成人小说亚洲一区二区三区,亚洲国产精品一区二区三区,国产精品成人精品久久久,久久综合一区二区三区,精品无码av一区二区,国产一级a毛一级a看免费视频,欧洲uv免费在线区一二区,亚洲国产欧美中日韩成人综合视频,国产熟女一区二区三区五月婷小说,亚洲一区波多野结衣在线


 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
A lesson in how not to value Apple
作者: Andy M. Zaky    時間: 2010年08月13日    來源: 財富中文網(wǎng)
 位置:投資理財         
字體 [   ]        
打印         
發(fā)表評論        
Many Wall Street analysts have been consistently wrong in predicting short-term prices for Apple shares, suggesting that investors should shift to a long-term focus.





????Until recently, I've been silent on the issue of Apple's valuation because I feel that such an analysis could be misleading when improperly used to try and forecast Apple's short or intermediate term price action. Far too many people are betting that Apple will see $300 or $400 a share by this January owing to its strong fundamentals. The latest to up the ante is veteran Apple analyst Charlie Wolf of Needham, who raised his target from $280 to $375 on Monday.

????While I agree that Apple (AAPL) is worth a lot more than what is reflected in its current market price, a long-term viewpoint is the only practical way to rely on fundamental analysis as a basis for investment decisions.

????On August 20, 2008, renowned Apple analyst Gene Munster of Piper Jaffray argued on CNBC's Fast Money that technology stocks generally tend to outperform in the fall and winter months, and that Apple's cheap valuation meant that it was time to buy the stock. Munster had a famous $250 price target on Apple at the time. In fact, nearly every analyst on the street had $200 price targets on Apple citing exceptionally strong "fundamentals" as a basis for their recommendations.

????Yet, 30 trading sessions later, Apple dropped from $175.84, when Munster and several hundred other market participants were touting the stock as being "undervalued," to a close of $89.16 on October 7. Swept up by the market's reaction to the financial crisis, Apple wouldn't see $200 a share for almost 15 months. Nearly every analyst on the street flipped 180 degrees on Apple cutting price targets, estimates and citing valuation concerns as a basis for downgrading their buy recommendations to neutral and sell.

????RBC analyst Mike Abramsky cut his price target from $200 that August to $125 in late September. Morgan Stanley's Kathryn Huberty cut her price target on Apple two weeks in a row from $190 to $179 on September 22, 2008 and again from $179 to $115 a share just one week later. By mid-November, Apple stabilized in the $80 to $90 a share range. Even long time Apple enthusiast Jim Cramer noted on several occasions during this period that he couldn't recommend Apple at $90 a share.

Strong fundamentals, weak market

????Meanwhile, Apple reported one record quarter after another, and it even posted 125% earnings growth in the September quarter of the financial crisis. The iPhone deferred revenue system masked Apple's true earnings power, making it very difficult for fund managers to accurately valuate the company during the post-crisis era. And though the company was undervalued, it didn't stop the market from pricing the stock at a 70% discount to its theoretical value.

????By the end of October, I published a detailed analysis demonstrating that Apple was likely the most undervalued large cap tech stock in the sector. I argued against long time Apple enthusiasts that despite what the investment community might hear from analysts, Apple was a strong buy at $80 a share. I made several arguments as to why the market would bottom in March and that Apple would see $230 within a 2-year period.

????Yet, instead of seeing opportunity in Apple's cheap valuation, Abramsky downgraded the stock to underperform in January 2009, and lowered his price target to $70 a share. The market bottomed just a month and a half later, and Apple significantly outperformed the market posting nearly 250% gains in the next year and a half – more evidence that fundamental analysis is only valuable when used to make long-term predictions.

????So what exactly did Abramsky's clients gain from this analysis? Abramsky, like nearly every other analyst, was literally advising clients to buy in the $180 a share range and sell at $80's a share. Is it any wonder why analysts continue to be the laughing stock of Wall Street?

Lessons from the numbers

????The lesson here is not that so many got it wrong ahead of and during the financial crisis, however. Rather, what investors should take from this history lesson is that price targets are often good in theory but fatal in fact. Attempting to put intermediate or short-term price targets on any stock based exclusively on fundamental analysis is really an exercise in futility.

????And before you dismiss the financial crisis as merely an outlier, think again. Apple's stock has collapsed by over 30% on at least four separate occasions over the past few years. See here.




相關(guān)閱讀
用戶名: 密碼:      匿名


0條評論          查看更多評論











国产性色福利在线视频| 国产强伦姧在线观看午夜| 波多野结衣多次高潮三个老人| 亚洲成AV人无码不卡影片| 伊人久久精品一区二区三区| 日韩在线一区二区三区观看| 人妻无码AⅤ在线一区二区视频| 国产FREEXXXX性播放麻豆| 啦啦啦在线观看视频免费观看| 久精品国产欧美亚洲色aⅴ大片| 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区在线| 久久av无码αv高潮αv喷吹| 成人性色生活片免费看成人性| 国产精品一线二线三线有什么区别| 日韩精品无码熟人妻我不卡| 91午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲无码专区免费在线观看| 亚洲AV综合色区无码区| 午夜寂寞成人网站在线观看| 国产欧美日韩综合精品二区| 国产三级久久久精品麻豆三级| 亚洲精品成人片在线观看精品字幕| 国产亚洲日本精品一区| 精品人妻无码专区在中文字幕| 老少妇人妻无码专区视频大码| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久| 国产亚洲日本中文。| 自拍视频精品一区二区三区| 久久无码人妻一区二区三区午夜| 色欲精品人妻AV一区二区三区| 欧美激情在线播放一区二区三区| 少妇AV射精精品蜜桃专区| 一区二区乱子伦在线播放| 国产仑乱老女人露脸的怀孕的| 欧美精品亚洲精品日韩传电影| 久久w免费人成看片中文| 一本加勒比少妇人妻无码精品| 国产乱子伦精品无码专区| 91香蕉亚洲精品人人影视| 久久精品一本到东京热| 日韩内射激情视频在线播放免费|