史上50大商業(yè)對(duì)手:惠普vs.IBM
·中國6大商業(yè)對(duì)手(京東vs.蘇寧、華為vs.中興…)
史上50大商業(yè)對(duì)手盤點(diǎn)
· 引言
· 可口可樂 vs.百事可樂
· 福特 vs.通用汽車
· 愛迪生 vs.特斯拉
· AT&T vs.MCI
· 耐克 vs.銳步
· 蓋茨 vs.喬布斯
· 威尼斯 vs.熱那亞
· 空中客車 vs.波音
· 聯(lián)合太平洋 vs.中央太平洋
· 麥當(dāng)勞 vs.漢堡王
????惠普(Hewlett-Packard,《財(cái)富》500強(qiáng))對(duì)IBM的勝利來得并不輕松。2006年,惠普營收超過IBM,之后在這方面便一直保持領(lǐng)先。然而,營收并不是衡量成功的唯一標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 ????在IT時(shí)代早期,兩家公司代表了兩個(gè)極端:惠普奠定了當(dāng)代硅谷濃厚的工程學(xué)氣質(zhì)。而IBM的標(biāo)志性人物湯姆斯?沃森則更像是一名銷售員,而不是一名科學(xué)家。 ????惠普在十年內(nèi)更換的CEO人數(shù)超過了IBM自結(jié)束沃森家族統(tǒng)治以來更換的CEO數(shù)量之和。IBM會(huì)制定五年發(fā)展計(jì)劃,而惠普則喜歡更為積極的舉措。 ????獲勝者:IBM(財(cái)富中文網(wǎng)) |
????Hewlett-Packards' victory over IBM has not been particularly sweet. In 2006 it surpassed IBM in revenues, a lead it has maintained. But revenues are not the only measure of success. ????Since the earliest days of IT, they have been polar opposites: HP seeded the engineering-heavy ethos of contemporary Silicon Valley. IBM's iconic Thomas Watson was more salesman than scientist. ????HP (HPQ, Fortune 500) has had more CEOs in a decade than IBM (IBM, Fortune 500)has had since the end of the Watson family reign. IBM draws from five-year plans, while HP is fond of aggressive moves. ????Winner:IBM |