超微電腦前戰(zhàn)略總監(jiān)繼續(xù)指控,該硬件制造商對(duì)其進(jìn)行報(bào)復(fù),并最終解雇了他,原因是他舉報(bào)了(自認(rèn)為)公司存在的會(huì)計(jì)不當(dāng)行為和違反美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)(SEC)規(guī)定的行為。
鮑勃·K·隆(Bob K. Luong)的律師周二提交了一份動(dòng)議,要求撤銷先前的中止令,以便提交針對(duì)超微電腦及其首席執(zhí)行官梁見(jiàn)后的修訂后的舉報(bào)投訴書(shū),并可能在聯(lián)邦法院提起訴訟。隆指控該公司在實(shí)際向客戶交付產(chǎn)品之前,以不當(dāng)方式確認(rèn)了數(shù)百萬(wàn)美元的收入,并故意向客戶發(fā)送缺少零件的設(shè)備,以使其財(cái)務(wù)狀況看起來(lái)比實(shí)際情況要好。隆還指控該公司首席執(zhí)行官的妻子、超微電腦聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人劉秋珠(Sara Liu Liang)及其兄弟埃德蒙·劉(Edmond Liu)與商業(yè)合作伙伴肯微科技(Compuware)的首席執(zhí)行官談判,以延遲付款并調(diào)整銷售條款,同時(shí)仍允許提前確認(rèn)收入。(肯微科技的首席執(zhí)行官是梁見(jiàn)后的弟弟梁見(jiàn)達(dá)(Bill Liang)??衔⒖萍际浅㈦娔X在臺(tái)灣、中國(guó)和澳大利亞的分銷商,超微電腦將電源設(shè)計(jì)和制造外包給肯微科技。)
在訴訟中,隆指出,他多年來(lái)一直試圖讓公司對(duì)其會(huì)計(jì)操作和部分員工的行為進(jìn)行審查,直至他最終在2023年2月提出內(nèi)部投訴。隆聲稱,他被搪塞過(guò)去了,被迫接受了無(wú)薪休假的安排,并在2024年3月遭到解雇。
超微電腦對(duì)隆的指控予以否認(rèn),并拒絕置評(píng)。根據(jù)法庭文件,超微電腦聲稱,人力資源部門收到了關(guān)于隆在2022年7月對(duì)兩名直接下屬進(jìn)行辱罵性欺凌的投訴。公司聲稱,隆拒絕配合針對(duì)他進(jìn)行的調(diào)查,這正是他被安排行政休假的原因。超微電腦指出,調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn)“有充分證據(jù)”證明隆對(duì)其他員工的欺凌行為,其中包括大聲斥責(zé)、辱罵和粗魯行為。公司在一份法庭文件中寫(xiě)道,隆存在頻繁缺勤和缺席會(huì)議的情況。
隆的律師譚雅·戈?duì)柭═anya Gomerman)表示,公司解雇他的主要原因在于他拒絕配合對(duì)一名下屬的調(diào)查,而隆本人則要求首席財(cái)務(wù)官在面談時(shí)在場(chǎng)。戈?duì)柭M(jìn)一步指出:“公司試圖將鮑勃描繪成一個(gè)我行我素、表現(xiàn)不佳的管理者,但實(shí)際上,他拒絕完成那些他認(rèn)為違法的工作?!?/p>
她指出,在隆提交了舉報(bào)人投訴之后,公司并未就所指控的不當(dāng)會(huì)計(jì)行為與他進(jìn)行會(huì)談,而是針對(duì)人力資源方面的投訴對(duì)他進(jìn)行了約談。
戈?duì)柭f(shuō):“在經(jīng)歷了一連串的風(fēng)波之后,隆感到自己因試圖發(fā)聲并采取正確行動(dòng)而成為眾矢之的?!弊?012年以來(lái),隆一直在該公司工作,他所持有的股票在2018年大幅縮水,原因是超微電腦受到美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)對(duì)其收入確認(rèn)方法的調(diào)查,因此被納斯達(dá)克摘牌。在與美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)達(dá)成和解并支付了1750萬(wàn)美元罰款后,該公司于2020年重新上市。當(dāng)時(shí),該公司與首席財(cái)務(wù)官霍華德·秀島(Howard Hideshima)分道揚(yáng)鑣,后者被監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)指控存在不當(dāng)會(huì)計(jì)行為。在重新上市后的幾年里,其股價(jià)上漲了300%,并與人工智能巨頭英偉達(dá)(Nvidia)建立了業(yè)務(wù)聯(lián)系。
