:"你可以把這看作是我們承諾不落后的信號。這是強有力的舉措?!?/p>
美聯(lián)儲在非危機時期下調(diào)利率50個基點的做法并不常見。人們擔心,這將表明美聯(lián)儲對經(jīng)濟走軟的跡象越來越擔憂。相反,鮑威爾表示,此舉表明美聯(lián)儲相信通脹率有望重返2%的軌道,而且他罕見地承認,更大的調(diào)整幅度是他本人的強烈偏好,他表示自己對這一決定感到“滿意”。
最新的就業(yè)報告不僅顯示8月新增就業(yè)崗位低于預期,而且顯示前兩個月的招聘速度也低于最初的估計。6月和7月的就業(yè)人數(shù)減少了8.6萬人,三個月的平均值創(chuàng)下了2020年中期以來的新低。
前美聯(lián)儲主席艾倫·格林斯潘(Alan Greenspan)推行的風險管理策略旨在防范潛在威脅,即使是那些看起來不太可能成為現(xiàn)實的威脅。降息50個基點后,美聯(lián)儲的基準利率仍處于限制區(qū)間,因此一些官員認為,大幅下調(diào)保險利率的成本很低。
“即使在降息50個基點之后,我相信貨幣政策的整體立場仍然是緊縮的?!泵髂岚⒉ɡ孤?lián)儲主席尼爾·卡什卡利(Neel Kashkari)在9月23日的一篇文章中寫道,解釋了他為什么支持大舉降息。
激烈辯論
鮑威爾的日程表顯示,他在每次聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會會議前幾天都會與所有18位官員進行討論。這些討論讓官員們了解主席的立場。鮑威爾在新聞發(fā)布會上強烈支持更大幅度的降息,這表明他在會議前一周開始例行電話會議時就傾向于降息50個基點。
一些在會議后發(fā)言的美聯(lián)儲官員稱,這次會議及其籌備過程都是激烈的辯論。
卡什卡利在9月23日接受美國全國廣播公司財經(jīng)頻道(CNBC)采訪時說:"會議上進行了積極的討論。顯然,在會議之前也進行了很多討論。”
亞特蘭大聯(lián)儲主席拉斐爾·博斯蒂克(Raphael Bostic)表示,每次聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會會議召開前的兩周都是“激烈討論”的時間。
在9月23日演講結(jié)束后的問答環(huán)節(jié)中,他說,“如果你想要協(xié)調(diào)一致,讓我們所有人都能圍繞一個行動方案團結(jié)起來,那就需要大量的溝通和參與,而我們在這方面做了很多工作?!?/p>
在9月份的會議上,有少數(shù)官員認為有理由降息25個基點。其中包括聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會最有影響力的成員之一、美聯(lián)儲理事克里斯多?!の掷眨–hristopher Waller)。
在9月6日的講話中,沃勒明確表示他支持降息,但許多人將他的措辭精確解讀為支持降息25個基點。在會后接受美國全國廣播公司財經(jīng)頻道采訪時,他說,講話后公布的近期消費者和生產(chǎn)者價格報告最終促使他支持降息50個基點。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
在美聯(lián)儲官員本月齊聚華盛頓的一周前,他們對降息的速度意見不一。
經(jīng)濟并沒有出現(xiàn)那種通常會促使美聯(lián)儲采取積極應對措施的明顯警示信號。但是,包括上周五公布的8月份就業(yè)報告在內(nèi)的一系列就業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)明顯疲軟,這讓美聯(lián)儲主席杰羅姆·鮑威爾(Jerome Powell)相信,有必要采取比往常更大的降息幅度,以防范勞動力市場風險上升。當周公布的兩份通脹報告顯示,物價壓力繼續(xù)緩解,這最終促使美聯(lián)儲采取降息舉措。
當美聯(lián)儲在9月18日發(fā)布其決定時,預測顯示微弱多數(shù)的官員贊成今年將基準利率下調(diào)整整一個百分點或更多——這意味著至少會有一次大幅降息。但有相當多的少數(shù)官員認為僅將基準利率下調(diào)75個基點,這表明他們支持三次較小幅度的降息。
不過,最終,聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會12位有投票權的委員中,除一人外,其余成員都支持鮑威爾從降息50個基點開始大舉降息。這對鮑威爾來說是關鍵的勝利,因為他正試圖延長許多人預言早已結(jié)束的經(jīng)濟擴張。唯一持反對意見的美聯(lián)儲理事米歇爾·鮑曼(Michelle Bowman)則呼吁采取更有節(jié)制的降息步伐,以避免破壞通脹方面的進展。
Potomac River Capital創(chuàng)始人馬克·斯賓德爾(Mark Spindel)說:"主席總是擁有巨大的權力。鮑威爾有能力說服除了鮑曼以外的所有人,這顯然是個成功的故事,他如今是更有權力的主席?!彼c人合著過一本關于美聯(lián)儲和國會的書。
在會后的新聞發(fā)布會上,鮑威爾稱降息50個基點是“良好的強勁開端”,從“經(jīng)濟和風險管理的角度來看”都是合理的。
