歐盟審計(jì)人員11月25日表示,歐洲購(gòu)物者買食品時(shí)可能被大量混亂,有時(shí)甚至存在誤導(dǎo)性的食品標(biāo)簽 “欺騙”,呼吁歐盟改善現(xiàn)行規(guī)則。
歐盟的標(biāo)簽制度要求提供有關(guān)食品成分準(zhǔn)確而真實(shí)的信息,方便消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買食物時(shí)做出明智選擇。
但根據(jù)歐洲審計(jì)法院(ECA)的說(shuō)法,由于歐盟規(guī)則存在空白,消費(fèi)者很容易迷失在令人費(fèi)解的說(shuō)法中。
“食品標(biāo)簽非但沒(méi)提升清晰度,反而經(jīng)常造成混亂。消費(fèi)者還得解讀數(shù)百種方案、標(biāo)志和聲明,”歐洲審計(jì)法院審計(jì)員凱特·彭圖斯-羅西曼努斯表示。
“公司在包裝上可能創(chuàng)意十足,歐盟的規(guī)則卻沒(méi)跟上不斷發(fā)展的市場(chǎng),導(dǎo)致約4.5億歐洲消費(fèi)者容易受到有意或無(wú)意的誤導(dǎo)信息影響。”
歐盟規(guī)定要求生產(chǎn)商在食品包裝上列出成分、過(guò)敏原和其他強(qiáng)制性信息。
公司可以添加營(yíng)養(yǎng)和健康聲明等自愿聲明,例如“Omega-3脂肪酸的來(lái)源”或“鈣是保持牙齒健康的必需物質(zhì)”。
按照歐盟27國(guó)支出監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)現(xiàn)行規(guī)定,允許企業(yè)放大產(chǎn)品更討人喜歡的功效,同時(shí)掩蓋負(fù)面效果。所以情況變得更為復(fù)雜。
報(bào)告稱,一塊含糖量很高的能量棒可以簡(jiǎn)單地貼上“高蛋白”標(biāo)簽,富含脂肪的橙子餅干可以貼上“纖維來(lái)源”標(biāo)簽。
“巨大影響”
報(bào)告稱,即使有些說(shuō)法有不實(shí)之處,對(duì)在線食品銷售的檢查和處罰也很薄弱,可以說(shuō)幾乎不存在。
審計(jì)員補(bǔ)充說(shuō),歐盟層面對(duì)植物物質(zhì)或“植物藥”相關(guān)的健康聲明尚未監(jiān)管,消費(fèi)者可能面臨沒(méi)有科學(xué)支持的論斷。
同樣,盡管存在私人認(rèn)證計(jì)劃,但歐盟對(duì)“純素”和“素食主義者”的含義并無(wú)清晰定義。
歐洲審計(jì)法院還表示,為了幫助消費(fèi)者辨別更健康的視頻,不同國(guó)家使用不同的“包裝前營(yíng)養(yǎng)標(biāo)簽”計(jì)劃,如Nutri Score和Keyhole,加劇了混亂。
歐洲消費(fèi)者權(quán)益組織Foodwatch正推動(dòng)歐盟普遍應(yīng)用在法國(guó)、德國(guó)和其他少數(shù)國(guó)家使用的Nutri Score營(yíng)養(yǎng)標(biāo)簽。
“食品標(biāo)簽的尺寸不大卻非常重要。標(biāo)簽會(huì)塑造了數(shù)百萬(wàn)人的飲食習(xí)慣,對(duì)歐洲消費(fèi)者的健康影響巨大,”Foodwatch布魯塞爾辦事處負(fù)責(zé)人蘇西·薩姆納說(shuō)。
歐洲審計(jì)法院敦促歐盟委員會(huì)采取一系列措施,包括解決歐盟法律框架中的漏洞,加強(qiáng)成員國(guó)對(duì)自愿標(biāo)簽和在線零售檢查等等。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
歐盟審計(jì)人員11月25日表示,歐洲購(gòu)物者買食品時(shí)可能被大量混亂,有時(shí)甚至存在誤導(dǎo)性的食品標(biāo)簽 “欺騙”,呼吁歐盟改善現(xiàn)行規(guī)則。
歐盟的標(biāo)簽制度要求提供有關(guān)食品成分準(zhǔn)確而真實(shí)的信息,方便消費(fèi)者購(gòu)買食物時(shí)做出明智選擇。
但根據(jù)歐洲審計(jì)法院(ECA)的說(shuō)法,由于歐盟規(guī)則存在空白,消費(fèi)者很容易迷失在令人費(fèi)解的說(shuō)法中。
“食品標(biāo)簽非但沒(méi)提升清晰度,反而經(jīng)常造成混亂。消費(fèi)者還得解讀數(shù)百種方案、標(biāo)志和聲明,”歐洲審計(jì)法院審計(jì)員凱特·彭圖斯-羅西曼努斯表示。
“公司在包裝上可能創(chuàng)意十足,歐盟的規(guī)則卻沒(méi)跟上不斷發(fā)展的市場(chǎng),導(dǎo)致約4.5億歐洲消費(fèi)者容易受到有意或無(wú)意的誤導(dǎo)信息影響?!?/p>
歐盟規(guī)定要求生產(chǎn)商在食品包裝上列出成分、過(guò)敏原和其他強(qiáng)制性信息。
公司可以添加營(yíng)養(yǎng)和健康聲明等自愿聲明,例如“Omega-3脂肪酸的來(lái)源”或“鈣是保持牙齒健康的必需物質(zhì)”。
按照歐盟27國(guó)支出監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)現(xiàn)行規(guī)定,允許企業(yè)放大產(chǎn)品更討人喜歡的功效,同時(shí)掩蓋負(fù)面效果。所以情況變得更為復(fù)雜。
報(bào)告稱,一塊含糖量很高的能量棒可以簡(jiǎn)單地貼上“高蛋白”標(biāo)簽,富含脂肪的橙子餅干可以貼上“纖維來(lái)源”標(biāo)簽。
“巨大影響”
報(bào)告稱,即使有些說(shuō)法有不實(shí)之處,對(duì)在線食品銷售的檢查和處罰也很薄弱,可以說(shuō)幾乎不存在。
審計(jì)員補(bǔ)充說(shuō),歐盟層面對(duì)植物物質(zhì)或“植物藥”相關(guān)的健康聲明尚未監(jiān)管,消費(fèi)者可能面臨沒(méi)有科學(xué)支持的論斷。
同樣,盡管存在私人認(rèn)證計(jì)劃,但歐盟對(duì)“純素”和“素食主義者”的含義并無(wú)清晰定義。
歐洲審計(jì)法院還表示,為了幫助消費(fèi)者辨別更健康的視頻,不同國(guó)家使用不同的“包裝前營(yíng)養(yǎng)標(biāo)簽”計(jì)劃,如Nutri Score和Keyhole,加劇了混亂。
歐洲消費(fèi)者權(quán)益組織Foodwatch正推動(dòng)歐盟普遍應(yīng)用在法國(guó)、德國(guó)和其他少數(shù)國(guó)家使用的Nutri Score營(yíng)養(yǎng)標(biāo)簽。
“食品標(biāo)簽的尺寸不大卻非常重要。標(biāo)簽會(huì)塑造了數(shù)百萬(wàn)人的飲食習(xí)慣,對(duì)歐洲消費(fèi)者的健康影響巨大,”Foodwatch布魯塞爾辦事處負(fù)責(zé)人蘇西·薩姆納說(shuō)。