隆提出的動(dòng)議對(duì)超微電腦而言無(wú)疑是雪上加霜。數(shù)月以來(lái),公司一直在努力應(yīng)對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)不當(dāng)行為的指控。由于未能按時(shí)提交年度報(bào)告和季度財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表,超微電腦第二次瀕臨退市邊緣,并已收到納斯達(dá)克的警告通知。8月份,興登堡研究公司(Hindenburg Research)發(fā)布的一份做空?qǐng)?bào)告對(duì)超微電腦造成了進(jìn)一步的打擊,指控其存在會(huì)計(jì)不當(dāng)行為等一系列問(wèn)題。超微電腦的前會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所安永(Ernst & Young)在審計(jì)過(guò)程中退出,并聲明無(wú)法依靠管理團(tuán)隊(duì)或董事會(huì)的獨(dú)立審計(jì)委員會(huì)。隨后,超微電腦聘請(qǐng)了立信會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所(BDO)作為新的審計(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)。
周一,超微電腦宣布,由一名專門負(fù)責(zé)調(diào)查的董事組成的董事會(huì)特別委員會(huì)已完成審查,并認(rèn)定安永的退出及其審計(jì)結(jié)論并不能得到委員會(huì)調(diào)查結(jié)果的支持。特別委員會(huì)的唯一成員蘇西·喬爾達(dá)諾(Susie Giordano)于2024年8月加入董事會(huì),她擁有長(zhǎng)達(dá)25年為高管團(tuán)隊(duì)提供咨詢服務(wù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn),此前曾擔(dān)任英特爾公司(Intel)的臨時(shí)總法律顧問(wèn)。按照超微電腦董事的慣例,喬爾達(dá)諾有資格獲得價(jià)值25.5萬(wàn)美元的股權(quán)。
超微電腦表示,喬爾達(dá)諾與美國(guó)科律律師事務(wù)所(Cooley LLP)及其50名律師以及Secretariat Advisors公司的法務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)團(tuán)隊(duì)進(jìn)行合作。調(diào)查團(tuán)隊(duì)審查了來(lái)自89名個(gè)人的900萬(wàn)份文件,并對(duì)現(xiàn)任及前任員工、管理層、顧問(wèn)及董事會(huì)成員進(jìn)行了68次證人面談,此外還與前審計(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)安永和德勤(Deloitte)進(jìn)行了會(huì)面。然而,委員會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)在確保防范措施到位方面存在“疏漏”,包括與公司前首席財(cái)務(wù)官簽訂的咨詢協(xié)議,后者在2017年審計(jì)委員會(huì)調(diào)查后辭職。據(jù)超微電腦稱,這項(xiàng)咨詢工作現(xiàn)已終止。
這家科技公司正在招聘新首席財(cái)務(wù)官、首席會(huì)計(jì)官和首席合規(guī)官。超微電腦還將任命一名總法律顧問(wèn),并將“擴(kuò)大內(nèi)部律師團(tuán)隊(duì)規(guī)模,使其與超微電腦的規(guī)模和復(fù)雜程度相稱,特別是考慮到近期的迅猛發(fā)展及未來(lái)擴(kuò)張的宏偉藍(lán)圖?!?/p>
安永和喬爾達(dá)諾沒(méi)有回應(yīng)置評(píng)請(qǐng)求。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