經(jīng)濟學家說,如果經(jīng)濟開始下滑,不排除再次降息50個基點的可能性,因為只要通脹降溫,鮑威爾就把保持經(jīng)濟接近充分就業(yè)放在首位。
如果勞動力市場數(shù)據(jù)再次令人失望,鮑威爾可能有機會在未來幾個月再次促使他的同事們傾向于降息50個基點。最近幾天,多位官員表示,他們可能支持進一步降息25個基點,但不排除再次大幅降息的可能性。
德意志銀行(Deutsche Bank)首席美國經(jīng)濟學家馬修·盧澤蒂(Matthew Luzzetti)說:"鑒于他在杰克遜霍爾發(fā)表的言論,以及我們在新聞發(fā)布會上聽到的他的發(fā)言,是的,我認為如果勞動力市場進一步疲軟,鮑威爾主席會傾向于再次降息50個基點?!?/p>
三大關鍵時刻
在過去的一年里,鮑威爾在三大關鍵時刻展現(xiàn)了他的領導力。
他暗示利率可能在2023年12月見頂,屆時一些官員認為他們可能不得不進一步加息。在2024年第一季度通貨膨脹率意外上升,令許多美聯(lián)儲官員感到震驚之后,他耐心地維持利率不變,直到確信價格壓力再次開始緩解。一些議員抱怨他將經(jīng)濟置于風險之中。最后,他選擇了大幅降息作為第一步行動。
所有這些行動都是在強烈的意識指導下進行的,即高利率正在使經(jīng)濟降溫,而不是使經(jīng)濟崩潰,通脹可以得到控制,而對就業(yè)造成的影響比許多經(jīng)濟學家想象的要小。
他在9月18日的新聞發(fā)布會上說:"我們能否成功實現(xiàn)這些目標關系到所有美國人。”
鮑威爾表示,降息是為了防止經(jīng)濟進一步走弱,這是一種風險管理行為。
鮑威爾上周說:"你可以把這看作是我們承諾不落后的信號。這是強有力的舉措。”
美聯(lián)儲在非危機時期下調(diào)利率50個基點的做法并不常見。人們擔心,這將表明美聯(lián)儲對經(jīng)濟走軟的跡象越來越擔憂。相反,鮑威爾表示,此舉表明美聯(lián)儲相信通脹率有望重返2%的軌道,而且他罕見地承認,更大的調(diào)整幅度是他本人的強烈偏好,他表示自己對這一決定感到“滿意”。
最新的就業(yè)報告不僅顯示8月新增就業(yè)崗位低于預期,而且顯示前兩個月的招聘速度也低于最初的估計。6月和7月的就業(yè)人數(shù)減少了8.6萬人,三個月的平均值創(chuàng)下了2020年中期以來的新低。
前美聯(lián)儲主席艾倫·格林斯潘(Alan Greenspan)推行的風險管理策略旨在防范潛在威脅,即使是那些看起來不太可能成為現(xiàn)實的威脅。降息50個基點后,美聯(lián)儲的基準利率仍處于限制區(qū)間,因此一些官員認為,大幅下調(diào)保險利率的成本很低。
“即使在降息50個基點之后,我相信貨幣政策的整體立場仍然是緊縮的。”明尼阿波利斯聯(lián)儲主席尼爾·卡什卡利(Neel Kashkari)在9月23日的一篇文章中寫道,解釋了他為什么支持大舉降息。
激烈辯論
鮑威爾的日程表顯示,他在每次聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會會議前幾天都會與所有18位官員進行討論。這些討論讓官員們了解主席的立場。鮑威爾在新聞發(fā)布會上強烈支持更大幅度的降息,這表明他在會議前一周開始例行電話會議時就傾向于降息50個基點。
一些在會議后發(fā)言的美聯(lián)儲官員稱,這次會議及其籌備過程都是激烈的辯論。
卡什卡利在9月23日接受美國全國廣播公司財經(jīng)頻道(CNBC)采訪時說:"會議上進行了積極的討論。顯然,在會議之前也進行了很多討論?!?/p>
亞特蘭大聯(lián)儲主席拉斐爾·博斯蒂克(Raphael Bostic)表示,每次聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會會議召開前的兩周都是“激烈討論”的時間。
在9月23日演講結(jié)束后的問答環(huán)節(jié)中,他說,“如果你想要協(xié)調(diào)一致,讓我們所有人都能圍繞一個行動方案團結(jié)起來,那就需要大量的溝通和參與,而我們在這方面做了很多工作?!?/p>
在9月份的會議上,有少數(shù)官員認為有理由降息25個基點。其中包括聯(lián)邦公開市場委員會最有影響力的成員之一、美聯(lián)儲理事克里斯多?!の掷眨–hristopher Waller)。
在9月6日的講話中,沃勒明確表示他支持降息,但許多人將他的措辭精確解讀為支持降息25個基點。在會后接受美國全國廣播公司財經(jīng)頻道采訪時,他說,講話后公布的近期消費者和生產(chǎn)者價格報告最終促使他支持降息50個基點。(財富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
One week before Federal Reserve officials gathered in Washington this month, they were split over how fast to lower interest rates.
