在唐納德·特朗普贏得總統(tǒng)大選后,由于對(duì)于該行業(yè)將放松監(jiān)管的預(yù)期,健康保險(xiǎn)股大漲,但在聯(lián)合健康保險(xiǎn)公司(UnitedHealthcare)首席執(zhí)行官布萊恩·湯普森遇害后,該板塊股票下跌。
聯(lián)合健康保險(xiǎn)的股價(jià)在總統(tǒng)大選結(jié)束后曾應(yīng)聲上漲9%,但自12月4日以來(lái)已下跌了15%。
瑞杰金融(Raymond James)醫(yī)療保健研究主管約翰·蘭瑟姆周二對(duì)CNBC表示,盡管共和黨人有望同時(shí)掌控國(guó)會(huì)和白宮,但選前關(guān)于保險(xiǎn)公司的論述現(xiàn)在看來(lái)存在更大的不確定性。
他指出:“我認(rèn)為現(xiàn)在押注有些困難,因?yàn)槊總€(gè)職位的人選尚不確定。而且即將上臺(tái)的是一個(gè)偏民粹主義的政黨,這個(gè)行業(yè)也不像以前那樣受歡迎?!?/p>
事實(shí)上,湯普森遇害事件在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上掀起了一波抨擊保險(xiǎn)公司的熱潮,人們紛紛吐槽被保險(xiǎn)公司拒保的經(jīng)歷。同時(shí),安保公司接到了大量來(lái)自公司要求加強(qiáng)高管保護(hù)的電話。
聯(lián)合健康集團(tuán)(UnitedHealth Group)首席執(zhí)行官安德魯·威蒂在《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》的一篇專(zhuān)欄文章中回應(yīng)了對(duì)公司的批評(píng),并承認(rèn)醫(yī)療系統(tǒng)需要改進(jìn)。
蘭瑟姆表示,在將人工智能應(yīng)用于所謂的事前授權(quán)(即服務(wù)或處方需要公司預(yù)先批準(zhǔn))存在爭(zhēng)論的情況下,該行業(yè)仍面臨“立法風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”。
他補(bǔ)充道:“我認(rèn)為需要展開(kāi)積極的辯論,因?yàn)檫@方面可能已經(jīng)失控。”
蘭瑟姆表示,人工智能仍然可以對(duì)醫(yī)療保健產(chǎn)生積極影響。例如,大語(yǔ)言模型可以用于分析差異數(shù)據(jù)集,以幫助預(yù)測(cè)可能需要服務(wù)的人群,并在情況演變成健康危機(jī)之前進(jìn)行干預(yù)。
他問(wèn)道:“但我們?cè)谑孪仁跈?quán)方面是否過(guò)度使用了AI?這個(gè)問(wèn)題值得辯論。我并不是說(shuō)這種情況已經(jīng)存在,但我認(rèn)為我們需要就此展開(kāi)辯論?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
在唐納德·特朗普贏得總統(tǒng)大選后,由于對(duì)于該行業(yè)將放松監(jiān)管的預(yù)期,健康保險(xiǎn)股大漲,但在聯(lián)合健康保險(xiǎn)公司(UnitedHealthcare)首席執(zhí)行官布萊恩·湯普森遇害后,該板塊股票下跌。
聯(lián)合健康保險(xiǎn)的股價(jià)在總統(tǒng)大選結(jié)束后曾應(yīng)聲上漲9%,但自12月4日以來(lái)已下跌了15%。
瑞杰金融(Raymond James)醫(yī)療保健研究主管約翰·蘭瑟姆周二對(duì)CNBC表示,盡管共和黨人有望同時(shí)掌控國(guó)會(huì)和白宮,但選前關(guān)于保險(xiǎn)公司的論述現(xiàn)在看來(lái)存在更大的不確定性。
他指出:“我認(rèn)為現(xiàn)在押注有些困難,因?yàn)槊總€(gè)職位的人選尚不確定。而且即將上臺(tái)的是一個(gè)偏民粹主義的政黨,這個(gè)行業(yè)也不像以前那樣受歡迎。”
事實(shí)上,湯普森遇害事件在網(wǎng)絡(luò)上掀起了一波抨擊保險(xiǎn)公司的熱潮,人們紛紛吐槽被保險(xiǎn)公司拒保的經(jīng)歷。同時(shí),安保公司接到了大量來(lái)自公司要求加強(qiáng)高管保護(hù)的電話。
聯(lián)合健康集團(tuán)(UnitedHealth Group)首席執(zhí)行官安德魯·威蒂在《紐約時(shí)報(bào)》的一篇專(zhuān)欄文章中回應(yīng)了對(duì)公司的批評(píng),并承認(rèn)醫(yī)療系統(tǒng)需要改進(jìn)。
蘭瑟姆表示,在將人工智能應(yīng)用于所謂的事前授權(quán)(即服務(wù)或處方需要公司預(yù)先批準(zhǔn))存在爭(zhēng)論的情況下,該行業(yè)仍面臨“立法風(fēng)險(xiǎn)”。
他補(bǔ)充道:“我認(rèn)為需要展開(kāi)積極的辯論,因?yàn)檫@方面可能已經(jīng)失控?!?/p>
蘭瑟姆表示,人工智能仍然可以對(duì)醫(yī)療保健產(chǎn)生積極影響。例如,大語(yǔ)言模型可以用于分析差異數(shù)據(jù)集,以幫助預(yù)測(cè)可能需要服務(wù)的人群,并在情況演變成健康危機(jī)之前進(jìn)行干預(yù)。
他問(wèn)道:“但我們?cè)谑孪仁跈?quán)方面是否過(guò)度使用了AI?這個(gè)問(wèn)題值得辯論。我并不是說(shuō)這種情況已經(jīng)存在,但我認(rèn)為我們需要就此展開(kāi)辯論?!保ㄘ?cái)富中文網(wǎng))
譯者:劉進(jìn)龍
審校:汪皓
Health insurance stocks jumped after Donald Trump won the presidential election on expectations for deregulation in the industry, but shares tumbled after the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
In UnitedHealth’s case, the stock surged as much as 9% in the immediate aftermath of the election, but has sold off 15% since Dec. 4.
Even with Republicans poised for unified control of Congress and the White House, the pre-election narrative on insurers now looks shakier, John Ransom, director of healthcare research at Raymond James, told CNBC on Tuesday.
“I think the bet is a little bit hard to make because you don’t know who’s going to be occupying these seats,” he said. “And also, you do have a more populist party, and the industry is not as popular as it used to be.”
In fact, Thompson’s shooting unleashed a wave of online vitriol aimed at insurers over coverage that was denied to patients. Meanwhile, security firms have been flooded with calls from companies looking to ramp up protection for executives.
UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty addressed the criticism of his company in a New York Times op-ed on Friday and acknowledged the healthcare system needs improvement.
But the industry still faces a “l(fā)egislative risk,” Ransom said, amid a debate on the use of artificial intelligence in so-called prior authorizations, which is when a service or prescription requires pre-approval from companies.
“That’s where I think there should be a healthy debate because maybe that has gotten out of control,” he added.
AI can still make a positive impact on healthcare, Ransom said. For example, large language models could be used to analyze difference datasets to help predict who might need services and intervene before a situation turns into a health crisis.
“But yeah, did we overdo it on prior auth?” he asked. “That’s the debate. I’m not saying we did, but I think that’s where we need to have a debate.”