超微電腦前戰(zhàn)略總監(jiān)繼續(xù)指控,該硬件制造商對(duì)其進(jìn)行報(bào)復(fù),并最終解雇了他,原因是他舉報(bào)了(自認(rèn)為)公司存在的會(huì)計(jì)不當(dāng)行為和違反美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)(SEC)規(guī)定的行為。
鮑勃·K·隆(Bob K. Luong)的律師周二提交了一份動(dòng)議,要求撤銷先前的中止令,以便提交針對(duì)超微電腦及其首席執(zhí)行官梁見(jiàn)后的修訂后的舉報(bào)投訴書(shū),并可能在聯(lián)邦法院提起訴訟。隆指控該公司在實(shí)際向客戶交付產(chǎn)品之前,以不當(dāng)方式確認(rèn)了數(shù)百萬(wàn)美元的收入,并故意向客戶發(fā)送缺少零件的設(shè)備,以使其財(cái)務(wù)狀況看起來(lái)比實(shí)際情況要好。隆還指控該公司首席執(zhí)行官的妻子、超微電腦聯(lián)合創(chuàng)始人劉秋珠(Sara Liu Liang)及其兄弟埃德蒙·劉(Edmond Liu)與商業(yè)合作伙伴肯微科技(Compuware)的首席執(zhí)行官談判,以延遲付款并調(diào)整銷售條款,同時(shí)仍允許提前確認(rèn)收入。(肯微科技的首席執(zhí)行官是梁見(jiàn)后的弟弟梁見(jiàn)達(dá)(Bill Liang)??衔⒖萍际浅㈦娔X在臺(tái)灣、中國(guó)和澳大利亞的分銷商,超微電腦將電源設(shè)計(jì)和制造外包給肯微科技。)
在訴訟中,隆指出,他多年來(lái)一直試圖讓公司對(duì)其會(huì)計(jì)操作和部分員工的行為進(jìn)行審查,直至他最終在2023年2月提出內(nèi)部投訴。隆聲稱,他被搪塞過(guò)去了,被迫接受了無(wú)薪休假的安排,并在2024年3月遭到解雇。
超微電腦對(duì)隆的指控予以否認(rèn),并拒絕置評(píng)。根據(jù)法庭文件,超微電腦聲稱,人力資源部門收到了關(guān)于隆在2022年7月對(duì)兩名直接下屬進(jìn)行辱罵性欺凌的投訴。公司聲稱,隆拒絕配合針對(duì)他進(jìn)行的調(diào)查,這正是他被安排行政休假的原因。超微電腦指出,調(diào)查發(fā)現(xiàn)“有充分證據(jù)”證明隆對(duì)其他員工的欺凌行為,其中包括大聲斥責(zé)、辱罵和粗魯行為。公司在一份法庭文件中寫(xiě)道,隆存在頻繁缺勤和缺席會(huì)議的情況。
隆的律師譚雅·戈?duì)柭═anya Gomerman)表示,公司解雇他的主要原因在于他拒絕配合對(duì)一名下屬的調(diào)查,而隆本人則要求首席財(cái)務(wù)官在面談時(shí)在場(chǎng)。戈?duì)柭M(jìn)一步指出:“公司試圖將鮑勃描繪成一個(gè)我行我素、表現(xiàn)不佳的管理者,但實(shí)際上,他拒絕完成那些他認(rèn)為違法的工作。”
她指出,在隆提交了舉報(bào)人投訴之后,公司并未就所指控的不當(dāng)會(huì)計(jì)行為與他進(jìn)行會(huì)談,而是針對(duì)人力資源方面的投訴對(duì)他進(jìn)行了約談。
戈?duì)柭f(shuō):“在經(jīng)歷了一連串的風(fēng)波之后,隆感到自己因試圖發(fā)聲并采取正確行動(dòng)而成為眾矢之的?!弊?012年以來(lái),隆一直在該公司工作,他所持有的股票在2018年大幅縮水,原因是超微電腦受到美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)對(duì)其收入確認(rèn)方法的調(diào)查,因此被納斯達(dá)克摘牌。在與美國(guó)證券交易委員會(huì)達(dá)成和解并支付了1750萬(wàn)美元罰款后,該公司于2020年重新上市。當(dāng)時(shí),該公司與首席財(cái)務(wù)官霍華德·秀島(Howard Hideshima)分道揚(yáng)鑣,后者被監(jiān)管機(jī)構(gòu)指控存在不當(dāng)會(huì)計(jì)行為。在重新上市后的幾年里,其股價(jià)上漲了300%,并與人工智能巨頭英偉達(dá)(Nvidia)建立了業(yè)務(wù)聯(lián)系。