The economy wasn’t flashing the kind of obvious warning signs that would typically prompt an aggressive response from the US central bank. But a notably weak run of jobs data, including the August employment report the previous Friday, had convinced Chair Jerome Powell that a bigger-than-usual rate cut was necessary to insure against rising risks to the labor market. A pair of inflation reports that week showing price pressures continuing to ease sealed the deal.
Related Video
When the Fed issued its decision on Sept. 18, forecasts showed a narrow majority of officials favored reducing their benchmark rate a full percentage point or more this year — implying at least one big cut. But a sizable minority penciled in just 75 basis points, suggesting support for three smaller moves.
In the end, however, all but one of the 12 voting members of Federal Open Market Committee supported Powell’s bid to start big with a half-point cut. That’s a key victory for the chair as he tries to prolong an economic expansion many predicted would be over long before now. The lone holdout, Governor Michelle Bowman, called instead for a more measured pace of cuts to avoid undermining progress on inflation.
“The chair always has enormous power,” said Mark Spindel, founder of Potomac River Capital and co-author of a book on the Fed and Congress. “There is a clear success story in Powell’s ability to get all but Bowman on board, and he is a more powerful chairman now.”
Speaking at a post-meeting press conference, Powell called the half-point cut “a good strong start” that made sense from “an economic standpoint and also from a risk management standpoint.”
Another half-point cut can’t be ruled out if the economy begins to stumble, economists say, given the priority Powell has put on keeping the economy near full employment so long as inflation is cooling.
Powell could have the chance to tilt his colleagues toward a half-point cut again in the next few months should data on the labor market once again disappoint. A number of officials speaking in recent days have signaled they’re likely to support quarter-point reductions moving forward, but left the door open to another large cut.
“Given his comments in Jackson Hole, and what we heard from him at the press conference, yes, I think Chair Powell would lean toward cutting 50 basis points again if there were further labor market weakness,” said Matthew Luzzetti, chief US economist at Deutsche Bank.
Three Key Moments
Powell has asserted his leadership at three key moments over the past year.
He signaled a possible peak in rates in December 2023, a time when some officials thought they might have to hike further. After a surprising pickup in inflation in the first quarter of 2024, which startled many Fed officials, he patiently held rates steady until gaining confidence that price pressures began easing again. Some lawmakers complained he was putting the economy at risk. Finally, he opted for a big cut as the first move.
All of those actions were guided by a strong sense that high interest rates were cooling — not cracking — the economy, and inflation could be tamed with less cost to jobs than many economists thought possible.
“Our success in delivering on these goals matters to all Americans,” he said at his Sept. 18 press conference.
Powell framed the cut as taking out insurance against further weakening in the economy – an act of risk management.
“You can take this as a sign of our commitment not to get behind,” Powell said last week. “It’s a strong move.”
A 50-basis-point adjustment to rates is atypical for the Fed outside a crisis. One worry was that it would signal the Fed had grown concerned by signs of economic softening. Powell, instead, said the move was a sign of confidence that inflation was on track to returning to 2%, and, in a rare acknowledgment that a bigger move was his own strong preference, he said he was “pleased” with the decision.
The most recent jobs report not only showed employers added fewer positions than forecast in August but also revealed a weaker pace of hiring than initially estimated for the prior two months. Payrolls were marked down 86,000 across June and July, leaving the three-month average at its lowest since mid-2020.
Risk management, a strategy embraced under former Chair Alan Greenspan, seeks to head off potential threats, even those that appear unlikely to materialize. And with a half-point cut leaving the Fed’s benchmark rate still in restrictive territory, the cost of a large insurance cut was viewed as low by several officials.
“Even after the 50-basis-point cut, I believe the overall stance of monetary policy remains tight,” Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari wrote in a Sept. 23 essay, explaining why he supported the larger move.
Lively Debate
Powell’s calendars show he holds discussions with all 18 of his fellow officials a few days before each FOMC meeting. Those discussions give officials a sense of where the chair stands. Powell’s strong endorsement of the bigger cut at the press conference suggests he favored the half-point cut in the week before the meeting as he began his usual calls.
Some Fed officials who’ve spoken since the meeting have described it, and the run-up to it, as featuring a lively debate.
“There was active deliberations at the meeting,” Kashkari said in a Sept. 23 interview on CNBC. “There was a lot of discussions, obviously, leading up to the meeting.”
Atlanta Fed president Raphael Bostic said the two weeks before every FOMC meeting is a time of “intense discussions.”
In a question-and-answer session after a speech on Sept. 23, he said, “If you want to get coordination, and you want us to all be able to coalesce around one course of action, it’s going to require a lot of communication, engagement, and we do a lot of that.”
There were a handful of officials who saw a case for a quarter-point cut at the September meeting. That included Fed Governor Christopher Waller, one of the FOMC’s most influential members.
In a Sept. 6 speech, Waller made clear he favored lowering rates, but many interpreted his precise wording as making the case for a quarter-point move. In a CNBC interview following the meeting, he said recent reports on consumer and producer prices that followed the speech ultimately pushed him to support a half-point move.