歐洲審計(jì)法院敦促歐盟委員會(huì)采取一系列措施,包括解決歐盟法律框架中的漏洞,加強(qiáng)成員國(guó)對(duì)自愿標(biāo)簽和在線零售檢查等等。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:梁宇
審校:夏林
European grocery shoppers are at risk of “being fooled” by a proliferation of confusing and sometimes misleading food labels, EU auditors said Monday, calling on the bloc to improve current rules.
Labeling in the EU is meant to give consumers accurate and honest information on the contents of their food so they can make informed decisions about what they are buying.
But due to gaps in EU rules consumers can easily get “l(fā)ost in a maze” of puzzling claims, according to the European Court of Auditors (ECA).
“Instead of bringing clarity, food labels too often create confusion; there are hundreds of different schemes, logos and claims that people need to decipher,” said Keit Pentus-Rosimannus, an ECA auditor.
“Companies can be very creative in what they put on packaging, and EU rules have not caught up with a constantly evolving market, leaving some 450 million European consumers vulnerable to intentionally or unintentionally misleading messages.”
EU rules require producers to list ingredients, allergens and other mandatory information on food packages.
Firms can then add voluntary statements including nutrition and health claims — such as “source of Omega-3 fatty acids” or “calcium is necessary to maintain healthy teeth”.
Here the picture gets muddier, according to the 27-nation bloc’s spending watchdog, as current rules allow businesses to zoom in on the more flattering features of their products and gloss over other aspects.
An energy bar with lots of sugar can for example be branded simply as “high in protein” and a fatty orange cookie as a “source of fibre”, according to the report.
‘Massive impact’
Even when such claims are false, checks and penalties are weak and almost non-existent for online food sales, it said.
Health claims related to plant-substances or “botanicals” are not yet regulated at EU level, which leaves consumers potentially exposed to assertions not supported by science, the auditors added.
Similarly, there is no EU definition of what “vegan” and “vegetarian” mean, although private certification schemes exist.
Finally, different “front-of-pack nutrition labelling” schemes such as Nutri-Score and Keyhole, which aim at helping shoppers identify healthier food options, are in use in different countries, adding to the confusion, the ECA said.
European consumer rights group Foodwatch is pushing for Nutri-Score, currently used in France, Germany and a handful other countries, to be adopted across the bloc.
“Food labels may often be small in size, but they are of huge importance: They shape eating habits of millions of people and therefore have a massive impact on the health of European consumers,” said Suzy Sumner, who heads the group’s Brussels office.
The ECA urged the European Commission to take a number of steps including addressing the gaps in the EU legal framework, and strengthening member states’ checks on voluntary labels and online retail.