隆提出的動(dòng)議對(duì)超微電腦而言無(wú)疑是雪上加霜。數(shù)月以來(lái),公司一直在努力應(yīng)對(duì)會(huì)計(jì)不當(dāng)行為的指控。由于未能按時(shí)提交年度報(bào)告和季度財(cái)務(wù)報(bào)表,超微電腦第二次瀕臨退市邊緣,并已收到納斯達(dá)克的警告通知。8月份,興登堡研究公司(Hindenburg Research)發(fā)布的一份做空?qǐng)?bào)告對(duì)超微電腦造成了進(jìn)一步的打擊,指控其存在會(huì)計(jì)不當(dāng)行為等一系列問(wèn)題。超微電腦的前會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所安永(Ernst & Young)在審計(jì)過(guò)程中退出,并聲明無(wú)法依靠管理團(tuán)隊(duì)或董事會(huì)的獨(dú)立審計(jì)委員會(huì)。隨后,超微電腦聘請(qǐng)了立信會(huì)計(jì)師事務(wù)所(BDO)作為新的審計(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)。
周一,超微電腦宣布,由一名專門負(fù)責(zé)調(diào)查的董事組成的董事會(huì)特別委員會(huì)已完成審查,并認(rèn)定安永的退出及其審計(jì)結(jié)論并不能得到委員會(huì)調(diào)查結(jié)果的支持。特別委員會(huì)的唯一成員蘇西·喬爾達(dá)諾(Susie Giordano)于2024年8月加入董事會(huì),她擁有長(zhǎng)達(dá)25年為高管團(tuán)隊(duì)提供咨詢服務(wù)的經(jīng)驗(yàn),此前曾擔(dān)任英特爾公司(Intel)的臨時(shí)總法律顧問(wèn)。按照超微電腦董事的慣例,喬爾達(dá)諾有資格獲得價(jià)值25.5萬(wàn)美元的股權(quán)。
超微電腦表示,喬爾達(dá)諾與美國(guó)科律律師事務(wù)所(Cooley LLP)及其50名律師以及Secretariat Advisors公司的法務(wù)會(huì)計(jì)團(tuán)隊(duì)進(jìn)行合作。調(diào)查團(tuán)隊(duì)審查了來(lái)自89名個(gè)人的900萬(wàn)份文件,并對(duì)現(xiàn)任及前任員工、管理層、顧問(wèn)及董事會(huì)成員進(jìn)行了68次證人面談,此外還與前審計(jì)機(jī)構(gòu)安永和德勤(Deloitte)進(jìn)行了會(huì)面。然而,委員會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)在確保防范措施到位方面存在“疏漏”,包括與公司前首席財(cái)務(wù)官簽訂的咨詢協(xié)議,后者在2017年審計(jì)委員會(huì)調(diào)查后辭職。據(jù)超微電腦稱,這項(xiàng)咨詢工作現(xiàn)已終止。
這家科技公司正在招聘新首席財(cái)務(wù)官、首席會(huì)計(jì)官和首席合規(guī)官。超微電腦還將任命一名總法律顧問(wèn),并將“擴(kuò)大內(nèi)部律師團(tuán)隊(duì)規(guī)模,使其與超微電腦的規(guī)模和復(fù)雜程度相稱,特別是考慮到近期的迅猛發(fā)展及未來(lái)擴(kuò)張的宏偉藍(lán)圖?!?/p>
安永和喬爾達(dá)諾沒(méi)有回應(yīng)置評(píng)請(qǐng)求。(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:中慧言-王芳
Super Micro Computer chairman and CEO Charles Liang in 2024.
ANNABELLE CHIH—BLOOMBERG/GETTY IMAGES
A former Super Micro Computer strategy director is pressing ahead with allegations the hardware manufacturer retaliated and ultimately fired him for reporting what he believed to be accounting improprieties and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) violations.
