成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线


 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
Ernst & Young: Too big to fail
作者: Allan Sloan    時間: 2010年12月24日    來源: 財富中文網
 位置:專欄         
字體 [   ]        
打印         
發(fā)表評論        





????Don't look for indictments in Andrew Cuomo's case against the accounting firm. That could kill the business, and no one wants that.

????If you're going to screw up, make sure you're working at a company that regulators aren't going to allow to fail. That's the lesson not only for big financial companies, but for the Final Four big national accounting firms as well.

????Take Ernst & Young, which is a target of New York attorney general Andrew Cuomo for its alleged role in helping Lehman Brothers produce misleading financial statements before it collapsed two years ago.

????People are baying for criminal indictments of big names for their roles -- make that alleged roles -- in the financial meltdown and ensuing horrible recession. But unless Cuomo or his successor as AG, Eric Schneiderman, have totally lost their senses, they're not going to indict E&Y, the nation's second-largest accounting firm.

????They'll try to get it to agree to fines and penalties, as well they should. But it's hard to imagine them indicting the firm.

????Why do I say that? Because in the accounting world, being indicted puts you out of business as customers and partners flee, and you lose some of your licenses that allow you to do business. And I don't think any sentient regulator wants to run the risk of E&Y going out of business.

????Call it the Arthur Andersen effect. Andersen, you may recall, was indicted and convicted in 2002 for its role in the collapse of Enron. Just being indicted destroyed the firm, because partners and clients fled. By the time Andersen won on appeal, it was a husk of its former self, and what had been the Big Five accounting firms had become the Final Four.

????Having the Final Four dwindle to the Terminal Three would increase an already unhealthy concentration among the nation's accounting firms, according to Emilie Feldman, an assistant professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School.

????Five years ago, I wrote a column based on her then-unpublished paper that said that having the Final Four absorb Andersen's business would have violated anti-trust guidelines had it involved a sale rather than a collapse.

????So I asked Feldman -- disclosure: her family and mine are close friends -- to calculate the effect of the demise of E&Y. The answer: It would be even worse than the collapse of Andersen. "The increased concentration would clearly violate the guidelines," she told me.

????By Feldman's math, a collapse of E&Y and assumption of its business by the Terminal Three would add 733 points to the Herfindahl-Hirschmann Index, which antitrust experts use to measure business concentration. The industry is already so concentrated that any increase of more than 50 points would violate guidelines and bring on an investigation.

????Andersen's collapse, she said, increased the index by 455 points. Her paper, "A Basic Quantification of the Competitive Implications of the Demise of Arthur Andersen," was published in 2006 in the Review of Industrial Organization.

????I'm not saying that E&Y doesn't deserve to fail, or that its partners shouldn't be punished severely. What I am saying is that we need to handle E&Y much more intelligently than we handled Andersen.

????The logical way to deal with Andersen's Enron role was to split the firm into a good firm with an accounting business that could be recapitalized with new money; and a bad firm that would have been allowed to fail and take the partners' money down with it. That would have produced serious consequences to Andersen and its partners, but we'd still have five big national accounting firms rather than four.

????We sure don't want to go down to three. You can bet that the SEC and the publicly traded firms that hire big nationally recognized accountants don't want to lose E&Y, either.

????So my bet is that E&Y gets whacked, fined, and punished -- but is allowed to stay in business. You don't have to be Citi (C) or Bank of America (BAC) to be too big to be allowed to fail.




相關閱讀
用戶名: 密碼:      匿名


0條評論          查看更多評論











久久久精品日本一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区无码免费视频| 夜夜爽妓女8888视频免费观看| 丁香婷婷在线成人播放视频| 国产一级三级毛片| 日韩视频中文字幕精品| 人妻系列AV无码专区| 久久久五月天亚洲天堂中文字幕在线观看| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩京东传媒| AV无码专区亚洲AVL在线观看| 精品国产乱码久久久久久蜜桃免费| 艳妇乳肉豪妇荡乳AV| ,欧美日韩永久免费看看视频| 99久热RE在线精品99 6热视频| 欧美粗大猛烈老熟妇| 中文字幕在线高清男人的天堂| 少妇高潮太爽了在线视频| 久久精品呦女一本久久综合公司| 国产在线视频福利资源站| 国产日韩在线观看国产精品一区二区av片| 成人国产精品一级毛片| 亚洲中文字幕在线精品2021| 日本高清线视频在线| 精品国产福利91一区二区三区| 台湾黄三级高清在线观看播放| 97超碰中文字幕久久| 天天做天天躁天天躁| 国产亚洲高清在线| 国产精品久久久久久成人影院| 波多野结衣中文字幕一区二区三区| 亚洲综合AV在线在线播放| 中文字幕日韩人妻在线乱码| 亚洲欧洲国产日产综合综合| 国产农村妇女精品一二区| 日韩欧美精品一区二区三区视频在线观看| 伊人久久大香线蕉AV最新午夜| 国产在线精品观看一| 欧美日本韩国一二区视频| 国产乱人伦App精品久久| 久久国产精品99国产精| 国产成人无码免费网站|