Lawyers for Bob K. Luong filed a motion on Tuesday to lift a previous stay so an amended whistleblower complaint against Super Micro and its CEO, Charles Liang, can be filed and potentially proceed in federal court. Luong is alleging the company improperly recognized millions in revenue before actually delivering goods to customers and purposely shipped equipment with missing parts to make its financials appear in better shape than they were. Luong also alleged the CEO’s wife and Super Micro cofounder, Sara Liu Liang, along with her brother Edmond Liu, negotiated with the CEO of a business partner, Compuware, to delay payments and adjust terms of sale—while still allowing for early recognition of revenue. (The CEO of Compuware is Charles Liang’s brother, Bill Liang. Compuware is a distributor for Super Micro in Taiwan, China, and Australia, and Super Micro outsources power design and manufacturing to Compuware.)
In his lawsuit, Luong said he tried repeatedly for years to get the company to investigate its accounting practices as well as certain employees before he finally filed an internal complaint in March 2022. Luong claimed he was brushed off and placed on unpaid leave before eventually being fired in April 2023.
Super Micro has denied Luong’s allegations and declined to comment. According to court documents, Super Micro alleged human resources got a complaint that Luong had engaged in abusive bullying of two of his direct reports in July 2022. The company alleged Luong refused to participate in its investigation of him, which is why he was put on administrative leave. Super Micro claimed its investigation found “sufficient evidence” to make findings about Luong’s treatment of other employees, including yelling, cursing, and rude behavior. Super Micro wrote in a court filing that Luong was also routinely absent from work and skipped meetings.
An attorney for Luong, Tanya Gomerman, said the company essentially fired him for not cooperating in an investigation into a subordinate, but what Luong had requested was for the chief financial officer to be present when he was interviewed. “They described Bob as being essentially a my-way-or-the-highway, bad manager type of person who wouldn’t agree to do things—but those were things he believed were illegal,” said Gomerman.
After Luong filed his whistleblower complaint, instead of interviewing him for alleged improper accounting practices, the company interviewed him for the human resources complaint, she said.
“This was after a lot of turmoil where he felt like he was being targeted when he wanted to speak up and do the right thing,” said Gomerman. Luong had worked at the company since 2012, and owned stock that had tanked when Super Micro was previously delisted by Nasdaq in 2018 owing to an SEC investigation into its revenue recognition practices. It was relisted in 2020 after settling with the SEC and paying a $17.5 million fine. At the time, the company parted ways with its CFO, Howard Hideshima, who was alleged by regulators to have engaged in improper accounting. In the years since being listed again, it has seen a 3,000% run-up in its stock price and does business with AI high-flier Nvidia.
But Luong’s motion is the latest blow to Super Micro, which has been battling accusations of improper accounting for months. It was on the brink of being delisted a second time and got a warning notice from Nasdaq after it failed to file an annual report or quarterly financial statement. A short-seller report from Hindenburg Research hit the company in August, alleging accounting improprieties among a litany of other issues. The company’s former accounting firm, Ernst & Young, resigned in the middle of an audit and announced that it couldn’t rely on the management team or the board’s independent audit committee. Super Micro later hired BDO as its new auditor.
On Monday, Super Micro announced that a special board committee, made up of a single director who joined specifically to lead the probe, had completed its review and determined that EY’s resignation and its conclusions “were not supported” by the committee’s final findings. The sole special committee member, Susie Giordano, joined the board in August 2024 and has 25 years of experience advising executive management teams and previously served as interim general counsel at Intel. As is customary for Super Micro directors, Giordano is entitled to an equity grant valued at $255,000.
According to Super Micro, Giordano worked with law firm Cooley LLP and 50 of its attorneys as well as a forensic accounting team from Secretariat Advisors. The investigators analyzed 9 million documents from 89 people and conducted 68 witness interviews of current and former employees, management, advisors, and board members—in addition to meeting with EY and another former auditor, Deloitte. However, the committee found “l(fā)apses” in ensuring guardrails were in place, including entering into a consulting agreement with the company’s former CFO, who resigned following a 2017 audit committee investigation. That consulting gig is now terminated, according to Super Micro.
The tech firm is hiring a new CFO, chief accounting officer, and chief compliance officer. Super Micro will also appoint a general counsel and will “expand the number of in-house attorneys to a level commensurate for a company of Super Micro’s size and complexity, particularly in light of its recent rapid growth and future growth ambitions.”
EY and Giordano did not respond to requests for comment.